On 08/01/06 22:57, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
this is the funniest post i've read on misc@ in a while.
That was why I put Amen below it...
..
sounds like it's already under way with google monitor me six ways from sunday
desktop. overt centralization of anything is dangerous, especially
2006/8/2, chefren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 08/01/06 22:57, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
this is the funniest post i've read on misc@ in a while.
That was why I put Amen below it...
..
A little bit of trolling never hurts anyone ;)
On Tuesday 01 August 2006 15:04, Andrew Pinski wrote:
I'm becoming slightly more cynical about testing any piece of C code with
optimization turned on in GCC.
And you think this will be different with anyother compiler, you have to
be joking.
-- Pinski
a GCC developer that actually tries
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:32:45PM -0300, Andr??s wrote:
We should convince both the Free Software Foundation and the Open
Source Initiative that Lucent Public License Version 1.02 is not a
free software license. Mainly based in Theo's arguments*.
This paragraph says it all:
And come on
On 08/01/06 16:48, Anton Karpov wrote:
This world sucks. We're living in a dark ages, playing with the same
technologies as 20 years ago. UNIX is still here. Gcc is still here. C is
still here. And it will always be the same.
This world needs something really new. Maybe nuclear war is the
Original message
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 19:19:11 +0200
From: chefren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OpenBSD's own compiler
To: misc@openbsd.org
On 08/01/06 16:48, Anton Karpov wrote:
This world sucks. We're living in a dark ages, playing with the same
technologies as 20 years ago
Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:37:46 +0200
From: Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: OpenBSD's own compiler
...
I am curently studying the Ada programming language and I read about the
different safety demands, which has been made
Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I read about how Ada is been used in all areas where safety is of great
issue, and about how it's being used in rockets, Boing Airplanes and so on
because of it's high level of safety.
What I understood from it is, that the demand and control upon compilers,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 02:12:47PM +0100, Steve Fairhead wrote:
Rico Secada [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I read about how Ada is been used in all areas where safety is of great
issue, and about how it's being used in rockets, Boing Airplanes and so on
because of it's high level of safety.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering, would it be a stupid and bad idea, for the
OpenBSD team to
develope, an OpenBSD C compiler based upon the OpenBSD security
knowledge
and internal standards regarding the language?
yeah we will just drop everything we do now,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:35:29AM -0500, R. Tyler Ballance wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering, would it be a stupid and bad idea, for the
OpenBSD team to
develope, an OpenBSD C compiler based upon the OpenBSD security
knowledge
and internal standards
On 7/31/06, R. Tyler Ballance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeeez, talk about an overreaction to the suggestion. [...] It's not that far
fetched of an idea
Given the times that this question popped up in the archives, Mickey's
reaction isn't too surprising. From the past discussions, I gather
that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 31, 2006, at 1:32 PM, Rogier Krieger wrote:
On 7/31/06, R. Tyler Ballance [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeeez, talk about an overreaction to the suggestion. [...] It's
not that far
fetched of an idea
Given the times that this question
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 10:35:29AM -0500, R. Tyler Ballance wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I was wondering, would it be a stupid and bad idea, for the
OpenBSD team to
develope, an OpenBSD C compiler based upon the OpenBSD security
knowledge
and internal standards
On 7/31/06, Andris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should convince both the Free Software Foundation and the Open
Source Initiative that Lucent Public License Version 1.02 is not a
free software license. Mainly based in Theo's arguments*.
* [9fans] The new ridiculous license
Section 4 (commercial distribution) with its beautiful certain
responsibilities is still there.
Section 7 (export control) is still there.
On 7/31/06, Ted Unangst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/31/06, AndrC)s [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We should convince both the Free Software Foundation and the
On 7/31/06, David Leung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not a regular GCC user, but my recent experience with it has been quite
bitter. Recently I came across a piece of code that only produces correct
results with optimization turned on.
Yeah, that's not an uncommon result of code that doesn't
Hi
I am curently studying the Ada programming language and I read about the
different safety demands, which has been made a standard, upon compilers.
I read about how Ada is been used in all areas where safety is of great issue,
and about how it's being used in rockets, Boing Airplanes and so
An OpenBSD C compiler from scratch, AFAIK, is not an idea of the
project. Today, I read about Theo's interest in Plan 9' C compiler.
But, there are license problems, so, that is not possible; at least,
right now.
A source tree in Ada, I think, would be safer. But maybe it is not as
19 matches
Mail list logo
