The load average on my machine is inexplicably high; when idle, it sits up
between 0.6 and 0.7. Though I'm running a snapshot from last night, I've
seen the same behaviour since I first installed a 4.4 snapshot from about
three weeks ago. This is on a Lenovo X200.
As I understand it, load
Mark Zimmerman wrote:
: I bet you could get your load average to drop if you forced your cpu
: to run full speed even when doing nothing. I am guessing that this is
: not really what you want.
Not only would that not fix it, it doesn't make any sense, either. If my
machine has no workload,
Theo de Raadt wrote:
: The load average on my machine is inexplicably high; when idle, it sits up
: between 0.6 and 0.7.
:
: Oh my god, the horror. Nothing is wrong with your machine at all.
: However, I have a diff which will probably keep you happy.
Not sure if you caught my last paragraph,
Theo de Raadt wrote:
: Looks like you don't know the algorithms used to calculate the number.
: But it is clearly beyond your skills to go read the source.
I would assume you're referring to uvm_loadav in uvm_meter.c? That's where
I'm looking. I was hoping for a little English to help me with
Simen Stavdal wrote:
:1) Less configuration on the devices (and also less load, though not a
:big problem anymore). This is not really a problem for small
:installations, but once you have 500+ devices to configure, it is easy
:to do the maths.
You should always have systems in
Simen Stavdal wrote:
: I am not trying to escape the fact that one needs systems in place
: to manage large installations, I am merely looking for what *I*
: think would be a better way to deploy resources.
I'm just going to drop this part of the thread.
: As a service
Simen Stavdal wrote:
: Worth submitting a feature request?
: --- I looks like this would be the best solution ---
Sounds like you have your desired solution. So long as the OBSD developers
accept your request as valid.
: --- The subject of my posting is Duplicating incoming
Claer wrote:
: Thanks for the answer, I guess dup-to isn4t the right tool then...
: Has anyone tried to achieve what I am trying to do though?
: I am obviously open to other ideas.
: Maybe I'll give you a wrong path but, did you looked at proxying the
: trap with net-snmp ?
: Direct the
Robert wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:10:02 +0200 (CEST)
Mark Kettenis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just committed a fix for the dmesg corruption problem. This may
also fix the random crashes you were saying. Current snapshots should
already have the fix.
Boy, those Intel-branded boards have
Mark Kettenis wrote:
I just committed a fix for the dmesg corruption problem. This may
also fix the random crashes you were saying. Current snapshots should
already have the fix.
Thanks, Mark! I'll give it a shot tonight and report back with the results.
Boy, those Intel-branded boards
On Tue 08/10/07 20:02, Damian Gerow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
Are you running the latest version of the BIOS on
the board??
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354029/direct/01/
Ah, yes, I knew I forgot to include something.
I also updated the BIOS to the latest
Release: 4.4 snapshot as of 2008/06/10
Platform: amd64 UP and MP
Hardware: Intel Atom 330 on D945GCLF2
I picked up an Intel D945GCLF2 last week to play with, and it's been
fairly unstable. Specifically, it randomly just freezes: no ddb, no
error messages, it just hangs. When it's hung, the
Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
Are you running the latest version of the BIOS on the board??
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354029/direct/01/
Ah, yes, I knew I forgot to include something.
I also updated the BIOS to the latest revision today, and re-ran all the
tests, to the exact same conclusion.
Thus spake J.C. Roberts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05/06/06 05:20]:
: Most people just don't get it. The equation is simple:
:
: HEAT * TIME
And, as someone else has more elegantly pointed out:
COOL != LOUD
A well-designed cooling system can keep your system running cooler than with
stock
Thus spake J.C.Roberts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05/06/06 08:35]:
: You're right that well designed cooling systems can make things run
: cooler and with less noise but more importantly, there's only one way to
: determine if various cooling systems are actually well designed; namely,
: you have to go
Thus spake Jeff Quast ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [11/05/06 09:22]:
: On 5/11/06, Damian Gerow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I'm not interested in bandwidth limitations, so it looks like priq is
: likely my best bet.
: [...]
: Then I create a queue with a bandwidth limit of 700Kbps.
:
: The man page
Thus spake Melameth, Daniel D. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13/05/06 20:06]:
: It would seem altq wants a bandwidth declaration. However, from man 5
: pf.conf:
:
: If bandwidth is not specified, the interface bandwidth is used.
And OpenBSD complains bitterly when not defining the bandwidth on a
After a bandwidth incident a few hours ago, I'm starting to look at doing
some queuing on my (unfortunately) asynchronous link at home. But as I'm
doing so, I've got a few questions. I'm not interested in bandwidth
limitations, so it looks like priq is likely my best bet.
If I declare my altq
Thus spake Bruno Carnazzi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [10/05/06 01:37]:
: My home PF NATing gateway route just one PPTP tunnel (for my laptop),
: and I don't need special thing for it to work (GRE enabled via sysctl
: and pf must pass GRE proto). Is there a special case when you have
: multiple PPTP (GRE)
I find myself in a situation where I need to route a few PPTP tunnels
through a NATing PF gateway. Because of the usage of GRE, I'm aware that I
need to enable GRE via sysctl, and that I'll need to run the connections
through a proxy.
However, I'm having a hard time digging up a proxy I've got
Thus spake Jonathan Glaschke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [06/05/06 16:58]:
: Think of somebody who burgles your house to steal your privat data. When
: your computer asks him to enter the password he sure will try the well
: known standard passwords like god, secret and sex. Or maybe
: swordfish. But
Thus spake Timo Schoeler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [18/04/06 08:33]:
: hm. somehow missing ECC et al. keeps me from deploying such systems on
: a regular basis... even when they're 'only' x86.
The systems, as much as I love 'em, are missing a few crucial 'features':
1) Proper RAID support
2) 3+ NIC
Thus spake Peter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [21/03/06 01:46]:
: Was the Win2k box connected first? Many (most?) Canadian cable
: providers
: cache the MAC address of the connected machine, and generally
: speaking,
: unplugging the cable modem for five minutes should re-set the cached
: address
:
Thus spake Joachim Schipper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20/03/06 00:34]:
: Provided that you didn't do something strange when copying the dump, it
: should - at least - be restorable on something that closely resembles
: the platform it was taken on (FreeBSD-6.x).
I believe the default FS type in
I've spent the past few days trying to get a wireless LAN working off my
OpenBSD gateway. There's a few interfaces in there, and I just moved to a
house that uses WiFi a fair bit. I thought I'd do the bridging right on the
gateway, so there's one less device running.
After a spate of other
Thus spake Damian Gerow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [13/06/05 20:55]:
: house that uses WiFi a fair bit. I thought I'd do the bridging right on the
Ack. 'bridging' is the wrong word; I'm definitely not bridging networks
here.
Thus spake Ben Goren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [06/05/05 11:42]:
: But do you complain to the record companies about their jewel cases?
For the record, I've never, ever received a broken jewel case for a music CD
that's been shipped in the mail (dozens of CDs). But from OpenBSD, it's
been broken both
27 matches
Mail list logo
