Sorry my bad these are actually system libraries and not packages missing.
Indeed I do not have X tgz packages installed yet.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On April 16, 2018 3:48 PM, mabi <m...@protonmail.ch> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> It looks like some
Do you have the X sets installed? I'm not at my computer but fontconfig sounds
like something that would be in the base x install.
On Apr 16, 2018 8:48 AM, mabi <m...@protonmail.ch> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It looks like some package dependencies are missing on the package reposito
Hello,
It looks like some package dependencies are missing on the package repository
of 6.3 amd64 or pfstat dependencies is broken. See below:
$ doas pkg_add -v pfstat
quirks-2.414 signed on 2018-03-28T14:24:37Z
quirks-2.414: ok
pfstat-2.5p2:libiconv-1.14p3: ok
pfstat-2.5p2:png-1.6.34: ok
Dear misc@ readers,
bear with me... Noob at work!
So, it seems that upgrading from 5.5-STABLE to -current completely
messed-up package dependencies.
2/3 of previously installed packages were not upgradable; I tried
to delete them all and re-add, but that of course didn't solve
anything.
Just
So, it seems that upgrading from 5.5-STABLE to -current completely
messed-up package dependencies.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html
You should ALWAYS use a snapshot as the starting point for running -current.
Upgrading by compiling your own source code is not supported.
I certainly
messed-up package dependencies.
2/3 of previously installed packages were not upgradable; I tried
to delete them all and re-add, but that of course didn't solve
anything.
Just as an example:
just22@poseidon:[~] pkga gtk+2
Update candidates: quirks-2.9 - quirks-2.9 (ok)
quirks-2.9 signed
previously on this list Alessandro DE LAURENZIS contributed:
bear with me... Noob at work!
So, it seems that upgrading from 5.5-STABLE to -current completely
messed-up package dependencies.
2/3 of previously installed packages were not upgradable; I tried
to delete them all and re-add
Hello!
I use a custom script to remove automaticly installed dependencies to the
manually installed packages I deleted.
AFAIK ``pkg'' doesn't provide this functionality (if I'm wrong, correct me,
please).
The things I wanted to ask are:
1. Is there any reason for this functionality being
On 12/27/10 09:35, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
I use a custom script to remove automaticly installed dependencies to the
manually installed packages I deleted.
If you had used -D dependencies when you manually deleted a package;
the dependencies would also be deleted (unless they are
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:08:09AM -0500, Frank Bax wrote:
On 12/27/10 09:35, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
I use a custom script to remove automaticly installed dependencies to the
manually installed packages I deleted.
If you had used -D dependencies when you manually deleted a
package; the
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Frank Bax f...@sympatico.ca wrote:
On 12/27/10 09:35, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
I use a custom script to remove automaticly installed dependencies to the
manually installed packages I deleted.
If you had used -D dependencies when you manually deleted a
I recently submitted a patch to do this. I haven't received much feedback
but check if it works for you.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-techm=129320921012808w=2
Luis
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff czark...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello!
I use a custom script to remove automaticly
Sorry about the lack of feedback.
Basically, there are quite a few severe limitations to the way pkg_delete
currently walks dependencies.
Putting a band-aid such as your patch is not going to help, and yeah,
redesigning that to work better is on my list.
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 12:09:05PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
No really, what is the right way to recursively list the
dependencies of a given package? pkg_info doesn't seem to
do that natively (and the above attempt only works for
installed packages indeed). Is that a design decision,
say
On Nov 08 09:50:19, Jan Stary wrote:
On Nov 07 19:21:07, srikant@gmail.com wrote:
Jan Stary wrote:
cat /var/db/pkg/$PACKAGE/+REQUIRING | xargs pkg_info -s
Thats just the first level of dependencies. What about the
dependencies of the dependencies, and so on? It is a tree
On Nov 07 19:21:07, srikant@gmail.com wrote:
Jan Stary wrote:
cat /var/db/pkg/$PACKAGE/+REQUIRING | xargs pkg_info -s
Thats just the first level of dependencies. What about the
dependencies of the dependencies, and so on? It is a tree
structure. Recursion is needed if you want to know
Jan Stary wrote:
dir=/var/db/pkg/$pkg
Since you use the above mechanism to read the package list,
your script only works for already installed packages.
Srikant.
Jan Stary wrote:
cat /var/db/pkg/$PACKAGE/+REQUIRING | xargs pkg_info -s
Thats just the first level of dependencies. What about the
dependencies of the dependencies, and so on? It is a tree
structure. Recursion is needed if you want to know the
'real collateral damage' :)
Srikant.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:42 AM, srikant@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Just wanted to share a script with fellow OpenBSD
desktop users who like to keep minimal non-base
software on the machine and prefer to use lighter
alternatives whenever possible.
This script will help you estimate the total
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:42 AM, srikant@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Just wanted to share a script with fellow OpenBSD
desktop users who like to keep minimal non-base
software on the machine and prefer to use lighter
alternatives whenever possible.
This script will help you estimate the total
Hi Aaron
On 11/6/09, Aaron Mason simplersolut...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:42 AM, srikant@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
Just wanted to share a script with fellow OpenBSD
desktop users who like to keep minimal non-base
software on the machine and prefer to use lighter
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:00:21PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
dependencies? Scenario is:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:57:39PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:00:21PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
is there an easy way to fetch
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, BadMagic wrote:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B?ttner wrote:
is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
dependencies? Scenario is:
eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In order to
proceed installing useful things,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
dependencies? Scenario is:
eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:28:57PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
As far as shared libs go, there's nothing wrong with adding the new shared
libs
in your soekris /usr/lib: grab base*.tgz xbase*tgz,
untar just the *.so.*
Hi!
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
dependencies? Scenario is:
eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In order to
proceed installing useful things, let's say firefox, I'd like to
Hi Dorian,
Dorian Buettner wrote on Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100:
is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
dependencies? Scenario is:
eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In order to
proceed installing useful things, let's say firefox,
On Monday 02 February 2009 13:02:59 Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
dependencies? Scenario is:
eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In order to
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de wrote:
P.S.
What the heck are you going to do with firefox on a box lacking
network access?
off the top of my head: operative phrase possibly being right now,
it can be a real annoyance to have to wait until net access is
available
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
As far as shared libs go, there's nothing wrong with adding the new shared
libs
in your soekris /usr/lib: grab base*.tgz xbase*tgz,
untar just the *.so.* thingies, and put them in /usr/lib...
I'd be very cautious doing this,
Ted Unangst schrieb am Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:16:42PM -0500:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de wrote:
P.S.
What the heck are you going to do with firefox on a box lacking
network access?
off the top of my head: operative phrase possibly being right now,
it can
Ingo Schwarze schrieb:
Ted Unangst schrieb am Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:16:42PM -0500:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Ingo Schwarze schwa...@usta.de wrote:
P.S.
What the heck are you going to do with firefox on a box lacking
network access?
off the top of my head:
Dorian Buettner wrote on Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 12:01:19AM +0100:
I tried some of the suggested hints, but haven't found for example nspr
end up in the package cache, some other deps might also be missing,
Did you copy the new system libraries to /usr/lib?
As far as i remember, when pkg_add
Hi all,
is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
dependencies? Scenario is:
eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In order to
proceed installing useful things, let's say firefox, I'd like to suck
packages onto a usb stick and installl from there.
I
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B?ttner wrote:
Hi all,
is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
dependencies? Scenario is:
eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In order to
proceed installing useful things, let's say firefox, I'd
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 09:24:24PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
On 17 Jun 2006, at 11:24, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:47:40PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
quick one for you knowledgeable chaps/chapesses...
If one does not have OpenBSD installed how would one obtain a list of
On 2006/06/19 11:34, Joachim Schipper wrote:
This has been covered over and over in the archives, but some
highlights:
fvwmthe default, in base: this is not the newest version, as
fvwm switched to GPL. It's quite usable.
It's also lighter on system resources than some people might
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:47:40PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
quick one for you knowledgeable chaps/chapesses...
If one does not have OpenBSD installed how would one obtain a list of
the dependencies of a certain package, say gnome-desktop for
arguments sake?
Many thanks
poncenby
On 17 Jun 2006, at 11:24, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:47:40PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
quick one for you knowledgeable chaps/chapesses...
If one does not have OpenBSD installed how would one obtain a list of
the dependencies of a certain package, say gnome-desktop for
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:47:40PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable desktop
system running gnome, when said system has no connection to the interweb
Just use pkg_add !
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:15:59AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:47:40PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable desktop
system running gnome, when said
On 2006/06/17 11:38, Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
Could you elaborate on this, since that was my first thought how to do
it, but it didn't work (and doesn't), do I need a special -F flag?
setenv PKG_PATH $OBSD_FTP/snapshots/packages/i386/
setenv PKG_CACHE $HOME
Results in:
/usr/sbin/pkg_add
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:20:44AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/06/17 11:38, Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
Could you elaborate on this, since that was my first thought how to do
it, but it didn't work (and doesn't), do I need a special -F flag?
setenv PKG_PATH
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 12:34:47PM +0200, Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:20:44AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/06/17 11:38, Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
Could you elaborate on this, since that was my first thought how to do
it, but it didn't work (and doesn't),
On 6/16/06, Bihlmaier Andreas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:19:26PM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable desktop
quick one for you knowledgeable chaps/chapesses...
If one does not have OpenBSD installed how would one obtain a list of
the dependencies of a certain package, say gnome-desktop for
arguments sake?
Many thanks
poncenby
p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:47:40PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable desktop
system running gnome, when said system has no connection to the interweb
If the net wont come
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If one does not have OpenBSD installed how would one obtain a
list of
the dependencies of a certain package, say gnome-desktop for
arguments sake?
$ cd /usr/ports/x11/gnome/desktop/
$ make describe
gnome-desktop-2.10.2p1|x11/gnome/desktop||components for the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable desktop
system running gnome, when said system has no connection to
the interweb
See also: 'make print-build-depends' and 'make
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:19:26PM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable desktop
system running gnome, when said system has no
51 matches
Mail list logo
