more weird as I use lots of tabs in chrome.
I don't think it matters but my boot disk is a 960g Crucial SSD.
--STeve Andre'
panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps
Stopped at Debugger+0x5: leave
RUN AT LEAST 'trace' AND 'ps' AND INCLUDE OUTPUT WHEN REPORTING THIS PANIC
pushing on it harder.
panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps
Stopped at Debugger+0x5: leave
RUN AT LEAST 'trace' AND 'ps' AND INCLUDE OUTPUT WHEN REPORTING THIS PANIC!
IF RUNNING SMP, USE 'mach ddbcpu #' AND 'trace' ON OTHER PROCESSORS, TOO.
DO NOT EVEN BOTHER REPORTING
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:14 PM, STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote:
On 05/08/14 22:43, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:59 PM, STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote:
Twice now in three or so weeks, I've gotten a panic on my -current_amd64
W500 laptop. I've updated my tree
I'll be taking a peek based on what I see in his traceback. Travelling at
the moment.
On 9 May 2014 06:44, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:14 PM, STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote:
On 05/08/14 22:43, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:59
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 17:59, STeve Andre' wrote:
Twice now in three or so weeks, I've gotten a panic on my -current_amd64
W500 laptop. I've updated my tree several times during this time, and have
not seen other problems besides the known acpi heat problem.
Thanks, I think we've fixed this.
'
panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps
Stopped at Debugger+0x5: leave
RUN AT LEAST 'trace' AND 'ps' AND INCLUDE OUTPUT WHEN REPORTING THIS
PANIC!
IF RUNNING SMP, USE 'mach ddbcpu #' AND 'trace' ON OTHER
PROCESSORS, TOO.
DO NOT EVEN BOTHER REPORTING THIS WITHOUT INCLUDING
time now.
panic: softdep_deallocate_dependencies: dangling deps
Stopped at Debugger+0x5: leave
RUN AT LEAST 'trace' AND 'ps' AND INCLUDE OUTPUT WHEN REPORTING THIS PANIC!
IF RUNNING SMP, USE 'mach ddbcpu #' AND 'trace' ON OTHER PROCESSORS, TOO.
DO NOT EVEN BOTHER REPORTING THIS WITHOUT
On 05/08/14 23:41, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:14 PM, STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote:
On 05/08/14 22:43, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:59 PM, STeve Andre' and...@msu.edu wrote:
Twice now in three or so weeks, I've gotten a panic on my
On 05/09/14 00:05, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 17:59, STeve Andre' wrote:
Twice now in three or so weeks, I've gotten a panic on my -current_amd64
W500 laptop. I've updated my tree several times during this time, and have
not seen other problems besides the known acpi heat
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Roger Hammerstein cheek...@live.com wrote:
i had another machine panic with this, and no disk errors.amd64, openbsd 5.3.
...
ddb{0} show panic
softdep_deallocate_dependencies: unrecovered I/O error
ddb{0} trace
Debugger() at Debugger+0x5
panic() at panic+0xe4
i had another machine panic with this, and no disk errors.amd64, openbsd 5.3.
it looks like outlook or the demimer ate the dmesg of my last message.
on reboot, /var needed manual fscking, and some bind logfiles were
unreferencedand put in lost+found.
ddb{0} show panic
11 matches
Mail list logo
