On 2018-10-16, def...@posteo.de wrote:
> Hello,
>
> FreeBSD is already on the Pi 2. Does OpenBSD 6.3 Support Raspberry Pi 2
> Model B?
It doesn't. See https://www.openbsd.org/armv7.html for the supported
hardware for the 32-bit ARM port.
There is some support for r
Hello,
FreeBSD is already on the Pi 2. Does OpenBSD 6.3 Support Raspberry Pi 2
Model B?
Many Thx.
Theo de Raadt cvs.openbsd.org> writes:
>
> >>My two cents:
> >>https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc=132788027403910=2
> >
> >Sorry, but this thread is nonsense for me.
> >How exactly people on this thread can claim about "no support for RPI"
> >when OpenBSD Project support all the Intel
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
Cheaper toys:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40_sacat=0_nkw=toy_sop=15rt=nc
That being funny and all, if there are any devs that want a rPIv2 to
play with, I'll be more than happy paying for it (and shipping).
On 2015-02-02, Janne Johansson icepic...@gmail.com wrote:
But it still requires a blob to actually run, does it not?
Not sure... It's no different on the 2 than the original pi (same GPU/boot
mechanism), but there is a project https://github.com/jncronin/rpi-boot which
claims to be an
Hello
I haven't know that Raspberry Pi is so closed that it requires closed source
blob to even boot. Thanks for responses. I am not going to buy Raspberry Pi 2
any more (or at least when blob will be open source).
Have a good day.
If you really do want a BSD on your Pi, use FreeBSD, I've successfully
installed FreeBSD on my original Pi.
There has been a line drawn by the OpenBSD developers, for the reasons they
have stated and its a fair decision and unless someone else wants to fork
OpenBSD, we'll just have to accept it
On 03/02/15 03:20, Janne Johansson wrote:
But it still requires a blob to actually run, does it not?
The fact that there is docs for the blob isn't as important as being forced
to have someone elses code running alongside your kernel in order to even
boot it, let alone produce graphics on
My two cents:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=132788027403910w=2
Sorry, but this thread is nonsense for me.
How exactly people on this thread can claim about no support for RPI
when OpenBSD Project support all the Intel Technology, running tons of
microcode?
Don't make sense for me and seems a
So, I can't resist to ask, Raspberry Pi is the answer to what question?
On 03/02/15 12:49, Mihai Popescu wrote:
So, I can't resist to ask, Raspberry Pi is the answer to what question?
It is a toy. Cheap. Can do simple computing tasks cheaper than
anything else.
Worik
--
Why is the legal status of chardonnay different to that of cannabis?
Am 02.02.2015 um 22:35 schrieb worik:
On 03/02/15 03:20, Janne Johansson wrote:
But it still requires a blob to actually run, does it not?
The fact that there is docs for the blob isn't as important as being forced
to have someone elses code running alongside your kernel in order to even
Hi
New version of Raspberry Pi is announced. Its SoC have four cores in Cortex-A7
microarchitecture so it is compatible with ARMv7. It also have 1 GB of RAM.
Have the same GPU as its predecessor: VideoCore IV 3d. For some time GPU have
open documentation and open (BSD licence) driver in Linux
But it still requires a blob to actually run, does it not?
The fact that there is docs for the blob isn't as important as being forced
to have someone elses code running alongside your kernel in order to even
boot it, let alone produce graphics on it.
2015-02-02 13:47 GMT+01:00 Lampshade
On 03/02/15 12:49, Mihai Popescu wrote:
So, I can't resist to ask, Raspberry Pi is the answer to what question?
It is a toy. Cheap. Can do simple computing tasks cheaper than
anything else.
Cheaper toys:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40_sacat=0_nkw=toy_sop=15rt=nc
Thomas Pi
My two cents:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=132788027403910w=2
Sorry, but this thread is nonsense for me.
How exactly people on this thread can claim about no support for RPI
when OpenBSD Project support all the Intel Technology, running tons of
microcode?
Don't make sense for me and seems a
Am 02.02.2015 um 15:20 schrieb Janne Johansson:
But it still requires a blob to actually run, does it not?
The fact that there is docs for the blob isn't as important as being forced
to have someone elses code running alongside your kernel in order to even
boot it, let alone produce graphics
Hi Einfach,
On 2 February 2015 at 07:43, Einfach Jemand rru@gmail.com wrote:
Am 02.02.2015 um 15:20 schrieb Janne Johansson:
But it still requires a blob to actually run, does it not?
The fact that there is docs for the blob isn't as important as being forced
to have someone elses code
There is a difference in code that runs in the cpu of your hard drive and
code running in your CPU to allow talking to the hard drive.
From what I recall, the RPI GPU stuff falls into the second category,
whereas hard drives normally falls into the first.
One of them is just stuff that makes the
19 matches
Mail list logo
