Stallman's moral arguments are compelling. Theo's moral arguments are
impeccable.
There is more Unix tradition in OpenBSD than there is in any modern Posix
compliant system, where most projects change their interface needlessly,
OpenBSD is a classic where much documentation is in effect timeless.
If you've got money go here: https://www.openbsd.org/support.html
If you don't have money go ask here: http://daemonforums.org/
Generally, msp, isp, it requests don't go on this list. You've posted no
evidence - a big no no. You need a high level of forensic verification
before you bring this
*sorry
should have been
If you can't drive - stick your thumb out, stfu, and enjoy the ride.
On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:32 PM, Zeb Packard <zeb.pack...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OpenBSD's man pages are a work of art. There's a cohesiveness to the base
> that "feels" like concre
OpenBSD's man pages are a work of art. There's a cohesiveness to the base
that "feels" like concrete, like you can build anything on top of it.I
can't think of a lot of software projects that claim "correctness" as a
goal. Aerospace, OpenBSD, DragonFlyBSD, SQL(?) and some academic
exercises?! I
Thanks, I like http://openbsd101.com/
This looks similar
Not a wiki, but if the mailing list is too busy daemon forums
has a community driven Guides and Howtos section.
http://daemonforums.org/forumdisplay.php?f=31
What's happening right now is OBSD-misc is doing in 6 months
what RH and MS do in ten years. Questions like this are
like hitting the stop button on a production line :D
Peter N.M. Hansteen is keen to answer questions like this.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/openbsd.newbies/
There's a regular
John Tate,
Consider living a life of service, instead of complaining that the
list has not helped you enough, try to figure out what you can do to
better serve the list. So, work more before hitting the list, don't
panic, give it a day or two. Read the archives and relevant man pages
always, then
Help, i shot it three times and I'm on my fourth monitor, 3 bullets
left. What next?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Eric Furman ericfur...@fastmail.net wrote:
Please don't. This whole thread has gotten really stupid.
Unless you have something funny to add, let's kill it now.
On Tue, 12 Jul
I think it worked.
Sent from my iclone.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us wrote:
shoot it again son.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Zeb Packard wrote:
Help, i shot it three times and I'm on my fourth monitor, 3 bullets
left. What next?
On Tue
*Sorry about the direct response Nick. :0
These two lines make me think it's a configuration problem.
bge0 at pci7 dev 0 function 0 Broadcom BCM57788 rev 0x01, BCM57780
A1 (0x57780001): apic 0 int 17 (irq 10), address 00:22:4d:4c:40:ee
brgphy0 at bge0 phy 1: BCM57780 10/100/1000baseT PHY, rev. 1
One thing I noticed is
that they're having a hell of a time transitioning away from the
traditional sysvinit-based system to the Upstart event-based init
daemon system.
That's syntactical stuff, who knows. That rabbit hole is as deep
as your project made it. Strategically, OBSD does less, but
I'd like to see the output from ifconfig.
That dmesg is about a year old, I'm leaning towards ESD damage.
So, i've setup a file server with softraid rather than the older
raidframe, however on the new system I tried setting my sd*b
partitions to a raid 0 configuration so the swap space runs a
little faster. After getting the swap space setup, though dmesg
prints [ root on sd0a swap on sd0b ..]. After
hmmkay, so both disklabels have an sd0b, softraid is pointed to
sd3b for swap, but dmesg still prints 'swap on sd0b dump on sd0b'
I'm assuming this is because sd0b is striped?
I figure it's worth a shot on my test system, if it's quicker, I'm not
opposed to the little bit of configuration up
-duplex
status: active
inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
inet6 fe80::208:54ff:fe69:1354%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
2011/7/7 Zeb Packard zeb.pack...@gmail.com
I'd like to see the output from ifconfig.
Hah, sorry Nick, R0me0, ifconfig only
yep, you're right. it's right there in the man page.
Overwriting file in /etc could cause all sorts of problems, rc scripts
corrupted could leave you in single user mode for example.
Regards
Nigel Taylor
Thanks a bunch for the tips and encouragement.
I was using the tutorial at http://www.argon18.com/raid_openbsd.html
This tutorial was very
I say go for it.
File is:
usr.sbin/Makefile
Code is:
# $OpenBSD: Makefile,v 1.154 2011/02/09 17:17:47 jasper Exp $
.include bsd.own.mk
SUBDIR= ac accton acpidump adduser amd apm apmd arp \
authpf bgpctl bgpd bind chroot config cron crunchgen dev_mkdb \
dhcpd dhcrelay
just want to copy my files off of it and transfer them to a
working system, but it is booting read-only with /etc/nologin in place
and I cannot figure out why.
Please help.
Zeb Packard
21 matches
Mail list logo
