On 24-02-13 08:17:20, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > On 2024/02/13 07:36, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2024-02-13, Kirill A Korinsky wrote:
> > > > > Good day,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm updating go's syscall table to modern OpenBSD
On 21-09-30 19:45:38, James Cook wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:02:17AM -0700, Chris Bennett wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm getting that the certs are expired, but https works fine in Firefox,
> > including when looking at the full chain.
> >
> >
> > openssl s_client -servername
On Thursday 29 November 2018 20:38:23 Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I need help / advice with a fresh install onto a Thinkpad T450s which I
> recently bought on eBay.
>
> The system starts with UEFI enabled and was running fine with a rather
> small SSD without FDE. dmesg from some recent
On Thursday 29 November 2018 12:05:08 Justus Hämäläinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see that stacking softraid disciplines is not supported, but why I
> wonder? I was thinking about running fulldisk encryption on softraid
> RAID1.
>
> Is it unsupported because it hasn't been tested enough that it doesn't
On Sunday 25 November 2018 17:36:16 Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Stephen Gregoratto wrote on Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 12:26:21AM +1100:
> >
> > Would I need to fully grok the code before I could write the docs?
>
> Absolutely not. You could spend an infinite amount of time to
> understand the code if you
On Tuesday 27 November 2018 16:07:18 Riccardo Mottola wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Nick Holland wrote:
> > So far, with one or two exceptions, everyone complaining about this has
> > a One Big Partition disk layout. A bad idea, not suggested, and I don't
> > think you will get much sympathy.
>
> yes
On Tuesday 27 November 2018 21:54:36 Angelo Rossi wrote:
> Sorry,
>
> To fix this problem I changed /usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/stand/Makefile.inc
>
> line #45 from
>
> HEAP_LIMIT=0xA
>
> to
>
> HEAP_LIMIT=0xB
That may work on your machine, however it is not a change that can be safely
On Monday 05 November 2018 17:02:50 Joel Carnat wrote:
> Le 05/11/2018 16:38, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> > On 2018-11-05, Joel Carnat wrote:
> >> Le 05/11/2018 13:48, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
> >>> On 2018-11-05, Joel Carnat wrote:
> TLS:
> New, TLSv1/SSLv3, Cipher is
On Saturday 28 April 2018 22:21:08 Eric Zylstra wrote:
> I’m installing 6.3 on a RAID1. Install was fine until ending with an error
> message, “invalid boot record signature…”.
> I manually ran installboot:
> >. installboot -v -r /mnt sd4
>
> Hand transcription:
>
> Using /mnt as root
>
On Friday 27 April 2018 11:17:07 Jordan Geoghegan wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, I have rebuilt a softraid mirror before, I was
> just hoping for some clarification as the faq wording is a little
> ambiguous as to whether drives can be rebuilt in multi user mode or not.
Rebuild is a background
On Saturday 10 February 2018 11:09:04 Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2018 16:24:38 +1100
>
> > > Just in case some libressl dev doesn't want read the full thread in
> > > the Alpine list, they want also a workaround for the lack of time_t
> > > for 32bits platforms on Linux.
> >
> >
On Saturday 10 February 2018 00:05:27 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
[snip]
> Just in case some libressl dev doesn't want read the full thread in the
> Alpine list, they want also a workaround for the lack of time_t for
> 32bits platforms on Linux.
We've already addressed this - a notafter
On Tuesday 04 July 2017 20:55:25 Paul de Weerd wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:34:56PM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote:
> | Hi there!
> |
> | Sorry if this may sound like a rather stupid question:
> | (Referencing the examples section of man installboot(8))
> |
> | Can s.o. verifiy that instead
On Tuesday 04 July 2017 20:34:56 Stefan Wollny wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> Sorry if this may sound like a rather stupid question:
> (Referencing the examples section of man installboot(8))
>
> Can s.o. verifiy that instead of
> # installboot sd0
>
> it is equally safe to issue
> # installboot
>
On Tuesday 20 June 2017 23:26:10 Andrew Lemin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sadly in my testing it seems that CVE-2017-8301 (
> http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/145) is still broken with the
> latest LibreSSL
> (2.5.4) and OpenVPN 2.4.2.
>
> Here is someone else reporting the same issue;
>
On Sunday 25 June 2017 22:28:17 Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> Doh... Yeah, starting from scratch with -r works. I guess quickly finding
> how long rounds take is not quite as easy as bioctl -d and try again.
The number of rounds can also be changed when you change the passphrase on an
existing
On Friday 16 June 2017 10:11:20 LÉVAI Dániel wrote:
> Karel Gardas @ 2017-06-15T09:07:39 +0200:
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:04 AM, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > Strangest thing is, if I boot with the 'bad' (=failing) drive as
> > > part of the array, softraid brings the
On Friday 26 May 2017 15:59:18 sharon s. wrote:
> On 05/26/17 15:49, sharon s. wrote:
> > disklabel: ioctl DIOCWDINFO: Open partition would move or shrink
> > disklabel: unable to write label
>
> Stupid me, I forgot that the softraid device was still attached.
>
> 12Tb, 14Tb and 15Tb works as
On Saturday 27 May 2017 01:56:06 Joel Sing wrote:
> On Friday 26 May 2017 01:05:59 sharon s. wrote:
> > On 05/26/17 00:45, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > myml...@gmx.com wrote:
> > >> Steps to recreate:
> > >>
> > >> dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/rsd0c
On Friday 26 May 2017 01:05:59 sharon s. wrote:
> On 05/26/17 00:45, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > myml...@gmx.com wrote:
> >> Steps to recreate:
> >>
> >> dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/rsd0c bs=1m (took over a week)
> >>
> >> fdisk -iy -g sd0 (I left off the "-b 960" because this is not a
> >> bootable
On Sunday 14 May 2017 14:30:55 Bryan wrote:
> OpenBSD 6.1 httpd is (according to Qualys SSL Labs) using "Supported EC
> Named Curves x25519, secp256r1, secp384r1 (server preferred order)"
> when `tls ecdhe "auto"` is used in the server configuration.
>
> Is it possible to configure httpd to use
On Wednesday 22 March 2017 18:17:12 Jan Betlach wrote:
> Solene, Ken,
>
> thanks a lot for quick responses. Primarily I need to protect the laptop
> against losing/stealing it. Therefore FDE would be ideal, however I've red
> somewhere that FDE is not officially supported on OpenBSD.
This is
On Thursday 02 March 2017 13:28:08 Kirill Miazine wrote:
> Recently I've noticed a number of error messages in my Exim mail log:
>
> TLS error on connection from mx1.slc.paypal.com (mx0.slc.paypal.com)
> [173.0.84.226] \ (SSL_accept): error:1403741B:SSL
> routines:ACCEPT_SR_KEY_EXCH:tlsv1
On Saturday 07 January 2017 21:14:29 Olivier Antoine wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it only me or Tor no longer works on -current ?
I believe this should already be rectified in -current (via a partial
reversion
of src/lib/libcrypto/x509/x509_vfy.c r1.54). Thanks for the report.
> Every port or
On Friday 06 January 2017 15:23:32 Timo Myyrä wrote:
> Here's the output of installboot on running system:
> $ doas installboot -v sd1
> Using / as root
> installing bootstrap on /dev/rsd1c
> using first-stage /usr/mdec/biosboot, second-stage /usr/mdec/boot
> sd1: softraid volume with 1 disk(s)
>
On Friday 06 January 2017 12:24:02 Timo Myyrä wrote:
> And found it. Seems the efi partitions boot loader isn't updated.
It should be - `installboot -r /mnt ${disk}` is run at the end of the
upgrade.
> Manually copying the efi bootloader fixed the boot:
>
On Friday 14 October 2016 18:19:21 Bryan Linton wrote:
> On 2016-10-14 09:21:24, Peter Janos wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > ps.: it would be nice to have a feature in the default installer to
> > install
> > with full disc encryption :) we still have to escape to
On Tuesday 20 September 2016 18:26:42 Joel Sing wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 September 2016 09:54:31 soko.tica wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In trying to build -stable from source, I get an error. I have downloaded
> > and unterred sys.tar.gz and src.tar.gz according to
> >
On Tuesday 20 September 2016 09:54:31 soko.tica wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In trying to build -stable from source, I get an error. I have downloaded
> and unterred sys.tar.gz and src.tar.gz according to
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Release and updated the sources
> through cvs, according to
On Friday 20 May 2016 18:38:08 Ted Unangst wrote:
> Peter Wens wrote:
> > On a encrypted (sd1) OpenBSD 5.9 install (amd64, (qemu, virtio)):
> >
> > I created a diskimage (dd if=/dev/urandom of=disk.img bs=1m count=100
> > vnconfig vnd0 disk.img
> > fdisk -iy vnd0
> > disklabel -E vnd0 ( a a RAID)
On Saturday 06 February 2016 16:09:53 Johan Huldtgren wrote:
> > Not sure. Perhaps these drives don't have good meta data due to the
> > crash?
> > Can you set sr_debug = SR_D_STATE | SR_D_META and see if that prints
> > anything informative?
>
> well we now get lots more:
>
> softraid0 at root
On Wednesday 28 October 2015 21:26:16 Ted Unangst wrote:
> Gerald Hanuer wrote:
> > Hello misc@,
> >
> > Killing Rebound(8) in current hard locks system.
>
> Thanks. We've found the cause of the bug. Now we're trying to find the bug.
> :)
This is fixed with r1.66 of sys/kern/kern_event.c.
On Monday 26 October 2015 10:42:01 Gerald Hanuer wrote:
> Hello misc@,
>
> Unbound(8) in current errors out, not starting.
>
> This is not a bug report.
> If this is known to devs@ please disregard.
>
>
> /usr/bin/unbound -v
>
> Version 1.5.4
> linked libs: libevent 1.4.15-stable (it
On Tuesday 22 September 2015 09:58:57 Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 3:20 AM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> > Karel Gardas [gard...@gmail.com] wrote:
> >> Let me ask, should SR RAID5 survive such testing or is for example
> >> rebuilding with off-lined drive considered
On Monday 21 September 2015 23:02:39 Karel Gardas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> due to work on SR RAID1 check summing support where I've touched SR
> RAID internals (workunit scheduling) I'd like to test SR RAID5/6
> functionality on snapshot and on my tree to see that I've not broken
> the stuff while
On Tuesday 01 September 2015 15:14:17 Andreas Thulin wrote:
> Hi misc readers!
>
> This is my first attempt to ask for help using misc@openbsd.org, so please
> bear with me if I'm making mistakes. Also, apologies if I'm asking about
> something recently discussed.
>
> I want to limit the number
On Saturday 13 June 2015, Joel Sing wrote:
On Friday 12 June 2015, Noth wrote:
Hi misc@
I've got a couple of softraid 1 volumes on a server and the /home one
was filling up a bit too much so I had to delete a bunch of isos and
other non necessary items. I did this yesterday
On Friday 12 June 2015, Noth wrote:
Hi misc@
I've got a couple of softraid 1 volumes on a server and the /home one
was filling up a bit too much so I had to delete a bunch of isos and
other non necessary items. I did this yesterday and it still hasn't
cleared the disk space completely
On Thursday 14 May 2015, Michal Lesniewski wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to configure OpenBSD 5.7 httpd with tls with
intermediate/chain certificate without no success.
my httpd.conf:
server default {
listen on 10.11.0.200 tls port 443
tls {
certificate
On Thursday 14 May 2015, Michal Lesniewski wrote:
On 14.05.2015 15:02, Joel Sing wrote:
On Thursday 14 May 2015, Michal Lesniewski wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to configure OpenBSD 5.7 httpd with tls with
intermediate/chain certificate without no success.
my httpd.conf:
server
On Tuesday 31 March 2015, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
Hello,
frankenstein warning: stable.mtier.org, all patches applied
the mail server in question doesn't deliver to a certain destination
(Network error on destination MXs). Other destinations work. When I
connect manually I can send messages
On Monday 02 March 2015, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
On 03/01/15 23:17, Ted Unangst wrote:
Peter J. Philipp wrote:
Hi,
I am not the best C reader and programmer out there so I try to make
myself tools that may seem useless in order to better understand. I see
this in
On Saturday 14 February 2015, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera wrote:
On 2015-02-14 02:28, Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera h...@barrera.io
wrote:
On 2015-02-13 13:20, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2015-02-12, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera
On Tuesday 06 January 2015, whoami toask wrote:
Hello,
isn't there too much SUID/SGID files on a default OpenBSD install?
Can this number be reduced?
Of course it can!
$ find / -perm -4000 -o -perm -2000 -exec chmod 0 {} \;
Example: why does wall, write, modstat need an SGID?
# uname -a
On Wednesday 31 December 2014, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 31/12/14 04:37, Joel Sing wrote:
On Wednesday 31 December 2014, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
After upgrading to latest snapshot I have problems with freeradius 2.2.5
package not starting.
Especially the problem occurs
On Wednesday 31 December 2014, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 31/12/14 11:29, Joel Sing wrote:
Well I've already made it working last night by adding a check
for SSL_CTX_need_tmp_RSA before calling SSL_CTX_set_tmp_rsa
Excellent. You might want to see if you can get that upstream.
Yes
On Wednesday 31 December 2014, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Hi,
After upgrading to latest snapshot I have problems with freeradius 2.2.5
package not starting.
Especially the problem occurs in loading of module eap-tls
rlm_eap_tls: Couldn't set ephemeral RSA key
rlm_eap: Failed to initialize
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Rusty wrote:
On 11/05/14 20:04, Joel Sing wrote:
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, Ted Unangst wrote:
I see errors trying to download some https URLs using python, but the
base ftp client isn't affected. 5.6 release and current. One example is
https://www.duosecurity.com/feed
On Thu, 6 Nov 2014, TJ wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 11:33:21PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 23:04, John Merriam wrote:
Hello. I am trying to create a 'headless' setup using a softraid
crypto root with serial console on OpenBSD 5.6-release amd64.
I have
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Patrik Lundin wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 01:24:30AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
You could try this (only compile tested) diff:
I tried this diff on 5.5-stable and it appeared to solve my problem! The
system now boots from sr0a without asking for a passphrase. Overwriting
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Patrik Lundin wrote:
Thank you Stefan for taking a look, see comments inline:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 12:32:30PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 09:19:25PM +0100, Patrik Lundin wrote:
# disklabel -E wd0
Create the following partitions (in this
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Joel Sing wrote:
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, Patrik Lundin wrote:
[snip]
Since I am not able to boot on the device i have to run installboot as
the last step in the installer. For this i need to add -r /mnt (of
course the following is also copied by hand
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Martijn van Duren wrote:
Hello misc@,
I'm currently trying to write a library that heavily relies on
libcrypto. Because I don't want applications linking to it, to have to
call OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms, for convenience, I added those calls to
the appropriate places in
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Dan Becker wrote:
two identical drives... shutdown system remove one turn the system back on
bioctl shows the partitions as 536871980544 which is 137. something times
bigger than the drive
oddly enough it is 512 times the size of the partition
536871980544/1048578087
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Dan Becker wrote:
forgot to add this relevant part
# bioctl -R /dev/wd0a sd1
softraid0: wd0a partition too small, at least 536871980544 bytes required
#
Again, note the bytes vs blocks. That has most likely been fixed already,
however without a dmesg I have no idea what
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Nicholas Fleisher wrote:
I found another place where the path to the openssl binary needs to be
updated. Here is a pair of diffs: one for configure and one for
configure.ac
Thanks. According to matthieu@, the hardcoded paths to /usr/sbin/openssl
should not be used if
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Nicholas Fleisher wrote:
Hi all,
Just upgraded to Aug 26 snapshot (amd64) and followed the current.html
instructions, including deleting the old /usr/sbin/openssl. Upon
trying to start X using startx, I got an error saying that the cookie
couldn't be set because
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014, Denis Lapshin wrote:
My fstab has identity for main boot HDD:
548ac03903a985e9.a / ffs rw 1 1
548ac03903a985e9.g /home ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
548ac03903a985e9.d /tmp ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
548ac03903a985e9.f /usr ffs rw,nodev 1 2
548ac03903a985e9.e /var ffs
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 01:04:23AM +1000, Joel Sing wrote:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:12:49PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
Hello misc@
I once created an USB stick (uSDHC card with reader, actually
On Tue, 5 Aug 2014, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 06:12:49PM +0200, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
Hello misc@
I once created an USB stick (uSDHC card with reader, actually) using
OpenBSD 5.4 (might have been an earlier that I later binary upgraded)
that contains a softraid
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014, Jens K. Loewe wrote:
Not sure where to leave this one (is there a separate LibreSSL mailing
iist available somewhere?), but I have just read the announcement that
LibreSSL 2.0 is available for FreeBSD too.
Can I use it as an in-place replacement for my existing OpenSSL
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014, Ez Egy wrote:
Since these two are using GCM:
www.ssllabs.com: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
www.google.com: ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
We wanted to make our webserver HTTPS connection more secure (don't look at
the self-signed certificate, that doesn't count right now..)
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014, John Cox wrote:
Hi
I'm running OpenBSD 5.4 (dmesg below) with softraid in mirror mode.
One of the drives failed so I replaced it - the first time that RAID
has actually saved my data as opposed to simply making my life harder!
Thank you softraid.
They are 3T drives and
On Tue, 18 Feb 2014, Olivier Mehani wrote:
Hi all,
I have been battling with this issue for far too long, and I am at wits
end.
I have an OpenBSD 5.4 machine, with httpd serving pages successfully
over both HTTP and HTTPS (with a CaCert-issued certificate). I want to
serve multiple sites
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, David Vasek wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, David Vasek wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013, Joel Sing wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Manuel Giraud wrote:
Hi,
I have a ntfs partition with rather large (about 3GB) files on it. When
I copy these files on a ffs partition
On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Federico Giannici wrote:
For a decision I have to do, I have to know if the RAID1 implementation
in softraid evenly distributes the read load through all the disks.
Yes, reads are interleaved across all online chunks.
So, for example: with a two identical disks RAID1
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Jeff Clarke wrote:
I've read that softraid crypto uses AES256-XTS for encryption. Can the
algorithm be changed?
Not currently.
Also, how long can the passphrase be? I've red the
faq and the manpages and didn't see anything.
A key is derived from the passphrase using
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Joel Sing wrote:
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Jeff Clarke wrote:
I've read that softraid crypto uses AES256-XTS for encryption. Can the
algorithm be changed?
Not currently.
Also, how long can the passphrase be? I've red the
faq and the manpages and didn't see anything
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Manuel Giraud wrote:
Hi,
I have a ntfs partition with rather large (about 3GB) files on it. When
I copy these files on a ffs partition they are corrupted. When I try to
checksum them directly from the ntfs partition the checksum is not
correct (compared to the same file
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013, Erling Westenvik wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:16:44PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 06:15:49PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
Maybe a stupid question, but is it possible to have a i386 machine
configured with FDE to automatically
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Jiri B wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 02:33:51AM +1000, Joel Sing wrote:
[...snip...] FWIW one of my servers (handles mail, etc) is a Sun Fire
V210 (sparc64) machine with 2x1GHz CPU, 2GB RAM and a pair of SCSI drives
- it runs perfectly well in a similar CRYPTO on RAID 1
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Erling Westenvik wrote:
Hi folks,
Anyone having any experience with putting an softraid CRYPTO partition
on top of a softraid RAID 1? In terms of performance?
I'd like to build a file server that favors redundancy, availability and
privacy over performance. The latter
On Wed, 15 May 2013, tichodr...@free.fr wrote:
Hello everyone.
I failed to upgrade my server from 5.2 to 5.3, probably because of a
bad answer to the 'Root filesystem?' question.
Setup:
- HP ProLiant MicroServer N40L server, amd64, GENERIC kernel
- Two disks (sd0, sd1) in softraid (sd2)
-
On Thu, 16 May 2013, Joel Sing wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2013, tichodr...@free.fr wrote:
Hello everyone.
I failed to upgrade my server from 5.2 to 5.3, probably because of a
bad answer to the 'Root filesystem?' question.
Setup:
- HP ProLiant MicroServer N40L server, amd64, GENERIC
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, keith scott wrote:
After changing the following line on our edge Firewalls PC.conf the Centos
server that was unusable is now usable. I've done another tcp dump and
there are still lot's of TCP ACT DUP's but not as many as there were
before,
match on $ExtIf scrub
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Brandon Tanner wrote:
Anyone else having trouble getting bioctl to see more than 2TB when
creating softraid0?
I've got 2 x 3TB drives, BIOS sees them fine.
dmesg on bootup:
sd1 at scsibus0 targ 3 lun 0: ATA, ST3000DM001-1CH1, CC24 SCSI3 0/direct
fixed
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Brandon Tanner wrote:
By the way, does softraid on amd64 support 4096 bytes per sector?
No. There is a large amount of work required to fix this since everything in
softraid was originally designed around 512-byte blocks. It is somewhere on
my TODO list, however I do not
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Andy Bradford wrote:
Thus said Joel Sing on Sat, 09 Feb 2013 16:44:11 +1100:
umount via DUID does not work currently - this will be fixed shortly
after the next release freeze has ended.
Will that also include shutdown of softraid via DUID? e.g.,
bioctl -d DUID
On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Scott McEachern wrote:
I get a rather curious error when shutting down a machine with a RAID 1
setup that contains a crypto partition and a normal partition:
syncing disks... done
sd3 detached
softraid0: I/O error 5 on dev 0x433 at block 16
softraid0: could not write
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Jiri B wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:56:47AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
While stacked softraid volumes generally work, they are not officially
supported (for a variety of reasons). The problem that you mention above
is due to the way that softraid volumes are shutdown
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013-02-08, Paul de Weerd we...@weirdnet.nl wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:54:27PM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
| What kind of hardware do you have powering those machines? Besides,
| I don't use the crypto partition too often and I really
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Scott McEachern wrote:
On 02/08/13 11:26, Joel Sing wrote:
On Sat, 9 Feb 2013, Jiri B wrote:
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 02:56:47AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
While stacked softraid volumes generally work, they are not officially
supported (for a variety of reasons
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Erling Westenvik wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:11:17AM +0530, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
I hate to say it but I am sure your hard disk is dying. Replace it ASAP
No no, that's all right. Death is an inevitable part of life. I know the
disk is dying and I'm going to
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Eivind Evensen wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:33:16AM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Eivind Evensen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 07:21:08PM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Eivind Evensen wrote:
Hello.
Trying to play
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Eivind Evensen wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 07:21:08PM +1100, Joel Sing wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Eivind Evensen wrote:
Hello.
Trying to play around a bit with softraid using vnd reliably results
in a panic when assembling the raid volume. I think the first
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Jonathan Thornburg wrote:
I wrote
| FreeBSD has the BSD-Sysctl perl module available from CPAN, which would
| be ideal for my purposes... except that it doesn't (yet) support OpenBSD.
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Philip Guenther wrote:
So, uh, what fails if you try to build
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Martin Kjær Jørgensen wrote:
Hi
I've just installed OpenBSD 5.2 on my Soekris 6501. Im using two WDC
WD2500BPVT-22JJ5T0 disks in RAID1.
Installation goes well and the system boots fine the first time.
After reboot I'm greeted with the following error:
Using drive 0,
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012, Eivind Evensen wrote:
Hello.
Trying to play around a bit with softraid using vnd reliably results
in a panic when assembling the raid volume. I think the first time I
tried this was around 4.9 so it's not something new.
While the combination of vnd and softraid may not
On Thu, 22 Nov 2012, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Doing Per-Olov's advice on
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=133771632704741w=2
and applying the following, fixes the problem.
Should I stick with this or is there another reason it has not been
included in current so far?
Yes - it is a work
On Thu, 8 Nov 2012, Erling Westenvik wrote:
I'm running current on a ThinkPad T500 with a fully encrypted disk (sd0)
and using a usb keydisk (sd1) to assemble the crypto volume on sd2. Last
snapshot upgrade was around 11th of October.
Yesterday the machine suddenly stopped responding to
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012, Marcin wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded to 5.1, but I was able to reproduce the issue
described below with 4.8, 5.0 and 5.2 snapshot.
After the upgrade I discovered that workstations behind the OpenBSD
firewall experience occasional timeouts
while trying to access web
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Chris Bennett wrote:
I went and tried files I had produced many months ago and I get same error!
./cat[1]: syntax error: `(' unexpected
I don't think the problem is with nasm, but something else?
For some reason the kernel does not think it is a valid executable - can
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 05:08:31PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 07:03:42AM -0600, Aaron wrote:
It is possible if you use different partitions on the same drive, however,
you would have to run -P twice ( once for each volume ).
Sorry for not mentioning that
On Tuesday 22 May 2012, Rodolfo Gouveia wrote:
Hi all,
I was running 4.9 on this server and finally got it
updated to 5.0 and right after to 5.1.
But security(8) now gives me this:
disklabel: partition a: partition extends past end of unit
sd1 is a softraid crypto volume and running
On Saturday 24 March 2012, Brett wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:30:40 -0400
Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
On 03/23/12 22:02, Brett wrote:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:43:53 +0100
Henning Brauer lists-open...@bsws.de wrote:
* Brett brett.ma...@gmx.com [2012-03-24 01:56]:
On Monday 23 January 2012, Matt Behrens wrote:
Been playing with 5.1-beta (Jan. 21 build) in the interests of seeing
what I need to get together to set up my next system. I was hoping to
do it with three drives, booting from a softraid RAID 5 volume.
From bioctl(8):
CAVEATS
Use of the
On Monday 16 January 2012, keith wrote:
I built a storage server to run the Bacula storage daemon on. My plan
was to boot of a usb key then to use the four 2TB sata disks that are in
the server as a softraid raid 5 volume. The server in question is a dell
poweredge R310, i3 CPU 540 @ 3.07GHz
On Thursday 15 December 2011, Jonathan Perkin wrote:
I read a long time ago that layered softraid wasn't supported, and
when looking recently I didn't read anything which suggested that had
changed, however on the off-chance I tried it out and it seems to work
ok - at least in limited testing
On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Mattieu Baptiste wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to reassemble a softraid(4) volume, created with the 'force'
flag. When I'm trying:
# bioctl -C force -c C -l /dev/sd1a softraid0
softraid0: chunk sd1a already in use
bioctl: ioctl: Invalid argument
According to the
On Thursday 06 October 2011, Jiri B wrote:
would be possible to tell kernel via `bsd -a' or with extended
boot.conf configuration capabilities to use a root device defined
with DUID?
Short answer, no.
My intend is to boot from an external usb stick and to have root device
in the box
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo