> -Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org [mailto:owner-m...@openbsd.org] On
> Behalf Of soko.tica
> Sent: 09 September 2016 11:09
> To: misc
> Subject: Install octeon on Qemu question(s)
>
> Hello,
>
> I am unsucesfully trying to install octeon on Qemu (I have
On 3/20/2009 12:59 PM, (private) HKS wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:49 PM, Mail Listsmail-li...@peachnet.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:33 PM, (private) HKShks.priv...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Mail Listsmail-li...@peachnet.com wrote:
Hello all,
I'm have
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2009/03/18 20:45, Mail Lists wrote:
Is there anyway possible that this is 'legitimate' traffic?
damned unlikely. I think I'd be looking at a layer-1 solution if the
box can't be made to behave...
Sorry, I
Hello all,
I'm have some issues setting up a bridge. We recently co-located a
router in a data canter. The machine is a a soekris 5501 running
openbsd4.4.
The interfaces use the vr drivers.
A machine belonging to someone in our cabinet is sending out about
10 packets/second of udp traffic
Hello List,
I'm having some issues with IPSec VPN tunnels.
Here is what I'm trying to do:
I have a VPN 'server' with 2 internet connections (IP1, IP2)
I have several remote locations which connect to the VPN server.
When IP1 goes down on the VPN server I want the
Jesus Sanchez wrote:
Hi, I'm using 4.2 with no problem for anything but one thing.
I have a box with 2 NICs. One have a ip get with dhcp from the cable
moden, and everything goes right but at the other side, if I wake up a
bridge as described in brconfig manpage and ifconfig manpage (following
Hello everyone,
I have what might amount to a silly question.
I'm attempting to set up pf for a voip system. In order to prioritize
VoIP packets I have this queue:
altq on $ext_if priq bandwidth 1.4Mb queue {std_out, voip_out,
tos_lowdelay_out}
queue std_out priq(default)
queue voip_out
David Newman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/7/07 8:59 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/09/07 08:41, David Newman wrote:
1. I believe keep state is still needed when using queuing. The
pf.conf manpage says it must be specified explicitly to apply options to
a
Why bother adding WPA when you can turn many wlan cards into AP-mode and
have an OpenBSD box serve wireless computers with IPsec capabilities.
You then have an AP with many more capabilities than any
linksys/netgear/whatever AP.
This would be great. However, I've yet to find an IPsec client
Openvpn
Unless I'm mistaken Openvpn is not equal to Ipsec
Darren Spruell wrote:
On 3/30/07, mail-lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Openvpn
Unless I'm mistaken Openvpn is not equal to Ipsec
Depends on what you mean by equal to - OpenVPN makes use of SSL/TLS
rather than the transport protocols IPsec employs, but they are of
similar equivalence
Hello again,
Unfortunately the 'quick' keyword in my pf.conf file didn't seem to fix
the issue.
The situation lies as such:
I can increase mbufs indefinitely (until I run out of memory I suppose).
When I disable pf (pfctl -d) the mbufs are immediately released and the
usage count drops to
Thanks for your reply.
I'm really about at my wits end with this. I think I'm going add a
generic wireless router to my switch and have everyone access through
that. Is it possible that there's something wrong with the ral driver?
I've heard though that this is a very reliable driver under
One other thing:
I have discovered that when I'm not connected to the wireless network
with my laptop (which has a belkin pcmcia card), the soekris seems to
stay up indefinitely (mbufs keep accumulating though).
This sort of leads me to believe I have some sort of setting incorrect
On 3/26/07, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007/03/26 16:41, mail-lists wrote:
I'm noticing that when I do a 'top' my interrupt usage stays at aroudn
30%. Again - I have to think that this is a hardware limitation on the
soekris.
soekris is not a fast i/o machine
I've looked over this mailing list and noticed some questions about
maxclusters
I'm running a wireless ap and for some reason the wireless link seems to
die on me intermittently
Looking at /var/log/messages I notice errors referring to maxclusters.
I then increased my maxclusters to 65000
Well,
I think I might have discovered the cause of this.
I noticed that when I disabled pf that all the mbufs were released
immediately. I then configured my pf rules from the wireless network
with the 'quick' keyword and the current buffer count doesn't seem to be
rising very much any more
Sorry, I've asked this before and didn't get a response.. am I asking
this incorrectly - or in the wrong place?
Hello all,
I'm trying to get a mini pci card working on OpenBSD 4.0. I ripped this
card out of a dlink router that we weren't using. From what I understand
it's supposed to use the
Hello all,
I'm trying to get a mini pci card working on OpenBSD 4.0. I ripped this
card out of a dlink router that we weren't using. From what I understand
it's supposed to use the acx driver.
When I try to do an 'ifconfig acx0 up' it gives me 'Device no configured'
I'm assuming that this
Jon Radel wrote:
Duplex mismatch between OpenBSD router NICs and switch ports plugged
into? Can make a horrible mess of packet loss rates and throughput.
Also see what OpenBSD has to say about NIC error rates.
--Jon Radel
Steve Glaus wrote:
Looking at my dmesg's I noticed the following
Hi everyone,
I'm at my wits end here with this and I don't know who to ask..
For about a week now my OpenBSD router has been acting up in the
strangest ways. Route's dissapear, ethernet speeds crawl to a halt and
other wierdness.. I'm about to wipe this box clean and start from
scratch but
Hello,
Does anyone know anything of when 802.11e might be supported in any of
the wireless drivers? I've searched around and can't really find
anything about it other than a review Theo gave in 2003 mentioning that
they don't plan to focus on it.
Perhaps someone is familiar with a radio
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/11/15 08:22, Diana Eichert wrote:
Are TDM over Ethernet devices supported under Asterisk running on OpenBSD?
No, they are configured as a channel under zaptel which we don't have.
(zaptel is ~20k lines of kernel driver including such fun things as echo
23 matches
Mail list logo