xternal interface, and gets routes to internal subnets by means of
> OSPF with Juniper switch over internal interface.
>
> Host on one of internal subnets queries snmpd listening on internal
> interface of OpenBSD firewall. When OSPF on OpenBSD firewall is
> up, requests arrive on in
Hi,
my OpenBSD firewall has static default route to the Internet over
external interface, and gets routes to internal subnets by means of
OSPF with Juniper switch over internal interface.
Host on one of internal subnets queries snmpd listening on internal
interface of OpenBSD firewall. When OSPF
Hi,
I use snmpd on OpenBSD 7.4 and try to get it work with PyAgentX3 [1] in
order to provide additional data to the SNMP daemon. To test it, I use
the minimal agent as provided in the PyAgentX3 readme (with the "print"
function adjusted to Python 3). The respective config line
On 07.01.24 09:37, Martijn van Duren wrote:
On Sat, 2024-01-06 at 16:12 +0100, Nicolas Goy wrote:
Unfortunately this isn't enough to give me a hint where the issue might
be... Let's keep an eye out and hope that we can gather some more
context next time, or that I can find something during norma
Can you reproduce it (somewhat)
> > reliably? Can you run snmpd with -vv to log the request(s) that
> > trigger it. If that's not sufficient context we might need to compile
> > either snmpd and/or libagentx with AX_DEBUG and AX_DEBUG_VERBOSE defined
> > and run it
On Fri, 2024-01-05 at 13:09 +0100, Nicolas Goy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am on OpenBSD 7.4 amd64 and today snmpd died with the following error
> message:
>
> snmpd[44109]: AgentX(1207475061): Protocol
> error<27>snmpd_metrics[52600]: [fd:0 sess:3150713266 ctx:]:
>
Hello,
I am on OpenBSD 7.4 amd64 and today snmpd died with the following error
message:
snmpd[44109]: AgentX(1207475061): Protocol
error<27>snmpd_metrics[52600]: [fd:0 sess:3150713266 ctx:]:
unsupported call: agentx-Close-PDU
snmpd[44109]: AgentX(1207475061/3150713266): Closed by
I have just upgraded a VM from OpenBSD 7.1 to 7.2.
Looks good so far except for snmpd which suddenly fails shortly after starting
up:
>From /var/log/daemon:
Jan 21 22:59:56 wo snmpd[86168]: legacy backend: Registering
1.3.6.1.6.3.15.1.1.6.0(instance) context() priority(1) timeout(1.50s)
Jan
; sshguard-2.4.2 protect against brute force attacks on sshd and others
> symon-2.88p6active host monitoring tool
> tiff-4.4.0p2tools and library routines for working with TIFF images
> unzip-6.0p16extract, list & test files in a ZIP archive
> vnstat-2.6v
m)
zstd-1.5.2 zstandard fast real-time compression algorithm
#
Thanks!
Mike
> Am 21.01.2023 um 23:21 schrieb Mike Fischer :
>
> I have just upgraded a VM from OpenBSD 7.1 to 7.2.
>
> Looks good so far except for snmpd which suddenly fails shortly after
> starting
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 09:51:46AM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020-11-09, Winfred Harrelson wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 01:53:00PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> On 2020-11-06, Winfred Harrelson wrote:
> >> > I am running OpenBSD 6.7 and am hav
On 2020-11-09, Winfred Harrelson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 01:53:00PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2020-11-06, Winfred Harrelson wrote:
>> > I am running OpenBSD 6.7 and am having a strange issue with snmpd(8).
>> >
>> > The issue is that it
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 01:53:00PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2020-11-06, Winfred Harrelson wrote:
> > I am running OpenBSD 6.7 and am having a strange issue with snmpd(8).
> >
> > The issue is that it doesn't have all the arp entries but this was
> &g
On 2020-11-06, Winfred Harrelson wrote:
> I am running OpenBSD 6.7 and am having a strange issue with snmpd(8).
>
> The issue is that it doesn't have all the arp entries but this was
> working before. I don't know exactly when this started happening
> but I just notic
I am running OpenBSD 6.7 and am having a strange issue with snmpd(8).
The issue is that it doesn't have all the arp entries but this was
working before. I don't know exactly when this started happening
but I just noticed today.
Here is the machine in question and what I get:
whar
I see that snmpd.conf supports "read-write disabled", but this doesn't seem to
_completely_ disable the private community. If I set "read-write disabled" I
can still poll values using the 'private' community. Is this a bug or a
feature?
-Steve S.
On 11/27/19 4:27 PM, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have set custom OIDs in my snmpd.conf(5).
> When I walk or get those values, using snmp(1) or snmpget(1), the
> "name" parameters is not listed. I only get values described as
> OPENBSD-BASE-MIB::localTest.*
>
> Is there a straight way to get
Hello,
I have set custom OIDs in my snmpd.conf(5).
When I walk or get those values, using snmp(1) or snmpget(1), the
"name" parameters is not listed. I only get values described as
OPENBSD-BASE-MIB::localTest.*
Is there a straight way to get the configured names from snmp clients?
Or do I have to
On 2018-08-28, Stanislav Yarakaeff wrote:
> Hi!
> We are testing OpenBSD v6 for emmbedded devices and would like get status
> about IPsec from snmpd. In the OPENBSD-BASE-MIB.txt file, I saw the line
> "- ipsecMIBObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER :: = {openBSD 4}".
> How is it
Hi!
We are testing OpenBSD v6 for emmbedded devices and would like get status
about IPsec from snmpd. In the OPENBSD-BASE-MIB.txt file, I saw the line
"- ipsecMIBObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER :: = {openBSD 4}".
How is it possible to determine the status (OID) for snmpd?
Thank you!
Hi,
On OpenBSD 6.3/amd64, I'm using snmpd(8) to gather pf(4) statistics.
It seems that some stats are not coherent.
For example, on egress and vio0 interfaces.
Asking snmpd(8), I get :
OPENBSD-PF-MIB::pfIfDescr.3 = STRING: "egress"
OPENBSD-PF-MIB::pfIfDescr.12 = STRING: "
On 04/12/18 23:13, Joel Carnat wrote:
>> Le 12 avr. 2018 à 21:10, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
>>
>> On 2018-04-12, Joel Carnat mailto:j...@carnat.net>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I want net-snmpd to run a script via the extend directive.
>>>
> Le 12 avr. 2018 à 21:10, Stuart Henderson a écrit :
>
> On 2018-04-12, Joel Carnat mailto:j...@carnat.net>> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I want net-snmpd to run a script via the extend directive.
>> This script has to run a command using doas to get temporary ro
On 2018-04-12, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want net-snmpd to run a script via the extend directive.
> This script has to run a command using doas to get temporary root
> permission.
>
> The script is run on snmpcmd call but the doas command returns:
> doas: a tty is
Joel Carnat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want net-snmpd to run a script via the extend directive.
> This script has to run a command using doas to get temporary root
> permission.
>
> The script is run on snmpcmd call but the doas command returns:
> doas: a tty is required
>
&
Hi,
I want net-snmpd to run a script via the extend directive.
This script has to run a command using doas to get temporary root
permission.
The script is run on snmpcmd call but the doas command returns:
doas: a tty is required
Is there a way to run doas from net-snmpd ?
I already have doas
On 2017-12-01, Thomas Boernert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> an update:
>
> it seems thats a memory pool problem.
>
> on the same machine its running bgpd with 2 uplinks.
How much memory does snmpd use? (You could run it with e.g.
"/usr/bin/time -l /usr/sbin/snmpd -vd")
"filter-routes yes" is likely to help.
Hi,
an update:
it seems thats a memory pool problem.
on the same machine its running bgpd with 2 uplinks.
if i stop on the backup machine the bgpd and then start the snmpd, than
i have only ~ 4000 page faults.
i have 8 GB memory, my ulimit:
time(cpu-seconds)unlimited
file(blocks
Hi List,
i've a default snmpd.conf. When i starting snmpd then the page fault
jumps to 38000:
procsmemory pagediskstraps
cpu
r b wavm fre flt re pi po fr sr sd0 sd1 int sys cs
us sy id
1 1 0 575124 60937927 0 0
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Luiz Gustavo dos S. Costa wrote:
> I have an OpenBSD 6.0 Installation and am having trouble with snmpd, it
> just dies after a time, see example below:
>
> # time snmpd -dv
> snmpe_bind: binding to address X.X.X.X:161
> startup
> traphandler exiting, pid
On 2016-09-23, a...@brandwatch.com wrote:
>>> We tried setting "listen on $IP_Lo1" etc, and this seemed to work, but it
>>> is unstable. That is, occasionally packets start being sourced from the
>>> egress interface again when something changes until snmpd i
Sent from a teeny tiny keyboard, so please excuse typos
> On 23 Sep 2016, at 20:24, Jeremie Courreges-Anglas wrote:
>
> Andy Lemin writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> TLDR; Is there a way of fixing the "source address" that SNMPD should use?
>>
>>
>&
Andy Lemin writes:
> Hi,
>
> TLDR; Is there a way of fixing the "source address" that SNMPD should use?
>
>
> We are having issues with reply snmpd packets sourcing from the egress
> interface and not the loopback interface which the poll request was sent to
> :
Hi,
TLDR; Is there a way of fixing the "source address" that SNMPD should use?
We are having issues with reply snmpd packets sourcing from the egress
interface and not the loopback interface which the poll request was sent to
:(
We have many GRE tunnels and various routes which t
Hi guys,
I have an OpenBSD 6.0 Installation and am having trouble with snmpd,
it just dies after a time, see example below:
# time snmpd -dv
snmpe_bind: binding to address X.X.X.X:161
startup
traphandler exiting, pid 85031
1m06.67s real 0m00.01s user 0m00.00s system
Anyone else with
Hi list :)
We have noticed our monitoring systems are reporting and alerting the wrong
data for OpenBSD Interface Discards since adding all the OpenBSD firewalls
to our new Monitoring system.
And we have proven that it is SNMPD which is returning the same value for
every single interface with
On 2015-10-07, Denis Fondras wrote:
> I'm using snmpd from base on 5.8 and while playing with snmpbulkget (from
> net-snmp), I noticed a weirdness.
Note, I've replied on tech@.
Hello,
I'm using snmpd from base on 5.8 and while playing with snmpbulkget (from
net-snmp), I noticed a weirdness.
* 'snmpbulkget -v2c -c public 10.100.200.19 iso.3.6.1.2.1.1' is ok
* 'snmpbulkget -v2c -c public 10.100.200.19 iso.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1' is ok
By "ok&q
First of all I would like just to thank developers of OpenBSD for a
great Simple Network Management Protocol daemon and its integration with
OpenBSD built in sensors framework. With minimal required editing of
/etc/snmpd.conf. I was easily able to pool more info from my OpenBSD
servers from Observ
that script modify
>> the OID values so that a remote SNMP server can monitor the changes using
>> SNMP gets and mgets. I do not want to use SNMP traps.
>>
>> Thanks for any feedback!
>>
>
>
> No.
>
> You would have to restart snmpd, there is no
D values so that a remote SNMP server can monitor the
> changes using SNMP gets and mgets. I do not want to use SNMP traps.
>
> Thanks for any feedback!
I don't know if snmpd can do this, I use net-snmpd (in ports) to pass
user OID values.
Regards,
SNMP server can monitor the changes using
> SNMP gets and mgets. I do not want to use SNMP traps.
>
> Thanks for any feedback!
>
No.
You would have to restart snmpd, there is no way to change it on runtime.
But AgentX support might solve this in the future (you still need an shell ->
AgentX wrapper).
Reyk
Is it possible to have a shell script modify the contents of a user defined OID
that is setup in snmpd.conf?
I would like to have a cron event run a shell script and that script modify the
OID values so that a remote SNMP server can monitor the changes using SNMP gets
and mgets. I do not want
On 2013-12-30, Julien T wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to see if I can switch my new openbsd 5.4 box from net-snmp to
> snmpd and for now, I miss only 2 things, disk informations and sensors that
> are not in snmpd.conf man.
>
> For disk monitoring, I didn't find
Hello,
I'm trying to see if I can switch my new openbsd 5.4 box from net-snmp to
snmpd and for now, I miss only 2 things, disk informations and sensors that
are not in snmpd.conf man.
For disk monitoring, I didn't find information anywhere. Checking the
output of snmpwalk, I foun
On 2013-04-11, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to get rid of net-snmp and use the shipped snmpd(8).
> I have OpenBSD boxes running various services (DNS, Web, Mail...) and have
> scripts providing service stats using the extend/exec net-snmp feature. I
> read about th
Hi,
I wanted to get rid of net-snmp and use the shipped snmpd(8).
I have OpenBSD boxes running various services (DNS, Web, Mail...) and have
scripts providing service stats using the extend/exec net-snmp feature. I read
about the "oid" feature of snmpd(8) but it seems it can only pub
It appears to me that the OpenBSD SNMP daemon: /usr/sbin/snmpd should create
it's own socket file: /var/run/snmpd.sock upon startup. There seems to be an
error which occurs at startup:
# /usr/sbin/snmpd -d
startup
fatal: snmpe: failed to bind SNMP UDP socket
check_child: lost child: snmp e
Will sending a trap with snmpdctl update the MIB information for a custom MIB
setup with snmpd.conf? Or, does it only send the information to the snmp trap
receiver without updating the MIB that was setup with snmpd.conf?
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Bales, Tracy
wrote:
> I'm running 4.8 on an i386 platform. I have snmpd running with 300 custom
> MIB's installed via snmpd.conf. I've confirmed that they're installed
using
> net-snmp's snmpwalk program. Each of my MIB&#x
I'm running 4.8 on an i386 platform. I have snmpd running with 300 custom
MIB's installed via snmpd.conf. I've confirmed that they're installed using
net-snmp's snmpwalk program. Each of my MIB's is an integer value...no
strings. Question: Has anyone written the
sorry, I push the send button accidently.
NET-SNMP version: 5.4.2.1
Web: http://www.net-snmp.org/
Email: net-snmp-cod...@lists.sourceforge.net
I didnt make changes during snmpd is running, I also reboot the server.
maybe someone have a idea?
regard,
Tom
>
Hi,
I try to query the interfaces on my OpenBSD firewall.
But I get a wrong IfIndex/IP association:
IF-MIB::ifDescr.1 = STRING: lo0
IF-MIB::ifDescr.2 = STRING: em0
IF-MIB::ifDescr.3 = STRING: em1
IF-MIB::ifDescr.4 = STRING: em2
IF-MIB::ifDescr.5 = STRING: em3
IF-MIB::ifDescr.6 = STRING: enc0
IF-M
Hi,
I have two questions about the snmpd base:
1. Is there a way to disable the write community? I do not want to
have snmp write enabled at all.
2. Is it possible to restrict snmp reads based on source address? I
want to allow snmp read from only one single machine.
(I know that I could do
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 8:29 AM, Ariane van der Steldt wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:20:28PM -0500, (private) HKS wrote:
>> I made the following bug report on 2009-01-08, but didn't get a PR
>> number back. Did I botch this report, or does the bugs@ address
>> require hands-on that this repo
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:20:28PM -0500, (private) HKS wrote:
> I made the following bug report on 2009-01-08, but didn't get a PR
> number back. Did I botch this report, or does the bugs@ address
> require hands-on that this report simply hasn't gotten yet?
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
PR'
I made the following bug report on 2009-01-08, but didn't get a PR
number back. Did I botch this report, or does the bugs@ address
require hands-on that this report simply hasn't gotten yet?
Thanks for the clarification.
-HKS
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:52 PM, (private) HKS wrote:
Hi,
Isn't it a way to disable globally the read-write in snmpd by any chance?
The man page explain how to set the oid for ready only, but that's per oid.
I try to set the read-write to 0 as looking in the code I saw for the
write != 0 is does the process, but I can't set
>
> Tim
>
> - Original Message
> > From: Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Tim Kuijsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> > Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 1:35:46 AM
> > Subject: Re: snmpd
> >
> >
> >
On Jun 9, 2008, at 7:43 PM, Aaron Glenn wrote:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Jurvis LaSalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hi,
I've read the man page for snmpd.conf, but didn't see mention
of a
way to restrict snmpd to only respond to gets and sets from one ip
address
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Jurvis LaSalle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>I've read the man page for snmpd.conf, but didn't see mention of a
> way to restrict snmpd to only respond to gets and sets from one ip address.
> Is there a way to do this in
Hi,
I've read the man page for snmpd.conf, but didn't see mention of a
way to restrict snmpd to only respond to gets and sets from one ip
address. Is there a way to do this in snmpd.conf or should I look to
a pf solution?
Thanks,
JL
in advance,
Tim
- Original Message
> From: Brian A. Seklecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Tim Kuijsten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 1:35:46 AM
> Subject: Re: snmpd
>
>
> On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 15:22 -0700, Tim Kuij
On Thu, 2008-05-08 at 15:22 -0700, Tim Kuijsten wrote:
> It looks like there is no info about disk usage, memory usage, load
> and other sensor stuff. I have no clue where to find the mibs (locate
> mib or locate .txt | grep snmp have no results) or how to load them..
That's all in HOST-RESOURCES-
I'm a total noob to snmp and was excited snmpd from Reyk is included in 4.3. I
started snmpd with the default config and net-snmp-walked the tree.
It looks like there is no info about disk usage, memory usage, load and other
sensor stuff. I have no clue where to find the mibs (locate m
Is anyone working on adding pf monitoring support for snmpd (e.g.,
porting OPENBSD-PF-MIB.txt)? I would find it convenient to at least
be able to monitor simple PF statistics (such as the output from
'pfctl -s info') over SNMP. (I'll work on a patch, but I want to
avoid redun
Ok, thanks!
I can now to make graphics for network traffic. Is very easy, problem is
about confusion between snmpd from openbsd and
snmpd from net-snmp. Now i use snmpd from openbsd, is very simply and
work well.
Thanks again!
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-03-22, Fratiman Vladut <[EM
On 2008-03-22, Fratiman Vladut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you post an simple snmpd.conf file?
What for? net-snmp or OpenBSD snmpd? the latter is a 30-second job
to look at snmpd.conf(5) and make something that works.
> I overwrite the original, with one created by snmpconf
Can you post an simple snmpd.conf file?
I overwrite the original, with one created by snmpconf but not work.
Is posibil to make net-snmpd to work?
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-03-22, Fratiman Vladut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Finally i see that are two different binaries snmpd in o
On 2008-03-22, Fratiman Vladut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Finally i see that are two different binaries snmpd in openbsd.
> One located in /usr/sbin and another into /usr/local/sbin
the one in /usr/sbin is configured in /etc/snmpd.conf, and is normally
started with snmpd
Finally i see that are two different binaries snmpd in openbsd.
One located in /usr/sbin and another into /usr/local/sbin
This in /usr/local/sbin are installed once when put net-snmpd package.
I try to run command "/usr/local/sbin/snmpd -c /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf",
but, no error, and
one
I try to launch snmpd like this:
# /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -f /etc/snmpd.conf
I receive this error
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Fratiman Vladut wrote:
I try to configure snmpd in oreder to monitor traffic on openbsd.
I use snmpconf, and configure only community name. The generated
snmpd
Where can find an good tutorial about monitoring traffic with net-snmp?
Fratiman Vladut wrote:
I try to configure snmpd in oreder to monitor traffic on openbsd.
I use snmpconf, and configure only community name. The generated
snmpd.conf look like this
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:23:45AM +0200, Fratiman Vladut wrote:
> rocommunity someone
>
> When i run snmpd in debug mode, i receive an error that say about syntax
> error into snmpd.conf at line where is defined community name.
> What is wrong?
>
are you trying to use open
I try to configure snmpd in oreder to monitor traffic on openbsd.
I use snmpconf, and configure only community name. The generated
snmpd.conf look like this:
###
#
# snmpd.conf
#
# - created by the snmpconf configuration
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:32:45 +0700, Jason George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi!
I just imported snmpd(8) and snmpctl(8), an initial attempt to
implement a new SNMP daemon for OpenBSD. SNMP is the "Simple Network
Management Protocol" and it is still very commonly used in co
>Hi!
>
>I just imported snmpd(8) and snmpctl(8), an initial attempt to
>implement a new SNMP daemon for OpenBSD. SNMP is the "Simple Network
>Management Protocol" and it is still very commonly used in corporate
>networks, by network vendors, and in network manageme
This is great news! Hopefully I'll find the time to help test.
John
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 11:52:12AM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just imported snmpd(8) and snmpctl(8), an initial attempt to
> implement a new SNMP daemon for OpenBSD. SNMP is the "Simpl
Hi!
I just imported snmpd(8) and snmpctl(8), an initial attempt to
implement a new SNMP daemon for OpenBSD. SNMP is the "Simple Network
Management Protocol" and it is still very commonly used in corporate
networks, by network vendors, and in network management systems (NMS).
SN
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Insan Praja SW wrote:
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:45:47 +0700
From: Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "misc@openbsd.org"
Subject: snmpd on current
Hi all,
I'm currently running 4.2-current and installing net-snmp-5.4.1 from ports
(updated). Somet
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:30:30 +0700, Brian A. Seklecki
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Insan Praja SW wrote:
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:45:47 +0700
From: Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "misc@openbsd.org"
Subject: snmpd on current
Hi all,
Hi all,
I'm currently running 4.2-current and installing net-snmp-5.4.1 from ports
(updated). Something is wrong, when I run snmpd, it seem to eat all CPU
and memory keep getting bigger.. is there anything wrong?
thanks..
Insan
OpenBSD 4.2-current (GENERIC) #1: Wed Nov 21 19:37:37 WIT
Hi misc@,
while testing the to be released 4.1 I found a problem with the
snmpd daemon (package is net-snmp-5.1.3p5).
Trying, from another machine a command like this:
snmptable -c public -v 1 1.2.3.4 HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrSWRunTable
where 1.2.3.4 is the ip address of the
e.gz
>
> first: if you built the port yourself, try running from a binary
> package to rule out compilation errors. if that doesn't help...
> this seems easily repeatable, so recompile the port with debugging
> (assuming the port honours CFLAGS: "make clean; CFLAGS=-g make&q
, so recompile the port with debugging
(assuming the port honours CFLAGS: "make clean; CFLAGS=-g make", then
either reinstall or just run snmpd from the port build directory).
get it to dump core then run 'gdb snmpd snmpd.core', type 'bt'
which should display where in t
ok, it seems its a problem of a variable definition in snmpd, isn't it ?
Thomas
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 23:30, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
> That's awesome!
>
> BTW, I submitted a PR on this yesterday but haven't gotten the automated
> response. Will forward to y
That's awesome!
BTW, I submitted a PR on this yesterday but haven't gotten the automated
response. Will forward to you if I do.
~BAS
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi List,
openbsd 4.0
i've vlan interfaces from vlan1 to vlan9
i can start
snmpd -x localh
87 matches
Mail list logo
