Re: vether(4) use case

2010-06-23 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote: This will not work because em0 is having the clonable route for 172.16.0/24 and so arp is unable to work on vether0 since you created an addressing conflict. Thank you for your response. I have been testing it

Re: vether(4) use case

2010-06-23 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:16:43AM -0400, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote: On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote: This will not work because em0 is having the clonable route for 172.16.0/24 and so arp is unable to work on vether0 since you created an

Re: vether(4) use case

2010-06-23 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote: I am having a hard time getting a non-encrypted gif(4) tunnel working. Can anyone share a working config? I think if I can get gif(4) working right then I can get vether(4) working as well. Thanks again! ifconfig

Re: vether(4) use case

2010-06-23 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister
I knew it was something stupid. I added set skip on { gif0 vether0 } to pf.conf for testing and everything started working. Sorry for the noise. Bryan

Re: vether(4) use case

2010-06-23 Thread Bryan Vyhmeister
I do have one more question. I have the config below. I can ping the vether0 address from the other side of the tunnel from either host. Also, all IP addresses mentioned are publicly routable. On host1: ifconfig em0 1.1.1.1/24 up ifconfig gif0 tunnel 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 up ifconfig vether0

Re: vether(4) use case

2010-06-20 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:31:18PM -0400, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote: I am testing vether(4) and I am wondering if this is a use case that should work. ifconfig em0 172.16.0.10/24 up ifconfig bridge0 create ifconfig vether0 create ifconfig bridge0 add em0 add vether0 up ifconfig vether0