Matthew R. Dempsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a proper way to dynamically manage network interfaces
with OpenBSD? I have been using ``ifconfig iwi0 nwid $ESSID
nwkey $KEY; dhclient iwi0'' to connect to a given wireless
network and ``ifconfig iwi0 down'' to disconnect (and similarly
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:17:59AM +0200, Jan Johansson wrote:
You want trunk(4) in failover mode, it is pure magic. :-)
Ah, very cool. Thanks for the tip. :-)
Blame Intel that won't give out documentation so that developers
have to guess how the card works.
On that topic, I tried emailing
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
Just finished fun/test installing 3.9 mp on a x4000 and seeing the same
message.
Glad to know I'm not the only one ;)
Try to disable pcibios via boot -c bsd.mp. Worked for me in several occasions.
On 5/28/06, Antoine Jacoutot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Christian Pedaschus wrote:
Just finished fun/test installing 3.9 mp on a x4000 and seeing the same
message.
Glad to know I'm not the only
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
Try to disable pcibios via boot -c bsd.mp. Worked for me in several
occasions.
Yes, as I said on my first post, I saw references to this on Google, but I
still don't understand the meaning of that message. Besides, although I
got this message,
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
Try to disable pcibios via boot -c bsd.mp. Worked for me in several
occasions.
It does not work unfortunately :(
Hi...
I'm having (for the first time) an issue building 3.9-stable from 3.9-stable.
I compiled a new kernel then reboot and after issuing the following command in
/usr/src, I get this (this just cvs -up -Pd):
# make build
[.]
=== libexec/login_chpass
cc -O2 -pipe -Wall -DYP -c
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:37:11PM -0400, Adam wrote:
PF and spamd, for example. bgpd may be a good candidate, too.
Those scale better on openbsd than they do on freebsd and netbsd? Have
you actually tested this?
No, I neither do benchmarking nor have I equipment and a large
enough network
On Sun, 28 May 2006 19:06:33 +0200 Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 10:37:11PM -0400, Adam wrote:
PF and spamd, for example. bgpd may be a good candidate, too.
Those scale better on openbsd than they do on freebsd and netbsd? Have
you actually tested
Hi,
after upgrading from 3.8 to 3.9, logging pf via pfl2sysl (as per the
FAQ), this doesn't work anymore (and I don't get any error mails nor
can I find anything in the logs).
When I run pfl2sysl manually via
sudo -u pflogger /bin/sh /home/pflogger/pfl2sysl.sh
I get the message
tcpdump: need
2006/5/28, Martin Schrvder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FAQ), this doesn't work anymore (and I don't get any error mails nor
Allright, I get the mails. But that doesn't help. :-(
Best
Martin
Hi,
On Sunday, 28. May 2006 19:06, Matthias Kilian wrote:
...
Oh, but comparing general performance of Linux vs. OpenBSD on a
typical desktop/development PC, I *can* tell you that OpenBSD
performs much better, especially when the machine does lots of IO
in the background.
A daring statement.
* Martin Schr?der [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-28 20:12]:
Hi,
after upgrading from 3.8 to 3.9, logging pf via pfl2sysl (as per the
FAQ), this doesn't work anymore (and I don't get any error mails nor
can I find anything in the logs).
When I run pfl2sysl manually via
sudo -u pflogger
2006/5/28, Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What's wrong here? Bug in the FAQ?
you have to start tcpdump as root so it can run privilege seperated and
you don't have the scary decoders running with any real user's privs.
So it's a bug in the FAQ (faq/pf/logging.html), as that solution
Tcpdump must now be run as root.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=114279291827416w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=107980397806077w=2
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20040220120426
Found by searching for tcpdump root in the marc archives... ;)
On 5/28/06,
Adam wrote:
The question was about scalability.
I keep seeing that term. Is it supposed to mean something?
Methinks there is a problem with scalability if you cannot even
add two numbers together. (Well maybe with Lisp and infinite tapes)
Dijkstra had an analogy with comparing, as a means of
On Sun, 28 May 2006 13:58:39 -0500 Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam wrote:
The question was about scalability.
I keep seeing that term. Is it supposed to mean something?
Yes, and retarded posts like this aren't needed thanks.
An application which has evolved under Linux
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 08:08:54PM +0200, Tobias Weisserth wrote:
[...]
(sometimes I've the impression that Linux is only fast when idling).
This statement is clearly ridiculous.
No, just my personal experience.
This whole discussion is ridiculous and pointless.
May be.
There is no such
Adam wrote:
On Sun, 28 May 2006 13:58:39 -0500 Tony Abernethy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam wrote:
The question was about scalability.
I keep seeing that term. Is it supposed to mean something?
Yes, and retarded posts like this aren't needed thanks.
Then what precisely is it
On Sun, 28 May 2006 14:39:05 -0500 Tony Abernethy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then what precisely is it supposed to mean?
Running your Linux programs is not an adequate answer.
If don't understand the question (which wasn't directed at you) then
don't reply. Linux programs have nothing to do
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 03:07:02PM -0400, Adam wrote:
The question was about scalability.
I keep seeing that term. Is it supposed to mean something?
Yes, and retarded posts like this aren't needed thanks.
It isn't retarded. The term *is* fuzzy, and often abused, especially
in
* Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-28 21:17]:
Pretending openbsd scales well at these things, or pretending its other
benefits make up for this doesn't change anything. Nobody is saying
scalability is all that matters, I just want to know what the mysterious
task that openbsd scales well at
Henning Brauer wrote:
OpenBSD scales very well an most tasks you'll find.
There are some exceptions tho. That unfortunately includes threads.
Out of curiosity, what happens when you run apache on SMP hardware
where the libraries are not thread safe? (or whatever it's called)
Adam uttered following nonsense.
Linux programs have nothing to do with anything,
That is a good characterization of SMP and scaling?
and your desire to make a big stupid thread of bullshit is quite annoying.
You are annoyed.
My desire is a small thread.
Does anyone know how to bind ^L to clear the screen in a default 3.9
installation? I'd prefer to not have to change to bash if I don't have to...
Do some one knows what mailing list program
is used for the openbsd mailing lists ?
I also want to use it for my mailing list project.
Thanks,
Haluk
Martin,
The solution in the FAQ was ok for 3.8 but things changed in 3.9.
For now if you run the script underneath from root's crontab every 5
minutes you'll most likely be ok.
There should be a check in the script to see if it is already running to
prevent another instance starting when the
Daniel Dickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how to bind ^L to clear the screen in a default 3.9
installation?
You can't, at the shell prompt. ksh can't do that.
Run clear(1).
--
Christian naddy Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm looking for any syweb layouts and processing scripts for sendmail logs.
Hopefully something that will handle the dnsbl/rbls features in sendmail
too.
Mike Spenard
On Sun, May 28, 2006, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Daniel Dickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how to bind ^L to clear the screen in a default 3.9
installation?
You can't, at the shell prompt. ksh can't do that.
What's wrong with
alias =clear
It works for me
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 11:34:46PM +0300, Haluk Durmus wrote:
Do some one knows what mailing list program
is used for the openbsd mailing lists ?
I also want to use it for my mailing list project.
Thanks,
Haluk
majordomo
Tobias
On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 05:52:49PM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote:
| Does anyone know how to bind ^L to clear the screen in a default 3.9
| installation? I'd prefer to not have to change to bash if I don't have
to...
Please note that when using emacs editing mode (I think this is the
default mode,
Hi,
I am going to use sendmail and popa3d in release 3.8 for multiple domain.
I had setup and run mcojaya.com to run on rel 3.8. I will like to add
more domains:
mcojaya.com, abc.com, xyz.com, etc.
If I could do that, then how do i setup the users for those abc.com, xyz.com
Do I need other
Haluk Durmus escribis:
Do some one knows what mailing list program
is used for the openbsd mailing lists ?
I also want to use it for my mailing list project.
Thanks,
Haluk
Haluk:
OpenBSD uses Majordomo for its mailing lists.
Cheers,
Salvador Sabaini.
hi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just want to know, whether the RED algorithm is the same as WRED.
thanks :)
On Monday 29 May 2006 03:45, Adam wrote:
Again, if you can't answer the question I asked Henning, then do not
reply.
Funny how you did not answer the question Henning asked you.
---
Lars Hansson
On Monday 29 May 2006 03:07, Adam wrote:
I think if you don't even understand a simple question, and have no
way to answer, you shouldn't bother responding with nonsense.
Its a very simple question. I know openbsd scales poorly in SMP, I
know it scales poorly using apache, sendmail, courier,
On Sun, 28 May 2006 21:58:12 +0200 Henning Brauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OpenBSD scales very well an most tasks you'll find.
There are some exceptions tho. That unfortunately includes threads.
I don't find that actually. Apart from threads, there's also anything
that needs 1GB MAXDSIZ
On Sunday 28 May 2006 23:05, Lars Hansson wrote:
On Monday 29 May 2006 03:07, Adam wrote:
I think if you don't even understand a simple question, and have no
way to answer, you shouldn't bother responding with nonsense.
Its a very simple question. I know openbsd scales poorly in SMP, I
Paul de Weerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A last option would be to send a patch for ksh that adds a clearscreen
command to bind to. Send it here and it'll probably get more attention
from developers. This is left as an excercise to you ;)
This would require linking ksh to libtermcap, growing it
Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's wrong with
alias =clear
It works for me (OpenBSD 3.8, /bin/ksh).
How? You enter ^V^Lreturn? That's probably not what the original
poster asked for, given the mention of bash.
--
Christian naddy Weisgerber
Hey,
just a quick heads up that we'll be at LinuxWochen in Vienna this week,
I'll be there Wednesday noon to Sunday, drop by to say hello.
As most developers are out of town because they are at the Hackaton in Calgary,
I'm looking for volunteer boothslaves.
I have tried the archives and google, but didn't find any good pointer
(maybe a problem of keywords ?):
After some 20 cycles of power outage / restore - that is some twenty
crashes - a database server of mine doesn't reboot any longer. It gets
stuck at
booting hd0a:/bsd 4804448+939504
On Mon, May 29, 2006, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Claus Assmann wrote:
What's wrong with
alias =clear
It works for me (OpenBSD 3.8, /bin/ksh).
How? You enter ^V^Lreturn? That's probably not what the original
The alias is in .kshrc. I just it CNTL-L on the command prompt and
STeve Andre' wrote:
You know, all this discussion of the scalability of OpenBSD is really
fruitless. Every application is different, and a multitude of factors
come into play here, not the least of which is the hardware involved
in the equation, so with all the other questions like this, the
* Wim Vandeputte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-28 22:45]:
Hey,
just a quick heads up that we'll be at LinuxWochen in Vienna this week,
I'll be there Wednesday noon to Sunday, drop by to say hello.
LinuxWurstchen?
On Mon, 29 May 2006, Uwe Dippel wrote:
I have tried the archives and google, but didn't find any good pointer
(maybe a problem of keywords ?):
After some 20 cycles of power outage / restore - that is some twenty
crashes - a database server of mine doesn't reboot any longer. It gets
stuck at
On Monday 29 May 2006 00:50, Bob Beck wrote:
* Wim Vandeputte [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-28 22:45]:
Hey,
just a quick heads up that we'll be at LinuxWochen in Vienna this week,
I'll be there Wednesday noon to Sunday, drop by to say hello.
LinuxWurstchen?
Yeah, is this a food
48 matches
Mail list logo
