On Tue, Jun 04, 2024 at 08:31:04AM -0400, Scott Reese wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > I have really bad repetitive stress problems, so I have been looking at
> > split mechanical keyboards. The Glove80 looks might it might be OK, but
> > it's very expensive. Anyone used it?
> >
>
- Original Message -
> I have really bad repetitive stress problems, so I have been looking at
> split mechanical keyboards. The Glove80 looks might it might be OK, but
> it's very expensive. Anyone used it?
>
>
> After watching various reviews, it
On 02/06/2024 02:10, Chris Bennett wrote:
I have really bad repetitive stress problems, so I have been looking at
split mechanical keyboards. The Glove80 looks might it might be OK, but
it's very expensive. Anyone used it?
After watching various reviews, it
I have really bad repetitive stress problems, so I have been looking at
split mechanical keyboards. The Glove80 looks might it might be OK, but
it's very expensive. Anyone used it?
After watching various reviews, it suddenly occurred to me that I
already have
You are probably haunted by a bad issue with DMA memory and running out of
it. Your top is missing -SH since then you would probably see the
pagedameon go bananas. The problem is you have not enough memory below 4G
but the pagedaemon is not able to properly free memory there since it has
no
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:37:24PM +, James Cook wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 08:00:37AM GMT, Nick Holland wrote:
> > On 5/23/24 03:18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > On 2024-05-22, James Cook wrote:
> > > > One of my OpenBSD boxes sometimes gets in a weird locked-up or
> > > >
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 08:00:37AM GMT, Nick Holland wrote:
On 5/23/24 03:18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2024-05-22, James Cook wrote:
One of my OpenBSD boxes sometimes gets in a weird locked-up or
almost-locked-up state. I'm wondering what I can do to debug it
further next time it happens.
On 5/23/24 03:18, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2024-05-22, James Cook wrote:
One of my OpenBSD boxes sometimes gets in a weird locked-up or
almost-locked-up state. I'm wondering what I can do to debug it
further next time it happens.
...
I would also expect the cache number to be much higher.
On 2024-05-22, James Cook wrote:
> One of my OpenBSD boxes sometimes gets in a weird locked-up or
> almost-locked-up state. I'm wondering what I can do to debug it
> further next time it happens.
...
> I would also expect the cache number to be much higher. E.g. on
> this occasion, I was running
Hi,
One of my OpenBSD boxes sometimes gets in a weird locked-up or
almost-locked-up state. I'm wondering what I can do to debug it
further next time it happens.
It feels like swap thrashing, but top reports plenty of memory free.
Symptoms:
1. top reports lots of free memory, small act/tot
Maybe look at Meshcentral as an alternative to Rustdesk. It allows proxying
over https OOTB.
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 at 19:30, Kasak wrote:
>
>
> > 3 марта 2024 г., в 00:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling
> написал(а):
> >
> > ssh can work in tap VPN mode (ssh -w) and will tunnel udp fine ; I'm not
> > sure
> 3 марта 2024 г., в 00:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling написал(а):
>
> ssh can work in tap VPN mode (ssh -w) and will tunnel udp fine ; I'm not
> sure what you are trying to achieve but perhaps ssh tunnels might be an
> option for your use case. You are probably better off setting up something
>
ssh can work in tap VPN mode (ssh -w) and will tunnel udp fine ; I'm not
sure what you are trying to achieve but perhaps ssh tunnels might be an
option for your use case. You are probably better off setting up something
like wireguard, but in a pinch if the target and host already have ssh.
> 2 марта 2024 г., в 21:05, Stuart Henderson
> написал(а):
>
> On 2024-03-02, Kasak wrote:
>> Hello misc! There is a good manual on OpenBSD faq about redirection and
>> reflection, here it is: https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html#tcpproxy
>>
>> I’m using nginx as tcp and udp proxy,
On 2024-03-02, Kasak wrote:
> Hello misc! There is a good manual on OpenBSD faq about redirection and
> reflection, here it is: https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html#tcpproxy
>
> I’m using nginx as tcp and udp proxy, but maybe there is another software,
> more suitable for this task?
> I
> 2 марта 2024 г., в 19:17, Kapetanakis Giannis
> написал(а):
>
> On 02/03/2024 16:50, Kasak wrote:
>>
2 марта 2024 г., в 15:21, Kapetanakis Giannis
написал(а):
>>>
>>> On 02/03/2024 12:46, Kasak wrote:
Hello misc! There is a good manual on OpenBSD faq about redirection
On 02/03/2024 12:46, Kasak wrote:
Hello misc! There is a good manual on OpenBSD faq about redirection and
reflection, here it is: https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html#tcpproxy
I’m using nginx as tcp and udp proxy, but maybe there is another software, more
suitable for this task?
I need to
Hello misc! There is a good manual on OpenBSD faq about redirection and
reflection, here it is: https://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/rdr.html#tcpproxy
I’m using nginx as tcp and udp proxy, but maybe there is another software, more
suitable for this task?
I need to redirect and reflect near 15 tcp
Oooo I wasn't familiar with sniproxy. I DO have a working haproxy
configuration,
and even though it is good software, I find myself barely understanding
and was
wanting something simpler. sniproxy looks to be exactly what I need :)
I'm going
to give this a try. Thank you for pointing this
On 2023-10-10, Courtney wrote:
> Maybe I am wrong, but I thought that relayd was not capable of doing
> TLS pass through? That would be preferable if it is possible.
If you do TLS passthrough (i.e. passing packets directly to the origin
rather than doing "back to back" and terminating one TLS
Maybe I am wrong, but I thought that relayd was not capable of doing
TLS pass through? That would be preferable if it is possible.
Courtney
On 10/9/23 00:42, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 08/10/2023 04:00, Courtney wrote:
Ultimately, I want to serve a handful of services on 80/443 that are
On 08/10/2023 04:00, Courtney wrote:
> Ultimately, I want to serve a handful of services on 80/443 that are
> easily accessible internally and externally, and I don't want to have
> unencrypted traffic between relayd and my server for the services that
> are passing sessions and such.
Then don't
On 08.10.2023 03:00, Courtney wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm seeking an ideal way to make secure https connections to a handful
of
web servers in my house. Currently I have a Nextcloud server and a
gitea
server, but only the Nextcloud server is being port forwarded on
80/443.
I want to make my
On 10/7/2023 9:00 PM, Courtney wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm seeking an ideal way to make secure https connections to a handful of
web servers in my house.
I'm currently doing this with haproxy by having it inspect the SNI on
the incoming traffic and route based on that. At the time I set it
Hello everyone,
I'm seeking an ideal way to make secure https connections to a handful of
web servers in my house. Currently I have a Nextcloud server and a gitea
server, but only the Nextcloud server is being port forwarded on 80/443.
I want to make my gitea server publicly visible as well as a
Hi,
I have finally been able to get a decent desktop and a new 4k monitor.
I use fvwm2 right now (probably fvwm3 soon).
Another new user will be using gnome.
Both of us are in wheel group.
First, do I need to use xenodm with either fvwm? Or will startx do the
trick?
Second, it sounds like using
On 3/13/22 11:06 AM, Ted Wynnychenko wrote:
Hello
I "had" been following -current since about 5.6.
Unfortunately, due to events not at all related to anything here, I was
unable to keep -current "current" for the last several months.
I would guess my last update was about 8 months ago (6.9
On 2022-03-10, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hi,
> Owasp has some cheat sheets for hardening PHP configurations,
>
> https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/PHP_Configuration_Cheat_Sheet.html
>
> you can combine it with httpd which would run the php app and website
> inside a chroot jail,
>
> you can
serious security is taken in Go. I would suspect a lot better (simpler
> language, daily usage by Google and many other big companies,
> involvement of Ken, Rob, and others), but that is just assumptions. Any
> advice on that?
>
> I know how OpenBSD chroots the webserver and thereby PH
TI boot-loader cannot find
> >> the OS boot-loader??? not that it can't find itself.
> >
> > So, I have actually tried to power up the device without pressing the
> > button by the SD card reader. That also resulted in a bunch of "C"s.
> >
> > Any
Hi Stuart and David,
Thank you to you both for the amount of time and advice you have provided.
I am away from my BBB for a couple of days. As soon as I get back to it,
I will try out a few things, based on advice from both of you.
I will update after that.
Thank you.
joseph
On Wed, May 26
On Tue, 25 May 2021 08:29:52 -0700
Joseph Olatt wrote:
[Accidentally dropped CC… re-sending]
> Any advice on how I cat get to the U-Boot (which is what I presume you
> mean by the "TI boot-loader") prompt?
Nope, by "TI boot-loader", I mean "TI boot-load
??? (yes, half asleep this morning)??? TI boot-loader cannot find
> the OS boot-loader??? not that it can't find itself.
So, I have actually tried to power up the device without pressing the
button by the SD card reader. That also resulted in a bunch of "C"s.
Any advice on how I cat get to the U
>> To clarify??? (yes, half asleep this morning)??? TI boot-loader cannot find
>> the OS boot-loader??? not that it can't find itself.
>
> So, I have actually tried to power up the device without pressing the
> button by the SD card reader. That also resulted in a bunch of "
On Tue, 25 May 2021 09:38:21 +1000
Stuart Longland wrote:
> Maybe it can't find the boot-loader?
To clarify… (yes, half asleep this morning)… TI boot-loader cannot find
the OS boot-loader… not that it can't find itself.
--
Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)
I haven't lost my mind...
On Mon, 24 May 2021 07:54:38 -0700
Joseph Olatt wrote:
> Any advice on what those "C"s mean. The serial cable I'm using is:
>
Something in the back of my mind suggests this might be the TI
bootloader complaining, about something. Maybe it can't find the
boot-loader?
--
Stua
in the instructions, I get lines of "C"s. This happens at only
115200 baud rate. At all other baud rates, I get nothing.
Any advice on what those "C"s mean. The serial cable I'm using is:
https://www.amazon.com/GearMo%C2%AE-3-3v-Header-like-TTL-232R-3V3/dp/B004LBXO2A/
Thank you.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 1:14 AM Nick Holland
wrote:
>
> On 2020-11-20 17:15, Erik Lauritsen wrote:
> > Is it recommended to run some kind of intrusion detection on an
> > OpenBSD router/firewall?
> >
> > I suspect that any kind of system like Snort or Suricata will give a
> > lot of false
> 22. nov. 2020 kl. 02:02 skrev Predrag Punosevac :
> OpenBSD is all about prevention and exploit mitigation. Code simplicity,
> correctness, and code audit are all examples of intrusion prevention
> methods. They don't sound very sexy :-) If you are super new to OpenBSD
> Peter just gave a
On 2020-11-20 17:15, Erik Lauritsen wrote:
> Is it recommended to run some kind of intrusion detection on an
> OpenBSD router/firewall?
>
What do you mean by "some kind of intrusion detection" (IDS). At the
risk of sounding patronizing I would start by clarifying terminology.
I got confused by
On 2020-11-20 17:15, Erik Lauritsen wrote:
> Is it recommended to run some kind of intrusion detection on an
> OpenBSD router/firewall?
>
> I suspect that any kind of system like Snort or Suricata will give a
> lot of false positives?
MY philosophy is it is much easier to keep 'em out than to
Is it recommended to run some kind of intrusion detection on an OpenBSD
router/firewall?
I suspect that any kind of system like Snort or Suricata will give a lot of
false positives?
Kind regards,
Erik
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 09:48:04AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> Guesses can be made, but a quick email might get a more accurate
> answer :) "Hi, I see you are padding your announcements at $IX and we
> are seeing you from other peers with the same path length, would you
> prefer we send to
On 2020-08-25, Remi Locherer wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 07:11:12AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2020-08-24, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:36:10PM +, Laura Smith wrote:
>> >> *> N 2001:db8:::/29 2001:db8::::1 100 100
>> >>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 07:11:12AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020-08-24, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:36:10PM +, Laura Smith wrote:
> >> *> N 2001:db8:::/29 2001:db8::::1 100 100
> >> 64512 65500 i
> >> * N 2001:db8:::/29
On 2020-08-24, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:36:10PM +, Laura Smith wrote:
>> *> N 2001:db8:::/29 2001:db8::::1 100 100 64512
>> 65500 i
>> * N 2001:db8:::/29 2001:db8::::2 100 100 65500
>> 65500 i
>>
>> In this
Hi,
Let's say I've got a scenario where I've got transit ISPs and peering
connections.
My general config rule is that I use med to prioritise peering over transit
(because localpref is too high up in the BGP selection algorithm, so localpref
is a sledgehammer to crack a nut).
That setup has
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:36:10PM +, Laura Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Let's say I've got a scenario where I've got transit ISPs and peering
> connections.
>
> My general config rule is that I use med to prioritise peering over transit
> (because localpref is too high up in the BGP selection
Hi,
I'm looking for a bit of help on how to write a sensible and safe (i.e. avoid
race conditions) ifstated.conf.
I have a scenario where I have a LACP trunk and on top of the trunk, I have
four carp interfaces.
So: trunk1 => carp0–3
Now, obviously I know I can monitor up/down on trunk1.
But
doing in the way of testing
> (just look over the tech@ list archives, you'll find many examples), he
> has put in a lot of effort and the tests he's been doing are really useful.
Ill take a look at this Hrvoje has sent me advice on packet generators
Ill try them out
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
On 2019-08-03, Tom Smyth wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I was wondering as a user, what sort of testing and feedback
> can I give to driver developers that would be useful /helpful
> in improving driver functionality and performance in OpenBSD.
>
> Im particularly interested in OpenBSD Network
Hello all,
I was wondering as a user, what sort of testing and feedback
can I give to driver developers that would be useful /helpful
in improving driver functionality and performance in OpenBSD.
Im particularly interested in OpenBSD Network performance.
what tools / tests provide useful
Hi,
zoneminder is, as Stuart said, overcomplicated, plus unmantained and unable
to catch the more modern streams from IP cams.
The best free alternative is SHINOBI https://shinobi.video which is based
on java and ported on linux, mac and wi(n)dows, I do not know it it would
be feasible an OpenBSD
On 2019-01-01, kayasaman wrote:
> Hi. For this type of setup Zoneminder is great. I have no experience running
> it on OpenBSD though.
There is an unfinished zoneminder port in openbsd-wip. I must say the
architecture looked rather overcomplicated to me ..
multimedia/motion is simpler and
> From: "Elias M. Mariani"
> Date: 2019-01-01 17:46:25
>
> Hi list,
> I'm thinking in installing some cameras in my private home, I have
> been looking for solutions, my concern is that I wish to be able to
> look the videos from outside the house and I'm a little paranoid about
>
s.
A bit of advice for cameras outside: You are going to want
outdoor-rated cameras even if they aren't getting hit directly with
rain. Moisture in the air is still going to condense inside the camera
if there are any gaps in the case at all. Eventually the lens is just
going to become a p
Am 01.01.2019 um 18:46 schrieb Elias M. Mariani:
> Hi list,
> I'm thinking in installing some cameras in my private home, I have
> been looking for solutions, my concern is that I wish to be able to
> look the videos from outside the house and I'm a little paranoid about
> the quality of the
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019, at 04:22, Nick Holland wrote:
> Yes, I'd suggest an OpenBSD gateway to a commercial DVR security system
> rather than rolling your own, if it is really to be a security system
> (as opposed to maybe a, "who's at my front door?" or "what are the local
> wildlife doing when I'm
On 1/1/19 12:46 PM, Elias M. Mariani wrote:
> Hi list,
> I'm thinking in installing some cameras in my private home, I have
> been looking for solutions, my concern is that I wish to be able to
> look the videos from outside the house and I'm a little paranoid about
> the quality of the software
Thanks all for the help.
I will check out Zoneminder and the cameras that you have recommended.
> What do you want to do from the Android / browser?
Just look at the cameras from outside the house, I don't need any type
of functionality besides that.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2019, at 17:46, Elias M. Mariani wrote:
> I know that is a little off-topic but maybe someone knows about a good
> brand of cameras.
See uvideo(4).
Linux has more options, including cameras of better video quality.
I run GNU/Linux on one computer in order to use a Logitech BRIO.
solution here according to many cctv guys is to set them to 5fps though they do
reach 25fps/pal or 30fps/ntsc.
Regards,
Kaya
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
Original message From: Johan Mellberg
Date: 1/1/19 22:15 (GMT+00:00) To: OpenBSD General
Misc Subject: Re: Advice
> 1 jan. 2019 kl. 18:46 skrev Elias M. Mariani :
>
> Hi list,
> I'm thinking in installing some cameras in my private home, I have
> been looking for solutions, my concern is that I wish to be able to
> look the videos from outside the house and I'm a little paranoid about
> the quality of the
Hi list,
I'm thinking in installing some cameras in my private home, I have
been looking for solutions, my concern is that I wish to be able to
look the videos from outside the house and I'm a little paranoid about
the quality of the software that the different vendors use. I have
seen clusters of
On 2018-11-22, Chris Bennett wrote:
> After digging into many pages source and I use NoScript, which has an
> irritating side effect of actually hiding some of the JavaScript
> present, I now see that they are using cloud hosting and some naughty
> Google stuff. So I will get much more
than
Yes, that would be very true. Too slow could mean it's not being taken
seriously enough. Which could mean the same for known, but unreported
flaws. Good advice.
> rate of patches. I'd also consider the seriousness of the flaw being
> patched as well, like if it is due to a widespread issu
On 11/22/2018 12:56 PM, Chris Bennett wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 09:55:35AM -0600, Boris Goldberg wrote:
Hello Chris,
There is something extremely weird going on around lately. People are
easily take offense where no offense where intended (and hard to find
anyway). Nick was just
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:24:55PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
>
> all on one server?
>
> And as someone who has run a number of mail servers for a number of
> companies ... don't. Just don't. Running your own mail server is a
> good way to accomplish nothing except wasting a lot of time and
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 09:55:35AM -0600, Boris Goldberg wrote:
> Hello Chris,
>
> There is something extremely weird going on around lately. People are
> easily take offense where no offense where intended (and hard to find
> anyway). Nick was just telling you that (in his expert opinion) you
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:50:38AM +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On 11/20/18 4:43 PM, Chris Bennett wrote:
> > AMD? I have read about problems with non-CPU chips being compromised.
> > Another architecture? I have never used anything other than Intel/AMD.
>
> I can't comment on SUN etc. but AMD
gt;> > proper setup make collocation OK?
>>
>> You are using poorly defined buzzwords. What you mean by a "direct
>> connection", "proper setup", "collocation" and what I mean are likely
>> very different.
>>
CB> Well, then tell me
On 11/20/18 4:43 PM, Chris Bennett wrote:
> AMD? I have read about problems with non-CPU chips being compromised.
> Another architecture? I have never used anything other than Intel/AMD.
I can't comment on SUN etc. but AMD would be the way to go if you can.
Theo has said in a recent presentation
to run out of Austin, Texas.
I think that having a direct connection would be best, but would a
proper setup make collocation OK?
This isn't going to be my server, I will just be in charge. That's
completely new for me.
Any advice is really welcome, everywhere I read anything, hardware seems
broken
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 08:31:14PM +, Kaya Saman wrote:
> I don't think the response was assumed as such. It just is that there are so
> many issues with corporate politics and higher ups thinking they know things
> that gives OpenSource software a bad rep! Even once people didn't understand
>
On 11/20/18 8:11 PM, Chris Bennett wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 02:24:55PM -0500, Nick Holland wrote:
On 11/20/18 11:43, Chris Bennett wrote:
Unfortunately, if you have performance requirements, your choices are
AMD and Intel. Older Intel and AMD chips aren't getting any support to
deal
;proper setup", "collocation" and what I mean are likely
> very different.
>
Well, then tell me some useful information. Correct my idiotic
buzzwords. There was carefully noted in my message that I am facing new
territory and need some advice.
> > This isn't go
at I mean are likely
very different.
> This isn't going to be my server, I will just be in charge. That's
> completely new for me.
> Any advice is really welcome, everywhere I read anything, hardware seems
> broken and insecure.
Pretty much all new HW is optimized in ways that we are now l
that having a direct connection would be best, but would a
proper setup make collocation OK?
This isn't going to be my server, I will just be in charge. That's
completely new for me.
Any advice is really welcome, everywhere I read anything, hardware seems
broken and insecure.
Thanks a bunch for any help
On August 28, 2018 3:04 AM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
> On 28 August 2018 at 05:26, Joseph Mayer joseph.ma...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > Joel,
> > Are you saying you gave up on using the PCIe at all?
> > There's a 4-lane PCIe connector on the Rock64 right, aren't those
> > dedicated lanes,
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 21:48:17 +0200
Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 01:49:47PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:52:48 +0200
> > Patrick Wildt wrote:
> >
> > > On the MacchiatoBin we don't support the onboard ethernet yet. On the
> > > EspressoBin we do
Hi Carlos,
Check out this reddit post with similar questions.
https://www.reddit.com/r/openbsd/comments/966wpe/running_on_a_sbcsoc_rock64_rpi_beaglebone_etc
OpenBSD well hardware's supported
>> b/ Best network throughput
>>
>> It seems Raspberry 3 B+ maybe the best option, but I am not pretty sure.
>>
>> Any advice?
>>
>> --
>> Greetings,
>> C. L. Martinez
>>
>
On 28 August 2018 at 05:26, Joseph Mayer wrote:
> Joel,
>
> Are you saying you gave up on using the PCIe at all?
>
> There's a 4-lane PCIe connector on the Rock64 right, aren't those
> dedicated lanes, and, if they'd somehow be shared with any other
> hardware, then you should still have
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 01:49:47PM +0200, Karel Gardas wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:52:48 +0200
> Patrick Wildt wrote:
>
> > On the MacchiatoBin we don't support the onboard ethernet yet. On the
> > EspressoBin we do support the ethernet controller, but the connected
> > switch is a mess
On 08/27/18 09:11, Jon Tabor wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 01:33:27PM +0200, Mohamed Fouad wrote:
Hi Carlos, i have a similar requirement and i am considering testing a
banana pi router at this moment.
I'm currently using a Banana Pro as my home router/firewall. I experienced a
bunch of
Joel,
Are you saying you gave up on using the PCIe at all?
There's a 4-lane PCIe connector on the Rock64 right, aren't those
dedicated lanes, and, if they'd somehow be shared with any other
hardware, then you should still have supposedly >90% of the 16gbps
capacity available?
Did you try
ry 3 B+ maybe the best option, but I am not pretty sure.
>
> Any advice?
>
> --
> Greetings,
> C. L. Martinez
>
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 01:33:27PM +0200, Mohamed Fouad wrote:
> Hi Carlos, i have a similar requirement and i am considering testing a
> banana pi router at this moment.
>
>
I'm currently using a Banana Pro as my home router/firewall. I experienced a
bunch of packet loss on the internal port
I do actually have an rk3399 (firefly) - like you I also had high hopes for it.
It's still the best out of the Arm boards I've tried, but the lanes
are shared with the GMAC on the SoC so you end up not getting what you
might hope for; you can Sorta get another Gigabit port by using the
USB-C port
Yeah I got excited about the MachiattoBin when I first saw it - it's
possibly the first non-x86 SOHO router that can actually do 14MPPS
needed for 10G in the home.
BUT
The Copper ethernet situation is problematic, the original design
shares the PCI Bus with the SFP Slots to provide copper 10G
On August 26, 2018 3:16 PM, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
..
> I have a bunch of various SBC and they all suck pretty bad for network
> tasks. Fine for random server tasks but don't put them in your network
> path unless you like artificial bottlenecks.
Please note that the RK3399 (e.g. Pine64
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:52:48 +0200
Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On the MacchiatoBin we don't support the onboard ethernet yet. On the
> EspressoBin we do support the ethernet controller, but the connected
> switch is a mess that I don't dare to support. Got other stuff to do.
> Though I am working
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 11:30:15 -0700
Carlos Cardenas wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 05:50:02PM +0200, David Bern wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:52:48 +0200
> > Patrick Wildt wrote:
> >
> > > On the MacchiatoBin we don't support the onboard ethernet yet. On the
> > > EspressoBin we do
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 05:50:02PM +0200, David Bern wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:52:48 +0200
> Patrick Wildt wrote:
>
> > On the MacchiatoBin we don't support the onboard ethernet yet. On the
> > EspressoBin we do support the ethernet controller, but the connected
> > switch is a mess that
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 15:52:48 +0200
Patrick Wildt wrote:
> On the MacchiatoBin we don't support the onboard ethernet yet. On the
> EspressoBin we do support the ethernet controller, but the connected
> switch is a mess that I don't dare to support. Got other stuff to do.
> Though I am working
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 11:00:26AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2018-08-26, Carlos López wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 26/08/2018 11:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
> >> netboot works fine. However almost all of the Arm platforms including
> >> the Rpi3 make terrible gateways and in general l3
Tor gateway.
>
> My only requirements are:
>
> a/ OpenBSD well hardware's supported
> b/ Best network throughput
>
> It seems Raspberry 3 B+ maybe the best option, but I am not pretty sure.
>
> Any advice?
>
> --
> Greetings,
> C. L. Martinez
>
>
Still IME best bang for buck is n3160 ATOM based mini-pc's there are
several vendors (Jetway/Qotom) and you can get an AES-NI capable 4
core machine with dual NICs that will do 5Gbit Duplex on the nose for
less than 90$ USD.
I know intel isn't the flavour of the month, but these machines lack
On 2018-08-26, Carlos López wrote:
>
>
> On 26/08/2018 11:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
>> netboot works fine. However almost all of the Arm platforms including
>> the Rpi3 make terrible gateways and in general l3 packet path
>> machines.
>>
>> I have a bunch of various SBC and they all suck
On 26/08/2018 11:46, Joel Wirāmu Pauling wrote:
netboot works fine. However almost all of the Arm platforms including
the Rpi3 make terrible gateways and in general l3 packet path
machines.
I have a bunch of various SBC and they all suck pretty bad for network
tasks. Fine for random server
1 - 100 of 438 matches
Mail list logo
