Hi Andreas,
Andreas Bihlmaier wrote,
Besides the LED it works great and rock solid in DS11 Mode, but not at all
in
DS54 aka 802.11g mode. I hope this mode will be supported soon as well :)
It also works wonderful in monitor mode with kismet! (LED off as well)
Oh, I did not get it
ok, req_mime_type -- rep_mime_type and it's ok :-)
Thanks a lot
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
Hi,
Otto Moerbeek wrote,
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Peter Bako wrote:
I have a situation where I need to connect an OpenBSD box to a MS Windows
PPTP server (yep, I know it is not secure, but in this case I have no
choice
in the
On 10/6/05, Antti Nykdnen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think he wants to compare already built kernels, from two different
snapshots.
sorry, how couldn't I think about snapshots...
--knitti
Hi folks,
I just installed OpenBSD 3.7 on my Samsung P35 XVM 1600 III. Speedstep
works fine, but what about Ati's powerplay?
Another problem I have:
During system shutdown/reboot the system usually beeps, but on my P35
this beep is very loud, how to disable it?
Thanks in advance,
Vincent
Hi to all.
One of my clients has got an Internet connection with a no much affidable
provider. He reports continual disconnection and so on. I would like to do
a second connection with another provider to obtain a sort of redundancy, a
fault tollerance. What I have to do to obtain the
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:53:08AM +0800, Ilya A. Kovalenko wrote:
Hello,
Greetings,
I found out that sh(1) reads file in process of execution (instead of
read whole file and execute it from memory image), which makes
editing such scripts unreliable and/or dangerous. Is there any
can you connect with open authentication (-A 1) when you set to open auth.
AP too
From: Nikolaus Hiebaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OpenBSD mailing list - misc misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: WLAN (Linksys WPC111) + WEP
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 23:34:19 +0200 (CEST)
ifconfig wi0 192.168.200.2
TK just edit a copy, chmod +x and mv(1) it into place.
Slightly complicated, but works, because mv(1) removes
old file, so sh(1) working either old version or new one
(no hybrids).
On 06/10/05, Ilya A. Kovalenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TK just edit a copy, chmod +x and mv(1) it into place.
Slightly complicated, but works, because mv(1) removes
old file, so sh(1) working either old version or new one
(no hybrids).
Yes, sh(1) will probably keep a descriptor to the old
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Andreas Kahari wrote:
On 06/10/05, Ilya A. Kovalenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TK just edit a copy, chmod +x and mv(1) it into place.
Slightly complicated, but works, because mv(1) removes
old file, so sh(1) working either old version or new one
(no hybrids).
Hello,
I'd like to find the good working solution when sending AS announces to
our peering / transit neigbor.
In fact on bgpd.conf man page we have :
neighbor $peer1 {
remote-as 65001
announce foo
}
With foo :
announce
Andreas Kahari wrote:
Yes, sh(1) will probably keep a descriptor to the old file and
keep using it until done.
However, does this have any kind of other implications? The
behaviour that Ilya pointed out would not occur to me to be
expected...
In the meanwhile this behaviour has been changed
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Han Boetes wrote:
Andreas Kahari wrote:
Yes, sh(1) will probably keep a descriptor to the old file and
keep using it until done.
However, does this have any kind of other implications? The
behaviour that Ilya pointed out would not occur to me to be
expected...
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 03:18:41PM +0200, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to find the good working solution when sending AS announces to
our peering / transit neigbor.
In fact on bgpd.conf man page we have :
neighbor $peer1 {
remote-as 65001
Ntop has a built in webserver that displays data in html that can be
viewed from any workstation.
Shane
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Bihlmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:30 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: ntop
I think he wants to compile
Hello -
We are planning to build an OpenBSD server to be our edge router. We are
terminating 5 DS3's into two Cisco routers and using bridge-groups and vlans to
separate the connections. This works very well in our test setup.
We plan on building two servers and using carp for redundancy.
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 06:33:05PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
More on this with test results, example, setup use, and more details.
==
Without MD5 configure.
With bgpd master
Clear session from bgpd side, session comes back up right away.
Clear session from
[...]
The announce keyword is mostly for simple setups. For transit providers
announce should be set to all and real bgp filtering should be used.
The idea of announce is that small multihomed setups with e.g. two uplinks
just work in a save manner (defaulting to self and so not the full
unsuscribe
Ricardo german Kdrcher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
1GB gratis, Antivirus y Antispam
Correo Yahoo!, el mejor correo web del mundo
http://correo.yahoo.com.ar
Again forgot to cc:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jernej Vodopivec [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Oct 6, 2005 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: ntop
To: Andreas Bihlmaier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ntop
- displays data in html - can be viewed from any workstation withoud
installing additional products
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Han Boetes wrote:
In the meanwhile this behaviour has been changed in CVS.
Perhaps this will get backported as well. And if not it's
pretty easy to backport I'd guess.
What commit are you referring to? You can say that I'm closely
involved, but I
Hello
I have smaller server with openbsd 3.8 on it. It all doing greate, exept the
finction pgk_add. I get:
bash-3.00# pkg_add -v ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/s.../symon-2.71.tgz
Can't locate object method add_size via package
OpenBSD::PackingElement::FDESC at
On 06/10/05, Xavier Beaudouin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The announce keyword is mostly for simple setups. For transit providers
announce should be set to all and real bgp filtering should be used.
The idea of announce is that small multihomed setups with e.g. two uplinks
just
Hello,
(sorry for the long post!)
I used the ppp pppoe (for my dsl connection) for some while and decided to
switch to the kernel implementation.
I'm actually having a problem with kernel pppoe, after a reboot or when I try
to connect/reconnect it takes about
1 minute before it is able to
Claudio Jeker wrote:
With bgpd master
Clear session from bgpd side, session comes back up right away.
Clear session from remote side, session comes back up with delay.
With bgpd slave
Clear session from bgpd side, session comes back up with delay.
Clear session from remote side, session comes
concerning my original post:
sorry, I made a typo error in my hostname.pppoe0.
I have this line:
!/sbin/ifconfig \$if inet 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.1 netmask 0x
I do NOT have link1 in the line, as written in the previous mail!!!
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 16:55:05 +0400
Vladimir Potapov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have 1 server on which running firewall and DNS master service. And
we planned to install another server for load balancing and redudancy.
2 servers(each have running PF and BIND) will balancing load (or one
will
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 06:33:05PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
==
Without MD5 configure.
With bgpd master
Clear session from bgpd side, session comes back up right away.
Clear session from remote side, session comes back up with delay.
With bgpd
** Reply to message from ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 6 Oct 2005
14:04:20 +0100
Zone transfers are on tcp/53, DNS lookups are 53/udp, so:
That's not quite the whole story: 53/tcp is also used when the response
to a query is too big for a single UDP packet (the resolver sends a UDP
query and gets
* Joost Tr wrote on Oct 6, 2005 [10:00, -] :
can you connect with open authentication (-A 1) when you set to open auth.
AP too
Yes, with open authentication it works. I am not savvy enough to understand the
difference.
What is the difference between open and shared key? And what does it
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 14:04:20 +0100, ed proclaimed...
I use TinyDNS here, so we don't really need to transfer zones as its
handled with a single data file. CARP can be good with DNS.
53/tcp *is* required to answer normal queries.
Since you're drinking djb's koolaid, see
maybe this link helps:
http://www.exergia.biz/ptp/exap-GMF.htm
I am a new owner of two Soekris 4801s running OpenBSD 3.7 (generic) with
pf/pfsynch/carp for redundant firewalling. I've encountered a problem with
high
interrupts (and some packet loss), and after having perused the on-line
FAQ/forums and finding nothing that I could identify as matching the
Am Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2005 11:36 schrieben Sie:
Hi Stefan,
(II) NV(0): Not using mode 1600x1200 (no mode of this name)
This seems to be your problem. Caused by this:
(II) NV(0): Not using default mode 1600x1200 (hsync out of range)
You should try to create a modeline for 1600x1200
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:49:02 -0400
Dave Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not quite the whole story: 53/tcp is also used when the
response to a query is too big for a single UDP packet (the resolver
sends a UDP query and gets a 'truncated' UDP reply, so the resolver
retries the query
Hi Everyone,
I am using OpenBSD and the great pf in a production environment.
I want to be able to use vlan and carp at the same time.
I have two firewalls. These two boxes are responsible for a number of subnet.
I want to have a number of vlan defined on the openbsd to feed my
Hello list,
I'm trying to setup a sendmail config using tls to use gmail as a smart-host.
I made a copy of openbsd-proto.mc as follows:
divert(-1)
#
# Default OpenBSD sendmail configuration for systems accepting mail
# from the internet.
#
# Note that lines beginning with dnl below are comments.
Add this to your xorg.conf in the Device section for the nv driver:
Option FlatPanel True
and remove the Modes lines in the Screen section. It should default to
the largest res it can find.
Then double check the HorizSync and VertRefresh you have defined in
the Monitor section.
On 06/10/05,
Here's an explenation of open vs shared
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,8645211~reverse=0;days=10;root=wlan;mode=full
From: Nikolaus Hiebaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: OpenBSD mailing list - misc misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: WLAN (Linksys WPC111) + WEP
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 22:03:50 +0200
If the Soekris did not come with ethernet chipsets which are just
slightly over the bar of rl(4), the wimpy processor in the machine
might be able to cope.
Recently I and several other people have worked to improve the OpenBSD
article contained in the Wikipedia, I'm sure I need not explain how it
works.
Anyways, I've worked to get as much easily accessable information regarding
OpenBSD in that article as possible and I've pretty much run into a
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 11:17:04PM +0200, L?o Goehrs wrote:
ifconfig vlan0 vlan 11 vlandev carp0
It gives me an error. Is there a way to do that?
Yes there is.
The vlandev has to be the physical interface.
Then you use the vlan interface as the carpdev.
Example:
ifconfig em0 up
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Matthew Weigel wrote:
In theory, you should be able to answer your question simply by me
mentioning that radeon(4) supports dual displays on video cards still
available through retail channels.
Finally, I can vouch for dual displays working fine on Radeon cards,
although
Aaron Glenn wrote:
On 10/6/05, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In theory, you should be able to answer your question simply by me
mentioning that radeon(4) supports dual displays on video cards still
available through retail channels.
I wasn't clear enough in my original post. I'm
On 06/10/05, Jan Izary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently I and several other people have worked to improve the OpenBSD
article contained in the Wikipedia, I'm sure I need not explain how it
works.
Anyways, I've worked to get as much easily accessable information regarding
OpenBSD in that
On 10/6/05, Matthew Weigel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It appears I was correct in guessing that simply mentioning that radeon(4)
is where to look would not give you the information you need in order to
arrive at the fact that the Radeon 9600 drives the products for which you
are searching.
If the Soekris did not come with ethernet chipsets which are just
slightly over the bar of rl(4), the wimpy processor in the machine
might be able to cope.
Throughput is only marginally better using an em in the pci slot of a
4801. I think there's some other problem.
Yeah -- the super
--On 06 October 2005 16:00 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
If the Soekris did not come with ethernet chipsets which are just
slightly over the bar of rl(4), the wimpy processor in the machine
might be able to cope.
Throughput is only marginally better using an em in the pci slot of a
4801. I
experiences setting it up? I've got my eye on the Matrox Millennium
P750 card, but I can't find anything on any kind of support for
OpenBSD (I'm not looking to run Linux, Solaris, or even FreeBSD all of
which seem to have some sort of support).
Their old cards used to be a good choice for
On 10/6/05, Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Their old cards used to be a good choice for open-source, but
Parhelia-based cards are too proprietary. Pity.
I had used Matrox cards exclusively up until Parhelia was released
however long ago. I think my Millenium II card is still
I wondered that as well, but there appear to be lots (so it appears from other
postings I found using google) of 4801s in use with OpenBSD, doing essentially
the same thing as myself (Soekris w/ carp/pf/pfsynch). Yet, AFAICT, I'm the
only one who's posted about this symptom. Since there are
--On 06 October 2005 16:11 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
I had used Matrox cards exclusively up until Parhelia was released
however long ago. I think my Millenium II card is still chugging along
in a closet somewhere. From what I can tell on Matrox's site, the
Parhelia and the Millenium P750 are
** Reply to message from ed [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thu, 6 Oct 2005
22:15:25 +0100
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:49:02 -0400
Dave Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's not quite the whole story: 53/tcp is also used when the
response to a query is too big for a single UDP packet (the resolver
sends a
Jan Izary wrote:
Recently I and several other people have worked to improve the OpenBSD
article contained in the Wikipedia, I'm sure I need not explain how it
works.
Anyways, I've worked to get as much easily accessable information
regarding OpenBSD in that article as possible and I've
Hi List,
I'm running 3.8 from the snapshot 2nd Oct, which I upgraded from 3.7, on
a soekris net4501.
My problem, is probably offtopic, but I'm hoping the wisdom of this list
will point me in the right direction.
I have an apple iBook G4 which will not connect to my OpenBSD ath0
minipci
Aaron Glenn wrote:
Perhaps you could drop the cocky attitude and do something productive
with your catty prose?
No, actually - the catty prose itself is unproductive. But you worked so
hard to eliminate the productive options, I didn't want to give you
anything but what you wanted.
Thanks
Chris Zakelj wrote:
Jan Izary wrote:
Recently I and several other people have worked to improve the OpenBSD
article contained in the Wikipedia, I'm sure I need not explain how it
works.
Anyways, I've worked to get as much easily accessable information
regarding OpenBSD in that article as
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:08, you wrote:
I wondered that as well, but there appear to be lots (so it appears from
other postings I found using google) of 4801s in use with OpenBSD, doing
essentially the same thing as myself (Soekris w/ carp/pf/pfsynch). Yet,
AFAICT, I'm the only one who's posted
OM I know this behaviour form every Unix system I've worked on. Besides,
OM the nice thing about the current way of doing things is that you can
OM read a script form a pipe and have the desired behaviour without any
OM special case code.
This behavior has any advantages for regular files ?
The editing is perfectlty safe.
It is the reading of a file that is being changed that is unsafe.
Of course there's Microsoft Windows.
- --- Original Message --- -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: misc@openbsd.org
Sent: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 09:39:47
OM I know this behaviour form every
On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:07:23 -0500
eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 14:04:20 +0100, ed proclaimed...
I use TinyDNS here, so we don't really need to transfer zones as its
handled with a single data file. CARP can be good with DNS.
53/tcp *is* required to answer normal
On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 22:15:52 +0100, ed proclaimed...
TCP for for DNS lookups are probably going to incur latency. I'd rather
just block that off and ensure that the DNS being provided does not leak
excess 512 bytes. This might cause some problems with huge round robin
lists, but we can all
I think I fumbled last week when I posted this original message in reply
to one serveral months old (causing it to not be seen by MUA threading)
The question remains:
Can traffic travelling ingress on one-of-a-three-interface router be
queued as it egresses the other two possible interfaces,
Hi
I'm sharing a connection and I'm trying to set aside bandwidth for some
users. Here is the pftop -v queue log
QUEUEBANDW SCH PRIO PKTSBYTES
DROP_P DROP_B QLEN BORROW SUSPENDS P/S B/S
std_outpriq 350
On 2005-10-06 14:37:03 -0700, Aaron Glenn wrote:
I wasn't clear enough in my original post. I'm looking to run
1920x1200 on two DVI monitors; and I'd like some sort of OpenGL
hardware acceleration support, however minor. None of the ATi chipsets
currently support 1920x1200 on two DVI monitors.
66 matches
Mail list logo
