Re: high-end audio drivers [was: OSS audio drivers]

2007-10-23 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:55:39AM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > > > What is the relation of OpenBSD's audio drivers to the OSS project? > > > What, if anything, does opensourcing (GPL, I know) their code mean for > > > our audio drivers? In particular, does that mean (future) support for > > > the hig

high-end audio drivers [was: OSS audio drivers]

2007-10-23 Thread Jan Stary
> > What is the relation of OpenBSD's audio drivers to the OSS project? > > What, if anything, does opensourcing (GPL, I know) their code mean for > > our audio drivers? In particular, does that mean (future) support for > > the high-end soundcards such as M-Audio Delta? > > There's work in progre

Re: OSS audio drivers

2007-10-23 Thread Alexandre Ratchov
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 12:25:03PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > > What is the relation of OpenBSD's audio drivers to the OSS project? > What, if anything, does opensourcing (GPL, I know) their code mean for > our audio drivers? In particular, does that mean (future) support for > the high-end soundca

Re: OSS audio drivers

2007-10-23 Thread Jacob Meuser
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 03:32:07PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > > > What is the relation of OpenBSD's audio drivers to the OSS project? > > > What, if anything, does opensourcing (GPL, I know) their code mean for > > > our audio drivers? In particular, does that mean (future) support for > > > the hig

Re: OSS audio drivers

2007-10-23 Thread Edd Barrett
On 23/10/2007, Jan Stary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which underlying hardware driver does it use? uaudio -- Best Regards Edd --- http://students.dec.bournemouth.ac.uk/ebarrett

Re: OSS audio drivers

2007-10-23 Thread Jan Stary
> > What is the relation of OpenBSD's audio drivers to the OSS project? > > What, if anything, does opensourcing (GPL, I know) their code mean for > > our audio drivers? In particular, does that mean (future) support for > > the high-end soundcards such as M-Audio Delta? > > OpenBSD uses an implem

Re: OSS audio drivers

2007-10-23 Thread Theo de Raadt
That code is not free enough for us to use, and therefore we don't use it. that's the whole story. > this is to clarify (for me, anyway) the status of > audio drivers present in the (recently GPLed) OSS. > http://www.opensound.com/osshw.html > > What is the relation of OpenBSD's audio drivers to

Re: OSS audio drivers

2007-10-23 Thread Edd Barrett
Hi, On 23/10/2007, Jan Stary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > this is to clarify (for me, anyway) the status of > audio drivers present in the (recently GPLed) OSS. > http://www.opensound.com/osshw.html > > What is the relation of OpenBSD's audio drivers to the OSS project? > What, if anyt

OSS audio drivers

2007-10-23 Thread Jan Stary
Hi all, this is to clarify (for me, anyway) the status of audio drivers present in the (recently GPLed) OSS. http://www.opensound.com/osshw.html What is the relation of OpenBSD's audio drivers to the OSS project? What, if anything, does opensourcing (GPL, I know) their code mean for our audio dri