: OT: Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest,
atleast on embedded systems.
To: misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org
Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2011, 10:23 AM
[Other shit removed to concentrate on the ignorance of the last line.]
Any hacker not knowing a couple of Lisp macros
I believe SICP has much culture but not always so great style.
I'm not learning lisp.
Who are you to know of all lisp learners ?
Why are you associating lisp with functional programming ? CL in itself is
not really functional, but being a metalanguage you can make it so. You
could also make it
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 03:58:40 +0200, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
I believe SICP has much culture but not always so great style.
I'm not learning lisp.
Who are you to know of all lisp learners ?
Why are you associating lisp with functional programming ? CL in itself is
not really functional, but
+1
--- On Wed, 6/8/11, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
From: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
Subject: Re: OT: Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest,
atleast on embedded systems.
To: Nicholas Marriott nicholas.marri...@gmail.com
Cc: Thomas de Grivel billi
I'm not really selling anything. I'm seeing a deeply rooted bug in our
way of thinking programming languages. Struggling is not necessary
unless you want to punish yourself.
My experience, and I feel I have enough in C to speak untroubled, is
that not all languages are like C when it comes to
Like I said before, there is amply enough work in the ports tree for lisp
hackers.
Go work on porting clisp to other OpenBSD architectures. Give us something
concrete.
Talk is very, very cheap.
:
From: Thomas de Grivel billi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT: Re: Seems OpenBSD isn't absolutely alone in it's quest,
atleast on embedded systems.
To: misc@openbsd.org misc@openbsd.org
Date: Wednesday, June 8, 2011, 10:23 AM
[Other shit removed to concentrate on the ignorance of the last line.]
Any
Before even thinking of fixing it i'm trying to see if i'm alone in my
quest. I like code correctness and feel what's done in OpenBSD is epic given
the shitty language all the devs are dealing with. I love this much epic.
Now if you want to know what code I'm writing, first I'm writing english
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 12:08:26PM +0200, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
Before even thinking of fixing it i'm trying to see if i'm alone in my
quest. I like code correctness and feel what's done in OpenBSD is epic given
the shitty language all the devs are dealing with. I love this much epic.
I
On 7 June 2011 07:08, Thomas de Grivel billi...@gmail.com wrote:
Before even thinking of fixing it i'm trying to see if i'm alone in my
quest. I like code correctness and feel what's done in OpenBSD is epic given
the shitty language all the devs are dealing with. I love this much epic.
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:19:11AM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
[...]
Now, think again, parsing a language is nice, but it's almost never
the most important thing.
You also should not try to convert old school unix hackers into
lispers, there may be rape.
s/may be/will be/
--
You are either trolling or just very mixed up, the important thing is
not how quickly machines can parse it or how quickly you can write a
lexer but how quickly humans can parse it and what they can do with
it. C is not the best here but it is way ahead of any kind of useless
functional language.
On Jun 7, 2011, at 19:46, Nicholas Marriott nicholas.marri...@gmail.com
wrote:
You are either trolling or just very mixed up, the important thing is
not how quickly machines can parse it or how quickly you can write a
lexer but how quickly humans can parse it and what they can do with
it. C
You are either trolling or just very mixed up, the important thing is
not how quickly machines can parse it or how quickly you can write a
lexer but how quickly humans can parse it and what they can do with
it. C is not the best here but it is way ahead of any kind of useless
functional
14 matches
Mail list logo
