From: cyril.andreic...@hotmail.com
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Lenovo L420 ACPI, kernel panic
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:09:56 +0300
hi
there is always a kernel panic when booting with enabled acpi on my Lenovo
ThinkPad L420 (7854RP1). here are pics of it and trace
From: cyril.andreic...@hotmail.com
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Lenovo L420 ACPI, kernel panic
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:09:56 +0300
hi
there is always a kernel panic when booting with enabled acpi on my Lenovo
ThinkPad L420 (7854RP1). here are pics of it and trace
Hi all,
I would like to thanks all to your fast feedback and support
I'm moving my flat so I cannot test for these days. On Thursday I'll
receive a new USB - DB9 Null modem cable and a flash card reader.
So the next days I'll update this feed with my observation, tests and steps
to achieve it
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to connect an iPhone to the local subnet for VOIP
usage through VPN.
Has anyone succeeded in creating a VPN tunnel from an iPhone to OpenBSD?
I'm looking for a way to connect an iPhone to the local subnet for VOIP usage
through VPN.
Has anyone succeeded in creating a VPN tunnel from an iPhone to OpenBSD?
Yes. npppd's L2TP http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=npppd, or
OpenVPN is what I have used.
Greets dudez,
Help.
How can one properly share (on the firewall, not at application
level) the _downstream_ bandwidth between for example a HTTP download
(should get the most bandwidth) and a torrent queue (should be
reduced to the bare minimum except when no HTTP transfer is in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03, Gabor Berczi wrote:
Greets dudez,
Help.
How can one properly share (on the firewall, not at application
level) the _downstream_ bandwidth between for example a HTTP
download (should get the most bandwidth) and a torrent queue
Hi everyone,
I would like to share an issue with one of my OpenBSD Firewall which is
present in my company.
Everything was working fine until a server crash this last week-end.
We have setup the netflow protocol with the pseudo device pflow0.
You can find the relevant files for the netflow
On Dec 3, 2013, at 4:48 PM, indiunix wrote:
I would do it like this.
altq on $INTERFACE bandwidth $INMbp/s hfsc queue { http, torrent }
queue http bandwidth 70% priority 8 hsfc ( realtime 60% )
queue torrent bandwidth 50% priority 1 hsfc ( upperlimit 95% )
Just apply these rules to
Hi, I've got something really interesting to show, which shows this
clearly and should help point to the root cause.
In short, it seems that the desired nexthop is not applied by the CARP
master when it is in state 'nexthop 180.25.32.20 now valid: via
180.25.32.20'. I.e. when it is 'via' even
Hi Josh,
First of all thanks for the welcome to the misc list !
I don't get a failure when I tried to destroy and re-create the pflow
interface indeed.
You will find the information requested below :
- uname -a
OpenBSD casa-vpn01.my.domain 4.8 GENERIC.MP#335 amd6
- dmesg output
wskbd0 at
Alexis VACHETTE avache...@sisteer.com writes:
- uname -a
OpenBSD casa-vpn01.my.domain 4.8 GENERIC.MP#335 amd6
It's been a while since 4.8. It's not guaranteed that running outdated
software is your problem, but it's easier for everyone trying to help
if you're reasonably up to date (which
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:53:24PM +0100, Laurent CARON wrote:
I added a new transit to my network (Level3) and this issue is back
(runnning OpenBSD 5.4 but tried current also).
Nov 25 22:43:55 bgpgw-002 bgpd[24271]: neighbor 2001:450:2001:1001::45
(ev6_gw-002_to_L3): received notification:
On Tue 03 Dec 2013 16:06:39 GMT, Gabor Berczi wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 4:48 PM, indiunix wrote:
I would do it like this.
altq on $INTERFACE bandwidth $INMbp/s hfsc queue { http, torrent }
queue http bandwidth 70% priority 8 hsfc ( realtime 60% )
queue torrent bandwidth 50% priority 1
On Tue 03 Dec 2013 18:15:23 GMT, Laurent CARON wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:53:24PM +0100, Laurent CARON wrote:
I added a new transit to my network (Level3) and this issue is back
(runnning OpenBSD 5.4 but tried current also).
Nov 25 22:43:55 bgpgw-002 bgpd[24271]: neighbor
On 03/12/2013 19:20, Andy wrote:
Can you provide an example of what you did/fixed in bgpd.conf so when
others google for this error they will have a pointer of what to do :)
Here it is.
** Note for future readers, don't copy and paste this config snippet as
it does *NOT* work as you would
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Andy wrote:
queue ack on $extinterface bandwidth 10% priority 6 hfsc
( realtime 10% )
queue ack on $intinterface bandwidth 10% priority 6 hfsc
( realtime 10% )
One queue can't be on two interfaces.
queue XYZ already exists on interface pppoe0
Google for
On 2013-12-03 13:46, Gabor Berczi wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Andy wrote:
queue ack on $extinterface bandwidth 10% priority 6 hfsc ( realtime
10% )
queue ack on $intinterface bandwidth 10% priority 6 hfsc ( realtime
10% )
One queue can't be on two interfaces.
queue XYZ already
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:03 PM, josh Grosse wrote:
On 2013-12-03 13:46, Gabor Berczi wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Andy wrote:
queue ack on $extinterface bandwidth 10% priority 6 hfsc
( realtime 10% )
queue ack on $intinterface bandwidth 10% priority 6 hfsc
( realtime 10% )
One queue
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Andy wrote:
Including http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html
This page doesn't even mention neither HFSC nor any new scheduler...
--
G
On Tue Dec 3 2013 20:32, Gabor Berczi wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:03 PM, josh Grosse wrote:
On 2013-12-03 13:46, Gabor Berczi wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Andy wrote:
queue ack on $extinterface bandwidth 10% priority 6 hfsc ( realtime
10% )
queue ack on $intinterface bandwidth
Thanks, I fixed it using the same config I wrote
The problem is my npppd server is behind NAT and my windows needed registry
modification AssumeUDP
Thank you again
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:28 AM, Frans Haarman franshaar...@gmail.com wrote:
I have used this with windows 7
On Tue Dec 3 2013 20:40, Gabor Berczi wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Andy wrote:
Including http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html
This page doesn't even mention neither HFSC nor any new scheduler...
Please watch the video record of Henning's talk on the new queueing
subsystem.
On 2013-12-03 14:40, Gabor Berczi wrote:
This page doesn't even mention neither HFSC nor any new scheduler...
The new queueing system is HFSC, with a simpler syntax.
It became available to -current users in October, per
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html#20131012
The new scheduler will
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:57 PM, josh Grosse wrote:
The new scheduler will be included in 5.5-release. Users of -
current now, or of 5.5 when it is released, who wish to continue
using altq syntax and an altq scheduler may do so during a
transition period, as described in the link above.
Compute Engine now supports custom OSes [1], so I've been working on
getting OpenBSD working on it. I thought I'd share a status update.
[1]
http://googlecloudplatform.blogspot.com/2013/12/google-compute-engine-is-now-generally-available.html
** virtio-scsi
Compute Engine exposes disks as
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:10:32PM +0100, Gabor Berczi wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:57 PM, josh Grosse wrote:
The new scheduler will be included in 5.5-release. Users of -
current now, or of 5.5 when it is released, who wish to continue
using altq syntax and an altq scheduler may do so
On 2013-12-03 15:10, Gabor Berczi wrote:
Okay. But what you just described (Child queues are able to use the
same name) doesn't work with ALTQ either. Are you certain it does
with the new sched? (that would mean that it was impossible to do
before)
The PF User's guide shows a cbq example
Em 03-12-2013 11:43, Anders Berggren escreveu:
I'm looking for a way to connect an iPhone to the local subnet for VOIP
usage through VPN.
Has anyone succeeded in creating a VPN tunnel from an iPhone to OpenBSD?
Yes. npppd's L2TP http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=npppd, or
OpenVPN
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 12:12:09PM -0800, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
Compute Engine now supports custom OSes [1], so I've been working on
getting OpenBSD working on it. I thought I'd share a status update.
[1]
+--
| On 2013-12-03 16:35:45, Jiri B wrote:
|
| Have you tried OpenBSD on SmartOS? Some people say it would need
| some love (some storage issue).
I used OpenBSD on SmartOS a couple years ago. There was a bug in KVM that
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Jiri B ji...@devio.us wrote:
Aha, big brother grows up :-) I will try to test virtio-scsi on RHEVM
which also exposes this to VMs.
Cool, let me know if you run into any issues. I'm sure there's still
some bugs in the driver so I wouldn't put it into production
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:45:28PM -0500, Bryan Horstmann-Allen wrote:
I used OpenBSD on SmartOS a couple years ago. There was a bug in KVM that
would
kill the host, but that's been fixed for a while...
I saw when a VM with virtio devices killed RHEL host too. Funny :)
Baf, it was secured
Hi,
It happened again with another machine, a R420, also running 5.4-stable. I
can reproduce the problem giving a sequence of bioctl mfi0 commands:
(Please, do not try this on production servers)
# for foo in `jot 1000`; do bioctl mfi0; sleep 1; done
The kernel panics with:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2013 21:10:32 +0100, Gabor Berczi gabuc...@gabucino.be
wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:57 PM, josh Grosse wrote:
The new scheduler will be included in 5.5-release. Users of -
current now, or of 5.5 when it is released, who wish to continue
using altq syntax and an altq
On 2013-11-30, Jordan Earls ea...@lastyearswishes.com wrote:
I've been looking at trying to convert the CVS repository to a git
repository. My goal with this is to allow for more people to easily take a
glance at the source code of OpenBSD.
This already exists at
On 2013-12-03, Ryan Freeman r...@slipgate.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:10:32PM +0100, Gabor Berczi wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 8:57 PM, josh Grosse wrote:
The new scheduler will be included in 5.5-release. Users of -
current now, or of 5.5 when it is released, who wish to continue
On 2013-12-03, Gabor Berczi gabuc...@gabucino.be wrote:
On Dec 3, 2013, at 7:15 PM, Andy wrote:
Including http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/queueing.html
This page doesn't even mention neither HFSC nor any new scheduler...
The FAQ does not cover -current, it covers the last release.
(Feel free
On 2013-12-02, C. L. Martinez carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I need to deploy IPSec tunnels (lan-to-lan and roadwarriors clients
like linux and windows) under two openbsd carp firewalls.
..
What option can be best to deploy in these firewalls: ipsec
(ipsec.conf and isakmpd) or iked?
On 2013-12-02, Kapetanakis Giannis bil...@edu.physics.uoc.gr wrote:
I would love to go for the SFP+ path but we cannot afford it,
flexoptix do a xenpak-sfp+ converter (and lots of other interesting things)
On Dec 3, 2013, at 9:43 PM, Ryan Freeman wrote:
try:
queue extpribandwidth 10% priority 7qlimit 500 hfsc
(realtime 5% ecn red)
queue intpribandwidth 10% priority 7qlimit 500 hfsc
(realtime 5% ecn red)
Yes, but as I said, only one of these can be used (can't pass into
Hi Misc,
This is trivial question but I am having a hard time wrapping my head
around the possible use of relayd for ssh traffic redirecting. Namely I
have a situation where I have multiple hosts behind firewall which I
would like to make available for ssh loggin.
In the past I was using
On Dec 4, 2013, at 12:44 AM, andy wrote:
As Josh and the other guys said, you can use the same queue name on
different interfaces but they must be children.
Nope, they don't have to be, but thanks to your working example I
could deduce what's the deciding factor.
=== Every queue must have
43 matches
Mail list logo
