solved
/bkw
On 29/04/06, Bachman Kharazmi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to mount a nfs share over internet between two openbsd servers.
As faq describes rpcinfo -p on server should show that mountd listen
at udp: 633 and tcp: 916
But I get,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/ rpcinfo -p
program vers
I'm (almost desperately now) trying to localize the output of date(1).
The localization i'm going for, is da_DK.ISO8859-1 which exists on the system:
$ ls /usr/share/locale/da_DK.ISO8859-1
LC_CTYPE
I have - for a starters - added the following to the default-class in
/etc/login:
I want to use OpenBSD as the network firewall of my
network.
Now which firewall should i use ? i heard people say
pf is outdated use IP Filter instead.
what you recommend ?
regards
*:$., 88,.$:*(((*$ Stingray *:$., 88,.$:*((*$
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
Hi folks,
I have been writing Linksys because i need to know if the v5 of
their WMP54G wireless NIC can be used with the ral driver.
Here's an abstract of the mail:
Me asking:
I also need to know if v5 of the WMP54G uses a Ralink Technology RT25x0
chip?
Linksys answering:
I apologize but we
Il giorno dom, 30/04/2006 alle 12.38 +0200, Lasse Bach ha scritto:
Hi folks,
I have been writing Linksys because i need to know if the v5 of
their WMP54G wireless NIC can be used with the ral driver.
Here's an abstract of the mail:
Me asking:
I also need to know if v5 of the WMP54G
Hi Lasse,
On 2006.04.30, at 8:38 PM, Lasse Bach wrote:
I also need to know if v5 of the WMP54G uses a Ralink Technology
RT25x0 chip?
Are you unable to avoid it?
Maybe someone on the mailing list can provide me with an answer to:
2. Why are such information not available to their
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Marco Castronovo wrote:
Linksys answering:
I apologize but we are not allowed to disclose any information
regarding the
chipsets of any of our devices. Besides, we do not have any access with
those
information. Again, we apologize for any inconvenience.
Ask
**(Excuse my english I'm a frenchie)
Hi,
I bought a DWL-G122 (802.11g usb 2.0 adapter) from D-Link.
This adapter is on the list USB 2.0 adapters that should work but it
doesn't work.
When I plug it, dmesg give that:
---
ugen0 at uhub0 port 1
ugen0: Ralink 802.11 bg WLAN, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2
---
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:38:28PM +0200, Lasse Bach wrote:
Hi folks,
I have been writing Linksys because i need to know if the v5 of
their WMP54G wireless NIC can be used with the ral driver.
Here's an abstract of the mail:
Me asking:
I also need to know if v5 of the WMP54G uses a
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 01:08:34PM +0200, Julien Cabillot wrote:
**(Excuse my english I'm a frenchie)
Hi,
I bought a DWL-G122 (802.11g usb 2.0 adapter) from D-Link.
This adapter is on the list USB 2.0 adapters that should work but it
doesn't work.
When I plug it, dmesg give that:
---
ugen0
On 4/30/06, Julien Cabillot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I do something ?
You could modify the list of supported devies in
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/if_ral.c, so that it will also recognice your
device.
You can find a list of recognisable devices in
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb/usbdevs, but there is no
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 01:44:18AM -0700, S t i n g r a y wrote:
I want to use OpenBSD as the network firewall of my
network.
Now which firewall should i use ? i heard people say
pf is outdated use IP Filter instead.
what you recommend ?
If you use OpenBSD, use pf(4) - it's what OpenBSD
Hello,
The problem I am bumping into is CARP and/or OSPF. I am trying to replace some
old cisco stuff and to redesign/update
the network. What I am trying to accomplish is to have redundancy with load
balancing and routing between networks.
While using only OSPF the network is routable and I
Now what i want to know , maybe is O T in this list
but what is the diffrence , i mean pf in openBSD is
refered to as a firewall for home or small offices ?
why is that , i mean what is the criteria of an
enterprise firewall what is the diffrence between pf
MS ISA / cisco pix or checkpoint ?
On 2006.04.30, at 11:34 PM, S t i n g r a y wrote:
enterprise firewall what is the diffrence between pf
MS ISA / cisco pix or checkpoint ?
performance ? stability or features ?
Marketing which is designed to put a fright into people who have
responsibility for systems and data which are
Please use google before asking questions here.
www.google.com, search for openbsd pf. Click top result.
On 4/30/06, S t i n g r a y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where can i find detail infomation about pf ?
doumentation?
regards
--- Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 06:21:22AM -0700, S t i n g r a y wrote:
Where can i find detail infomation about pf ?
doumentation?
You are kidding right?
regards
--- Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 01:44:18AM -0700, S t i n g
r a y wrote:
I want to
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 06:34:09AM -0700, S t i n g r a y wrote:
Now what i want to know , maybe is O T in this list
but what is the diffrence , i mean pf in openBSD is
refered to as a firewall for home or small offices ?
why is that , i mean what is the criteria of an
enterprise firewall
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:54:06PM +0200, Martin Reindl wrote:
Any ideas? Simply bad hardware? This was working fine with 3.8 and
even a 3.9 snapshot from two months ago before the CDs arrived monday
and I did the upgrade.
Give the dc(4) driver a shot instead.
The dc driver didn't work
S t i n g r a y wrote:
Now what i want to know , maybe is O T in this list
but what is the diffrence , i mean pf in openBSD is
refered to as a firewall for home or small offices ?
why is that , i mean what is the criteria of an
enterprise firewall what is the diffrence between pf
MS ISA /
My CD finally arrived and I immediately installed 3.9 in the first machine.
I immediately found a problem for me: it seems that the GENERIC kernel
no longer support the procfs filesystem.
Instead of compiling a custom kernel, what is the best way (in Perl) to
get the list of current
Hi!
I wonder what the preferred style of return statments is -- for
returning simple values, both styles
return foo;
and
return (foo);
are used in the sources everythen and now. For me, the latter hurts
my eyes, since return just expects an rvalue which doesn't need
brackets
On 4/30/06, Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I wonder what the preferred style of return statments is -- for
returning simple values, both styles
return foo;
and
return (foo);
are used in the sources everythen and now. For me, the latter hurts
my eyes, since
Maybe my reply didn't make it: use ports' mail/nail package.
On 4/24/06, D. E. Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe I'm the only one around who still uses it, but there's one
option in mailx from SysV that I miss with OpenBSD: ~a. It would
be simpler to have either ~a to add the --
Hi folks at misc@ !
I've always missed the feature of GNU tail and FreeBSD tail to follow
multiple files using -f. I was used to monitor the logs on my 3.8 server
using tail -f /var/log/messages ; tail -f /var/www/logs/access_log
and so on, but wasn't pleased of this workaround. I know,
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 4/30/06, Matthias Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I wonder what the preferred style of return statments is -- for
returning simple values, both styles
return foo;
and
return (foo);
are used in the sources everythen and now. For
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 09:18:05PM +0100, Nick Guenther wrote:
I was wondering this myself last week, but I remembered that someone
once said check all the examples before deciding style(9) is silent
on an issue and so I did. The examples all use `return (expr);`.
Have a look at
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 03:44:13PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a
return (eight);
in man style.
But in err() context.
I suspect that bad things can happen with macros
when you do only sensible things with parens.
Good point, but if a macro `foo' works with
return
Maybe my reply didn't make it: use ports' mail/nail package.
It did.
Nail is one option, but seems a bit much for the want of a single
option, when the program that ships with OpenBSD will already do.
It will be easier (and perhaps a learning experience) to submit a
patch to the current
On 4/30/06, S t i n g r a y [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to use OpenBSD as the network firewall of my
network.
Now which firewall should i use ? i heard people say
pf is outdated use IP Filter instead.
what you recommend ?
regards
*:$., 88,.$:*(((*$ Stingray *:$., 88,.$:*((*$
Tired of spam?
Article at http://www.onlamp.com/lpt/a/6557
(excerpt)
Federico Biancuzzi: I remember that just before releasing 3.8 you had to
disable the new behavior of your
implementation of malloc()/free() that returned SIGSEGV when accessing a freed
area. You had to do this
because too many ports were
This is a very well written article for new users of OpenBSD:
http://www.softwareinreview.com/cms/content/view/34/1/
One question I have: Is the description in the article of what's
required to install Java on OpenBSD correct?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Lose, v., experience a loss, get rid of,
Yes, pretty much. Having installed Java on OpenBSD 3.8
a few months ago to be able to use the Camera
Cache simulator (which is written in Java) for school,
you do have to install every version of Java listed
(1.3, 1.4, etc) depending on the version you want.
If you want just 1.3 then you
Instead of compiling a custom kernel, what is the best way (in Perl) to
get the list of current processes?
I was going to suggest the Proc::ProcessTable module, but it looks like
it doesn't support OpenBSD, and looking at the code reveals it uses
/proc in most other OS it works on. :-(
I have
Lasse Bach wrote:
Wtf is that? How can that be a secret?
Because the WMP54G, at least, isn't manufactured by Linksys, it's a
rebadged Lite-On? (Hint: FCC ID)
Maybe someone on the mailing list can provide me with an answer to:
1. Can v5 af the card be used with the ral driver?
If you can
On Sunday 30 April 2006 21:19, David T Harris wrote:
Yes, pretty much. Having installed Java on OpenBSD 3.8
a few months ago to be able to use the Camera
Cache simulator (which is written in Java) for school,
you do have to install every version of Java listed
(1.3, 1.4, etc) depending
I've been tinkering with the code a bit, and found a dirty workaround.
I changed all the snprintf's and sscanf's calls using %a to %f. Things
compiled and installed fine, and the app (window manager enlightenment
dr17, code from CVS) seems to be working fine as far as I have tested,
though I am
You are aware that the main part of the people reading misc@ also reads
undeadly?
On 5/1/06, Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Article at http://www.onlamp.com/lpt/a/6557
(excerpt)
Federico Biancuzzi: I remember that just before releasing 3.8 you had to
disable the new behavior of your
Maybe someone on the mailing list can provide me with an answer to:
1. Can v5 af the card be used with the ral driver?
Yes, I used it to create an access point on 3.8-stable.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ dmesg|grep ral0
ral0 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 Ralink RT2560 rev 0x01: irq 11, address
May 1, 2006.
We are pleased to announce the official release of OpenBSD 3.9.
This is our 19th release on CD-ROM (and 18th via FTP). We remain
proud of OpenBSD's record of eight years with only a single remote
hole in the
40 matches
Mail list logo
