I'll try it and let you know.
Well I did a very quick test into memory at first (whilst doing
something else at the same time) and it seemed to talk about ufs
filesystem usage and I was very surprised. I then tried some more
comprehensive tests and only found dd usage.
I'll retry what I did
I have worked with clonezilla cloning OpenBSD filesystems using
its UFS support, but there are some problems concerning disklabel
creation, what I did, if I remember correctly was creating a dd
image from the first MB (or so of the disk) which when dumped will
create the partition table and
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:27:57AM +0100, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
4.15 of the faq says
Unfortunately, there are no known disk imaging packages which are
FFS-aware.
I haven't tested whether a broad brush had been applied expecting
ufs and ffs to be the same or if clonezillas statement is
On 04/13/13 19:27, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
4.15 of the faq says
Unfortunately, there are no known disk imaging packages which are
FFS-aware.
I haven't tested
...
Get back with me when you have.
I'll be happy to find out that statement is now wrong, but I've been
doing this
On 2013-04-14, Nick Holland n...@holland-consulting.net wrote:
On 04/13/13 19:27, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
4.15 of the faq says
Unfortunately, there are no known disk imaging packages which are
FFS-aware.
I haven't tested
...
Get back with me when you have.
I'll be happy to find out
4.15 of the faq says
Unfortunately, there are no known disk imaging packages which are
FFS-aware.
I haven't tested whether a broad brush had been applied expecting
ufs and ffs to be the same or if clonezillas statement is correct but
thought it may be worth bringing up that clonezilla.org says
On 04/13/13 19:27, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
4.15 of the faq says
Unfortunately, there are no known disk imaging packages which are
FFS-aware.
I haven't tested
...
Get back with me when you have.
I'll be happy to find out that statement is now wrong, but I've been
doing this about 20 years
7 matches
Mail list logo
