Re: permissions problems after update

On 2017-03-10, Allan Streib wrote: > Solved. As these things usually are, it was simple in hindsight. > > # ls -ld / > drwxr-x--- 13 root wheel 512 Mar 7 15:09 / Ah, I should have thought of checking directory perms. There are definitely somesituarions where pkg_add

Re: permissions problems after update

Solved. As these things usually are, it was simple in hindsight. # ls -ld / drwxr-x--- 13 root wheel 512 Mar 7 15:09 / I was looking at a ktrace trying to run the "doas -u im3 id -p" and saw it trying all the possible paths, and that gave me the hunch to check permissions on the root.

Re: FFS parameters for SSD filesystem?

On 03/09/17 15:20, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > On 2017-03-09, Jonathan Thornburg wrote: > >> Subject: FFS parameters for SSD filesystem? > > You are overthinking this. The defaults are fine. What he said. An SSD is a SATA storage device. It's the 2010s. JUST USE IT.

Re: OpenBSD 6.0 - Silicom PE2G4SFPI35L Intel i340AM4 based

On 2017-03-09, Uday MOORJANI wrote: > Dear Community, > > Hope all is well. I'm on my last stretch to put in production our > OpenBSD/OpenBGPd implementation. I have chosen a SuperMicro box as my > platform, some of our transit providers at the data center come in >

Re: permissions problems after update

Another observvation, mysqld won't start, similar issues: 170309 17:39:26 [ERROR] mysqld: Can't create/write to file '/tmp/ibMnUE5T' (Errcode: 13 "Permission denied") 2017-03-09 17:39:26 2739dade4e0 InnoDB: Error: unable to create temporary file; errno: 13 170309 17:39:26 [ERROR] Plugin

Re: Please: Is there ANY chance that Linux binaries might run again???

On 2017-03-09, Stefan Wollny wrote: >> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 09. März 2017 um 09:43 Uhr >> Von: "Stuart Henderson" >> An: misc@openbsd.org >> Betreff: Re: Please: Is there ANY chance that Linux binaries might run > again??? >> >> On 2017-03-07, Stefan

Re: Setting rtable 0 from >1 with ping et al

On 09/03/2017 23:02, Joe Holden wrote: Hi, So - it seems that pledge will deny a change of rtable to 0 when using level SOL_SOCKET and the current rtable is >0, so eg if you're in table 1 and you do ping -V0 it will fail. Can anyone shed any light on why this is restricted? Especially since

Re: Please: Is there ANY chance that Linux binaries might run again???

Am 03/09/17 um 21:55 schrieb Marc Espie: ... > In my opinion, there's more chance vmm will eventually be mature > enough to run a virtual linux machine than the return of userland > linux emulation. > This is what I am hoping for - it is just this particular piece of software that I need from

Re: Please: Is there ANY chance that Linux binaries might run again???

Am 03/09/17 um 22:44 schrieb bofh: > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Stefan Wollny wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> I have to live up to my obligations - and one of them is to be able to >> work with M$-Word docs. I used to do this with SoftMaker's office suite, >> but since

Setting rtable 0 from >1 with ping et al

Hi, So - it seems that pledge will deny a change of rtable to 0 when using level SOL_SOCKET and the current rtable is >0, so eg if you're in table 1 and you do ping -V0 it will fail. Can anyone shed any light on why this is restricted? Especially since the same can be achieved with route

Re: Please: Is there ANY chance that Linux binaries might run again???

On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Stefan Wollny wrote: > Hi there, > > I have to live up to my obligations - and one of them is to be able to > work with M$-Word docs. I used to do this with SoftMaker's office suite, > but since Linux-compat is gone I am stuck with

Re: Please: Is there ANY chance that Linux binaries might run again???

To clarify, from what I remember, killing linux compat was not a political decision per-se ("emulation is bad"). Rather, it is that the emulation was 32 bits-only, and more and more out-of-date so completelely useless, and also not really very maintained, so it amounted to more code with possible

Re: FFS parameters for SSD filesystem?

On 2017-03-09, Jonathan Thornburg wrote: > Subject: FFS parameters for SSD filesystem? You are overthinking this. The defaults are fine. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de

Re: FFS parameters for SSD filesystem?

On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:08:56PM -0500, Jonathan Thornburg wrote: > Hi, > > I'm preparing to set up a new 1TB SSD (Samsung 850pro) for use in an > OpenBSD laptop. Like every other SSD I've seen, this SSD uses a 4K > byte block size. > > I'm planning to use softraid crypto for this disk, and

FFS parameters for SSD filesystem?

Hi, I'm preparing to set up a new 1TB SSD (Samsung 850pro) for use in an OpenBSD laptop. Like every other SSD I've seen, this SSD uses a 4K byte block size. I'm planning to use softraid crypto for this disk, and mount all the main filesystems with softdep and noatime. I understand that fdisk

Re: File Server with OpenBSD?

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Roderick wrote: > And where are the planned checksums written? First version divided partition to data and checksum areas which means RAID1 with checksums and RAID1 were compatible in a sense that if something terribly happen in checksumming

Re: Bizarre arp entry corruption

On 09/03/2017 11:51, Martin Pieuchot wrote: On 07/03/17(Tue) 19:38, Joe Holden wrote: On 12/12/2016 16:55, Joe Holden wrote: On 12/12/2016 10:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote: On 11/12/16(Sun) 00:50, Joe Holden wrote: On 10/12/2016 08:43, Mihai Popescu wrote: seeing some bizarre behaviour on one

Re: Running OpenBSD on Hypervisor

Strictly speaking there is only a small subset of _Linux_ distros that are supported. To get anything else running you need to manually install them yourself: https://forum.linode.com/viewtopic.php?f=20=12080. But after doing this for a long time, I set up a private ftp server to host filesystem

OpenBSD 6.0 - Silicom PE2G4SFPI35L Intel i340AM4 based

Dear Community, Hope all is well. I'm on my last stretch to put in production our OpenBSD/OpenBGPd implementation. I have chosen a SuperMicro box as my platform, some of our transit providers at the data center come in through 1000-Base-LX fiber cross connects hence the search for an SFP and LX

Re: Bizarre arp entry corruption

On 07/03/17(Tue) 19:38, Joe Holden wrote: > On 12/12/2016 16:55, Joe Holden wrote: > > On 12/12/2016 10:27, Martin Pieuchot wrote: > > > On 11/12/16(Sun) 00:50, Joe Holden wrote: > > > > On 10/12/2016 08:43, Mihai Popescu wrote: > > > > > > > seeing some bizarre behaviour on one box, on one

Re: Please: Is there ANY chance that Linux binaries might run again???

> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 09. März 2017 um 09:43 Uhr > Von: "Stuart Henderson" > An: misc@openbsd.org > Betreff: Re: Please: Is there ANY chance that Linux binaries might run again??? > > On 2017-03-07, Stefan Wollny wrote: > > at home this is the way I

Re: permissions problems after update

Stuart Henderson writes: > Seems odd. Let's check the permissions on things needed for ftp... > Can you show the output from this (as root if necessary), > > ls -l $(ldd /usr/bin/ftp | awk '/\// { print $7 }') > $ ls -l $(ldd /usr/bin/ftp | awk '/\// { print $7 }')

Re: File Server with OpenBSD?

I want to make my questions below more concrete. Let us suppose, I boot from wd0 and want to make a Raid 1 with wd1 and wd2, and that I follow the instructions in "man softraid": # printf "a\n\n\n\nRAID\nw\nq\n\n" | disklabel -E wd1 # printf "a\n\n\n\nRAID\nw\nq\n\n" | disklabel -E wd2 # bioctl

Re: permissions problems after update

On 2017-03-08, Allan Streib wrote: > $ doas openup > ===> Checking for openup update > ===> Installing/updating binpatch(es) > quirks-2.241 signed on 2016-07-26T16:56:10Z > binpatch60-amd64-httpd-1.0: ok > Error from >

Re: Please: Is there ANY chance that Linux binaries might run again???

On 2017-03-07, Stefan Wollny wrote: > at home this is the way I go, too. But I have to travel to my client's > place (by train!) and when working in the evening in the hotel room like > tonight (as I have to leave the office building by 8 pm at the latest) > it is somewhat