* Tony Sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-30 02:28]:
bgp rib and fib look out of sync.
Any ideas why it behaves this way ?
It seems like the networks that only exist in bgp fail to re-route when I
take
down a core router that is the current bgp-nexthop.
lookslike there is a case we miss
On 10/30/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Tony Sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-30 02:28]:
bgp rib and fib look out of sync.
Any ideas why it behaves this way ?
It seems like the networks that only exist in bgp fail to re-route when
I
take
down a core router that is
On 2007/10/30 10:17, Tony Sarendal wrote:
So running a setup where ospfd and bgpd carries the same prefixes should
work ?
I had problems with this, I think bgpd was stomping on the ospf route
of my IX's /24, causing the routes from peers to fail nexthop validation
on the other routers. I didn't
* Tony Sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-30 11:25]:
On 10/30/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Tony Sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-30 02:28]:
bgp rib and fib look out of sync.
Any ideas why it behaves this way ?
It seems like the networks that only exist in bgp
On 10/30/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Tony Sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-30 11:25]:
On 10/30/07, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Tony Sarendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-10-30 02:28]:
bgp rib and fib look out of sync.
Any ideas why it behaves this
I set up a test network with bgpd/ospfd, a standard service provider design
where ospf carries the network links and loopbacks and bgp carries
everything,
bgp routers doing nexthop self, core full mesh and access routers rr-clients
of the two nearest core routers.
I'm seeing some pretty odd
6 matches
Mail list logo
