| When the process starts, it issues an error message:
|
| dwb:/usr/local/lib/libestdc++.so.16.0: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.57.0 : WARNING:
symbol(_ZN11__gnu_debug17_S_debug_messagesE) size mismatch, relink your program
|
|
| Also, if anyone could point me to the info about adding
| noscript/flashb
I was quite happy, seeing dwb browser included in packages
for lattest current. Since I found no name of porter, I'd
like to ask few questions to the list.
When the process starts, it issues an error message:
dwb:/usr/local/lib/libestdc++.so.16.0: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.57.0 : WARNING:
symbol(_ZN
Hi,
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 21:00:31 +0200
Jens Hansen wrote:
> I can successfully connect to my opensbsd 5.5. isakmpd / npppd IPSEC L2TP
> vpn setup.
> But (not knowing too much about netwoking) i think i'm having a mtu
> problem. I can do low volume traffic fine, but transmitting larger files
> stal
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:13:42AM +0800, Tito Mari Francis Esca??o wrote:
> Good day,
> I'm planning to experiment modifying FirefoxOS to be based on OpenBSD
> instead of the default Linux kernel, and it seems we don't have the
> corresponding zlib from www.zlib.net. I checked on Ubuntu and they u
Good day,
I'm planning to experiment modifying FirefoxOS to be based on OpenBSD
instead of the default Linux kernel, and it seems we don't have the
corresponding zlib from www.zlib.net. I checked on Ubuntu and they use
zlib 1.2.8, this is the latest version as per zlib homepage. Can
somebody please
Hi All,
Previously I sent out a very long e-mail about this and I didn't get any
responses,
so this is my second attempt which will be much shorter. Basically, I am having
a problem
with the included version of dhcpd in OpenBSD 5.5 stable, and I'm not sure if
it's an
issue with OpenBSD, or my c
2014-09-13 19:27 GMT+02:00 why not :
> hello
>
> Besides NTRU is having a GPL licence,
https://github.com/NTRUOpenSourceProject/ntru-crypto/issues/4
https://github.com/tbuktu/libntru
but:
http://blog.cr.yp.to/20140213-ideal.html
Daniel
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Henning Brauer
wrote:
> * Tony Sarendal [2014-09-03 06:48]:
> > The initial request disappearing and the firewalls staying demoted
> > "forever" are independent issues.
>
> sure about that? the demotion counter for the interface group pfsyncX
> is part of (usual
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:18:31PM +1000, Brett Mahar wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 21:15:59 -0400
> Steve Litt wrote:
>
> | Hi all,
> |
> | Has anyone gotten qemu to install a Linux vm on OpenBSD5.5, 64bit?
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> There's a readme that is installed when you install the qemu package,
hello
Besides NTRU is having a GPL licence, what are the obstacles that need to be
overcome to have it in LibreSSL?
https://github.com/NTRUOpenSourceProject/ntru-crypto
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=NTRU+crypto
https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/11629/public-key-cryptosy
Hi Thomas,
A possible solution to your problem might be to put ext_if1 into its own
rdomain with its default route out through ext_if1.
/Benno
Henning Brauer(hb-open...@ml.bsws.de) on 2014.09.12 18:10:26 +0200:
> * Thomas Pfaff [2014-08-28 13:51]:
> > I have a router with two external interface
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 21:15:59 -0400
Steve Litt wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| Has anyone gotten qemu to install a Linux vm on OpenBSD5.5, 64bit?
Hi Steve,
There's a readme that is installed when you install the qemu package, you
should check that out. I had opensuse running a while ago (lots of the othe
On 13/09/14 11:55, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Kapetanakis Giannis [2014-09-06 00:50]:
I'm asking about "reassemble tcp".
According to some 2010's threads in misc@ it used to cause problems to some
users.
I'm wondering what's the status now.
unchanged.
Thanks for the reply
G
On 12 September 2014 19:22, wrote:
> Still didn't found a way to disable the mouse and keyboard.
>
> Any hints please?
I asked you before what you meant by this, and suggested:
Style * NeverFocus
Is that not what you're after? It's a pretty odd request. Are you
trying to build some kind
On 12 September 2014 19:18, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we are using OpenBSD 5.5 with FVWM.
>
> How can we disable the mouse cursor?
>
> So we shouldn't see the mouse cursor if we push the mouse a little.
>
> Is the solution somewhere here? :
Not via FVWM directly. You might be able to use unclutter to
* Kapetanakis Giannis [2014-09-06 00:50]:
> I'm asking about "reassemble tcp".
>
> According to some 2010's threads in misc@ it used to cause problems to some
> users.
> I'm wondering what's the status now.
unchanged.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH, h
* Sonic [2014-09-05 17:12]:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Kapetanakis Giannis
> wrote:
> > yeah, don't use reassemble tcp. it's not perfect.
> Isn't that default behavior?
hell, no.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services GmbH, http://bsws.de, Full-Service ISP
* Matt Hamilton [2014-09-06 14:11]:
> Based on the info above it would seem that the routing table thinks
> the packet should be routed to bnx0 based on the IP address. bnx0
> supports HW tcp checksums, so the OS does not create the checksum
> itself.
>
> But the packet never goes out bnx0, it is
* andy [2014-09-02 21:12]:
> Hoping this is a pretty dumb question and someone can just shoot me down
> with an instant answer but is there any reason why I can't compare against
> multiple tags?
because list expansion for that case is not implemented in the parser.
not hard to do at all...
--
On 12 September 2014, Zé Loff wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 05:31:01PM +0200, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-09-12 at 16:22 +0100, Zé Loff wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 04:28:46PM +0200, Lars wrote:
> > > > On 12.09.2014 15:27, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > > > >Hello misc@,
>
* Tony Sarendal [2014-09-03 06:48]:
> The initial request disappearing and the firewalls staying demoted
> "forever" are independent issues.
sure about that? the demotion counter for the interface group pfsyncX
is part of (usually carp) is kept raised until the bulk transfer
finishes.
--
Henni
* Gregory Edigarov [2014-09-12 20:28]:
> On 09/12/14 19:07, Henning Brauer wrote:
> >* Paul S. [2014-08-28 11:19]:
> >>Earlier today, however, I discovered that routes that I'm announcing under
> >>the same ASN (in another location) are being received and put into the RIB
> >>-- but never into th
22 matches
Mail list logo
