Hej Bryan,
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:32:43 -0500, Bryan Chapman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have a pass rule along with that rdr rule?
Nope. But IIRC it's pass in and pass out anyway by default. And I have no block
rule (yet) :)
Correct me if I'm wrong...
./Marian
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
I was reading about the new hoststated tool in OpenBSD, and wondering
if it would be possible to use rssi as a link health check.
Short answer: not at the moment.
Scripting will soon be enabled and will allow you to specify external
health checkers. Of course with RSSI
Frank Denis wrote:
Le Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 03:36:07PM -0500, Matthew Szudzik ecrivait :
Adobe released Flash Player 9 for Linux today. (I know, it's not
open-source, but it's sometimes hard to navigate the web without it.)
Hej Stuart,
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 09:52:15 +, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2007/01/18 09:17, Marian Hettwer wrote:
That doesn't make sense to me... why should the destination reply
directly to the origin?
That's because rdr only rewrites the destination address, not the
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
guys i want ask to regarding quota
this is my fstab:
/dev/wd0a / ffs rw 1 1
/dev/sd0a /data ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
/dev/wd0g /home ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
/dev/wd0d /tmp ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
/dev/wd0e /usr ffs rw,nodev 1 2
/dev/wd0f /var
PS.: although wrong thread, any chance to use the brand new hoststated in
OpenBSD 4.0 ?
If I get it via CVS, will it build? I don't like the idea to upgrade my
production box to -CURRENT at all ;)
What you can do is get the 4.0 source, then just checkout latest
hoststated and hoststatectl
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
guys i want ask to regarding quota
this is my fstab:
/dev/wd0a / ffs rw 1 1
/dev/sd0a /data ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
/dev/wd0g /home ffs rw,nodev,nosuid 1 2
/dev/wd0d /tmp ffs rw,nodev,nosuid
Is any difference in two configs:NEINEIAcl office src
192.168.0.0/24NEINEIdelay_pools 1NEIdelay_class 1 1NEIdelay_access allow
officeNEIdelay_parameters 12000/12000NEINEIdelay_pools 1NEIdelay_class 1
2NEIdelay_access allow officeNEIdelay_parameters 12000/12000 -1/-1NEI
Excuse me, something wrong with my mailNEINEI-Original
Message-NEIFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Artyom GoryainovNEISent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 4:55
PMNEITo: misc@openbsd.orgNEISubject: delay_poolsNEINEIIs any difference
in two configs:NEINEIAcl office
Alexander Bochmann wrote:
...on Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:42:35AM +0100, Marc Balmer wrote:
hmm, why are people so proud of their uptimes when it only show they
don't care for their systems?
Bah, uptimes (is it that time of the year again?)...
Last login: Sun Jan 7 19:22:19 2007 from
Hi,
On 1/17/07, Darrin Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
most real content in flash is about using
the newest coolest features to get across what could easily be done in
plain old HTML.
Most clicked item on the web: Skip Intro
sorry, you are wrong: there is some very cool flash stuff:
like
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 02:29:13PM +0100, Samuel Mo?ux wrote:
every state is a [src, dst, direction] tuple
which lets pass [src - dst, direction ] and [dst - src,
not(direction)], but not [ src- dst, not(direction) ] packets.
Very clear - I think that description should go into pf.conf(5)
I've been VERY pleased with spamd performance on my system. My mail
volume is so low (~300 msgs/day) that I may consider removing
SpamAssassin, because spamd catches just about everything. I've gone
from about 80 spam messages caught by SA to less than 2 caught, per day.
Users are also reporting
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 07:41:07AM -0500, Seth Hanford wrote:
I've been VERY pleased with spamd performance on my system. My mail
volume is so low (~300 msgs/day) that I may consider removing
SpamAssassin, because spamd catches just about everything. I've gone
from about 80 spam messages
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 07:41:07AM -0500, Seth Hanford wrote:
1) Does it make sense to have spamd discard malformed sender / recipient
addresses? In this case, there is no envelope sender address at all,
which I seem to recall violates an RFC
Null return paths are used for delivery failure
On 2007/01/18 07:12, Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 07:41:07AM -0500, Seth Hanford wrote:
1) Does it make sense to have spamd discard malformed sender / recipient
addresses? In this case, there is no envelope sender address at all,
which I seem to recall violates an RFC
I
Hi guys,
we are using 3 Soekris firewall pairs in our companies setup to provide
failover IPSec connections between 3 sites using OpenBSD 4.0 RELEASE.
The big picture looks like this :
A - B (passive)
A - C (passive)
B - C (passive)
By now its basically working fine, but with the IPSec
Stuart Henderson wrote:
RFC2821 6.1 - also see 3.7, 4.5.5:
If there is a delivery failure after acceptance of a message, the
receiver-SMTP MUST formulate and mail a notification message. This
notification MUST be sent using a null () reverse path in the
envelope.
- do not
Hello.
I'm using spamd but am noticing that some SPAM is still coming though
It's probably more dev but I don't like posting to the dev/tech lists. If the
ideas/info have merit, then perhaps it can be forwarded to that list.
Can (or does) spamd look at the From:, do a MX/A record dns lookup
On 2007-01-18T11:27, Martin wrote:
Hello.
I'm using spamd but am noticing that some SPAM is still coming though
It's probably more dev but I don't like posting to the dev/tech lists. If
the
ideas/info have merit, then perhaps it can be forwarded to that list.
Can (or does) spamd
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Martin wrote:
Hello.
I'm using spamd but am noticing that some SPAM is still coming though
It's probably more dev but I don't like posting to the dev/tech lists. If
the
ideas/info have merit, then perhaps it can be forwarded to that list.
Can (or does) spamd
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 11:27:29AM -0500, Martin wrote:
I'm using spamd but am noticing that some SPAM is still coming though
Me, too. But spamd stops over 90% with minimal overhead.
dig mx tnnb.com
SNIP
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
mx1.tnnb.com. 3600IN A
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Vijay Sankar wrote:
Good day,
I purchased a new server two days ago so that I can help test applications
like OpenOffice, Asterisk, and gCompris. It has Core 2 Duo 6400, 4GB of RAM,
reasonable disk space etc.
Compiling the kernel took about 25 minutes.
After
On Jan 17, 2007, at 11:41 PM, Mike Spenard wrote:
Could someone direct me to a howto on setting up Openbsd,sendmail
and spamassassin
to use milter-spamd?
Thank you,
-Mike
Mike -
Check out:
http://erdelynet.com/2005/03/26/openbsd/site-side-spamassassin-for-
openbsd-36/
While this uses
Sometime ago, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
Iain Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attempting to use a Sun Type 6 USB keyboard on 4.0/amd64. The
keyboard works, but extra functionality such as the compose key does not
work. Further, wsconsctl detects it as a plain vanilla PC-XT keyboard.
On Thursday 18 January 2007 11:19, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 11:02:12AM -0600, Beavis wrote:
A suggestion would be to enable softdep on your /etc/fstab
softdep is nice but running without it does not make a core 2 duo as slow
as a PIII.
A good sugestion would be to look
On Thursday 18 January 2007 11:46, Marc Balmer wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 11:02:12AM -0600, Beavis wrote:
A suggestion would be to enable softdep on your /etc/fstab
softdep is nice but running without it does not make a core 2 duo as slow
as a PIII.
A good
On Thursday 18 January 2007 11:48, you wrote:
This turns out not to be the case. MX records tell you where to send
mail TO that domain, and have nothing to do with mail FROM that domain.
While the TO/FROM servers are often the same, they are also often not
the same, especially for large
Martin wrote:
Can (or does) spamd look at the From:, do a MX/A record dns lookup and
compare. it to the sender IP to see if it's valid during the SMTP
transaction ?
Assuming you're talking about spamd in greylisting mode, here's your
answer from spamd (8): spamd will use the db file in
On Thursday 18 January 2007 13:02, you wrote:
I need to spend more time doing scripting anyway...so it could be a good
learning curve. I never seem to have the time ordinarily.
But there again, it looks like it's likely impossible without doing too much
damage.
At least I understand the
Vijay Sankar wrote:
On Thursday 18 January 2007 11:46, Marc Balmer wrote:
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 11:02:12AM -0600, Beavis wrote:
A suggestion would be to enable softdep on your /etc/fstab
softdep is nice but running without it does not make a core 2 duo as slow
as a
On 10:15 Wed 17 Jan , Martin Hedenfalk wrote:
Hello list,
Is there a nullconsole in OpenBSD, similar to the nullconsole in FreeBSD?
in /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_prf.c
in printf function:
-- retval = kprintf(fmt, TOCONS | TOLOG, NULL, NULL, ap);
++ retval = kprintf(fmt, TOLOG,
On 2007/01/18 11:46, Vijay Sankar wrote:
apps1# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq7/ohci0 30
irq5/ehci01280
irq10/pciide1 126946
irq5/azalia0 5760
On Thursday 18 January 2007 12:12, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2007/01/18 11:46, Vijay Sankar wrote:
apps1# vmstat -i
interrupt total rate
irq7/ohci0 30
irq5/ehci01280
irq10/pciide1
On 1/11/07, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007/01/10 20:45, bofh wrote:
However, it won't be easy porting it. It's been out in opensolaris
for over a year+, but only showed up in solaris 10 6/06. However the
linux folks have to do it through fuse
that's because it's not
I'm setting up some auto-failover web servers (load balancing isn't needed).
CARP would seem ideal for the case where a machine fails, but I'd also like
to failover if httpd stops responding for some reason. Some research has
shown a couple of possible solutions, but there doesn't seem to be a
If you haven't already seen it on undeadly.org this might be what
you're after:
http://spootnik.org/hoststated/hoststated_introduction.html
Cheers
On 18 Jan 2007, at 18:08, Jeff Simmons wrote:
I'm setting up some auto-failover web servers (load balancing isn't
needed).
CARP would seem
Hi,
I'm planning to buy this:
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=730
or as alternative this mainboard:
http://de.asus.com/products4.aspx?modelmenu=2model=1163l1=3l2=101l3=300
First one has a Vitesse VSC8601 LAN-Chipset.
Second one has a NVIDIA nForce 590
Hello all.
I have an OpenBSD 4.0 system with three interfaces.
My interfaces are setup as follows:
/etc/hostname.bge0
inet xx.yy.101.98 255.255.255.224 xx.yy.101.127
/etc/hostname.em0
inet xx.yy.125.130 255.255.255.224 xx.yy.125.159
/etc/hostname.em1
inet 192.168.19.1 255.255.255.0 NONE
On Thursday 18 January 2007 16:05, Joerg Zinke wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to buy this:
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID
=730
or as alternative this mainboard:
http://de.asus.com/products4.aspx?modelmenu=2model=1163l1=3l2=101l3=300
First one has a
Glad it's working; however, depending on your security level needs there are
some variants on the configuration you may wish to consider.
rdr pass is an unrestricted pass or opening. An improvement to it follows.
#---EG1---
rdr log (all) on $external proto tcp from any to $external port 80 \
Why does fopen()ing a directory for reading succeed instead of failing
with EISDIR? This has the possibly unexpected consequence of letting
you pass yyin to yylex() as a fopen()ed directory, which then thinks it
finished successfully because fread() returns 0 immediately.
Adam
Hi,
For those who asked, we are still processing the submissions for CanSecWest
and the call closed, please stand by. The paper selections are back from the
reviewers for EUSecWest, in London on March 1-2.
In absolutely random order:
Threats against and protection of Microsoft's internal
Adam writes:
Why does fopen()ing a directory for reading succeed instead of failing
with EISDIR? This has the possibly unexpected consequence of letting
I believe it is so things like grep -r regex * work.
// marc
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 10:23:31PM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
[snip]
Since I'm probably the worst person you could ask, hopefully one of the
many shell scripting gods inhabiting this mailing list will chime in on
how do useful work in shell scripts with serial.
I've typically used kermit
Le Jeudi 18 Janvier 2007 02:00, Allen a icrit :
Peter Matulis wrote:
I am using OBSD 3.8 as a firewall for a small office and I have an
XP user that connects to a remote host via MS Remote Desktop (TCP
3389).
Occasionally, this user complains that her connection is severed
and that
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:36:21 -0600
Vijay Sankar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 18 January 2007 16:05, Joerg Zinke wrote:
Hi,
I'm planning to buy this:
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID
=730
or as alternative this mainboard:
47 matches
Mail list logo