Hi,
On Monday, 22. May 2006 19:55, Ted Unangst wrote:
I have read that mixing up checked out subsystems from CVS like src,
ports and XF4 cannot be done across different branches without breaking
the system at some time. Let's assume I don't want to spend the extra
compile time and
Hi everybody,
I am still trying to sort out some of the information on the OpenBSD website
about how to follow a specific branch and what are the benefits of each
method.
I understood what STABLE, CURRENT and RELEASE are and how to follow them.
I still have some difficulties figuring out what
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 07:21:33PM +0200, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
I guess the best solution would be to follow stable but speaking honestly
this seems like a lot of wasted bandwidth and CPU time for a few small
changes at best?
Best depends on many things. ;) I follow stable on my production
On 5/22/06, Tobias Weisserth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Starting with 2.7, OpenBSD provides a source tree that contains important
patches and fixes (i.e. those from the errata plus others which are obvious
and simple, but do not deserve an errata entry) and makes it available via
CVS in addition
On Mon, 22 May 2006 19:21:33 +0200, Tobias Weisserth
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still trying to sort out some of the information on the OpenBSD website
about how to follow a specific branch and what are the benefits of each
method.
I understood what STABLE, CURRENT and RELEASE are and how
Tobias Weisserth wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am still trying to sort out some of the information on the OpenBSD website
about how to follow a specific branch and what are the benefits of each
method.
I understood what STABLE, CURRENT and RELEASE are and how to follow them.
I still have some
6 matches
Mail list logo
