Re: Q: Problems forwarding traffic using pf ...

Sorry about the delay in replying, i was travelling ... On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 06:04:25PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > ... > > May 23 10:32:13.267374 rule 1/(match) pass in on em0: 192.168.178.166.56334 > > > 192.168.178.11.54321: udp 7 > So this last one never leaves, right? Right.

Re: Q: Problems forwarding traffic using pf ...

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 06:04:25PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:14:20AM +0200, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > pfctl reports: > > # pfctl -vvs rules | grep @ > > @0 block return log all > > @1 pass in log on em0 inet proto udp from

Re: Q: Problems forwarding traffic using pf ...

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:14:20AM +0200, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > pfctl reports: > # pfctl -vvs rules | grep @ > @0 block return log all > @1 pass in log on em0 inet proto udp from 192.168.178.166 to any tag UDP > @2 pass out log on ure0 all flags S/SA tagged UDP > > I

Re: Q: Problems forwarding traffic using pf ...

Hi Guys, Thanks for the feedback, to address your points: 1> Possibly stupid question, but did you set the sysctl(s) to enable forwarding? Yes I tried this pf rule change with version 4 forwarding (net.inet.ip.forwarding) both enabled and disabled. Either way the pf "pass out tagged" rule is

Re: Q: Problems forwarding traffic using pf ...

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 08:24:03PM +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: > On 23/05/2024 20:18, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:14:20AM +0200, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > > I need to quickly create a solution for forwarding multicast traffic > > > between two

Re: Q: Problems forwarding traffic using pf ...

On 23/05/2024 20:18, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:14:20AM +0200, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: I need to quickly create a solution for forwarding multicast traffic between two systems, so I though perhaps I could use pf to do just that by writing some rules along

Re: Q: Problems forwarding traffic using pf ...

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:14:20AM +0200, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > I need to quickly create a solution for forwarding multicast traffic > between two systems, so I though perhaps I could use pf to do just that > by writing some rules along the lines of: > > 1. pass in on iface A

Q: Problems forwarding traffic using pf ...

Hi All, I need to quickly create a solution for forwarding multicast traffic between two systems, so I though perhaps I could use pf to do just that by writing some rules along the lines of: 1. pass in on iface A proto UDP ... tag mcast 2. pass out on iface B tagged mcast And

Re: pkg_info -Q confusion

> Am 15.04.2023 um 23:44 schrieb Antun Matanović : > >> I'm generally interested in what is available for the exact machine I am >> running on. > > You could use `pkg_info -a -Q` which searches all the repositories. >> From the pkg_info man page: >

Re: pkg_info -Q confusion

> I'm generally interested in what is available for the exact machine I am > running on. You could use `pkg_info -a -Q` which searches all the repositories. >From the pkg_info man page: -Q substring Show the names of all packages in the first r

Re: pkg_info -Q confusion

> Am 14.04.2023 um 18:24 schrieb Allan Streib : > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023, at 05:50, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> I never found pkg_info -Q to be a useful tool. >> >> Try pkglocate instead ("pkg_add pkglocatedb" first) which allows >> searching on an

Re: pkg_info -Q confusion

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023, at 05:50, Stuart Henderson wrote: > I never found pkg_info -Q to be a useful tool. > > Try pkglocate instead ("pkg_add pkglocatedb" first) which allows > searching on an index that is built from : - as a > result it lets you do a substring match o

Re: pkg_info -Q confusion

Inline… > Am 14.04.2023 um 12:50 schrieb Stuart Henderson : > > On 2023-04-14, Mike Fischer wrote: >> Usually when looking for a port to install I use `pkg_info -Q name` to >> search for the the port. >> >> Strangely this does not completely work for PHP on

Re: pkg_info -Q confusion

On 2023-04-14, Mike Fischer wrote: > Usually when looking for a port to install I use `pkg_info -Q name` to > search for the the port. > > Strangely this does not completely work for PHP on OpenBSD 7.3: > > `pkg_info -Q php` does not list PHP 7.4.33 and related ports wh

pkg_info -Q confusion

Usually when looking for a port to install I use `pkg_info -Q name` to search for the the port. Strangely this does not completely work for PHP on OpenBSD 7.3: `pkg_info -Q php` does not list PHP 7.4.33 and related ports which are clearly available. It seems that -Q only finds ports

Re: Q: Error: mount_mfs: mmap: Cannot allocate memory

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 03:10:08PM +0100, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > However, I also tried testing the same two filesystems using the > "Flexible IO Tester" or fio (it's available as a package). When I used it > to do random 4K reads and writes, I appear to have the opposite result: ...

Re: Q: Error: mount_mfs: mmap: Cannot allocate memory

On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 01:50:13PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote: > ... > It maybe worth checking whether mfs is actually helping - > it's easy to assume that because it's in RAM it must be fast, > but I've had machines where mfs was slower than SSD >

Re: Q: Error: mount_mfs: mmap: Cannot allocate memory

On 2023-02-12, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > You're exactly right. With this entry in fstab: >> swap /tmp mfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=4194304 0 0 > > I now have this /tmp space: >> mjoelnir:~ 12.02 13:15:07 % df -h >> Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on >> /dev/sd1a

Re: Q: Error: mount_mfs: mmap: Cannot allocate memory

On Sun, Feb 12, 2023 at 01:28:04PM +0100, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:50:44PM -0300, Crystal Kolipe wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 06:05:22PM +0100, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > ... > > > The fstab file contains this mount entry for tmp: > > >

Re: Q: Error: mount_mfs: mmap: Cannot allocate memory

On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:50:44PM -0300, Crystal Kolipe wrote: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 06:05:22PM +0100, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > ... > > The fstab file contains this mount entry for tmp: > > swap /tmp mfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=16777216 0 0 > > This is 8 Gb, which exceeds the default

Re: Q: Error: mount_mfs: mmap: Cannot allocate memory

On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 06:05:22PM +0100, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > mount_mfs: mmap: Cannot allocate memory ... > The fstab file contains this mount entry for tmp: > swap /tmp mfs rw,nodev,nosuid,-s=16777216 0 0 This is 8 Gb, which exceeds the default value for datasize for the daemon

Q: Error: mount_mfs: mmap: Cannot allocate memory

Hi All, After an update to a recent snapshot on my desktop system, I noticed these mount_mfs messages at boot time: /dev/sd0h (7a1775fef773535e.h): file system is clean; not checking /dev/sd1j (281ef747da03afe7.j): file system is clean; not checking /dev/sd1k (281ef747da03afe7.k): file system

Re: pkg_info -Q not finding all entries?

On Mon, 2023-01-30 at 11:26 +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2023-01-30, David Demelier wrote: > > While searching for sqlite3 I've realized that pkg_info -Q sqlite3 > > finds some php packages but not everything available in the remote > > repository: > > This is

Re: pkg_info -Q not finding all entries?

On 2023-01-30, David Demelier wrote: > While searching for sqlite3 I've realized that pkg_info -Q sqlite3 > finds some php packages but not everything available in the remote > repository: This is a consequence of the "first repository of the package search path" limitation of

Re: pkg_info -Q not finding all entries?

Hi, * David Demelier wrote: > Hello, > > While searching for sqlite3 I've realized that pkg_info -Q sqlite3 > finds some php packages but not everything available in the remote > repository: > > # cat /etc/installurl > ht

pkg_info -Q not finding all entries?

Hello, While searching for sqlite3 I've realized that pkg_info -Q sqlite3 finds some php packages but not everything available in the remote repository: # cat /etc/installurl https://ftp.fr.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/ # pkg_info -Q sqlite3 debug-php

Re: Q: dmesg: dt: 443 probes

Am Tue, May 04, 2021 at 03:38:14PM - schrieb Stuart Henderson: > On 2021-05-04, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 12:59:27AM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > >> > ... > >> > But when I do (as root): "sysctl kern.allowdt=1" it returns this error: > >> > sysctl:

Re: Q: dmesg: dt: 443 probes

On 2021-05-04, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 12:59:27AM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: >> > ... >> > But when I do (as root): "sysctl kern.allowdt=1" it returns this error: >> > sysctl: kern.allowdt: Operation not permitted >> >> Similarly to kern.allowkmem, you can

Re: Q: dmesg: dt: 443 probes

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 12:59:27AM +0200, Patrick Wildt wrote: > > ... > > But when I do (as root): "sysctl kern.allowdt=1" it returns this error: > > sysctl: kern.allowdt: Operation not permitted > > Similarly to kern.allowkmem, you can only set it when the securelevel is > still 'low'.

Re: Q: dmesg: dt: 443 probes

Am Sun, May 02, 2021 at 11:49:10PM +0200 schrieb Why 42? The lists account.: > > Actually I do notice one thing, having just upgraded to: > kern.version=OpenBSD 6.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #492: Sat May 1 17:37:28 MDT > 2021 > > I checked the output from dmesg and I have a new boot time message:

Q: dmesg: dt: 443 probes

Actually I do notice one thing, having just upgraded to: kern.version=OpenBSD 6.9-current (GENERIC.MP) #492: Sat May 1 17:37:28 MDT 2021 I checked the output from dmesg and I have a new boot time message: dt: 443 probes man dt tells me that dt is dynamic tracing and that I can enable it by

Re: Q: pkg_add fails with: TLS handshake failure: ocsp verify failed: Undefined error ...

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:56:11PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote: > In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, li...@y42.org wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > What would cause pkg_add -u to report this error? > >> https://ftp.fau.de/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/: TLS handshake > >> failure: ocsp verify

Re: Q: pkg_add fails with: TLS handshake failure: ocsp verify failed: Undefined error ...

ycJ5v/hqO2V81xrJvNHy+SE/iWjnX2J14np+GPgNeGYtEotXHAgMBAAGj QjBAMA8GA1UdEwEB/wQFMAMBAf8wDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgEGMB0GA1UdDgQWBBS/ WSA2AHmgoCJrjNXyYdK4LMuCSjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAMQOiYQsfdOhy NsZt+U2e+iKo4YFWz827n+qrkRk4r6p8FU3ztqONpfSO9kSpp+ghla0+AGIWiPAC uvxhI+YzmzB6azZie60EI4RYZeLbK4rnJVM3YlNfvNoBYimipidx5joi

Q: pkg_add fails with: TLS handshake failure: ocsp verify failed: Undefined error ...

Hi All, What would cause pkg_add -u to report this error? > https://ftp.fau.de/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/: TLS handshake > failure: ocsp verify failed: Undefined error: 0 > https://ftp.fau.de/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/: empty > Couldn't find updates for ... a long list of

Re: FFS sync/async/softdep mount opts clarifications gap q stable is softdep now?

On Sunday, 14 March 2021 16:31, Joseph Mayer wrote: > Hi misc@! (Copying posters to the previous threads on this topic) Pondering further: 5) "mount -o sync" is practically never useful, isn't it so?: mount's default synchronicity setting is that data is written asynchronously. But,

FFS sync/async/softdep mount opts clarifications gap q stable is softdep now?

Hi misc@! (Copying posters to the previous threads on this topic) I just took the time to go through the ML archive's writeups between now and 2015, about FFS mount options in respect of synchronicity and especially softdep. Here I like to bring up four points to conversation: 1) OpenBSD's

Re: Quick Q: proc: table is full ?

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 05:56:16PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > What causes "proc: table is full", or better asked, what limit might I be > > hitting? > Perhaps kern.maxthread; check kern.nthreads. Hi Stuart, Aha. I think you have nailed it: > mjoelnir:/etc 19.01 21:13:02 # sysctl kern |

Re: Quick Q: proc: table is full ?

On 2021-01-19, Why 42? The lists account. wrote: > > Hi All, > > What causes "proc: table is full", or better asked, what limit might I be > hitting? Perhaps kern.maxthread; check kern.nthreads.

Quick Q: proc: table is full ?

Hi All, What causes "proc: table is full", or better asked, what limit might I be hitting? I wrote a quick loop to check how many processes are running i.e. > while true > do > DATE=`date +'%Y.%m.%d %H:%M:%S'` > echo -n "${DATE}: " > ps -AHk | wc -l > sleep 90 > done > 2021.01.19

hostctl -q print no infomation

A am using OpenBSD-current on VMware ESXi. The hostinfo command print no information with -q option. Is this a expected behavior? $ hostctl guestinfo.ip 172.19.200.100 $ hostctl -q guestinfo.ip $ The following is an extract from man hostctl. -q Don't ask for confirmation of any

Re: pkg_info -Q bug?

+++ usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/PkgInfo.pm23 Nov 2019 17:45:52 - @@ -597,15 +597,18 @@ sub parse_and_run $state->say("PKG_PATH=#1", $ENV{PKG_PATH} // "") if $state->verbose; my $partial = OpenBSD::Search::PartialStem->new($state->op

Re: pkg_info -Q bug?

on a fresh 6.6 installation. >> > I also tried with a different mirror in /etc/installurl and receive >> > the same partial response from pkg_info -Q. >> > What makes it even more odd is that pkg_add finds the correct package. >> >> Thanks Antonio for double-c

Re: pkg_info -Q bug?

ied with a different mirror in /etc/installurl and receive > > the same partial response from pkg_info -Q. > > What makes it even more odd is that pkg_add finds the correct package. > > Thanks Antonio for double-checking this! I have also tested it on a > fresh installation

Re: pkg_info -Q bug?

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:15:05AM +0100, Antonio Bibiano wrote: Hello, I just wanted to add to this thread that I incurred in the same issue on a fresh 6.6 installation. I also tried with a different mirror in /etc/installurl and receive the same partial response from pkg_info -Q. What makes

Re: pkg_info -Q bug?

Hello, I just wanted to add to this thread that I incurred in the same issue on a fresh 6.6 installation. I also tried with a different mirror in /etc/installurl and receive the same partial response from pkg_info -Q. What makes it even more odd is that pkg_add finds the correct package. Cheers

Re: pkg_info -Q bug?

On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 08:04:45PM +, Raf Czlonka wrote: On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 05:45:23PM GMT, Dumitru Moldovan wrote: Hi misc, I see pkg_info's man page says: -Q query Show all packages in $PKG_PATH which match the given query. Trying in 6.6 to find the Python module

Re: pkg_info -Q bug?

On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 05:45:23PM GMT, Dumitru Moldovan wrote: > > Hi misc, > > I see pkg_info's man page says: > >-Q query >Show all packages in $PKG_PATH which match the given query. > > Trying in 6.6 to find the Python module "mysqlclient&

pkg_info -Q bug?

Hi misc, I see pkg_info's man page says: -Q query Show all packages in $PKG_PATH which match the given query. Trying in 6.6 to find the Python module "mysqlclient", I get the following puzzling results: $ pkg_info -Q mysql php-mysqli-7.2.24 php-mysqli-7.3.11 php-pdo_my

pkg_info -Q multiple queries?

Hello, Is there a way to do multiple queries at once using pkg_info? Something like: pkg_info -Q query1 query2 ... The best I've found so far is to do something like: for q in query1 query2 ...; do pkg_info -Q $q; done which is slow when the list of queries is long (my network bandwidth

Re: boot -s shutdown q.?

Hi Harold, harold felton wrote on Sat, Jul 06, 2019 at 12:52:12PM +: > > boot -s > (only / mounted ro, other filesystems [/usr,..] not-mounted) > # shutdown now > shutdown: unveil: No such file or directory > (original version, and recompiled-default-version same-msg) > > # shutdown.patch

Re: boot -s shutdown q.?

update: re-patch... > boot -s (only / mounted ro, other filesystems [/usr,..] not-mounted) # shutdown now shutdown: unveil: No such file or directory (original version, and recompiled-default-version same-msg) # shutdown.patch now shutdown: unveil: Read-only file system i started to try and

Re: boot -s shutdown q.?

thanx ingo, correct - it did not occur to me to mount /usr since my single-user skills are minimal, at best... "halt" should have been my correct response (rather than power-button 4-sec) and i will need to go spend a bit more time to be able to try your untested-patch... (ie - i need to do the

Re: boot -s shutdown q.?

Hi Harold, harold felton wrote on Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 11:16:01PM +: > On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:39:55PM +, harold felton wrote: >> boot -s Did you mount(8) /usr between the above and the below? >> # shutdown now > shutdown: unveil: No such file or directory If the answer to the

Re: boot -s shutdown q.?

adding dmesg/hw-sensors... hth, h. On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 11:16 PM harold felton wrote: > uh - ok, but i had gone into single-user to run/fix some fsck-stuff > so i had assumed that somehow i mightve borked something... > > shutdown: unveil: No such file or directory > > is the exact message...

Re: boot -s shutdown q.?

uh - ok, but i had gone into single-user to run/fix some fsck-stuff so i had assumed that somehow i mightve borked something... shutdown: unveil: No such file or directory is the exact message... in-case-it-matters i hit RETURN for default sh ... since i was in single-user mode i wasnt able to

Re: boot -s shutdown q.?

On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:39:55PM +, harold felton wrote: > howdee, > > just need a confirmation that there is something wrong > with my system since i dont have a spare running atm... > > > boot -s > # shutdown now > > i get an error message about "unveil" missing ? > > tia, h. > > ps

boot -s shutdown q.?

howdee, just need a confirmation that there is something wrong with my system since i dont have a spare running atm... > boot -s # shutdown now i get an error message about "unveil" missing ? tia, h. ps - i would rather reinstall than try to debug but can provide dmesg if nec. (running

Re: Q: Systems with Skylake based XEON silver CPUs supported by OpenBSD 6.3 amd64

Hello Peter, On Wed, 2018-07-18 at 12:40 +, Steiner Peter wrote: > Hello folks, > > we are currently looking for new server hardware compatible with > OpenBSD 6.3 amd64. > I couldn't find a compatibility list for current systems. > > We'd like to use Skylake based XEONs (e.g. Xeon Silver

Q: Systems with Skylake based XEON silver CPUs supported by OpenBSD 6.3 amd64

Hello folks, we are currently looking for new server hardware compatible with OpenBSD 6.3 amd64. I couldn't find a compatibility list for current systems. We'd like to use Skylake based XEONs (e.g. Xeon Silver 4108) in current dual (or single) socket systems like "Dell PowerR640", "Fujitsu

Re: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_=ef=bf=bccloning_to_smaller_hard_disk?

my way has a weak point that the kernel of the small HDD may become different from that of the big HDD by of using ' upgrade ' . ( it is good in case of virsion up 6.2->6.3 ) are there sophistcated methods not chainging kernel ? i used 'upgrade' process to load the boot loader to small HDD .

Re: pkg_info -Q fails [OpenBSD 6.3 amd64/virtualbox]

info script. > > So, to sum up: > > Pkg_add works; > Syspatch works; > Cloudflare was up last time I tried it; > Despite the above, pkg_info -Q does *not* work. Try this: $ su -l root # echo 'https://fastly.cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/

Re: pkg_info -Q fails [OpenBSD 6.3 amd64/virtualbox]

t; > Syspatch works; > > Cloudflare was up last time I tried it; > > Despite the above, pkg_info -Q does *not* work. > > Try this: > > $ su -l root > # echo 'https://fastly.cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/' > /etc/installurl > # unset PKG_PATH > # pkg_info -Q mat

Re: pkg_info -Q fails [OpenBSD 6.3 amd64/virtualbox]

; >> So, to sum up: >> >> Pkg_add works; >> Syspatch works; >> Cloudflare was up last time I tried it; >> Despite the above, pkg_info -Q does *not* work. > >Try this: > >$ su -l root ># echo 'https://fastly.cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/' > /etc/i

Re: pkg_info -Q fails [OpenBSD 6.3 amd64/virtualbox]

med would be fixed. > The issue may simply be one of consistency, but looks more likely to be an > error in the pkg_info script. > > So, to sum up: > > Pkg_add works; > Syspatch works; > Cloudflare was up last time I tried it; > Despite the above, pkg_info -Q does *not* w

Re: pkg_info -Q fails [OpenBSD 6.3 amd64/virtualbox]

to be an error in the pkg_info script. So, to sum up: Pkg_add works; Syspatch works; Cloudflare was up last time I tried it; Despite the above, pkg_info -Q does *not* work. Jeff ⁣Sent from Blue ​ On 15 Apr 2018, 03:26, at 03:26, Edgar Pettijohn <ed...@pettijohn-web.com> wrote: > > >

Re: pkg_info -Q fails [OpenBSD 6.3 amd64/virtualbox]

Hi, I've installed OpenBSD 6.3-release for amd64 on virtualbox, and updated it with syspatch as of 20:40 UTC. pkg_info -Q seems to be failing. Specifically, I tried $ pkg_info -Q mate ...and also as root, to remind myself what the metapackage is [I have a feeling it's

pkg_info -Q fails [OpenBSD 6.3 amd64/virtualbox]

Hi, I've installed OpenBSD 6.3-release for amd64 on virtualbox, and updated it with syspatch as of 20:40 UTC. pkg_info -Q seems to be failing. Specifically, I tried $ pkg_info -Q mate ...and also as root, to remind myself what the metapackage is [I have a feeling it's just "mate" any

Re: [Q] Thinkpad x230, softraid crypto and ZZZ

> On 03 Jul 2016, at 20:30, Mike Larkin wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 01:40:39PM -0400, Bryan Everly wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have suspend to RAM working just fine on this system but when I try to >> suspend to disk (ZZZ) it just hangs the system (I thought it might just

Re: [Q] Thinkpad x230, softraid crypto and ZZZ

On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 01:40:39PM -0400, Bryan Everly wrote: > Hi, > > I have suspend to RAM working just fine on this system but when I try to > suspend to disk (ZZZ) it just hangs the system (I thought it might just > be slow so I let it run for 2 hours and it never completed). Some data >

[Q] Thinkpad x230, softraid crypto and ZZZ

Hi, I have suspend to RAM working just fine on this system but when I try to suspend to disk (ZZZ) it just hangs the system (I thought it might just be slow so I let it run for 2 hours and it never completed). Some data points: 1. I encrypt my boot drive (sd0) with softraid 2. My

Re: [Q] Building a release, how do I create install60.fs and install60.iso

With help from Theo Buehler, I was able to create the install60.fs and install60.iso images. I would like to propose a patch to /usr/src/share/man/man8/release.8 that includes what I learned. I have attached a CVS diff of the proposed manpage change. Should I submit the patch to this list or to

Re: [Q] Building a release, how do I create install60.fs and install60.iso

> They are part of release. > (man release) > > The rules are somewhere arch-dependent under distrib, e.g., > distrib/macppc/iso Marc, Thanks for the reply. I was following along with man release - unfortunately my RELEASEDIR doesn't contain those two files. I'm guessing that there is some

Re: [Q] Building a release, how do I create install60.fs and install60.iso

Thanks Scott. I'm backing up the internal drive via time machine right now. I have a hacked kernel that is seeing the NVMe drive just fine. I'm going to shrink it, create an empty partition and see what happens when I try to install OpenBSD 6.0-current on it. Thanks, Bryan On Fri, Jun 17,

Re: [Q] Building a release, how do I create install60.fs and install60.iso

Just wanted to say good luck and I'm rooting for you! I've got a Macbook8,1 that would be better with OpenBSD running most days instead of OS X. :) On 06/16, Bryan C. Everly wrote: Sorry if this is an obvious one but I've been all over the FAQ, read the makefiles, etc. and cannot for the

Re: [Q] Building a release, how do I create install60.fs and install60.iso

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:39:50PM -0400, Bryan C. Everly wrote: > Sorry if this is an obvious one but I've been all over the FAQ, read the > makefiles, etc. and cannot for the life of me figure out how those files > get created. I have everything else (all of the *.tgz files, etc.) just > not

Re: [Q] Building a release, how do I create install60.fs and install60.iso

On 17.06.2016 03:39, Bryan C. Everly wrote: Sorry if this is an obvious one but I've been all over the FAQ, read the makefiles, etc. and cannot for the life of me figure out how those files get created. I have everything else (all of the *.tgz files, etc.) just not these two. man release

[Q] Building a release, how do I create install60.fs and install60.iso

Sorry if this is an obvious one but I've been all over the FAQ, read the makefiles, etc. and cannot for the life of me figure out how those files get created. I have everything else (all of the *.tgz files, etc.) just not these two. I'm probably on a fool's errand but I'm trying to get this

Can read-only mmap() and fwrite() be combined.. via msync or something? In OpenBSD now. (repetition of Q sorry)

Hi! This question was answered as part of another conversation 1-2 years ago however I totally forgot and due to its relative complexity I simply wish to ask it again as to have it set in stone: In OpenBSD's current absence of a Unified Buffer Cache, is there any trick that I can apply to

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

Another feature to look for is spin down of the dedicated hot spare. Go Vikings :) Patrick > On Feb 21, 2016, at 7:23 AM, Marcus MERIGHI wrote: > > ti...@openmailbox.org (Tinker), 2016.02.20 (Sat) 21:05 (CET): >> So glad to understand better what's in the box. >> >> Also

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

ti...@openmailbox.org (Tinker), 2016.02.20 (Sat) 21:05 (CET): > So glad to understand better what's in the box. > > Also please note that I'm not trying to suggest to implement lots of > crap, am perfectly clear that high security is correlated with low > complexity. > > On 2016-02-21 00:29,

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

On 20 February 2016 at 14:29, Tinker wrote: [..] > On 2016-02-21 04:39, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: [..] >> When you do http://mdoc.su/o/newfs.8, it does not write to every >> sector of the underlying partition; thus you cannot expect all sectors >> to be the same. > > >

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

On 2016-02-21 05:05, Karel Gardas wrote: The RAID 1 discipline does not initialize the mirror upon creation. This is by design because all sectors that are read are written first. There is no point in wasting a lot of time syncing random data. I'm afraid the claim "all sectors that are read

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > > Scrub cannot possibly be supported due to the design of the softraid: > > http://mdoc.su/o/softraid.4 > > The RAID 1 discipline does not initialize the mirror upon creation. This > is by design because

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

On 20 February 2016 at 12:23, Tinker wrote: > > On 2016-02-21 01:29, Karel Gardas wrote: >> >> scrub is IIRC not supported by any softraid yet. > > > But there's "patrol"! > > "bioctl -t start mysoftraid" [...] > On 2016-02-21 02:44, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: >> >> On

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Tinker wrote: > > On 2016-02-21 01:29, Karel Gardas wrote: >> >> scrub is IIRC not supported by any softraid yet. > > > But there's "patrol"! > > "bioctl -t start mysoftraid" bioctl also supports hardware raid cards besides softraid, so

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

On 2016-02-21 01:29, Karel Gardas wrote: scrub is IIRC not supported by any softraid yet. But there's "patrol"! "bioctl -t start mysoftraid" Rebuild by all which support redundancy. Yey! Clarified by Marcus & looking forward to his clarification Marcus recommendation to read man pages

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

Marcus, Holy moly, that is beautiful. So glad to understand better what's in the box. Also please note that I'm not trying to suggest to implement lots of crap, am perfectly clear that high security is correlated with low complexity. On 2016-02-21 00:29, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

On 20 February 2016 at 10:29, Karel Gardas wrote: > scrub is IIRC not supported by any softraid yet. Rebuild by all which > support redundancy. Marcus recommendation to read man pages can just > be highlighted here. Otherwise just read the code for ultimate > reference of what

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

scrub is IIRC not supported by any softraid yet. Rebuild by all which support redundancy. Marcus recommendation to read man pages can just be highlighted here. Otherwise just read the code for ultimate reference of what is or is not done.

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

ti...@openmailbox.org (Tinker), 2016.02.20 (Sat) 16:43 (CET): > On 2016-02-20 22:23, Marcus MERIGHI wrote: > >ti...@openmailbox.org (Tinker), 2016.02.20 (Sat) 15:29 (CET): > >>This email is an attempt to get some knowledge on how softraid works. > > > >So many of your questions are answered if you

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

On 2016-02-20 22:23, Marcus MERIGHI wrote: ti...@openmailbox.org (Tinker), 2016.02.20 (Sat) 15:29 (CET): This email is an attempt to get some knowledge on how softraid works. So many of your questions are answered if you start with bioctl(8)[1], and continue with softraid(4)[2]. Maybe

Re: OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

ti...@openmailbox.org (Tinker), 2016.02.20 (Sat) 15:29 (CET): > This email is an attempt to get some knowledge on how softraid works. So many of your questions are answered if you start with bioctl(8)[1], and continue with softraid(4)[2]. Maybe bio(4)[3] helps, too. What's there is usually

OpenBSD softraid can do scrub, hotspare, hotswap? How do rebuild + those 3 really done? (Absence of docs and howtos - ultimate Q!)

Hi, This email is an attempt to get some knowledge on how softraid works. There's basically zero docs on these topics out here (all docs are about how to set it up first & subsequent times in non-failure cases). If you would be able to respond in "HOWTO form" would be awesome, then at least

Re: routing q

On 19/10/15(Mon) 13:37, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > On 10/19/2015 01:24 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > >On 2015-10-19, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > >>In order to conserve address space I am trying to confugure 'ip > >>unnumbred' in cisco terminology, that is have an interface borrow

Re: routing q

On 10/19/2015 02:14 PM, Martin Pieuchot wrote: On 19/10/15(Mon) 13:37, Gregory Edigarov wrote: On 10/19/2015 01:24 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2015-10-19, Gregory Edigarov wrote: In order to conserve address space I am trying to confugure 'ip unnumbred' in cisco

routing q

Hello, In order to conserve address space I am trying to confugure 'ip unnumbred' in cisco terminology, that is have an interface borrow the ip of a different interface, I am experimenting with vether0 and vlans the thing is to have one 'main' address on some 'real' interface and then just

Re: routing q

On 2015-10-19, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > In order to conserve address space I am trying to confugure 'ip > unnumbred' in cisco terminology, that is have an interface borrow the ip > of a different interface, I am experimenting with vether0 and vlans the > thing is to have

Re: routing q

On 10/19/2015 01:24 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2015-10-19, Gregory Edigarov wrote: In order to conserve address space I am trying to confugure 'ip unnumbred' in cisco terminology, that is have an interface borrow the ip of a different interface, I am experimenting with

Re: Fwd: Re: Q: Assistance with pf.conf rules

On 2015-06-24, John Nyhuis jnyh...@uw.edu wrote: bond0 is a virtual interface that consists of two LACP bonded NICs. This doesn't sound like OpenBSD...

Re: Fwd: Re: Q: Assistance with pf.conf rules

} pass quick on fw all keep state ideas or comments? Anyone have a better way? Thanks, John Nyhuis IT Manager, Stam Lab 2211 Elliott Avenue 6th Floor, 6S139 Seattle, WA 98121 O: (206)-267-1097 ext 220 F: (206)-441-3033 Forwarded Message Subject: Re: Q: Assistance with pf.conf rules

  1   2   3   >