On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:01:18 -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
You are a prick.
I don't know what his problem was but
Back in early September I bought a new netbook. A samsung NC20. It has
1280x800 video.
In the past I've had fun with video doing X so I thought I'd toss a
quick install of a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
2009/11/29 Brynet
:
Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
Actually, I'm used to recommend nvidia cards (desk laptop)
for most people because they do support most open source systems
(Linux, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris), which is way better than ati at
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 07:27:01AM -0500, Brynet wrote:
Hi,
From what I can find, this is a GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M based
chipset.. xf86-video-nv does not have the product ID listed in the
attach structure, this could be due to incompability with the chipset or
maintainer neglegence
You are a prick.
2009/12/6 rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com:
Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
Your manner is counter productive, including for yourself. So why do
you persist?
Unless of course you're more interested in causing mischief than
getting anything out of OpenBSD.
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 17:08 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Soner Tari so...@comixwall.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 21:30 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Making hardware is a lot more difficult than writing software. So it takes
more resources and more skills.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 10:59 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Why did I say that? Let's take a poll on this list of how many people are
using one of those cards? Or any list, anywhere.
I have not contributed to it in anyway. But why is that relevant? Can you
explain? And how did you
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:11:07AM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 17:08 -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Soner Tari so...@comixwall.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 21:30 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Making hardware is a lot more difficult than
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 10:16 -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
Since your reply implicitly replaced making with designing,
that shouldn't prove to much of a stretch.
My reply explicitly emphasizes the difficulty in designing software,
which is part of writing it. Otherwise, I mention I am against
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Matthieu Herrb mhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Yes, I'd like to see some pointers also. I recall that there was
discussion (might've been on linux kernel) a while ago about a
partially-open video
Oh, we have another troll on the lists! Welcome rhubbell!
May ignorance be with you and stupidity always guide your emails, amen!
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 06:43:01PM +0200, Soner Tari wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 10:16 -0500, William Boshuck wrote:
Since your reply implicitly replaced making with designing,
that shouldn't prove to much of a stretch.
My reply explicitly emphasizes the difficulty in designing software,
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:33:22 -0200
Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:20:16AM +, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Peter Miller feu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have 4.6 amd64 installed and can't get X to work at 1280x800.
--snip--
Stay away from
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Yes, I'd like to see some pointers also. I recall that there was
discussion (might've been on linux kernel) a while ago about a
partially-open video card. Why doesn't the community support that?
You mean
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 21:30 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Making hardware is a lot more difficult than writing software. So it takes
more resources and more skills.
Sorry Matthieu, but I have to say that this is utter bullshit, and I
believe such underestimation is the underlying reason that
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Soner Tari so...@comixwall.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 21:30 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
Making hardware is a lot more difficult than writing software. So it takes
more resources and more skills.
Sorry Matthieu, but I have to say that this is utter
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:08:36 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
More than I've ever spent on all the computers I've ever written
software with.
How much would that be? Ballpark. Doesn't seem like it would be very much.
Seems like you're just hand-waving without real numbers.
Wikipedia has a money-raised
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:30:28 +0100
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Yes, I'd like to see some pointers also. I recall that there was
discussion (might've been on linux kernel) a while ago about a
partially-open video card. Why
Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
another to the project.
KTHX HAND
On 12/5/09, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 17:08:36 -0500
Ted Unangst wrote:
More than I've ever spent on all the computers I've ever written
software with.
How
blah blah blah
go away troll
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 02:59:19PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 21:30:28 +0100
Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:02 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
Yes, I'd like to see some pointers also. I recall that there was
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:14:00 -0500
bofh wrote:
Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
another to the project.
Gee, ok. What have you contributed to it?
You don't want to converse. Fine by me.
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:54 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:14:00 -0500
bofh wrote:
Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
another to the project.
Gee, ok. What have you contributed to it?
You don't want to converse. Fine by me.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:10:19 -0500
bofh wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:54 PM, rhubbell rhubb...@ihubbell.com wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 18:14:00 -0500
bofh wrote:
Come back and talk when you've bought one for yourself, and donated
another to the project.
Gee, ok. What have you
Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:17:14 -0600
Marco Peereboom wrote:
fuck off troll
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:26:49PM -0800, rhubbell wrote:
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009 19:10:19 -0500
bofh wrote:
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 6:54 PM,
rhubbell wrote:
Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
As distinguished from insensitive twerps like yourself.
rhubbell wrote:
Another sensitive type. Guess there are always a few on every list.
It has nothing to do with sensitivity, we just have an aversion toward
idiots.
-Bryan.
wow now I have point. You are like kid on sand. Look they have thermometer
and you haven't :-P :-D You don't have even any respect for long time OpenBSD
developers or users which know a LOT more then you. Just because you are
unqualified user doesn't mean that you can shout around on everyone.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Peter Miller feu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have 4.6 amd64 installed and can't get X to work at 1280x800.
After a default install X won't start and i get an error which i think
is caused by nv. I created a xorg.conf file using X -configure and
then changed the
Hi,
From what I can find, this is a GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M based
chipset.. xf86-video-nv does not have the product ID listed in the
attach structure, this could be due to incompability with the chipset or
maintainer neglegence (..the driver is very rarely updated).
---
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 08:20:16AM +, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Peter Miller feu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have 4.6 amd64 installed and can't get X to work at 1280x800.
After a default install X won't start and i get an error which i think
is caused by nv. I
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:33:22PM -0200, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
I'm not a nvidia fanboy, but I've found the need to clarify what nvidia
actually does for open source community.
You mean, what nvidia does to close parts of unprincipled
projects that like to call themselves 'open
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 01:33:22PM -0200, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
Actually, I'm used to recommend nvidia cards (desk laptop)
for most people because they do support most open source systems
(Linux, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris), which is way better than ati at least.
I do know that OpenBSD
Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
Actually, I'm used to recommend nvidia cards (desk laptop)
for most people because they do support most open source systems
(Linux, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris), which is way better than ati at least.
ATI(..now AMD) releases full NDA-free documentation on their
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
From what I can find, this is a GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M based
chipset.. xf86-video-nv does not have the product ID listed in the
attach structure, this could be due to incompability with the chipset or
maintainer
Made the changes to nv_driver.c and built xenocara with the following
# cd /usr/xenocara
# rm -rf /usr/xobj/*
# make bootstrap
# make obj
# make build
Upon reboot when i use the nv driver X now recognizes my card, but
it goes to a blank screen (just looks like the terminal) and
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 02:56:05PM -0500, Brynet wrote:
Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
Actually, I'm used to recommend nvidia cards (desk laptop)
for most people because they do support most open source systems
(Linux, FreeBSD, OpenSolaris), which is way better than ati at least.
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 07:21:37PM -0200, Rodrigo Amorim Bahiense wrote:
As said: I'm not a fanboy. I thought nvidia was doing something
that was good enough to me, but actually isn't helping the community at
all. [...]
Yea, `the community'. Who the fuck is that? Nobody managed to explain
that
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Brynet bry...@gmail.com wrote:
Made the changes to nv_driver.c and built xenocara with the following
# cd /usr/xenocara
# rm -rf /usr/xobj/*
# make bootstrap
# make obj
# make build
Upon reboot when i use the nv driver X now recognizes my card, but
it
I have 4.6 amd64 installed and can't get X to work at 1280x800.
After a default install X won't start and i get an error which i think
is caused by nv. I created a xorg.conf file using X -configure and
then changed the driver from nv to vesa' and was able to get X
running, but only at 800x600
39 matches
Mail list logo
