On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Maurice Janssen maur...@z74.net wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 07:52:58AM -0400, Nick Holland wrote:
On 07/09/11 03:57, Maurice Janssen wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to somehow force a program to run on a single CPU in an
SMP system?
The reason I ask that on some
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Francois Pussault
fpussa...@contactoffice.fr wrote:
Hi all,
load is not realy a cpu usage %.
In facts it is sum of many % (cpu real load, memory, buffers, etc...)
No, it isn't.
we should consider load as a host ressources %...
No, we shouldn't.
The load
There is no such thing as a bad frame pointer crash. That's a
diagnostic message from ddb that it can't find anything further up the
stack trace, which is correct, since the function sched_sync is on top
of the stack.
Now, what the kernel tells you is that your kernel didn't panic, so
I'm not
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Tom Murphy open...@pertho.net wrote:
I had set up ALTQ on a 4.9 firewall box as a box in our network needed
its sending throttled, but I noticed that while the firewall was
throttling this machine in question, ALL connections going through the
machine were
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do
look more like?
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Kenneth Gober kgo...@gmail.com wrote:
I assume there's a language translation issue here. if there's a real
non-idiotic question you're asking, we can't tell what it is due to
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Chris Bennett
ch...@bennettconstruction.biz wrote:
Looking at this and Peters message, I think there may be an answer much
simpler than a TODO list, which I think will never work out. If developers
wanted a TODO list, we would already have one.
We do.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Christiano F. Haesbaert
haesba...@haesbaert.org wrote:
I also know he (as every developer) is busy with more important
things, so publishing these small tasks would also give the
developers more time to focus on the big/important issues.
There are a bunch of
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Donald Allen donaldcal...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the compliment, but I'm a *lot* older than nine.
Yet you still believe that it's ok for guests to tell the hosts how to
behave in their home. Amazing. What culture are you from?
//art
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 1:39 PM, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
vt...@c3sl.ufpr.br wrote:
Marco, instead of complaining about GNU, GPL, FSF, Linux, etc. Why
don't you write some code instead? I know it's a strange concept.
Hehehe. A funny hippie.
//art
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Alexander Hall ha...@openbsd.org wrote:
frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 11:26:28AM +0200, Jan Stary said that
On Apr 06 11:15:26, frantisek holop wrote:
hi there,
what happens if i specify a cronjob like this?
23 59 31 * *
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:09 PM, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org wrote:
i am looking for an alternative @monthly, not
0 0 1 * *
but the last minutes of the last day of the month.
Why?
because for me the month ends at 23:59:59 on the last day
of month n, and not at 00:00:00 on the
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Noah McNallie n...@n0ah.org wrote:
Well, i've found on openbsd without sofdeps enabled it will do this just
fine. But when enabling softdeps it will not. The 'uname' or 'ls' will take
quite a while to complete.
Simplified explaination. Without softdeps, your
Brett Lymn bl...@baesystems.com.au writes:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:57:31PM +0100, Artur Grabowski wrote:
Is this really the dmesg from the machine? Not manually copied or something?
Because every strange error I see in it looks like one bit was flipped.
E.g. com`at)bili4y:
` 0x60
Is this really the dmesg from the machine? Not manually copied or something?
Because every strange error I see in it looks like one bit was flipped.
E.g. com`at)bili4y:
` 0x60, should be p 0x70
) 0x29, should be i 0x69
4 0x34, should be t 0x74
Etc.
Although. This is pre-reboot dmesg. I've
Soner Tari so...@comixwall.org writes:
Due to unexpected reaction from the leader of the OpenBSD project
(please read below), I am terminating the ComixWall project.
Do you cut yourself when somebody yells at you just to show them?
I will feel stupid continuing with this project while I am
MK pub...@kubikcz.net writes:
1. Is it normal that memory is not freed after I kill ftpd daemon?
yes. because the ftp daemon didn't allocate it.
2. Is it normal ftpd can take about 800MB of real memory while serving
GET requests? (only 1 client is able to consume that portion of
memory)
If
. However significant performance hit on a busy
ftp server.
/Pete
On 17. nov.. 2009, at 10.25, Artur Grabowski wrote:
MK pub...@kubikcz.net writes:
1. Is it normal that memory is not freed after I kill ftpd daemon?
yes. because the ftp daemon didn't allocate it.
2. Is it normal ftpd can
Claire beuserie claire.beuse...@gmail.com writes:
That came out a bit weird: are you saying you knew about the bug for 2 years
but did not fix it?
Yes. Because the solution sucks. And all others we tried were just not
workable.
Just like we knew that executable stacks can be used for exploits
Insan Praja SW insan.pr...@gmail.com writes:
These must be a problem right? I've tried replacing RAM since I think
these are memory problem. But it keep coming. Then I updated to
current, it's not going anywhere. I think somewhere in the h/w
there's something really wrong.
nothing is
- Tethys tet...@gmail.com writes:
And that attitude is why OpenBSD will never be more than a hobby OS. Sigh.
Yes? So? Not everyone has to have an ambition to take over the world.
The developers do it as a hobby, for fun.
Which ties into the OP. The answer to his question is why?.
//art
Mic J michael.cogn...@gmail.com writes:
But to
imply that CVS is better than (or equal to) Mercurial or Git is a bit
ridiculous :)
Mercurial and Git are crap.
Because none of the above mentioned will allow for 70+ developers to
update ~1.2GB/~140,000 files of source code, allow anonymous
Shaowei Wang (wsw) wsw1w...@gmail.com writes:
Is there any informations ?
When someone wants to do it and does it, then it will be done.
//art
Pawlowski Marcin Piotr pawlowski...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all,
I'm a little bit curious about why there is place in bin for tmux(1)
and there is no place for wake(8). In my opinion it's a little bit
unfair. Could someone explain it?
Sure, I'll try to explain. Ready? Brace yourself for the
Lars Nooden lars.cura...@gmail.com writes:
OpenAFS is part of the base distro.
Where?
//art
Brock.Zheng goodme...@gmail.com writes:
But I think the protection is not strong enough! You should
disable IRQ totally!
Interrupts are blocked.
//art
Mark Romer romes...@gmail.com writes:
Hello, just a simple question. We have here at work a old hand at openbsd
and he says he only uses openbsd versions that are even numbered. (3.8, 4.0,
4.2, 4.4 etc...) I am not sure why, did not have a chance to ask him.
I believe that you should
rembrandt rembra...@jpberlin.de writes:
:words:
Here's a nickel, kid. Buy yourself a better tinfoil hat.
//art
Michael bele...@bsdmail.de writes:
my system crashes
[...]
kqemu: kqemu version 0x00010300 loaded, max locked mem=519228kB
No shit?
//art
Taylor Venable tay...@metasyntax.net writes:
The plain-text version is here:
http://real.metasyntax.net:2357/tmp/kevent.c
changelist[i].ident = i;
Pretty sure this line is your problem.
//art
Lazarus Wasbeim lazarus.wasb...@googlemail.com writes:
Surely I know something You perhaps don't.
Says the guy whose only existence on the net is in this thread. Go
away, astroturfer.
It's very interesting when one side of the conflict is only supported
by throwaway gmail accounts, don't you
Lazarus Wasbeim lazarus.wasb...@googlemail.com writes:
L'haim.
It's quite amazing how low these who calls themselves developers can go at
pouring dirt all over somebody they were shaking hands with just moments
ago.
[...]
... and God bless my friends.
Not everyone believes in turning the
Where do they come from? Suddenly there's this astroturfing campaign
about... what? forcing Theo to do business with someone he has no
intention of doing business with anymore?
If you're really so butthurt, sue for defamation. Those fanboy mails
from total nobodies are just retarded.
//art
Daniel Seuffert d...@praxisvermittlung24.de writes:
WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE Mr. Grabowski?
Evidence of what? Of you being butthurt by some perceived injustice?
It's right there in your mail.
You can stop speculating who I am btw, I'm Daniel Seuffert.
So, basically you're saying that you're a
Daniel Seuffert d...@praxisvermittlung24.de writes:
I am Daniel Seuffert asking two questions.
And I am Dr. Mbeke Bulabula with a strictly confidential urgent none
of your business proposal.
//art
Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net writes:
1. Theo not wanting to do business with Wim anymore.
It's his choice and none of your business.
2. The reasons(s) given why Theo does not want to do business with
Wim anymore.
It's his reasons and none of your business.
3. Theo's handling
Daniel Seuffert d...@praxisvermittlung24.de writes:
Because Mr. de Raadt accuses Mr. Vandeputte in public for having done
some bad things without any evidence yet.
No, he doesn't.
Accusing him like that in public is something completely
different.
Where?
I have asked two
questions:
1.
Richard Ben Aleya richard.benal...@gmail.com writes:
But this conflict does not give you the rights in any manner to
insult the Europeans and their culture (you reference to the beer).
We cannot accept a such behaviour.
European people is offended when they read such things.
Obvious troll.
Michael Grigoni michael.grig...@cybertheque.org writes:
I also add my thanks to the discussion. I do have a fundamental
question to pose however. It seems that opensource culture for
large projects is driven by featurism and the need to make massive
changes incorporated into frequent
Richard Ben Aleya richard.benal...@gmail.com writes:
Theo,
There in Europe, there are a lot of OpenBSD users who don't like the
way you handle this conflict.
We don't like how you can instantly punish Wim *a honest guy who made
a lot of work, efforts and spent a lot of time for the OpenBSD
Toni Mueller openbsd-m...@oeko.net writes:
I messed up a bit, sorry. I did not want to say that this would help
with the specific problem of someone attacking a flashable BIOS or by
other machines that can't be readily observed by the user. But what I
think such a program *will* help with, is
jmc j...@cosmicnetworks.net writes:
block in log quick on $ext_if from openproxies to any probability 90%
is because it seems a little bofh-ly to me. and i guess it borders on
security-through obscurity, which of course it not really security at
all. but it seems a bit more sinister than
Han Boetes h...@mijncomputer.nl writes:
Paul Irofti wrote:
Hello Mr. Troll, thanks for flaming by. Have a good day!
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by
stupidity.
That doesn't seem to be a good idea when you're working with security.
Weren't we talking about
Lars Noodin larsnoo...@openoffice.org writes:
What else is there on a wish-list for being able to do kernel-level work
remotely?
Serial console, a machine connected to the same net, remote power
cycling, a slave willing to plug and unplug cables to see what
happens.
//art
Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org writes:
On 2008-12-17, Lars Noodin larsnoo...@openoffice.org wrote:
What is a reasonable way to capture kernel debugger (ddb) output without
a serial console? I'm able to consistently get ifconfig to crash on the
latest snapshots.
-Lars
Are your
frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
my last question for people running ahci, is it better than
ide in any perceivable way?
The code is so much cleaner than the pciide mess. That's enough to
make it better.
I also believe it's faster, but I don't have any concrete numbers for it.
Also,
Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
more than 13 years
[...]
If you write shell scripts that depend on being run by a specific
shell, you are supposed to use the #! thing.
Yes, you are great. You've never made any mistake in more than 13 years.
Us mere mortals prefer to avoid the risk of making
Martin Schrvder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do not let serious problems sit unsolved.
It's not a serious problem for us.
//art
Heimdall Imbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hahaha, I wanted to say the same thing but figured that this wouldn't be an
appropriate venue for a discussion of this nature. But since someone else
brought it up, I figure I might as well add my two cents. I currently run
Debian and Windows XP on
new_guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know. Longest uptime is silly, macho, pointless stuff... but I ran across
an old SunOS 2.6 box that had been up for 387 days. It had been hacked. The
only reason it was not an open mail relay is that /var was full. So, I
thought to myself, I bet I could run
Neko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
its shows that some poor trolls here dont own ultraportables with no
external drives, and use more than one os alternative.
When your machine is a tool, not a toy, you run one operating system,
whichever that might be.
//art
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/110397.jpg
//art
Vladimir Kirillov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 14:44 Fri 10 Oct, Beavis wrote:
thanks for the reply vladimir.
is it needed to upgrade my 4.3 stable to -current? isn't there a patch
available for this?
The 4.3 uvm_map.c is 5
Wow. I'm impressed. So if I mailed you a random diff that you don't
understand you'd happily apply it without having a single clue about
what the diff does and who sent it?
Cool. Can I have your money and business without going through that
hassle? Can't be bothered to make a malicious diff right
gm_sjo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2008/10/10 Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wow. Good luck. Can't you see we've been down that road before with
those bastards? But really. Good luck. You really are too optimistic,
but sure, learn the reality for yourself.
I'm sure calling vendors
there are since there
were lots of things since 4.3 that lowered the pressure on static
map entries.
//art
Artur Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wow. I'm impressed. So if I mailed you a random diff that you don't
understand you'd happily apply it without having a single clue about
what the diff
Peter Kay - Syllopsium [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given that I'm in a minority of kgdb users, what's everyone else using
in cases like this?
I use printfs, pstat -d and ddb. Never use breakpoints since I don't
trust them, they mess up timing too much.
//art
Marc Espie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, when he tries to say that the OpenBSD crowd has a different attitude,
I don't know who he's referring to, but certainly not me.
That's the funniest part about this. If the attitude we have about the
issue in that disucssion makes us a bunch of wanking
It happens when some memory was freed to the pool and then modified after
it was freed.
//art
banana split [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hello,
I've a question (maybe a stupid one). I have a problem with a box so I'm start
searching the reason of this problem. By reading the code I'm wondering
viq [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sorry for the carpet bombing, I grabbed the list of people who I saw
report problems with rtorrent.
I'm writing to ask those who had problems with rtorrent try it again
with newest snapshots, I was not able to reproduce the problem on a
box that used to freeze.
Your userland is out of sync with the kernel. That's bad, mmkay?
//art
Insan Praja SW [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Misc@,
on latest OpenBSD 4.4-beta (GENERIC.MP) #18: Mon Jul 7 08:40:47 WIT
2008 AMD64 machine, while lookin' to my new favorite tool systat, on
the first page, I got the
Jose Quinteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Super quick and dirty check, and I'd have to get it with Windows Vista
Ultimate. Ultimate what?
is the question that comes immediately to mind. No thanks.
Personally, I'd buy a Dell Insipidron N-series, purely for political reasons.
I sometimes hit
Don Hiatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[ Pardon if this email was repeated.
Sadly, I'm using Outlook and you know the rest :-) ]
Can anyone point me to a kernel developers guide or tutorial?
Something that explains how to write a hello world type device driver
and such. Anything to bootstrap
Pieter Verberne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pulic domain also says do with it whatever you like. I really don't
know about the importance of the disclaimer. Maybe it depends on
the country you live in.
public domain is a meaningless term in many countries (it doesn't have
any meaning in courts,
Marco Peereboom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
He is eluding to things like smart tabs and auto indent. Those are
disabled by default on vim and when programming they are both a curse and
a gift from the gods. I'll admit to having spend more than a few
minutes fine tuning that.
I am an old vi
Andris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I found an old email on the mailing lists, dating back to 1996, when
Theo announced users could connect and chat with the developers on
their ICB server.
Many developers did not
Jernej Makovsek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reading the archive it seems to me that el8 was taken as a joke:
Yes, some random person, on a publicly available list where anyone
can post, said he thought it was a joke.
Your point is?
Go away, little troll.
//art
Ross Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Jacob Meuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you say, config makes me boot faster. so then people go and config
their kernel, and then we get problem reports about broken kernels.
that's fine if you want to go break
Most likely (although you haven't provided any information, so we
can't be sure), your machine is using the 8254 time counter.
Earlier it would have been using TSC for timekeeping, but TSC is so
unreliable on so many machines and it's more or less impossible to
know when it can be trusted, so TSC
Martmn Coco [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
pfstatekeypl 108 108435160 5769657 138375 1243 137132 137132 0
80
[...]
In use 540926K, total allocated 559516K; utilization 96.7%
This is a bit extreme. Either you have some insane amount of states in
your pf or something is leaking
Mathieu Stumpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I disagree.
A complex interface implies a lot of code. a lot of code
leads to unreliablity, either through bugs or detracting valuable
developer time from more important things
A simple interface (well designed) imples less
Brian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So why does that majority not provide the skills or the money to
support that facility?
Maybe you should use something else that panders to your appetite.
Completely unable to resist a great setup presented above, is the
software really free then?
free
Insan Praja SW [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Misc,
I got an important directory in my 4.1 bsd and it's deleted using rm
-rf :(. Anyone had experience restoring them? I really.. (I mean
Really) need help on this one..
Forget it.
We zero block before they are marked as free in the filesystem,
Artur Grabowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Insan Praja SW [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Misc,
I got an important directory in my 4.1 bsd and it's deleted using rm
-rf :(. Anyone had experience restoring them? I really.. (I mean
Really) need help on this one..
Forget it.
We zero
Alexey Suslikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Johan Mson Lindman wrote:
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/cpumemory.pdf
- Alexey.
Is this paper from the same Drepper as is posting in the URL below?
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2000-08/msg00053.html
Yes. But it's up to
frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
dual boot at least once :]
never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and both times it
worked. Dual boot is for sissies who can't get a second machine.
//art
Didier Wiroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I updated my src tree (current sources) this morning and updated it a few
times this afternoon but I'm not able to build the kernel anymore, is anyone
else experiencing this issue?
I'm able to reproduce this on another PC where I updated the
V. Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Artur Grabowski wrote:
frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
dual boot at least once :]
never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and both times it
worked. Dual boot
Johan Mson Lindman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Monday 26 November 2007 18:37:05 you wrote:
V. Karthik Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Artur Grabowski wrote:
frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
dual boot at least once
kernels. bsd and bsd.working.
On 27/11/2007, at 2:14 AM, Artur Grabowski wrote:
frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
but can't call yerself a unix guru if havent fu*ed up
dual boot at least once :]
never fucked up a dual boot. Only tried it two times and both times it
worked. Dual
frantisek holop [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hmm, on Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:14:50PM +0100, Artur Grabowski said that
worked. Dual boot is for sissies who can't get a second machine.
single boot is for sissies who drag around 3 notebooks with themselves :p
I guess you've never hacked
n0g0013 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Development is not the same process as writing a whiny mail.
that is a shame. i can probably better understand the relectance to
re-visit this if it has failed before. perhaps, others are right,
perhaps linux can tolerate it because it's not as good as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
surely there must be _some_ merit to creating a list of lower level
development tasks (as dictated by those with experience to judge) to
encourage people to enter the development cycle.
The most amusing thing about this thread is that such a list has been
published
Tom Van Looy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on unix everything is a file?
no, it's not. It's the dumbed down truth so that you can explain to
random people what the hell Unix is, or rather to make them have a
dumb look on their face and nod.
A process is not a file, a memory region is not a file,
Brian Candler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Don't be misguided by what has been said here. OpenBSD is genuinely *free*.
That means you can use it for whatever you like. There's nothing in any way
immoral from selling it, whether or not you make a profit.
There's a difference between immoral and
Hannah Schroeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess he means writing own additions/modifications (thus creating a
combined or derivative work), and releasing those *own*
additions/modifications under the GPL. In the end, you can use the
combined/derivative work only to the extent that's
Theo de Raadt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If anyone had any doubt that our insistance on freedom was important,
just read this.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2007/08/24/0027.html
What is even more astounding is the incestious love-in these other
groups have, with their
Kevin Cheng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Darrin,
Thanks for reply.
The reason is that we have bunch of files integrated with 4.0 and it would
take us months to upgrade to 4.2 again. we just finished from 3.3 to 4.0 of
upgrade few months ago, plus months of test to stabilize our 4.0 based
Pawel Jakub Dawidek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In my opinion there are just too many potential problems with syscall
wrappers that I fully agree with Robert - they should not be used.
I must fully agree here. I never liked systrace and bashed sysjail really
hard because the solution is at the
chefren [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OpenBSD Founder Theo deRaadt Has Conflict of Interest With AMD
By David Marcus, 2007-08-05 03:41:29
Section: Technology, Topic:
I formerly had a great deal of respect, bordering on admiration, for
Theo deRaadt's refusals to compromise his open
bofh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So, everyone picks up on the one thing that Linus fixed a while back,
the TLB stuff. What about the rest of the bugs? The non-TLB crap?
How is Art ignoring the relevance of the rest of the message? He just
said, the TLB is just a minor issue, that the *OTHER*
Christoph Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linus contradicts Theo on Intel TLB issue:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=559
No he doesn't. The article is confused and missed the whole point.
The TLB issues are just one small part of what Theo was talking about,
not even the most important one.
Constantine Kousoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you art. You have been crystal clear.
Constantine
No, thank You for making me look in this direction and finding a way to
speed up the pmap by another 10% (hacked up a diff tonight).
//art
Karl Sjvdahl - dunceor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 7/11/07, Marcus Watts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: Re: ADVERT: C12G
...
That, and Schneier's 'snake oil' may well apply.
...
Almost certainly applies. See
Constantine Kousoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which one level 1 ptp do we keep at the recursive area? Does OpenBSD
keep the last used level 1 ptp cached at that area? Please clarify.
Huh? That question, no parse.
The recursive map is simply the top level page table that we enter into
itself
Constantine Kousoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A second thing is that recursive mapping works well when we have
2-level page tables (as in the i386 architecture).
Try a few more levels of recursion. It works fine.
When we have 3 or
more page tables, the recursive mapping just points to
Karl O. Pinc [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FYI,
Running OpenBSD 4.0 stable, 32MB RAM, 3 identical
nics.
One symptom of running out of RAM is getting a
panic on boot. The system boots fine with bsd.rd,
but try to boot with the bsd image and you get
(from handwritten notes):
bmtphy1 at
Vim Visual [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How are the chances that suspend is implemented in ACPI for 4.2??
1%
I had a prototype almost working at one point, messed it up without
saving the working version, then never had time or energy to go back
to it and noone else has picked it up.
syl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi everyone,
I'm not sure if I'm at the right place to ask this question, but I
might aswell try; I'm writing you this mail because there is one thing
I can't understand in the openbsd kthread.
Actually, it is those two functions from the kthread's man :
Why not write the keyboard driver the same way how the friend did it
in his OS - using bitmasking and avoiding conditional jumps and
lookup tables? Then the security would be guaranteed and not just
hoped for.
Why not write the driver yourself?
I don't see the reason to jump and reinvent
Luca Losio [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
I'm having a lot of crashes with my 4.1 since I updated from 4.0 ...the
console output is:
page fault trap code=0
stopped at enqueue_randomness+0xc5addb%al,0(%eax)
ddb
RUN AT LEAST 'trace' AND 'ps' AND INCLUDE OUTPUT WHEN REPORTING
Constantine Kousoulos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having a linux background (and a limited NetBSD experience), i
expected to find linker scripts in the kernel source code. However,
this is simply not true for most architectures. What is the logic
behind the lack of linker scripts?
The same
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
