On Saturday 06 August 2011 02:24:42 Benny Lofgren wrote:
I've got a Z61p with what I assume is similar hardware (haven't got
mine handy right now so can't get a dmesg) and exactly the same
symptoms. The resume would indeed be useful even with the blank text
console if only the network got
On Friday 05 August 2011 13:35:16 Jona Joachim wrote:
When I try to resume it starts blinking. The screen backlight does not
light up, the screen stays totally dark, same behaviour with or
without X.
For me the repost all ati video change in vga_pci.c broke resume with
similar symptoms. You
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 15:14:50 Benjamin Nadland wrote:
[...]
+source=radiotap_bsd_ab,urtw0,radiotap_bsd_ab
Why radiotap_bsd_ab? urtw(4) is an 802.11b/g only device and does not
support 802.11a operation. This still doesn't explain your crash as
kismet_server should receive an error and
On Tuesday 11 January 2011 16:29:07 Benjamin Nadland wrote:
Just tested with radiotap_bsd_b and I get the same crash with the same
traces.
There is nothing that kismet_server does with the device that cannot be
replicated with ifconfig(8) and tcpdump(8). If you can reproduce the
crash with
i am trying to mount the mass storage on my LG GW620
android phone.
ugen0 at uhub0 port 3 LG Electronics Inc. LG Mobile USB Modem rev
2.00/1.00 addr 2
Your phone is not configured as OpenBSD needs.
it is a modem. then i turn on
settings - sd card phone storage - mass storage only
and
On Friday 31 July 2009 23:45:43 you wrote:
man softraid
For dump(8), an ffs slice full of one file works if your softraid(4) is
atop mount_vnd(8).
Can anyone explain how to create encrypted virtual disk?
(Linux Expo Live, held in london last october)
Fun times... though that was a dead, unattended event. At other events
there were eager punters who wanted OpenSSH/OpenBSD t-shirts, posters,
cds, lanyards, soft toys, etc. Lots of 'em.
There was no indication the proceeds were going anywhere
On Friday 20 March 2009 11:15:05 jmc wrote:
i started paying attention to this thread because i've been interested
in setting up clamav for sometime. i noticed that there's a
clamav-milter(8) that gets installed as part of the clamav package.
is the general consensus of those in the know to
Wow, people don't know modems anymore.
Yup, I've never had to deal with them much either.
Umsm(4) are commonly pre-configured. If you are using a provider
provided umsm(4) ATD may be the only Hayes you need.
_ Plextor PX-EH40L but seems to be very slow (1)
Or plenty fast enough, depending on your needs.
These days it's most unlikely you will find one, sadly.
On Sunday 15 February 2009 15:28:17 Tom Jones wrote:
I got a HUAWEI E169 usb modem on the three carrier, here in the UK.
I am completely lost on how to set the modem up, Ive been through the
example from the FAQ and from some Linux sources, but I would really
appreciate if someone could give
On Friday 06 February 2009 13:20:55 Stuart Henderson wrote:
3 give information; most are huawei. E220 matches the umsm(4) list.
the umsm list has E619G which seems to be a typo (can anyone confirm
this?) and is probably actually E169G also on 3's list.
My 3 umsm is an E160G - which reminds
On Friday 06 February 2009 16:03:56 Tom Jones wrote:
I was thinking about trying that, have you ever seen any on display in
stores?
Sure, everywhere. But they ship in sealed boxes or blister packs.
Wouldn't mind plugging them in in-store to see how they are picked up
I was able to find them
On Thursday 15 January 2009 03:03:12 Jason Dixon wrote:
I have a Verizon USB720 dongle that shows up as ucom0. I intend to
use it for connecting remotely with my X40. I'm having problems when
packets exceed a certain size. When this happens, the return packets
never make it back to my
On Thursday 15 January 2009 17:44:38 Jason Dixon wrote:
Normal for what? I see 2.5Mbps/512Kbps with the same device in OS X.
Normal for me with the devices I have.
Have you seen tcp traffic that is not affected?
Not by application type per se, only by packet size.
I was wondering if
Glad to see it's not just me.. I was actually thinking this might be a
bug in the net80211 code, but you guys are also getting this with a
2860.
I have a similar ral in a 5501 and it's reliable. I don't recall needing
to touch it.
ral0 at pci0 dev 14 function 0 Ralink RT2860 rev 0x00: irq
So, you have to have the perfect sync on the vga side to make the
picture show up nice on the TV side.
Agreed. Try any modeline you think might help. Good luck.
xrandr --newmode pal-i 13.5 720 732 795 864 576 581 586 625 \
interlace -hsync -vsync
xrandr --addmode VGA-0 pal-i
xrandr
I have about 6 of them running an older version of OpenBSD, probably
the first or second release.
Landisk -current as a .5TB Topfield PVR - TCP/IP bridge / cache here.
I only wish I could get more of 'em.
I have a Netra T1 that unexpectedly fell off the net. I think it was
alive but without working network. It was power cycled before I had a
chance to look at it. After the event I found this:
Apr 16 16:41:11 sun /bsd: gem0: device timeout
Apr 16 16:41:44 sun last message repeated 3 times
Apr 16
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 10:53:23 Stuart Henderson wrote:
I have a pair of Gigabyte cards which identify the same way;
ral0 at pci0 dev 16 function 0 Ralink RT2560 rev 0x01: irq 10,
address 00:0f:ea:84:f4:ed ral0: MAC/BBP RT2560 (rev 0x04), RF RT2525
They are terrible, very poor signal
OK, now that my Linksys WMP54G turns out to be this fscking piece of crap,
instead of ral, does anyone have any advice on a _current_ PCI based
802.11a/b/g card that can work as an AP?
http://www.maplin.co.uk/Search.aspx?criteria=WL-181
Not quite what you asked for, it's b/g/n not a/b/g.
It would be great if the devs could get back to the list which card(s)
Or you could send whatever you have instead of talking about it.
On Wednesday 09 January 2008 21:10, bofh wrote:
You are buying it for the source code and binaries on the CD
[snip]
If you _are_ buying the CDs only for the stickers
Exactly. Buy them because you want to. There is no obligation.
Alexander Hall wrote:
Anyway, you don't happen to know any retailers that ship world-wide (or
at least Sweden-wide), with decent shipping costs?
They were easy to find in Europe quite recently. Have you seen:
On Thursday 12 April 2007 18:28, Niall O'Higgins wrote:
Interesting, I have always found the radio in ural(4) (and rum(4) which
is next-generation chip) to be excellent. Much better than ral(4) and
even wi(4) in my experience.
Better than Senao/Engenius wi(4)?
The usual recommendation is ral(4)
Or acx(4), ath(4), rtw(4), rum(4), wi(4).
If I'm not mistaken you could use a Patton (or any other brand) VoIP
gateway to connect to the physical phonelines and use Asterisk running
on OpenBSD to talk to the VoIP gateway using SIP.
I've not tried Patton, and there are many alternatives. But yeah, exactly.
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 09:47, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
Did anyone succeed in installing any SIP client on OpenBSD?
Several, and IAX. Always had fatal problems with audio and/or threads.
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 21:04, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Anyone with a phone... there are numerous companies gatewaying
PSTNSIP in and out and some doing PSTNH323 and a few doing
PSTNIAX
And a choice of ISDN (basic, pri) - SIP gateways. Much easier.
On Friday 15 December 2006 09:51, you wrote:
So far for all you people who have complained about lousy ral(4)
range or reception, only one of you has posted a dmesg (and even it was
incomplete) and none of you have posted your interface config.
Irrelevant.
Don't let this interrupt your
On Monday 18 December 2006 03:05, Damien Miller wrote:
Knowing the MAC and RF versions of the affected cards is irrelevant?
Yes.
I guess ral(4) that works fine over 20m through several double-brick
walls is a figment of my imagination then...
No.
A sensitive ral radio would be.
http://www.netgate.com/info/miniPCI/2511MPPLUS/2511MP_PLUS_Spec.pdf
Receive sensitivity: -89dBm to -91dBm.
http://soekris.kd85.com/pdf/ralabg.pdf
Receive sensitivity: -70dBm to -84dBm.
i actually never tested it with openbsd (why? i can use tcpdump and
hostapd(8) for wireless monitoring).
Really?
I can easily get some Realtek 8169 based (not 8139!) re cards, some
Intel gbit em (they seem less stable than fxp ?), and probably some sk
(SMC 9452TX).
I have been using sk(4) as my Gigabit card of choice with great success for
some time now. In fact, I don't bother looking for anything
Yes this is a problem with kismet (even the current svn snapshot).
Maybe, it depends how you look at it.
Ath(4) devices have problems (partly) because Kismet configures net80211 based
capture sources to IFM_AUTO on OpenBSD. Only ath(4) has a problem with this,
IFM_AUTO is the correct way to
http://lists.samba.org/archive/linux/2006-August/015771.html
A load of these were donated to a charity I assist. It appears that they are
actually Silan Micro-Electronics SC92031 chips. The dodgy PCI ID's known to
me thus far are:
vendor 0x1904 product 0x2031
vendor 0x1904 product 0x8139
I was wondering the same:
Shop.iodata.com is currently available to residents living in the United
States. We are in the process of developing our Online Store for the greater
European and UK markets.
Your IP Address [...] is listed as coming from !USA (!USA)
If you live in the United States
I have a Thinkpad Z61m on loan with the 1st Sept i386 snapshot installed.
I see a huge performance penalty with the multiprocessor kernel. The system
is as installed, no mk.conf etc.
An example, 'time make bsd' with mp and up kernel.
mp kernel:
41m36s real 4m12.26s user 38m50.02s system
up
And seriously, how does one manage to fill a TB of data?
/rant
DVB.
Did you try with other source types than radiotap_bsd_b?
This will only change the channels used. Kismet has one generic capture
source and one for wi(4).
I focus the radio signal minimimizing other radios seeing the signal
from the sides.
I use an(4)'s antenna diversity to similar effect. Either way, good ears
need less signal.
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 13:01, Diana Eichert wrote:
I want to put a bi-quad at the focal point of an 18 parabolic dish at
either end.
If that combination is necessary a ralink radio is likely a poor choice.
On Monday 03 July 2006 23:29, Novak, Trevor SCIC wrote:
I'm trying to setup a wireless bridge with openbsd on a Toshiba
laptop. I'm using an SMC2532W-B (Prism 2.5) wireless card and a 3Com
3C574-TX.
Is the wi(4) in hostap mode? If not you cannot bridge...
Yes, that is what I figured too from the source. I have a 200mW card
here which I'd like to limit to 100mW (european limit) by setting the
appropriate txpower after accounting for antenna gain/cable loss.
Use an EU card.
However, I doubt that e.g. subtracting 3dBm is sufficient,
dBm(r)?
Do you trust *any* wireless media to be such a substitute?
In the right circumstances you can make quiet, insensitive, reliable
point to point links.
On Thursday 08 June 2006 22:28, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I've just been trying to get a softphone running too. You'll
get a bit further using --with-osip=/usr/local/include but I haven't
got the build to complete yet.
It works with ossaudio(3), except audio.
Me too! I thought minisip looked
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 22:00, Gaby vanhegan wrote:
It's mainly to draw punters into the hotspot area, and have them feel
a little more comfortable about using a public access point
Hotspot? Public access point?
Enforcing encryption will hurt you and your visitors.
If you must, read:
Is ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 Graphics Chipset fully supported on 3.8?
No, not if I remember correctly.
Anyone using it successfully?
For about a year...
But finding it difficult to configure X to get Color Depth of 24 :-(
Any pointers to get X running fine is highly appreciated :-)
I had to
Vodafone Mobile Connect 3G
All the ones I have/had are/were branded GlobeTrotters?
They all work really well. They do sms really well too.
The 0x705c has a ZyDAS ZD1211 chipset in it, the 0x7050 is Ralink.
A Ralink based F5D7050 can be unambiguously identified via it's FCC ID. It
will be printed on the device (and IIRC the box). FCC ID K7SF5D7050A is an
RT25xx based device.
ural0: Belkin Belkin 54g USB Network Adapter, rev
I work for an ISP
It shows. Disagree off-list please.
all UK ADSL is operated by them, with the minor exception of LLU.
What?
AFAIK there is only one UK operator unbundling for ADSL, in some southern
exchanges (eg London there abouts).
What?
I've seen it often enough where [...] a JCB has dug though the footpath and
taken the lot out
there are three access points that i can pick up that have the same
ssid. is there a way to specify the mac address of the access point i
wish to use?
Yes, read wi(4) and ifconfig(8). I doubt you need wicontrol at all.
This is driving me nuts. I've installed FreeBSD-6.0RC1 w/same result
about EEPROM.
I recently had that same error with a few Intel Pro 100S dual port cards in a
new Asus K8S-MX motherboard. In my case a BIOS upgrade resolved it.
D-Link DWL-G650
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/forms/blobs/retrieve.cgi?attachment_id=303696native_or_pdf=pdf
I don't think you understand at all.
Shrink wrap vendors are unsupportable.
It was the most current I could find for this particular chipset
The chipset is ancient.
shorty.kirknet.net:~$ dmesg
OpenBSD 3.4-stable (GENERIC) #0: Sun Sep 18 18:29:41 EDT 2005
I'm bailing here. I don't remember 3.4 well enough.
I don't know that I need it, but it generally provides for greater
range without the need for an external antenna...
Perhaps in the unusual case where all it's clients are similarly well endowed.
An AP with the best receive sensitivity (and a well chosen antennae) will
provide the best range
200mW Cardbus card that can do 802.11g with hostap?
Why do you need 200mW?
On Thursday 25 August 2005 17:36, Anwar Puthu wrote:
When I tried configuring wi0 in hostap mode with WEP, it used to fail
consistently with the message wi0: init failed.
I suspect that's because you are using wicontrol after ifconfig.
I then tried setting up the card in ibss-master mode.
It would be useful if this little gotcha could be added to the man page
man 4 wi
/EXAMPLES
I think you have the wrong list, try here -
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
and here
/usr/local/share/examples/asterisk/openbsd/
What I am looking for
It depends what you need. You didn't say.
These are not in AMD64 GENERIC, but I gave it a go.
It worked well. In hostap clients just worked (at 54M), in client (BSS)
mode it's just as good as on i386. Are there issues with ural on AMD64?
OpenBSD 3.7-current (GENERIC+URAL) #0: Thu Jun 23 12:14:17 BST 2005
[EMAIL
64 matches
Mail list logo
