Hi list,
I'm planning to configure SSL offloading using relayd(8).
The manpage for relayd.conf(5) states the following:
``If the ssl keyword is present, the relay will accept connections
using the encrypted SSL protocol. The relay will attempt to look
up a private key in
Hi all,
I need to deploy IPSec tunnels (lan-to-lan and roadwarriors clients
like linux and windows) under two openbsd carp firewalls.
Searching in google and reading some docs, I have several doubts
about which one to choose. If I am not wrong, iked doesn't supports
sasyncd, is it correct??
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:13 AM, C. L. Martinez carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I need to deploy IPSec tunnels (lan-to-lan and roadwarriors clients
like linux and windows) under two openbsd carp firewalls.
Searching in google and reading some docs, I have several doubts
about which one
Hmm surprised by that!
Henning, could you please confirm for us if the 32bit bandwidth limit
was lifted in the new queuing subsystem, or if it is just still in
place whilst dual-running the new and the old?
I guess considering Hrvoje's findings the limit is still in place until
ALTQ is
On 29/11/13 19:16, Andy wrote:
On Fri 29 Nov 2013 16:19:26 GMT, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Unfortunately on the Cisco part I don't SFP+.
I have XENPACK option only which give me 3 options:
SR ~ 3K GPL
LRM ~ 1.5K GPL (I can't find any LRM GBIC for Intel side)
CX4 ~ 600 GPL
I'd avoid CX4, you
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:36:31AM +0200, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
On 29/11/13 19:16, Andy wrote:
On Fri 29 Nov 2013 16:19:26 GMT, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
Unfortunately on the Cisco part I don't SFP+.
I have XENPACK option only which give me 3 options:
SR ~ 3K GPL
LRM ~ 1.5K GPL (I
Em 02-12-2013 06:05, Bernd escreveu:
Hi list,
I'm planning to configure SSL offloading using relayd(8).
The manpage for relayd.conf(5) states the following:
``If the ssl keyword is present, the relay will accept connections
using the encrypted SSL protocol. The relay will attempt to look
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:00:53PM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Chris Cappuccio [ch...@nmedia.net] wrote:
openda...@hushmail.com [openda...@hushmail.com] wrote:
Hi,
What are the ups and downs of replacing Linux with OpenBSD in Google's
Android operating system? I guess this
I m not sure if you already investigated this but s.m.a.r.t. has quite many
diagnostic info. Even if the drive has not actually been marked as broken.
This is somewhat vendor dependent. I did not check these info with openbsd
but it should be possible.
Facts from my hard drives include:
Bad
El 29-11-2013 14:26, Andy escribió:
On Fri 29 Nov 2013 17:24:15 GMT, Andy wrote:
Fastest you can buy!! Even then you probably struggle..
You'll need the fastest single core you can get your hands on for the
network stack/OBSD kernel, and the other cores for Snort etc..
...
On Fri 29 Nov 2013
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:39:17PM +0100, Jan Lambertz wrote:
I m not sure if you already investigated this but s.m.a.r.t. has quite many
diagnostic info. Even if the drive has not actually been marked as broken.
This is somewhat vendor dependent. I did not check these info with openbsd
but it
Yea CX4 will work, its the chipset that matters. But CX4 is short range
and superseded, and by using SFP+ you can pick and choose your
transceivers for fibre or CAT cabling etc.
On Mon 02 Dec 2013 10:10:37 GMT, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 11:36:31AM +0200, Kapetanakis
Hey guys,
I have just upgraded two Dell servers (a PowerEdge R410 and a R320) to
OpenBSD 5.4-stable -- before the upgrade, these machines were running
5.3-stable without a problem.
After the upgrade to 5.4, both machines started to panic with a uvm_fault.
(3 panics so far...) The panic messages
On 02/12/13 17:15, Andy wrote:
Yea CX4 will work, its the chipset that matters. But CX4 is short
range and superseded, and by using SFP+ you can pick and choose your
transceivers for fibre or CAT cabling etc.
Well the Cisco CX4 costs ~ 600$ List price,
while the SR one costs 3.000$ List
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Mikael mikael.tr...@gmail.com wrote:
just like everyone else, i would love to see an openbsd
powered android phone. but i think the elephant in
the room no one is talking about is performance.
without getting into running bad code faster vs
running
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Erling Westenvik wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:39:17PM +0100, Jan Lambertz wrote:
I m not sure if you already investigated this but s.m.a.r.t. has quite many
diagnostic info. Even if the drive has not actually been marked as broken.
This is somewhat vendor dependent. I
On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, David Vasek wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, David Vasek wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2013, Joel Sing wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2013, Manuel Giraud wrote:
Hi,
I have a ntfs partition with rather large (about 3GB) files on it. When
I copy these files on a ffs partition they are
The choice is of course yours.. ;)
It would be worth trying a Cisco 'compatible' first before spending the
big bucks on 'branded' optics..
http://www.gbics.com/xenpak-10gb-sr/?gclid=CKv_96G-irsCFSX4wgodQDEAdA
Anyway, this is quite a personal decision and does affect support..
On Mon 02 Dec
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Matthieu Herrb mhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:00:53PM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
Chris Cappuccio [ch...@nmedia.net] wrote:
openda...@hushmail.com [openda...@hushmail.com] wrote:
Hi,
What are the ups and downs of replacing
cross compiling is really missing in openBSD to handle very small Platform
which does not have the power to compile, and more.
If you choose to not become educated, fine, that's your choice. There
is a completely fine cross-build environment that works well.
We can natively build on a vax and a
Hi,
I'm having trouble configuring Windows clients with l2tp over ipsec,
This config works great on OSX/iOS/Android/Linux
I do not know which type of auth/enc/group I should use for Windows clients
I currently use OpenBSD 5.4 with the following
ike passive esp transport \
proto udp from
Kapetanakis Giannis [bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr] wrote:
On 02/12/13 17:15, Andy wrote:
Yea CX4 will work, its the chipset that matters. But CX4 is short range
and superseded, and by using SFP+ you can pick and choose your
transceivers for fibre or CAT cabling etc.
Well the Cisco CX4 costs
Hello misc@
There have been discussions about extending mg with tinyscheme:
http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=7262
Or with lua:
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20120723072952
What about with python?
Any thoughts?
Regards,Edward.
There have been discussions about extending mg with tinyscheme:
http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=7262
Or with lua:
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20120723072952
What about with python?
So we should put python in the base. That would be great.
So why don't we have python in the base? Perl is in there.
Just curious, not that I'm requesting. :-)
Thanks.
Edward
From: Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
To: Edward L. drawd...@gmail.com
CC: misc@openbsd.org
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 08:41:47PM -, Edward L. wrote:
[...]
Any thoughts?
[...]
For that, tinyscheme, lua or python would have to be integrated into
base. That seems rather unlikely.
What would be nice would be to take the Lisp interpreter from xedit and
integrate it into mg. Xedit is in
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 20:58, Edward L. wrote:
So why don't we have python in the base? Perl is in there.
Just curious, not that I'm requesting. :-)
It's totally reasonable for an operating system to include *a* first
class scripting language. It allows us to build tools like pkg_add in
that
I have used this with windows 7 and osx:
ike passive esp transport \
proto udp from $public_ip to any port 1701 \
main auth hmac-sha1 enc 3des group modp1024 \
quick auth hmac-sha1 enc aes \
psk
2013/12/2 Or Elimelech o...@xwise.com
Hi,
I'm having trouble
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 04:13:34PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 20:58, Edward L. wrote:
So why don't we have python in the base? Perl is in there.
Just curious, not that I'm requesting. :-)
It's totally reasonable for an operating system to include *a* first
class
Hi,
Could someone help me with this issue we have found where the OpenBGPd
rule 'match to bgppeerip set nexthop bgpcarpip' doesn't work if OpenBGPd is
started whilst the OpenBSD host is a carp master. It only works if it is a
CARP backup :(
Or could someone give me a clue where in the source
andy [a...@brandwatch.com] wrote:
Hi,
Could someone help me with this issue we have found where the OpenBGPd
rule 'match to bgppeerip set nexthop bgpcarpip' doesn't work if OpenBGPd is
started whilst the OpenBSD host is a carp master. It only works if it is a
CARP backup :(
Or could
Siju George sgeorge.ml2 at gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Henning Brauer lists-openbsd at
bsws.de wrote:
I have one of these somewhere - basically, all that is needed is a pci
attachment for the existing urtwn. shouldn't be too hard, but as usual
- somebody has to
No, I'm seeing the same thing - the carp master advertises the carp IP as
next-hop no matter what.
The carp backup advertises whatever you've told it to advertise via set
nexthop.
-Adam
On Dec 2, 2013 6:43 PM, Chris Cappuccio ch...@nmedia.net wrote:
andy [a...@brandwatch.com] wrote:
Hi,
On 12/2/2013 11:10 PM, Craig McCormick wrote:
Siju George sgeorge.ml2 at gmail.com writes:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Henning Brauer lists-openbsd at
bsws.de wrote:
I have one of these somewhere - basically, all that is needed is a pci
attachment for the existing urtwn. shouldn't be
hi
there is always a kernel panic when booting with enabled acpi on my Lenovo
ThinkPad L420 (7854RP1). here are pics of it and trace
http://imgur.com/KPW4972http://imgur.com/gUAV1Gy
any suggestions?
thanks
This works with Windows 8, OSX, Android and iOS:
ike passive esp transport \
proto udp from $public_ip to any port 1701 \
main auth hmac-sha1 enc aes group modp1024 \
quick auth hmac-sha1 enc aes \
psk $psk
On 03 Dec 2013, at 00:28, Frans Haarman
36 matches
Mail list logo
