I am running OBSD 4.0-release (i386) on Toshiba Satellite A30.
I started apmd and here's my ps output
root 10023 0.0 0.1 240 316 ?? Ss 5:57AM0:00.00 apmd
But when I do apm it says
Battery state: unknown, 0% remaining, unknown life estimate
A/C adapter state: not known
2006/11/6, atstake atstake [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am running OBSD 4.0-release (i386) on Toshiba Satellite A30.
I started apmd and here's my ps output
root 10023 0.0 0.1 240 316 ?? Ss 5:57AM0:00.00 apmd
But when I do apm it says
Battery state: unknown, 0% remaining, unknown
Hi all,
I just run the following program in obsd 3.9, but it doesn't work as
expected. As said that child process created by vfork should run in the
address space of the parent, until it calls exec/exit.
-
#include sys/types.h
#include unistd.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
int
Hi all,
I just run the following program in obsd 3.9, but it doesn't work as
expected. As said that child process created by vfork should run in the
address space of the parent, until it calls exec/exit.
-
#include sys/types.h
#include unistd.h
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
int
On Monday 06 November 2006 17:54, Kasicass wrote:
Hi all,
I just run the following program in obsd 3.9, but it doesn't work as
expected. As said that child process created by vfork should run in the
address space of the parent, until it calls exec/exit.
-
#include sys/types.h
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Kasicass wrote:
Hi all,
I just run the following program in obsd 3.9, but it doesn't work as
expected. As said that child process created by vfork should run in the
address space of the parent, until it calls exec/exit.
Not _should_, posix is very clear about that. It
Hi all,
I've been installed new 4.0 on my laptop.Looks fine unlike 3.8 and 3.9.
X are running ok.
I use Cable modem Motorola 5100 - with USB connection there is a message
in dmesg - disabling USB port (unrecognized device).Same thing with USB
mouse Genius GM-03003 (touchpad works fine)
If I use
2006/11/5, Wim Vandeputte [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hey,
I will be in Moscow in December from the 6th to the 9th and would like
to meet up with some OpenBSD users, please contact me if you have
local knowledge, especially if you know of a place called B1 in
Ordzhonikidze
Wim.
It would be
Hi Girish,
On 05/11/2006, at 6:39 PM, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
I have setup a multiboot machine with 4 OSes,
gentoo,NetBSD,OpenBSD(but of course :-) and FreeBSD on a single
hard disk.
Now I want to do two things.
a) Take a screenshot of the grub splash screen at bootup
b)
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to isolate this issue, but the exact same setup and
configuration for the 3.9 was working and after the upgrades to 4.0
without any changes what so ever to the bgpd.conf doesn't work anymore.
All bgp sessions are up as before, all ibgp sessions are up
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
The behaviour of dd on OpenBSD 3.9 is noncompliant to it's own OpenBSD
manpage:
OpenBSD:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dd bs=1 skip=2
1234
1234
5+0 records in
5+0 records out
5 bytes transferred in 1.764 secs (3 bytes/sec)
Linux:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 06/11/2006, at 23:27 , Miod Vallat wrote:
You don't happen to use xdm (or kdm) to log in in X11, and have getty
running on ttyC0, do you?
Awesome! That's much better :-)
Not only does the keyboard work, but kdm also starts on boot.
Much obliged,
chris
* Pierre-Yves Ritschard [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-03 11:59]:
* Stuart Henderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On 2006/11/03 11:34, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
Another solution would be, once 4.1 gets out to unpack the base41.tgz,
etc41.tgz and comp41.tgz into /usr/somewhere then unpack
* Der Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-03 21:46]:
I have a doubt about if OpenBSD/PF can NAT 40Mbits with a simple rule
set and like 60 redirects.
The box has a xeon proc and two integrated NICs, one fxp and a bge,
can it handle it?
yeah, but what do you want it to do for lunch?
--
Henning
Dear All.
I start with the simple rule set in my pf bridge
machine to limit
bandwidth 3Mbps from my server on lan to internet and
from internet to
my server on lan
my_server_on_lan=172.16.0.228
internet=202.x.x.x
lan = 172.16.0.0/16
altq on xl1 bandwidth 100% cbq queue \
{int_out,dflt_out}
Does anyone know if something happened to OpenBSD 4.0 or the net-snmp
package for OpenBSD 4.0? I've just installed both on a new box and SNMP
UCD objects are broken; they seem to be missing?
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Can you say what the irrelevant i386 machine is? Lots of difference
between a 90MHz PentiumI and a 3GHz Opteron, and I'd like to know where
those numbers fit in.
The i386 results were sent to me off-list, so I don't know the
processor details.
Hi gang
I think that I have a problem
1. my cisco 7513 makes my electric bill glow!
I am bring two (2) DSL lines to my 7513 and with a little cisco magic on
both end (ip load-sharing per packet) (people also call this bonding)
port # 0.1 net { bridge #1 216.90.150.70 255.255.255.252 }
* Cris Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-06 00:36]:
Hi gang
I think that I have a problem
1. my cisco 7513 makes my electric bill glow!
I am bring two (2) DSL lines to my 7513 and with a little cisco magic on
both end (ip load-sharing per packet) (people also call this bonding)
On 11/3/06, Sam Fourman Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess i was mistaken , I had thought that the OpenBSD support for armish
http://www.openbsd.org/armish.html
would also include devices like the Nintendo DS
I think the DS is too armmy for armish.
Sam Fourman Jr.
Greg Mortensen wrote:
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Can you say what the irrelevant i386 machine is? Lots of difference
between a 90MHz PentiumI and a 3GHz Opteron, and I'd like to know where
those numbers fit in.
The i386 results were sent to me off-list, so I don't know the
Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:49:07AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Greg Mortensen wrote:
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Can you say what the irrelevant i386 machine is? Lots of difference
between a 90MHz PentiumI and a 3GHz Opteron, and I'd like to know
Hey list members,
i have just received my 4.0 CD Set! I am trying to install it on a
third HD i have in my computer. The problem i am facing is that the
i386 CD cannot be seen by the CD DRIVE. It looks like there is no CD
in the disc drive. After i insert it, i see some beeps in fixed
interval
Hi All,
I've just installed a -current snapshop (the day before 4.0 release,
sods law) onto a Soekris 4521 board. It is booting and running off a
512MB flash card. I just signed up for T-Mobile's (UK) flat rate 3G
data service, which came with an Option Globetrotter card. The card is
Looked in the FAQ and don't find any path to start understanding
internationalization and localization in OpenBSD ... if there is
such a path?
--
Jack J. Woehr
Director of Development
Absolute Performance, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
303-443-7000 ext. 527
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:56:29PM -0700, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
Looked in the FAQ and don't find any path to start understanding
internationalization and localization in OpenBSD ... if there is
such a path?
Nope, there isn't. For one good reason: it's still work in progress.
The integration of
I have one of those. There is an issue with ohci that needs to be worked out
but it works with it disabled. I enabled the on-board NIC for amd64 so you
should be good there too.
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 08:12:12AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote:
Is anyone running OpenBSD on a Dell E521 machine (it
Your best bet is to use internationalization support in applications
themselves. OpenBSD doesn't provide much on the base OS level, but most
applications have support for it. Here's a site that provides a good
starting point for app level Unicode/i18n support:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:51:13AM -0800, Dag Richards wrote:
Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:49:07AM -0700, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Greg Mortensen wrote:
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Darrin Chandler wrote:
Can you say what the irrelevant i386 machine is? Lots of difference
wire interfaces behave as expected:
remove hostname.iface and it will never be UP after boot.
This however does not apply to wlan interfaces.
Why not?
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:32:49AM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to isolate this issue, but the exact same setup and
configuration for the 3.9 was working and after the upgrades to 4.0
without any changes what so ever to the bgpd.conf doesn't work
Needs a link pointing to Packages for OpenBSD 4.0
Claudio Jeker wrote:
Please check that the routes on your route-reflector. My guess is that you
need to set nexthop qualify via bgp at least that was the error I had
while testing it now. Afterwards route reflection worked for me.
I just tried it and still not it. A clear session came back
mb as in megabit or megabyte?
alec
Steve Shockley wrote:
I've got an OpenBSD 3.9 firewall/AP with a ral wireless card, and I'm
connecting to it from a WinXP machine with an Intel 2915 wireless and
Broadcom 5751 Ethernet.
My provider just upgraded my speeds, so I was using
There is no such a thing as a secure language! What there is it is a
promise for those who does not know anything about logic nor math to
be able to code without the need to know how to program.
... and i have said!
On 11/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I was wondering if
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 05:27:05PM -0500, Kyle George wrote:
Actually, what I should have said was uncomment the ddb.console=1 line in
sysctl.conf. That's where it should go. It will work in either place
though.
Yeah that's what I did. :-) Unfortunately the machine crashed again
tonight
Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no such a thing as a secure language! What there is it is a
promise for those who does not know anything about logic nor math to
be able to code without the need to know how to program.
Right, because if you aren't perfect then you shouldn't be
I'm having the same issue with 4.0 -stable--well, a bastardized copy of
-stable that also contains ral, cardbus and related changes from
-current. I've used more than one fxp card as well as more than one ral
card and the issue stays the same--fxp0: warnings and timeouts and,
eventually under
On Monday 06 November 2006 22:10, Melameth, Daniel D. wrote:
I'm having the same issue with 4.0 -stable--well, a bastardized copy of
-stable that also contains ral, cardbus and related changes from
-current. I've used more than one fxp card as well as more than one ral
card and the issue
Maybe a TcpWindowSize issue on Windows XP? By default, this is higher
for a 100Mb/s interface than the wireless interface. FWIW, I get the
full speed of my Internet connection over a ral AP, 6Mb/s, and, when
using it normally, with WEP I still can get about ~20Mb/s. Have you
tried shutting off
Original message
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 22:57:42 -0300
From: Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: D vs. C
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
There is no such a thing as a secure language! What there is it is a
promise for those who does not know
hello all,
This post is for informational purposes mostly, I bought 2 D-LINK
Wireless N adapters
DLINK DWA-552 Ver 1
D-Link DWA-542 Ver 1
Both of these adapters are in my computer and have a Atheros chipset
unsupported it looks like.
if anyone is interested in random dmesg's My dmesg is as
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
The behaviour of dd on OpenBSD 3.9 is noncompliant to it's own OpenBSD
manpage:
OpenBSD:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dd bs=1 skip=2
1234
1234
5+0 records in
5+0 records out
5 bytes transferred in
43 matches
Mail list logo
