On 26.4.2024 20:36, Gustavo Rios wrote:
Hi folks!
May some here tell me if openbsd supports python dev package in the
ports
collection ?
Reading this
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35866369/how-to-manually-install-python-dev-from-source
and after that checking
https
On 26.4.2024 20:43, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2024-04-26, Gustavo Rios wrote:
--78bcdd0617042ecf
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Hi folks!
May some here tell me if openbsd supports python dev package in the
ports
collection ?
What is "python dev&q
On 2024-04-26, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> --78bcdd0617042ecf
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi folks!
>
> May some here tell me if openbsd supports python dev package in the ports
> collection ?
What is "python dev"?
--
Please keep replies on the mailing list.
Hi folks!
May some here tell me if openbsd supports python dev package in the ports
collection ?
Thanks a lot.
--
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolves do not perform
in the circus
On 01/06/23 11:02 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> [moved to ports@; reply-to set]
>
> On 2023-05-31, Roger Marsh wrote:
> > Script started on Wed May 31 10:43:00 2023
> > This pkg_info report shows Python 3.10 required by py3-bsddb3 after upgrade
> > from OpenBSD 7.2
[moved to ports@; reply-to set]
On 2023-05-31, Roger Marsh wrote:
> Script started on Wed May 31 10:43:00 2023
> This pkg_info report shows Python 3.10 required by py3-bsddb3 after upgrade
> from OpenBSD 7.2 to 7.3 and package upgrade.
>
> As bsddb3 does not support Python 3.
Script started on Wed May 31 10:43:00 2023
This pkg_info report shows Python 3.10 required by py3-bsddb3 after upgrade
from OpenBSD 7.2 to 7.3 and package upgrade.
As bsddb3 does not support Python 3.10 or later but does support Python 3.9 and
earlier, surely the requirement should be on Python
On 2023-05-14, Judah Kocher wrote:
> Some web searching has not turned up any details around this. I also do
> not see python 3.9 as an installable option via pkg_add, just 3.10 and
> 3.11.
3.9 is still there.
> Does this mean that installing python via pkg_add installs
python scripts that
update various public DNS records when my public IP changes started failing
with generic segfaults. I did see the note in the OpenBSD Upgrade Guide
about 3.10 being the new default so I ran pkg_add -u which updated python to
3.10 and now the same scripts fail but with this error
On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 12:25:28PM -0400, Judah Kocher wrote:
> After updating one of my routers to OpenBSD 7.3, my python scripts that
> update various public DNS records when my public IP changes started failing
> with generic segfaults. I did see the note in the OpenBSD Upgrade Guid
After updating one of my routers to OpenBSD 7.3, my python scripts that
update various public DNS records when my public IP changes started
failing with generic segfaults. I did see the note in the OpenBSD
Upgrade Guide about 3.10 being the new default so I ran pkg_add -u which
updated python
..
> The above is just a simple example that has one input field ('name').
> In order to grab the 'name' inputted by the user,
> I need to use the 'cgi' module.
Firstly, you don't actually _need_ to use the Python cgi module to write a cgi
program that h
isplaying content.
I can display HTML from within a python file
and run python code to alter what's displayed in HTML.
All good stuff.
However, the 'cgi' module is giving me trouble that I can't resolve.
It simply won't import without errors.
Why am I trying to import the
On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 02:01:03PM +, indivC wrote:
> Crystal,
>
> I really appreciate the detailed explanations
> and step by step instructions.
> I was able to follow everything without a problem
> and was able to finally access the python file from a web browser.
Crystal,
I really appreciate the detailed explanations
and step by step instructions.
I was able to follow everything without a problem
and was able to finally access the python file from a web browser.
On Monday, December 19th, 2022 at 11:07 AM, Crystal Kolipe
wrote:
> # mkdir /var/www/
-- Original Message --
From: stu.li...@spacehopper.org
To: po...@openbsd.org
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2022 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: Python access to Berkeley DB
[ moving to ports@, hopefully reply-to will be set correctly
if
I got the gmane/nntp
ave not done which would make this work?
>
> I tried this because the bsddb3 (Python) package is not supported at Python
> 10, and it's replacement, berkeleydb, does not support the Berkeley DB
> versions provided as OpenBSD packages.
You might possibly be able to kludge around it
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 05:43:28AM +, indivC wrote:
> What I'm trying to do is display a python file
> that has imbedded HTML within a web browser.
...
> Within a browser, I want to be able to access this file
> and see 'Hello World' displayed.
OK, so you ba
o messages further down.
What I'm trying to do is display a python file
that has imbedded HTML within a web browser.
The file is 'hello_world.py' and below are its contents:
#!/usr/local/bin/python3
print('Content-type:text/html\n')
print('')
print('
On 18.12.2022 08:07, indivC wrote:
Can anyone provide a guide for this or rough instructions?
I'm running httpd(8) and trying to utilize a python(1) script
with an html file.
I've got this working using perl(1).
However, it doesn't work with python(1) when following the same s
is or rough instructions?",
> which is in reference to the subject
> "Guide for Configuring python(1) with httpd(8)".
Surely the goal is to run some particular software and make it available
via an httpd(8) frontend and not just run python(1) i.e. the Python interpreter?
>
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 12:18:32PM +0100, Omar Polo wrote:
> On pypi there is a 'fastcgi' library. it's not packaged on OpenBSD
> and I can't asses how good it is
Alternatively, just write a fastcgi handler from scratch - the protocol
is fairly simple and fully documented.
Httpd only implements
On 2022/12/18 10:23:39 +, indivC wrote:
> On Sunday, December 18th, 2022 at 9:04 AM, Omar Polo
> wrote:
> > Since httpd speaks fastcgi, why not write some python code that
> > accepts the requests over fastcgi? (assuming this is what you're
> > trying to do,
On Sunday, December 18th, 2022 at 8:38 AM, Mark Willson
> This is the script I use to set up python for httpd:
I looked over the script and it seems to do
pretty much what I've already done.
It copies some additional files that I didn't copy.
My first attempt was just to
bject
"Guide for Configuring python(1) with httpd(8)".
Did i precede to explain
how I was trying to attempt to accomplish Y with X?
Yes, but I don't see why that would be a problem.
I feel like it's better for users to actually attempt to try
and solve their problems then not to tr
instead of asking how to do X so that you can do Y, ask directly how
to do Y.
Why do you need python at all in the chroot? Installing all the
needed files (and keeping them up-to-date!) manually in a chroot is a
pain.
Since httpd speaks fastcgi, why not write some python code that
accepts the
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-m...@openbsd.org On Behalf Of indivC
> Sent: 18 December 2022 07:07
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Subject: Guide for Configuring python(1) with httpd(8)
>
> Can anyone provide a guide for this or rough instructions?
> I'm r
Can anyone provide a guide for this or rough instructions?
I'm running httpd(8) and trying to utilize a python(1) script
with an html file.
I've got this working using perl(1).
However, it doesn't work with python(1) when following the same steps.
My python(1) version is 3.
The attempt to get at Berkeley DB, installed from packages, via tkinter fails
with some undefined symbol messages.
Is there something I have not done which would make this work?
I tried this because the bsddb3 (Python) package is not supported at Python 10,
and it's replacement, berke
nal email describing the problem is appended below for interested
ports@ readers.
___
From: owner-m...@openbsd.org on behalf of Stuart
Henderson
Sent: Monday, 26 September 2022 11:27 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Libreoffice crashing on Thinkcentre m92p 7.1 FVWM - seems to be
On 2022-09-25, Luke A. Call wrote:
> Details in case it helps:
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=161280915705719&w=2
> https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=164814366002554&w=2
I think I tried to read that bugs@ report before but got totally bogged down
in all the detail about how you use a spe
on Thinkcentre m92p 7.1 FVWM - seems to be a
python problem
Details in case it helps:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=161280915705719&w=2
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-bugs&m=164814366002554&w=2
On 2022-09-25 08:24:44-0600, Luke A. Call wrote:
> I had a similar problem
the command line when launching LO, but File / Open would crash when
> choosing the file and hitting OK. But I don't think mine was
> python-related. It seemed that my cleaning up by removing evidently unused
> packages
> removed something that was required for LO but not explicitly lis
I had a similar problem where I could open files with LO if I typed them
on the command line when launching LO, but File / Open would crash when
choosing the file and hitting OK. But I don't think mine was
python-related. It seemed that my cleaning up by removing evidently unused
pac
rning: failed to launch javaldx - java may not function correctly
Could not find platform independent libraries
Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to [:]
Python path configuration:
PYTHONHOME = (not set)
PYTHONPATH = '/usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../program'
program name = 'py
HI Stuart,
I was redoing the install to reproduce the error messages. But this time it
went fine.
I guess the difference was previously I ran the command as root
and this time as sudo/doas user. Might be something to do with PATH
environment
for root vs. non-root user. Sorry for the noise.
Thank
On 2022/09/01 19:41, Ali Farzanrad wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> I think that I know the problem.
> pkg_add will search python in stable directory before searching for it
> in release directory and it find python. However it will only find
> version 3, because there is no python 2 i
Hi Stuart,
I think that I know the problem.
pkg_add will search python in stable directory before searching for it
in release directory and it find python. However it will only find
version 3, because there is no python 2 in stable directory.
So it will stop searching (because it found python
On 2022-09-01, Sandeep Gupta wrote:
> Is there a workaround for installing texlive_full on openbsd 7.1?
> Installing via package manager currently fails because
> it has Python2.7 as dependency which has reached end-of-life. Can I force
> the installation?
Python 2.7 packages are sti
Is there a workaround for installing texlive_full on openbsd 7.1?
Installing via package manager currently fails because
it has Python2.7 as dependency which has reached end-of-life. Can I force
the installation?
Thanks
Sandeep
On 2021-11-29, Why 42? The lists account. wrote:
>
> Well, errors related to the python package ...
>
> After updating to the latest snapshot and rebooting I ran "pkg_add -vu"
> to update all my packages, which I think is the right thing to do.
>
> I noticed some s
Well, errors related to the python package ...
After updating to the latest snapshot and rebooting I ran "pkg_add -vu"
to update all my packages, which I think is the right thing to do.
I noticed some strange errors related to python scroll past i.e.
> ...
> Update candidate
and usually readdir is the
preferred method, but might be too slow for your usage case (in my case
it was, it took hours to read the directory while with getdents took
minutes).
It doesn't seems a problem with OpenBSD, but with Python code. Looks
like some additional logic will be required t
took hours to read the directory while with getdents took
>minutes).
>
>It doesn't seems a problem with OpenBSD, but with Python code. Looks
>like some additional logic will be required to address the differences
>betweens the UNIX-like OSs and their implementation of getdent
'/mnt/thinkpad_void_obsd_borg/thinkpad.borg/data/12'
This is same error is reproducible with a test Python 3.8 program:
#!/usr/bin/env python
import os
os.listdir('/mnt/thinkpad_void_obsd_borg/thinkpad.borg/data/12/')
Running ktrace & kdump reveals the error is from
Dear Ingo,
On 2/13/20, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> (Unless you pierce its heart with a woodden stick. Sorry, now i was
>$ kill -CONT 39747
Thank you for showing me the wooden stick! It worked!
Yours sincerely,
Xianwen
Hi,
Xianwen Chen wrote on Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 09:31:45PM +:
> Maurice wrote:
>> you could try kill -1 8926
> Thank you. I just tried it. It did not kill the process.
Small wonder, you already already dropped a nuke on it (-9 = -KILL)
and even that didn't make the zombie go away.
You certa
Dear Maurice,
> you could try kill -1 8926
Thank you. I just tried it. It did not kill the process.
Yours sincerely,
Xianwen
Hi,
Xianwen Chen wrote on Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 08:10:17PM +:
> I am not able to kill a python process.
> $ pgrep python
> showed a PID of 8926
> However, I am not able to kill the process.
> $ kill -9 8926
> # kill -9 8926
> Running as root did not help.
Sounds like
you could try kill -1 8926
Dear OpenBSD users,
I am not able to kill a python process.
$ pgrep python
showed a PID of 8926
However, I am not able to kill the process.
$ kill -9 8926
# kill -9 8926
Running as root did not help.
How can I kill this process?
Yours sincerely,
Xianwen
Hi Claudio,
I did actually try putting my python plugin and unboundmodule.py into the
chroot, but I completely forgot that I would also need to install the rest of
python into the chroot! Haha
Serves me right for working on it until 1am when I should should have been
asleep and trying with
values for PYTHONHOME and I have also tried
>
> --with-pythonmodule=/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages
>
>
> Searching around shows others have found the exact same issue;
> https://nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/unbound-users/2011-July/007371.html
>
> What do you think about this
And I found “/usr/src/usr.src/unbound/Makefile.bsd-wrapper” so I think I have
> found the correct build options to match with the base builds
> CONFIGURE_OPTS_UNBOUND
>
> I will try again with these options tomorrow, and see if I have the same
> errors.
>
> “The default ins
CONFIGURE_OPTS_UNBOUND
I will try again with these options tomorrow, and see if I have the same errors.
“The default install can't include Python support, because the default install
of Unbound is in the base OS, and Python isn't.”
Facepalm.. Of course!
Is there a C plugin library? I would like to
On 2019-08-06, Andy Lemin wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I’m just after some general advice as I feel like I’m doing something wrong,
> and having to hack around too much for what I believe should be simple.
>
> I am developing a simple Python plugin for Unbound, and the default Unb
Hi guys,
I’m just after some general advice as I feel like I’m doing something wrong,
and having to hack around too much for what I believe should be simple.
I am developing a simple Python plugin for Unbound, and the default Unbound
install on OpenBSD sadly wasn’t built with “—with
On 2019.05.18 11:39, David Mimms wrote:
On 2019.05.17 11:41, Paco Esteban wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2019, Joel Carnat wrote:
On Thu 16/05 08:55, Paco Esteban wrote:
Can't say about your VM. On my desktop:
$ time (khard list | wc -l)
104
( khard list | wc -l; ) 0.51s user 0.25s system
On Sat 18/05 19:15, Strahil wrote:
> I run vanilla openBSD 6.5 on oVirt (KVM) with gluster as storage and it seems
> OK for my needs but I never used khard.
> What kind of slowness do you experience?
> Maybe I can run some tests and see if the situation is the same on KVM.
>
Well, it takes sever
On Sat 18/05 11:39, David Mimms wrote:
> On 2019.05.17 11:41, Paco Esteban wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 May 2019, Joel Carnat wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu 16/05 08:55, Paco Esteban wrote:
> > > > Can't say about your VM. On my desktop:
> > > >
> > > > $ time (khard list | wc -l)
> > > >104
> > > >
I run vanilla openBSD 6.5 on oVirt (KVM) with gluster as storage and it seems
OK for my needs but I never used khard.
What kind of slowness do you experience?
Maybe I can run some tests and see if the situation is the same on KVM.
Best Regards,
Strahil NikolovOn May 18, 2019 18:39, David Mimms w
On 2019.05.17 11:41, Paco Esteban wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2019, Joel Carnat wrote:
On Thu 16/05 08:55, Paco Esteban wrote:
> Can't say about your VM. On my desktop:
>
> $ time (khard list | wc -l)
>104
> ( khard list | wc -l; ) 0.51s user 0.25s system 97% cpu 0.779 total
>
Is this o
On Thu, 16 May 2019, Joel Carnat wrote:
> On Thu 16/05 08:55, Paco Esteban wrote:
> > Can't say about your VM. On my desktop:
> >
> > $ time (khard list | wc -l)
> >104
> > ( khard list | wc -l; ) 0.51s user 0.25s system 97% cpu 0.779 total
> >
>
> Is this on OpenBSD ? The time out
gt; > noticed that ranger felt a bit slow to start but thought it was the
> > software ; so I switched to nnn.
> >
> > # time (khard list | wc -l)
> > 112
> > 0m07.10s real 0m04.08s user 0m02.99s system
> >
> > Is this an issue with
ware ; so I switched to nnn.
>
> # time (khard list | wc -l)
> 112
> 0m07.10s real 0m04.08s user 0m02.99s system
>
> Is this an issue with my VM (2 vCPU / 4GB RAM / 20GB SSD) or are Python
> software just slow?
Can't say about your VM. On my desktop:
real 0m04.08s user 0m02.99s system
Is this an issue with my VM (2 vCPU / 4GB RAM / 20GB SSD) or are Python
software just slow?
Thanks.
Il giorno Dom 20 Gen 2019 16:00 Ingo Schwarze ha scritto:
[...]
>
> OpenBSD intentionally does not implement any LC_MONETARY or strfmon(3)
> functionality because we believe that such functionality does not
> belong in the C library but should instead be implemented in
> specialized support libr
Hi Luca,
Luca Franchini wrote on Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 03:41:46PM +0100:
> I got an error while running this:
>
> amidatacyber730:~$ python3.6
> Python 3.6.6 (default, Oct 11 2018, 12:39:19)
> [GCC 4.2.1 Compatible OpenBSD Clang 6.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_600/final)] on o
> Type
Hi all,
I got an error while running this:
amidatacyber730:~$ python3.6
Python 3.6.6 (default, Oct 11 2018, 12:39:19)
[GCC 4.2.1 Compatible OpenBSD Clang 6.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_600/final)] on o
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license"
see 2 possible cause :
- your python script,
- or maybe the userid for which your python script runs is not the one
defined in doas.conf.
i switch back to spawnl function and it worked with doas so I will stick
with that since it's working. Maybe later I will revisit the problem and
give it an
Hello Markus,
I cannot reproduce your problem.
As you can see here under I can create a user "test1" on the command line,
and, with the same userid, I can create it with python2 and python3 too.
(I'm running 6.4)
I see 2 possible cause :
- your python script,
- or maybe the u
Hi Vincent
Am 30.10.2018 um 16:03 schrieb Vincent Legoll:
Maybe you should try like the following:
cmd = ['doas', 'useradd',
'-u', user_id,
'-g', '=uid',
'-s', '/sbin/nologin',
'-d', mb_parent_dir,
user_name]
exit = subprocess.check_call(cmd)
this doesn't solve the problem, i
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 12:33 PM Markus Rosjat wrote:
> exit = subprocess.check_call(['doas', 'useradd', '-u %s' % user_id,
> '-g =uid',
> '-s /sbin/nologin',
> '-d %s' % mb_parent_dir,
> user_name])
Maybe you should try like the following:
cmd = ['doas', 'useradd',
'-u', user_id,
Hi,
as I stated before on a cmd is no problem, Im using 6.4 release
Am 30.10.2018 um 12:56 schrieb Solene Rapenne:
Markus Rosjat wrote:
hi all,
I have some old python scripts that using os.spawnl to execute stuff
like useradd combined with sudo. This worked just fine on systems with
sudo
Markus Rosjat wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I have some old python scripts that using os.spawnl to execute stuff
> like useradd combined with sudo. This worked just fine on systems with
> sudo installed but these days we have doas and its totally enough for
> things I use to do s
hi all,
I have some old python scripts that using os.spawnl to execute stuff
like useradd combined with sudo. This worked just fine on systems with
sudo installed but these days we have doas and its totally enough for
things I use to do so I said to myself "lets update these old sc
On 0816 1541, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> butresin wrote on Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 03:28:57PM +0200:
>
> > There is a python script, what is using the /proc/ directory.
> [...]
> > Should i worry?
>
> Yes, you should: /proc is a mostly broken concept.
&g
ser www read and write to
>it?
>On Aug 12, 2018 11:40 AM, Tony Boston wrote:
>>
>> On 12.08.18 03:25, flipchan wrote:
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> > im trying to run a python flask application with httpd
>> > as a reverse proxy and im not getti
What are the permissions on the socket? Can user www read and write to it?
On Aug 12, 2018 11:40 AM, Tony Boston wrote:
>
> On 12.08.18 03:25, flipchan wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > im trying to run a python flask application with httpd
> > as a reverse proxy
On 12.08.18 03:25, flipchan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> im trying to run a python flask application with httpd
> as a reverse proxy and im not getting it to work.
>
> According to the python flask's online documentation,
> i should be able to just create a fast-cgi socke
Hello all,
im trying to run a python flask application with httpd
as a reverse proxy and im not getting it to work.
According to the python flask's online documentation,
i should be able to just create a fast-cgi socket that
should work with httpd, however i am only getting 500
errors w
On 2018-05-01, IL Ka wrote:
>> while there are Python modules which rely on W|X.
> Yes, but I do not use them.
>
> I only run Python and Django.
> I am aware of the fact that my python is not compatible with some modules,
> and I am ok with it since I do not need them.
>
Not exactly. For starters right now I am getting to know OpenBSD as a
platform
so at this point is more about evaluating if and how to alter my workflows
to
better fit with the platform.
Next off though is in general with python code I do consider it important to
think about what the deployment
Hi, Ken.
Did you noticed that you are spending much more time
with setting up your env every time you want to run your
python apps than with programming itself?
No offense but I think this is not normal.
Ve.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 04:46:49PM +, Ken MacKenzie wrote:
> Is there a recommended best practice when setting up an environment with
> python
> virtualenv with regards to wxallowed.
>
> My typical workflow is under my home directory I have a
> dev/language/project/.venv
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 04:22:50PM +, Ken MacKenzie wrote:
> I power my flying car with flying monkeys...
>
No need to, I am free as a bird, I can power my flying car
with my flying wings. Oh, wait, I don't have wings...
Anyway, nice joke, but I feel myself embarrasing.
I power my flying car with flying monkeys...
I think the best answer from all this comes back to, at least for python 3,
switching over to the built in venv in python3.
Other than that the symlink to a location in /usr/local for venv is another
option for python 2 or packages that need to
Leonid Bobrov wrote:
> I have a plan how to completely get rid of wxallowed mount option,
> but I am not yet skilled to fix W|X ports, especially the ones
> written in C++ (I've started learning C++ recently).
Is that like
"I have a plan to build a flying car, but I don't
yet have any meta
> while there are Python modules which rely on W|X.
Yes, but I do not use them.
I only run Python and Django.
I am aware of the fact that my python is not compatible with some modules,
and I am ok with it since I do not need them.
> use ports instead of pkg_add to get Python binary witho
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 06:09:59PM +0300, IL Ka wrote:
> >
> > So you're now on a custom built python and are unable to use standard
>
> pkg_add upgrades to new versions. I'd say that on balance, this is more
> > likely to *reduce* your security.
>
>
>
>
> So you're now on a custom built python and are unable to use standard
pkg_add upgrades to new versions. I'd say that on balance, this is more
> likely to *reduce* your security.
I built it from ports, so I can update it using standard port update
procedure.
Since pack
- On Apr 30, 2018, at 5:46 PM, Ken MacKenzie k...@mack-z.com wrote:
> Is there a recommended best practice when setting up an environment with
> python
> virtualenv with regards to wxallowed.
I use a specific directory in /usr/local which is very close to your option 2:
# mkdi
On 05/01/18 01:54, IL Ka wrote:
Since /usr/local/ has wxallowed by default (see your /etc/fstab) it works.
Does it affect security?
In theory -- yes, because python can now create WX pages.
True. But I use this solution because:
- root controls what goes in /usr/local
- I mount /home
On 2018-05-01, IL Ka wrote:
> It is up to you, but I still belive that best solution is to rebuild python
> without of wxneeded.
> 1) It improves security
So you're now on a custom built python and are unable to use standard
pkg_add upgrades to new versions. I'd say that on ba
The only difference is venv creates link to python, it does not copy binary
itself.
You now have
python3 -> /usr/local/bin/python3
in your venv.
Since /usr/local/ has wxallowed by default (see your /etc/fstab) it works.
Does it affect security?
In theory -- yes, because python can now create
from a
serving python web app perspective, security wise?
Just trying to understand what I seem to be missing.
Ken
On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 03:18:00AM +0300, IL Ka wrote:
> It is up to you, but I still belive that best solution is to rebuild python
> without of wxneeded.
> 1) It improves
It is up to you, but I still belive that best solution is to rebuild python
without of wxneeded.
1) It improves security
2) It fixes your virtualenv issue.
If you do not use packages that need WX, why do you need wxneed?
I happen to like python and will be the first I reach for for many simple or
even some bigger tasks. Nothing against those other languages. I actually have a
special place in my heart for perl, but with the perl 5 vs 6 thing I wonder on
the longer term future of the language.
Honestly I need to
Thanks for all the responses but it seems an alternate solution presented by
another user in a direct reply is to use python3 - m venv. Basically using the
venv built in to python3 as opposed to the legacy method of py-virtualenv that I
typically only have to use for older python 2 code bases
Ken MacKenzie writes:
> Is there a recommended best practice when setting up an environment with
> python
> virtualenv with regards to wxallowed.
AFAIK nothing official.
>
> My typical workflow is under my home directory I have a
> dev/language/project/.venv type structure.
1 - 100 of 274 matches
Mail list logo
