On 9/9/06, Martin Schrvder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not if you use rsnapshot.
Memory use in rsync scales linearly with the number
of files being synced. Hence, any backup app that's
calls rsync on large trees will hit this limitation and
die a horrible death.
I hit this limit on a 300GB fs
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:39:57AM +0530, Raja Subramanian wrote:
rdiff-backup however, does not suffer from this problem.
And it's a bit more space efficient than rsnapshot as
well. Give it a shot and I doubt you'll be disappointed.
I've had an experimental port of rdiff-backup 1.0.4 and
On 9/10/06, Will Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 11:39:57AM +0530, Raja Subramanian wrote:
rdiff-backup however, does not suffer from this problem.
And it's a bit more space efficient than rsnapshot as
well. Give it a shot and I doubt you'll be disappointed.
I've had
Hi Joachim,
On 09/09/2006, at 10:02 AM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
And seriously, how does one manage to fill a TB of data?
video, lossless-compressed music, backups from a bunch
of machines, none of our business really (-:
I'll grant you the latter, but still... well, let's just say that
On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 15:58:54 +1000, Shane J Pearson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi Joachim,
On 09/09/2006, at 10:02 AM, Joachim Schipper wrote:
And seriously, how does one manage to fill a TB of data?
video, lossless-compressed music, backups from a bunch
of machines, none of our business
2006/9/9, Benjamin Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mix). In a development environment in which one might have multiple
working copies of a large repository (such as OpenBSD's src), all
those backups add up, and fast.
Not if you use rsnapshot.
Best
Martin
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:33:56PM +0200, Martin Schr?der wrote:
2006/9/9, Benjamin Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mix). In a development environment in which one might have multiple
working copies of a large repository (such as OpenBSD's src), all
those backups add up, and fast.
Not if you use
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 04:00:20PM +0200, Francois Slabbert wrote:
Hi misc,
I'm looking to build soho development and storage server, what would be the
most stable current hardware configuration.
I was thinking of along the lines of:
* Intel 945G motherboard
* Celeron CPU
* 512MB of
I was thinking of along the lines of:
* Intel 945G motherboard
* LSI Megaraid SATA-6
Try and get a BBU for that MegaRAID card...
MegaRAID SATA 150-6 will be happier on a PCI-X motherboard
(this is _not_ the same thing as PCI-Express).
(MegaRAID SATA 300-8x requires PCI-X).
I've just
Joachim Schipper wrote:
Try mine: refurbished Dell Optiplex GX1, 400 MHz Pentium II, 128 MB
memory, and two matching pairs of harddisks (6.1 and 4 GB) with a
combination of RAIDframe, altroot, and regular backups guaranteeing data
consistency. Runs mail, DNS, web, and a couple of other services,
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 08:26:24PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
I was thinking of along the lines of:
* Intel 945G motherboard
* LSI Megaraid SATA-6
* 512MB of RAM
* 1+ TB of disk
...and be sure to split the disk into smaller partitions
unless you want to buy more RAM, fsck
And seriously, how does one manage to fill a TB of data?
/rant
DVB.
On 2006/09/08 20:26, I wrote:
I've just noticed there is a new 4-lane PCI-Express SATA card
listed on LSI's website:
http://www.lsilogic.com/products/megaraid_sata/megaraid_sata_300_8elp.html
...though the 8308ELP which is definitely listed in mfi(4)
and supports both SAS and SATA-II drives
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 08:49:06PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
And seriously, how does one manage to fill a TB of data?
Quite easily, if you do daily, weekly, and monthly backups. My group
at work doesn't do daily, but we do something like MWF, weekly,
monthly, with tapes done weekly and
14 matches
Mail list logo
