vio(4) stops working with debian 9.0 qemu-2.8+dfsg-6

Hello, found an very strange problem, which seems more to be an qemu/kvm issue. Maybe one of you knows what happens and give me an hint to solved this (with vio). I use an debian 9.0 kvm/qemu setup with bridge-networking. After i upgrade from debian 8.0 to 9.0 i run into a problem with my

Re: dhcrelay broken after Apr 5

On 04/07/17 19:09, Reyk Floeter wrote: > Could you try again with the attached diff? It doesn't change > behavior but it adds some chatty logging when a packet is rejected. > Maybe it helps to find the issue. > > Reyk I've send the bug report as detailed as I could. In a few words, applying

Re: dhcrelay broken after Apr 5

> On 05.07.2017, at 11:50, Kapetanakis Giannis > wrote: > > On 05/07/17 12:45, Reyk Floeter wrote: >> >>> On 05.07.2017, at 11:41, Kapetanakis Giannis >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 04/07/17 19:09, Reyk Floeter wrote: Could you try again

Re: dhcrelay broken after Apr 5

> On 05.07.2017, at 11:41, Kapetanakis Giannis > wrote: > > On 04/07/17 19:09, Reyk Floeter wrote: >> Could you try again with the attached diff? It doesn't change >> behavior but it adds some chatty logging when a packet is rejected. >> Maybe it helps to find the

Re: dhcrelay broken after Apr 5

On 05/07/17 12:45, Reyk Floeter wrote: > >> On 05.07.2017, at 11:41, Kapetanakis Giannis >> wrote: >> >> On 04/07/17 19:09, Reyk Floeter wrote: >>> Could you try again with the attached diff? It doesn't change >>> behavior but it adds some chatty logging when a

allow/deny BOOTP in dhdcpd.conf

Hello Everyone, I am pretty new to the networking world. But as a sysadmin, I am thoroughly appreciating pf and OpenBSD as a whole. I think I may have fallen in love. My question is about BOOTP. I've always heard it in the context of PXE booting, but as I was configuring it in dhcpd.conf, I

Re: dhcrelay broken after Apr 5

On 04/07/17 19:09, Reyk Floeter wrote: > First of all, please send a proper bug reports to bugs@, not misc. > "It used to work but now it doesn't" is not very helpful. > > Could you share your actual configuration or, even better, provide a > simplified way to reproduce your problem? rzalamena,

Re: problem with netlock and unbound

Seems to have been resolved with the July 4 snapshot: syncing disks... done System restart. ? Looking for valid bootloader image Jumping to start of image at address 0xbfc8 U-Boot 1.1.1 (UBNT Build ID: 4670715-gbd7e2d7) (Build time: May 27 2014 - 11:16:22) BIST check

Re: A question of lock usage in OpenBSD kernel code

Hi, J Doe wrote on Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 12:02:42AM -0400: > I would like to target OpenBSD with some networking code I am > writing in C++ (again, in user land, not kernel networking code). > I'd like to follow the OpenBSD way The OpenBSD way is to write userland network daemons in C, not in

Re: problem with netlock and unbound

Here also Just updated to jully 4th snapshot, and unbound doesn`t panic with net lock 2017-07-05 3:04 GMT-03:00 Jan Kalkus : > Seems to have been resolved with the July 4 snapshot: > > syncing disks... done > System restart. >? > Looking for valid bootloader

Re: installboot(8)

On Tuesday 04 July 2017 20:55:25 Paul de Weerd wrote: > On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:34:56PM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote: > | Hi there! > | > | Sorry if this may sound like a rather stupid question: > | (Referencing the examples section of man installboot(8)) > | > | Can s.o. verifiy that instead

Re: installboot(8)

Am 07/05/17 um 17:59 schrieb Joel Sing: > On Tuesday 04 July 2017 20:55:25 Paul de Weerd wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:34:56PM +0200, Stefan Wollny wrote: >> | Hi there! >> | >> | Sorry if this may sound like a rather stupid question: >> | (Referencing the examples section of man

Re: installboot(8)

On Tuesday 04 July 2017 20:34:56 Stefan Wollny wrote: > Hi there! > > Sorry if this may sound like a rather stupid question: > (Referencing the examples section of man installboot(8)) > > Can s.o. verifiy that instead of > # installboot sd0 > > it is equally safe to issue > # installboot >

vesa vs. wsfb?

Between the vesa(4) and wsfb(4) X11 video driver, are there any advantages one has over the other? I have a brand new laptop (Kaby Lake) whose integrated graphics chipset isn't yet supported by inteldrm(4)/intel(4). vesa(4) works if you remember to enable machdep.allowaperture. And since the

Re: vesa vs. wsfb?

> I went with wsfb because it doesn't need allowaperture. Any other > differences? > > > PS: The FAQ is silent on this topic. I had to dig through old > mailing list posts for a reminder to enable allowaperture. > I knew there was a wscons-based driver, too, but if you don't > know

Dell R210 II crashing on boot

Hello misc@, I'm trying to use a Dell R210 II server, remotely hosted at online.net (LT 1701.3 model). Installation was done from a qemu on a live "rescue" linux with both 6.1 and current as of 20170705. When it boots, it crashes at some point, and when it does the idrac (on a p

Re: Dell R210 II crashing on boot

http://marc.info/?t=14986422261=1=2

Limit internet connection by time of day and number of hours

Hi there! "Security" means to constantly re-evaluate your options and processes - right? So the other day I checked the settings in the Fritz!Box router and remembered that they had implemented a time quota for a defined group of users (=IPs). Example: My young son has a tablet and a mobile