Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-17 Thread Duncan Patton a Campbell
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:40:32 +0200 Tor Houghton t...@bogus.net wrote: On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 04:15:51AM +, Miod Vallat wrote: This whole thread is actually one more proof that nobody ever reads the installation notes (INSTALL.*). Miod Oooh, you've just identified a space-saving

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-06 Thread Tor Houghton
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 04:15:51AM +, Miod Vallat wrote: This whole thread is actually one more proof that nobody ever reads the installation notes (INSTALL.*). Miod Oooh, you've just identified a space-saving measure! *ducks*

New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Hi, I try to keep the actual partition of the disk as it was before and do a fresh install, but the snapshots looks like simply do not allow this now. You can select Custom label and it will show the previous label, but then when you write it, obviously no changes are present, but when you Quit

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Theo de Raadt
I try to keep the actual partition of the disk as it was before and do a fresh install, but the snapshots looks like simply do not allow this now. You can select Custom label and it will show the previous label, but then when you write it, obviously no changes are present, but when you Quit

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Daniel Ouellet
No label changes. Wait. Don't you see what is wrong above? Let me guess. The last time you used this disk, partition d was your /home partition, right, and i is /var? Nope. Here is the standard setup on a truck load of servers. All use the same partition table, unless there is a very

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Theo de Raadt
Let me guess. The last time you used this disk, partition d was your /home partition, right, and i is /var? Nope. Here is the standard setup on a truck load of servers. All use the same partition table, unless there is a very special need. How would we know that? You are doing an

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Daniel Ouellet
You need to learn how to listen. That's fair Theo. But to make it short. Before when at the disklabel part of the install, one could just type 'q' and it was then asked for the mount point of that actual unchanged partition as before and skip the 'm' steps if you want. Now you can't just type

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Theo de Raadt
You need to learn how to listen. That's fair Theo. But to make it short. Before when at the disklabel part of the install, one could just type 'q' and it was then asked for the mount point of that actual unchanged partition as before and skip the 'm' steps if you want. You still are

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Brynet
Daniel, As made quite clear in Theo's post, a disklabel does not contain any information about mount points. All of the partitions you created in 4.5 exist, but the installer does not know where to mount them, or even if you want to. In 4.6 selecting (C)ustom layout will show you what's

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Theo de Raadt
You *NEED* to use 'm' to define mount points, this information will be passed to the installer and won't be retained on-disk. Or 'n' There is a reason why the installer disklabel and fdisk commands both have a 'M' command in them, to show the manual page. Hopefully you are now aware of the

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Brynet
Theo de Raadt wrote: Or 'n' Thank you. There is a reason why the installer disklabel and fdisk commands both have a 'M' command in them, to show the manual page. I agree, that is a handy shortcut. :-) I am not being sarcastic. B I truly am sick of having my time wasted. Many people get

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Matthew Clarke
Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 10:13:05PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet may have written: You need to learn how to listen. That's fair Theo. But to make it short. Before when at the disklabel part of the install, one could just type 'q' and it was then asked for the mount point of that actual unchanged

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Brynet
Hi Daniel, It appears as if you're still confused. Specifiy the mount points within disklabel using 'm' or 'n' has been standard proceedure for some time. Some users skipped this and waited for the confirmation prompts after quiting disklabel. This was deemed redundant, users can already

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Hi Matthew Use 'n' instead of 'm' to provide the needed mount points. That address my question. An obvious over site on my part! I never used it until today as far back as version 2.8. With the old installer, while in the disk label editor, you could name your mount points while creating

Re: New disklable doesn't keep old partitions if requested

2009-07-05 Thread Miod Vallat
This whole thread is actually one more proof that nobody ever reads the installation notes (INSTALL.*). Miod