Tried to pass on this, obviously, the call will be answered mostly for
the nice and polite tone of public address.
Since the thread is already broken and dead,
Are you questioning the productive meaning of the initial post?
Oh, you're realising the fact there were some replies that you
don't
Off-the-shelf yes, home no, it's just a specialized setup with some odd
requirements. We're fine with paying for good quality components but
there's no need to overpay for something that offers a bunch of stuff we
don't need, especially when we're going to be building several of these.
I'm just
What's your useful idea to bring to other readers?
Since the thread is already broken and dead, I would like to ask who
the hell are you lists-wrant-com user?
I use to read the threads on marc and most of them (maybe all) are
interrupted by emails from this address. The answers are meaningless,
looking forward to your dmesg then
yet the original poster is
obviously looking for COTS consumer electronics general purpose
inexpensive mini-ITX mainboards for home router project.
Off-the-shelf yes, home no, it's just a specialized setup with some odd
requirements. We're fine with paying for good quality components but
yet the original poster is
obviously looking for COTS consumer electronics general purpose
inexpensive mini-ITX mainboards for home router project.
Off-the-shelf yes, home no, it's just a specialized setup with some odd
requirements. We're fine with paying for good quality components but
-* (think virtualisation) extensions, but a router or
storage appliance does not need these.
http://ark.intel.com/products/49490/Intel-Atom-Processor-D525-1M-Cache-1_80-GHz
With a grain of salt as the benchmarks are unreliable source of
performance comparisons (and these promote a utility):
http
ECC RAM always helps in the long term,
It helps yes, but for a router I wonder if it makes a significant
difference.
if the board is collocated
It's in-house.
but I'd not have IMPI serial BIOS (out
of band) access.
Both of those aren't necessary for this project.
If you want to
On 2015-07-28, li...@wrant.com li...@wrant.com wrote:
The 2 LAN GigE ports are enough for a router, one is shared for IPMI.
Shared IPMI is *never* fine IMHO.
The 2 LAN GigE ports are enough for a router, one is shared for IPMI.
Shared IPMI is *never* fine IMHO.
The notion was that 2 ports are enough for a router, though I agree and
have the same sentiment on the shared IPMI port.
Supermicro did not put a standalone IPMI Ethernet port on the
On 2015-07-27 11:22, Quartz wrote:
What's Intel Atom support like these days? I remember they used to be
a little weird. Are they handled pretty much like any other x86 chip
now or are some things still unsupported? Are they capable of handling
pf on a saturated 100-base-t connection? How about
Atom C2000 Host rev 0x02
ppb0 at pci0 dev 1 function 0 Intel Atom C2000 PCIE rev 0x02: msi
pci1 at ppb0 bus 1
ppb1 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 ASPEED Technology AST1150 PCI rev 0x03
pci2 at ppb1 bus 2
vga1 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 ASPEED Technology AST2000 rev 0x30
wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console
What's Intel Atom support like these days? I remember they used to be a
little weird. Are they handled pretty much like any other x86 chip now
or are some things still unsupported? Are they capable of handling pf on
a saturated 100-base-t connection? How about gig-e?
Thanks,
Bryan
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Quartz qua...@sneakertech.com wrote:
I just posted a dmesg from a SuperMicro motherboard with 8-core Intel
Atom C2758.
Yeah, I've heard about that board. I think it's a tad overkill for our
situation though :)
Depending on how you configure
Michael McConville wrote:
(especially when the proxied traffic is TLS-encrypted)
Disregard that clause. It's obviously the end-points that handle TLS
sessions, not the exit relay.
at scsibus2 targ 1 lun 0: ATA, HGST HDN724040AL, MJAO SCSI3 0/direct
fixed naa.5000cca249d4599d
sd1: 3815447MB, 512 bytes/sector, 7814037168 sectors
ahci1 at pci0 dev 24 function 0 Intel Atom C2000 AHCI rev 0x02: msi, AHCI
1.3
scsibus3 at ahci1: 32 targets
sd2 at scsibus3 targ 0 lun 0: ATA, OCZ
I just posted a dmesg from a SuperMicro motherboard with 8-core Intel
Atom C2758.
Yeah, I've heard about that board. I think it's a tad overkill for our
situation though :)
Depending on how you configure your disks the 8-core C2758 should be
able to saturate a single gig-e nic.
Our
FWIW here's the DMESG from the system I just put in place.
pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 vendor Intel, unknown product 0x0bf3 rev 0x04
ehci0: timed out waiting for BIOS
xhci0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0 vendor Etron, unknown product 0x7052
ehci1: timed out waiting for BIOS
I admit
I just deployed an OpenBSD 5.7 firewall/router/dhcp/dns using this motherboard:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157417
It uses the Intel Atom D2550 1.86GHz 2-Core chip and has dual 1000
Mbps Intel NICs on the motherboard. I am running the amd64 binaries
on it and it's
: 3815447MB, 512 bytes/sector, 7814037168 sectors
ahci1 at pci0 dev 24 function 0 Intel Atom C2000 AHCI rev 0x02: msi, AHCI
1.3
scsibus3 at ahci1: 32 targets
sd2 at scsibus3 targ 0 lun 0: ATA, OCZ-VERTEX3, 2.22 SCSI3 0/direct fixed
naa.5e83a97e9c46465c
sd2: 85857MB, 512 bytes/sector, 175836528 sectors
I just deployed an OpenBSD 5.7 firewall/router/dhcp/dns using this motherboard:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157417
As a side question, is that a female usb connector planted vertically
right on the motherboard?
It uses the Intel Atom D2550 1.86GHz 2-Core chip
There's a huge range of Atom processors. Some are 32-bit only single-
core, there are models which are 64-bit capable and multi-core. There are
a wide range of clock speeds, cache sizes, and bus speeds.
I know, I was mainly looking for general opinion about support and
performance. IIRC, back
an OpenBSD 5.7 firewall/router/dhcp/dns using this
motherboard:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813157417
As a side question, is that a female usb connector planted vertically right
on the motherboard?
It uses the Intel Atom D2550 1.86GHz 2-Core chip and has dual 1000
I've been using an atom for a firewall/VPN for a couple of years. Works
great
On Monday, July 27, 2015, Quartz qua...@sneakertech.com wrote:
What's Intel Atom support like these days? I remember they used to be a
little weird. Are they handled pretty much like any other x86 chip now
Here's the dmesg for my Tor exit relay, which runs on a D2700. It moves
about 2.0-4.5 MB/s in each direction.
Hmmm that's nowhere near as fast as what we do, and not even as fast
as a P3.
It seems to be running at full
capacity doing so,
I don't know much about tor. When you say full
Quartz wrote:
Here's the dmesg for my Tor exit relay, which runs on a D2700. It
moves about 2.0-4.5 MB/s in each direction.
Hmmm that's nowhere near as fast as what we do, and not even as
fast as a P3.
Do you have 4,500-7,000 open connections? That slows my machine's
networking down
On 7/27/15 10:22, Quartz wrote:
What's Intel Atom support like these days? I remember they used to be a
little weird. Are they handled pretty much like any other x86 chip now
or are some things still unsupported? Are they capable of handling pf on
a saturated 100-base-t connection? How about gig
Here's the dmesg for my Tor exit relay, which runs on a D2700. It moves
about 2.0-4.5 MB/s in each direction. It seems to be running at full
capacity doing so, but that's with 3,000-5,000 open files and
4,500-7,000 open connections. So, I think you'll be able to get a lot
out of one of these CPUs.
On 2015-07-27, Aaron Poffenberger a...@hypernote.com wrote:
The SuperMicro board I was using has 4 intel nics + a separate IPMI nic.
N.B. on the recent SuperMicro boards I have, if the IPMI nic is
unconnected, standard settings are to run IPMI on the first main
NIC instead. This isn't really
On 7/27/15 14:34, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2015-07-27, Aaron Poffenberger a...@hypernote.com wrote:
The SuperMicro board I was using has 4 intel nics + a separate IPMI nic.
N.B. on the recent SuperMicro boards I have, if the IPMI nic is
unconnected, standard settings are to run IPMI on
Here's the dmesg for my Tor exit relay, which runs on a D2700. It moves
about 2.0-4.5 MB/s in each direction.
Hmmm that's nowhere near as fast as what we do, and not even as fast
as a P3.
I have an N280 1000/1666 MHz netbook which is roughly the same
computation power as a P3 750 MHz
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 7:14 PM, li...@wrant.com wrote:
The D525 is quite older than the new systems suggested in the thread,
and fully saturates the 100 Mbps LAN with SSH so no worries, external
networks is 100 Mbps.
snip
Recommendation for a very capable router are C2750/C2758 Supermicro
Recommendation for a very capable router are C2750/C2758 Supermicro
So, do you think we'd *need* a board like that? The reason I ask is that
they're nearly twice the price of other dual-gigE Atom boards, and the
ECC SODIMMs don't help. If you're saying that an old D525 can handle our
traffic
I am using OpenBSD 5.5 with motherboard Supermicro X9SBAA-F which has
CPU Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU S1260 @ 2.00GHz. Intel's website reports
that my CPU has 2 cores and 4 hardware threads:
http://ark.intel.com/products/71267/Intel-Atom-Processor-S1260-1M-Cache-2_00-GHz
I was using the top command
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 15:51, Ryan wrote:
$ sysctl -a | egrep -i 'hw.machine|hw.model|hw.ncpu'
hw.machine=amd64
hw.model=Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU S1260 @ 2.00GHz
hw.ncpu=1
hw.ncpufound=4
Does this output indicate that my operating system is only using one
core? During the installation
:51, Ryan wrote:
I am using OpenBSD 5.5 with motherboard Supermicro X9SBAA-F which has
CPU Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU S1260 @ 2.00GHz. Intel's website reports that
my CPU has 2 cores and 4 hardware threads:
http://ark.intel.com/products/71267/Intel-Atom-Processor-S1260-1M-Cache-
2_00-GHz
I
On Mon, September 1, 2014 10:46 pm, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 15:51, Ryan wrote:
$ sysctl -a | egrep -i 'hw.machine|hw.model|hw.ncpu'
hw.machine=amd64
hw.model=Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU S1260 @ 2.00GHz
hw.ncpu=1
hw.ncpufound=4
Does this output indicate that my operating
,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE,SSE3,DTES64,MWAIT,DS-CPL,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM,MOVBE,NXE,LONG,LAHF,PERF,ITSC
We only do speedstep if the processor advertises that speedstep is
supported in cpuid (ie there should be a 'EST' flag above).
According to
http://ark.intel.com/products/65470/Intel
' flag above).
According to
http://ark.intel.com/products/65470/Intel-Atom-Processor-D2550-(1M-Cache-1_86-GHz)
it doesn't do speedstep as well.
i386 fakes a table with high/low values for older processors that
still have a fsb, which was mostly used before the code to fetch
tables from acpi
in cpuid (ie there should be a 'EST' flag above).
According to
http://ark.intel.com/products/65470/Intel-Atom-Processor-D2550-(1M-Cache-1_86-GHz)
it doesn't do speedstep as well.
i386 fakes a table with high/low values for older processors that
still have a fsb, which was mostly used
Am 01.05.2014 03:56, schrieb Jonathan Gray:
It wouldn't hurt to check with md5 -tt and/or a power meter
to see if there is actually a difference between
hw.setperf=0 and hw.setperf=100.
hw.setperf=100
16.5 Watt
# md5 -tt
MD5 time trial. Processing 10 1-byte blocks...
Digest =
Am 01.05.2014 05:51, schrieb Thomas Bohl:
Am 01.05.2014 03:56, schrieb Jonathan Gray:
It wouldn't hurt to check with md5 -tt and/or a power meter
to see if there is actually a difference between
hw.setperf=0 and hw.setperf=100.
hw.setperf=100
16.5 Watt
# md5 -tt
MD5 time trial. Processing
Hello List,
I installed 5.5-current, both with i386 and amd64, on a ASRock
AD2550-ITX mainboard [1] which has a Intel Dual-Core Atom D2550 CPU on
board.
On the i386 version sysctl shows the MIB name hw.setperf and therefore
it's possible to throttle the CPU down. The amd64 version on the other
/65470/Intel-Atom-Processor-D2550-(1M-Cache-1_86-GHz)
it doesn't do speedstep as well.
i386 fakes a table with high/low values for older processors that
still have a fsb, which was mostly used before the code to fetch
tables from acpi was added.
Paul B. Henson(hen...@acm.org) on 2013.11.15 15:54:04 -0800:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:25:50PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Don't buy this one (yet). The Marvell 88SE9230 SATA does not work.
i know cause i have one ;-)
Arg, disappointing, but I'm glad I thought to check before buying
On 11/16/2013 00:54, Paul B. Henson wrote:
Does anybody have any suggestions for a good/cheap 2 port SATA
PCI card that supports openbsd?
Maybe just buy the previous model 5015A-*? I have been running one of
those for some years now and it works like a charm. From their website I
see it has
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:34:15AM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
sorry, i mispoke, i meant 5015A-* and they dont have a dedicated ipmi port.
Oh, yah, I've actually got one of those, it's been working great. I was
actually planning on replacing it with this newer one, which supports
more memory
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:27:08PM +0100, Carsten Larsen wrote:
Maybe just buy the previous model 5015A-*? I have been running one of
those for some years now and it works like a charm. From their website I
see it has reached End-of-Life though.
I've actually got one of those, as you say,
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 08:42:50PM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
It's very old. This patch did not make it into the driver and I have
no idea if those chips work through some other change, or not. Likely
not. These older chips must be really buggy pieces of shit if you have
to disable NCQ.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:15:19PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
sorry, i mispoke, i meant 5015A-* and they dont have a dedicated ipmi port.
Oh, yah, I've actually got one of those, it's been working great. I was
actually planning on replacing it with this newer one, which supports
more
I'm looking at a supermicro SuperServer 5017A-EF for openbsd purposes,
it's got an Intel atom S1260 SoC, Marvell 88SE9230 SATA, and i350AM2 dual
gig interfaces.
It looks like i350 support shipped in 5.2, and I'm pretty sure the
Marvell chip is AHCI compliant, so I'd think that would be ok
Paul B. Henson(hen...@acm.org) on 2013.11.15 13:59:19 -0800:
I'm looking at a supermicro SuperServer 5017A-EF for openbsd purposes,
it's got an Intel atom S1260 SoC, Marvell 88SE9230 SATA, and i350AM2 dual
gig interfaces.
It looks like i350 support shipped in 5.2, and I'm pretty sure
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:25:50PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Don't buy this one (yet). The Marvell 88SE9230 SATA does not work.
i know cause i have one ;-)
Arg, disappointing, but I'm glad I thought to check before buying :). Do
you know if anybody's working on it? So much for standard
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:25:50PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Don't buy this one (yet). The Marvell 88SE9230 SATA does not work.
i know cause i have one ;-)
Hmm, looks like support was added in FreeBSD back in June 2012:
Paul B. Henson [hen...@acm.org] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:25:50PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote:
Don't buy this one (yet). The Marvell 88SE9230 SATA does not work.
i know cause i have one ;-)
Hmm, looks like support was added in FreeBSD back in June 2012:
Just an update:
I am able to cat /dev/ttyC0 and cat /dev/ttyC0 and send and get text
both ways.
If I run /usr/klibexec/getty std.9600 /dev/ttyC0, I get nothing. the
only way to get out is ^Z and then kill it.
Also, getty is not running when I start up. I check ps ax and its not there.
Thanks for the response. Unfortunately, I ended up reinstalling 4.6.
I suppose i shouldn't have so I could have figured out the problem.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Miod Vallat m...@online.fr wrote:
Just an update:
I am able to cat /dev/ttyC0 and cat /dev/ttyC0 and send and get text
Just an update:
I am able to cat /dev/ttyC0 and cat /dev/ttyC0 and send and get text
both ways.
If I run /usr/klibexec/getty std.9600 /dev/ttyC0, I get nothing. the
only way to get out is ^Z and then kill it.
Also, getty is not running when I start up. I check ps ax and its not there.
Hi everyone,
I have an Intel D945GSEJT mini-itx motherboard
running 4.6 GENERIC.MP#89 i386.
I have been using it as a server for a while without
a monitor or keyboard and it has been
working just fine. I hooked up a monitor and
keyboard but I don't get a login prompt. If I type on
the keyboard,
,
amounts of lag.
I'm not sure what would be causing this behaviour or how to properly
diagnose it.
The system in question is using the Intel Atom D510MO motherboard (
http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/motherboards/D510MO/D510MO-overview.htm
).
I'm not sure how relevant this is, but the top output
in question is using the Intel Atom D510MO motherboard (
http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/motherboards/D510MO/D510MO-overview.htm
).
I'm not sure how relevant this is, but the top output seems to indicate
something:
load averages: B 1.73, B 0.97, B 0.46
03:18:14
33 processes: B 30 idle, 3
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 03:47:24 -0800
Will Storey wsto...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure how relevant this is, but the top output seems to indicate
something:
Memory: Real: 10M/137M act/tot Free: 845M Swap: 0K/2051M used/tot
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIMECPU
has seemingly varying, but significant,
amounts of lag.
I'm not sure what would be causing this behaviour or how to properly
diagnose it.
The system in question is using the Intel Atom D510MO motherboard (
http://www.intel.com/products/desktop/motherboards/D510MO/D510MO-overview.htm
).
I'm
Use arandom.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 6:47 AM, Will Storey wsto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I was attempting to test temperatures under load by running cat
/dev/urandom file and I thought my system had crashed. Instantly when
this command begins the system becomes very unresponsive. All input
Hi, my openbsd pc started to complain that way when a wire stuck on
the cpu fan. Hope this helps
No uses linux como tu VM para emacs
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Brynet wrote:
Several BIOS updates appear available for your motherboard as well
perhaps one of them will solve the problem
Thanks for the pointer, I had the latest when I looked but I guess 04 came
out since then. In fact, when I went to download it today, it had already
Hi,
You should probably try a -CURRENT snapshot, before reporting problems
you see in 4.6.
Several BIOS updates appear available for your motherboard as well
perhaps one of them will solve the problem, if it's still an issue with
OpenBSD -CURRENT.
Original message from Steve B at 27-9-2008 4:24
Is anyone running OpenBSD on one of these boards? The supported platform
page does not list either the chipset or the CPU so I'm guesing it is not
supported at this time.
I have been running OpenBSD 4.3 for several weeks on an Atom D945GCLF
Is anyone running OpenBSD on one of these boards? The supported platform
page does not list either the chipset or the CPU so I'm guesing it is not
supported at this time.
I have been running OpenBSD 4.3 for several weeks on an Atom D945GCLF
and didn't encounter any problems.
The dmesg
2008/9/26 Steve B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone running OpenBSD on one of these boards? The supported platform
page does not list either the chipset or the CPU so I'm guesing it is not
supported at this time.
Steve
Hi, I got an Acer One that is the same chipset, I will try on thursday to
Andres Genovez wrote:
2008/9/26 Steve B [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone running OpenBSD on one of these boards? The supported platform
page does not list either the chipset or the CPU so I'm guesing it is not
supported at this time.
Steve
Hi, I got an Acer One that is the same chipset, I will
Not yet, but will be by the end of today. I will post a DMESG later.
Steve B wrote:
Is anyone running OpenBSD on one of these boards? The supported platform
page does not list either the chipset or the CPU so I'm guesing it is not
supported at this time.
Steve
.
Is anyone running OpenBSD on one of these boards? The supported platform
page does not list either the chipset or the CPU so I'm guesing it is not
supported at this time.
Steve
73 matches
Mail list logo
