OpenBSD, software and hardware all free

My name true is Jorge Luis. I am revealing my identity private to I be considered seriously. Before of I delete my account OpenBSD Nabble for I do more research, use more software, learn what I doing for not make people mad, I ask that you respond the following questions: Is worth the effort to

Re: OpenBSD, software and hardware all free

Because are bullshit? Jan Stary wrote >> If yes, I go decide use only software and hardware free in hobby or maybe >> also in profession. > > You go decide good. > > Because I go decide good? > >> Also are bullshits the followings operating systems? > > Also are bullshits. Because are

Re: OpenBSD, software and hardware all free

Jan Stary wrote >> If yes, I go decide use only software and hardware free in hobby or maybe >> also in profession. > > You go decide good. Because I go decide good? -- View this message in context:

Re: The kernels of *BSD include nonfree firmware blobs?

2015-11-27 18:35 GMT-02:00 bofh : Do you understand your question has been answered over and over again, and is not relevant here? Why do you continue by asking about blobs in FreeBSD? Because I interpreted badly, English is not my native language. Please forgive

The kernels of *BSD include nonfree firmware blobs?

The Free Software Foundation (FSF) says that: "FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD all include instructions for obtaining nonfree programs in their ports system. In addition, their kernels include nonfree firmware blobs. Nonfree firmware programs used with Linux, the kernel, are called “blobs”, and

Re: The kernels of *BSD include nonfree firmware blobs?

Theo de Raadt wrote >> The Free Software Foundation (FSF) says that: >> >> "FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD all include instructions for obtaining >> nonfree >> programs in their ports system. In addition, their kernels include >> nonfree >> firmware blobs. > >> Nonfree firmware programs used with

Re: The kernels of *BSD include nonfree firmware blobs?

> The Free Software Foundation (FSF) says that: > > "FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD all include instructions for obtaining > nonfree > programs in their ports system. In addition, their kernels include nonfree > firmware blobs. > Nonfree firmware programs used with Linux, the kernel, are called >

Re: Who teach the true message about the true free software?

Benjamin Heath wrote > On Nov 20, 2015 9:15 AM, "français" > romapera15@ > wrote: >> >> Please excuse me because I have posted on OpenBSD lists and other lists. >> >> Who teach the true message about the true free software? >> >> I ask this because I not want be deceived by hypocritical liars

Who teach the true message about the true free software?

Please excuse me because I have posted on OpenBSD lists and other lists. Who teach the true message about the true free software? I ask this because I not want be deceived by hypocritical liars that teach falsely about free software. Hardcore OpenBSD user community, please, for avoid flames,

Whats are the problems caused by licences that are not free?

I am a so great fan of computer that I have tears in my eyes and I'm a seriously curious guy wanting to know , this are the motives of I post this topic. I've been reading a lot on the BSD license and GPL license. Second the position of OpenBSD, source code published under version 2 of the

GUI is for wimps second the currently opinion of hardcore OpenBSD user community?

Is good idea to create a user-friendly and easy-to-use variant of OpenBSD second the hardcore OpenBSD user community? If no, because? GUI is for wimps second the currently opinion of hardcore OpenBSD user community? If yes because? -- View this message in context:

Re: The OpenBSD developers approve “optimizing assembler” and compilers?

The Story of Mel is one such example of programmers that were unwilling to accept that programming in machine code was no longer useful or relevant in most situations. Mel wrote machine code, even though he would have been able to develop software that was almost as good in a lot less time using

The OpenBSD developers approve “optimizing assembler” and compilers?

Mel didn't approve of compilers. “If a program can't rewrite its own code”, he asked, “what good is it?” Mel had written, in hexadecimal, the most popular computer program the company owned. Mel loved the RPC-4000 because he could optimize his code: that is, locate instructions on the drum so

Re: The OpenBSD developers approve “optimizing assembler” and compilers?

Raul Miller wrote > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:13 AM, français > romapera15@ > wrote: >> The OpenBSD developers approve “optimizing assembler” and compilers? > > You are overgeneralizing from jokes. > > -- > Raul Raul Are jokes the quotes from John Von Neum

Because Theo and various users told them that the projects GnoBSD and Comixwall were worthless and that they weren't contributing to OpenBSD?

I always find it amusing how OpenBSD is "audited", yet there's not one audit report on the OpenBSD website. The closest answer I've been able to find on the mailing list is to review all of the CVS commit logs. Yeah, that's not opaque in the slightest... The bigger problem with OpenBSD is it's