Man,
It's not like the other thread even died yet.
--
http://www.glumbert.com/media/shift
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGvHNNOLnCk
"This officer's men seem to follow him merely out of idle curiosity." --
Sandhurst officer cadet evaluation.
"Securing an environment of Windows platforms from abu
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, J Duke wrote:
> I realize that the whole fix to this DNS cache poisoning is to have
> random ports and random query ids, and that generating good, strong,
> random numbers costs cpu cycles and time. Has anyone else noticed the
> performance hit? Anything that I can do? Particu
I did some additional tests : pings using link-local addresses work
"out-of-the-box", whether the target is hme0 or le0, but the problem
remains with public addresses (2000::/3)
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 2:36 PM, dermiste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> my ISP is kind enough to provide nat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Here's the full story, people seemed to be wondering if the drivers were
open/had binary blobs etc.
- Original Message
Subject: [FSF] Atheros releases free software wireless driver; no binary
blobs
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:27:14 -0
On Mon, July 28, 2008 11:47, Eric Furman wrote:
> Who can we write to at atheros to tell them I will never
> ever purchase one of their products?
>
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:18:34 -0500, "Jacob Yocom-Piatt"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Reyk Floeter wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 09:28:10AM -0
But can't you overwrite in cache both the A and NS record to re-direct the
whole domain with an answer and authority answer spoofed from the NS server?
Isn't this the other poisoning problem that really hasn't been spoken about
much? However, then you would need to have a NS to redirect with.
* Hari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-29 02:52]:
> problem. As an aside, would a different NIC solve this problem?
no. you have interrupt routing problems.
--
Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Servic
--- On Mon, 7/28/08, Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Rogier Krieger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: FAQ License?
> To: "OpenBSD-misc list"
> Date: Monday, July 28, 2008, 10:46 AM
> If I'm not mistaken, there has already been a thread [1]
> on this,
> including an explanation
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if that still doesn't work... after install, at the boot> prompt, do
> "boot -c", and the the upcoming UKC> prompt do a "disable acpi"
> followed by "quit"
> once the system is running send dmesgs with and without acpi and
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:16:22AM +0200, Martin Toft wrote:
> You need to escape the dot... e.g. grep -v ^\\\.
Two backslashes is enough. My attempt at being a smart ass failed :-)
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 07:07:55PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 7/28/08, Jesus Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can I make "ls" to NOT show
> > the hidden files (.xinitrc , .vimrc, etc) when
> > using as Root??
>
> ls *
> ls | grep -v ^.
You need to escape the dot... e.g. grep -v ^\\\.
Ted Unangst escribis:
On 7/28/08, Jesus Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can I make "ls" to NOT show
the hidden files (.xinitrc , .vimrc, etc) when
using as Root??
ls *
ls | grep -v ^.
sudo -u nobody ls
find . -name "[abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ]*"
-maxdep
man ls shows -A option is implicit when using as root. So in short it
would be no.
On Jul 28, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Jesus Sanchez wrote:
Hi, using 4.2.
Just for curiosity...
Can I make "ls" to NOT show
the hidden files (.xinitrc , .vimrc, etc) when
using as Root??
Thanks 4 all.
On 7/28/08, Jesus Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can I make "ls" to NOT show
> the hidden files (.xinitrc , .vimrc, etc) when
> using as Root??
ls *
ls | grep -v ^.
sudo -u nobody ls
find . -name "[abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ]*"
-maxdepth 1 -print0 | xargs -0 ls -
Hi, using 4.2.
Just for curiosity...
Can I make "ls" to NOT show
the hidden files (.xinitrc , .vimrc, etc) when
using as Root??
Thanks 4 all.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Nick Holland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Guenther wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Nick Holland
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Besides, the finished flash drive is wonderfully useful. :)
>>> (I've got a 4G, partitioned out as 2G OpenBSD, 2G F
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Edd Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have this strange link message for xetex (Im building binaries for the
> TL DVD, its nothing to do with the port).
>
> Take a look at this:
> http://tug.org/pipermail/tlbuild/2008q3/000310.html
>
> Does anyone have any clu
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Marco Peereboom wrote:
P.S. And, btw., they were so eager to relicense Reyk's HAL from BSD licence
to GPL -- isn't Atheros breaking the GPL licence of Linux's ath5k driver
now? Didn't they argument, that the purpose of GPL is to protect their work
from being used by big corp
On 7/26/08, J Duke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder is anyone is seeing performance issues with the patched DNS in the
> late snapshots?
http://marc.info/?l=bind-users&m=121726908015389&w=2
> P.S. And, btw., they were so eager to relicense Reyk's HAL from BSD licence
> to GPL -- isn't Atheros breaking the GPL licence of Linux's ath5k driver
> now? Didn't they argument, that the purpose of GPL is to protect their work
> from being used by big corporations for free?
Which it doesn't
On 7/28/08, Tony Berth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have in 4.3 with a default US keyboard.
>
> When I set wsconsctl keyboard.encoding=de in order to get a German one,
> nothing happens! I get following reply:
>
> keyboard.encoding -> de
>
> but my keyboard is still on the US charset!
Are yo
Hannah Schroeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is your keyboard an USB one? I observe the same with an USB keyboard.
>
> - keyboard.encoding=us.swapctrlcaps has no effect (in
> /etc/wsconsctl.conf)
These settings only affect the _first_ keyboard in the system
(wskbd0). Unfortunately, for a PC
Tor Houghton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The supported hardware page for Alpha says that "most devices" for pci(4)
> are supported.
>
> Does this mean that it will support a PCI SATA card with, e.g. a SiL3512
> chipset?
I would expect it. However, SRM won't recognize the card so you
can't boo
Thanks Paul!!!
Wow!!! is the only thing that comes to my mind. Didn't even know that
DNAME existed.
I will definately read up on it.
Thanks a bunch!
-Parvinder Bhasin
On Jul 25, 2008, at 12:14 AM, Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:49:55PM -0700, Parvinder Bhasin wrote:
Thanks
Hi,
I have this strange link message for xetex (Im building binaries for the
TL DVD, its nothing to do with the port).
Take a look at this:
http://tug.org/pipermail/tlbuild/2008q3/000310.html
Does anyone have any clue what is happening here?
--
Best Regards
Edd
http://students.dec.bmth.ac.u
John Wright escreveu:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 05:24:10PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
>
>> I have to say that I'm via ssh/xterm to the box. I don't know if this makes
>> a difference?
>>
>
> hehe. (-:
>
>
>
hahahahahahah...
Tony, when you are sshing to a machine, the keyboard encoding tha
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 05:24:10PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
> I have to say that I'm via ssh/xterm to the box. I don't know if this makes
> a difference?
hehe. (-:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:47:31AM -0400, Eric Furman wrote:
| Who can we write to at atheros to tell them I will never
| ever purchase one of their products?
Maybe it's better to write a polite e-mail explaining the situation
wrt documentation vs source code (even if it is ISC licensed). This is
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Giancarlo Razzolini
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Louis V. Lambrecht escreveu:
> > Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:22:37PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have in 4.3 with a default US keyboard.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>> When I
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Louis V. Lambrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hannah Schroeter wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:22:37PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I have in 4.3 with a default US keyboard.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> When I set wsconsctl keyboard.encoding=de in o
Louis V. Lambrecht escreveu:
> Hannah Schroeter wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:22:37PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
>>
>>> I have in 4.3 with a default US keyboard.
>>>
>>
>>
>>> When I set wsconsctl keyboard.encoding=de in order to get a German one,
>>> nothing happens! I get
2008/7/29 Eric Furman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Who can we write to at atheros to tell them I will never
> ever purchase one of their products?
>
http://www.atheros.com/contact/index.html
Might work, you get e-mail, postal, and phone numbers to contact them with.
Who can we write to at atheros to tell them I will never
ever purchase one of their products?
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 04:18:34 -0500, "Jacob Yocom-Piatt"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Reyk Floeter wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 09:28:10AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> >
> >> I threw my git savi
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:22:37PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
I have in 4.3 with a default US keyboard.
When I set wsconsctl keyboard.encoding=de in order to get a German one,
nothing happens! I get following reply:
keyboard.encoding -> de
Hi!
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:22:37PM +0200, Tony Berth wrote:
>I have in 4.3 with a default US keyboard.
>When I set wsconsctl keyboard.encoding=de in order to get a German one,
>nothing happens! I get following reply:
>keyboard.encoding -> de
>but my keyboard is still on the US charset!
>Wh
I have in 4.3 with a default US keyboard.
When I set wsconsctl keyboard.encoding=de in order to get a German one,
nothing happens! I get following reply:
keyboard.encoding -> de
but my keyboard is still on the US charset!
What do I miss?
Thanks fot your help
Tony
Chris Bennett wrote:
This is so simple if you know the answer, and very hard otherwise.
/etc/fstab will refuse to work unless the wd0 and etc are correct.
Thanks for the reply. So, the only way to get it to work is to tell
OpenBSD it's booting from wd1? Inconvenient, but workable.
Paul de Weerd wrote:
> ...
> If your admins lock themselves out, they shouldn't have been typing on
> the machine in the first place. Accidents do happen, so surely you
> have OOB access (serial console, anyone ?). Then, if this is still
> such a big issue, you can write some scripts that will give
Hi misc,
my ISP is kind enough to provide native IPv6 access, so I'd like to
have a full-IPv6 intranet.
IPv6 addresses are assigned with rtadv and IPv4 with DHCP
The setup :
curry: OpenBSD-current, Thinkpad x41.
/etc/hostname.bge0:
up
/etc/hostname.vlan0:
vlan 0 vlandev bge0 up
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:31:37PM +0200, Tor Houghton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The supported hardware page for Alpha says that "most devices" for pci(4)
> are supported.
>
> Does this mean that it will support a PCI SATA card with, e.g. a SiL3512
> chipset?
>
> Alternatively (if no), is there a way
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 09:28:10AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
I threw my git saving throw so I was able to avoid looking at it.
There is a version in the OpenWRT tree:
https://dev.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/browser/tr
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:53 AM, Reyk Floeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They neither apologized for all the trouble nor give me any credits
> for my work. ath9k would not exist without my work on the OpenBSD
> ar5k driver, it was a door opener, the base of the ath5k port, and
> Atheros' way in
Hello,
The supported hardware page for Alpha says that "most devices" for pci(4)
are supported.
Does this mean that it will support a PCI SATA card with, e.g. a SiL3512
chipset?
Alternatively (if no), is there a way of getting SATA disks into an
Alphaserver 800?
Tor
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-07-28, Charlie Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/07/28 11:37, Charlie Clark wrote:
don't you have some way to handle the other situations where pfctl -sr
doesn't output exactly what pfctl -f was fed as input? how
On 2008-07-28, Charlie Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2008/07/28 11:37, Charlie Clark wrote:
>>
don't you have some way to handle the other situations where pfctl -sr
doesn't output exactly what pfctl -f was fed as input? how do you handle
macros
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008/07/28 11:37, Charlie Clark wrote:
don't you have some way to handle the other situations where pfctl -sr
doesn't output exactly what pfctl -f was fed as input? how do you handle
macros or the ruleset optimiser?
There are no macro's as I'm using fwbui
If I'm not mistaken, there has already been a thread [1] on this,
including an explanation
[2] of the various considerations involved.
1. MARC.info - OpenBSD-misc - Thread 'BSD Documentation License?'
http://marc.info/?t=12061249355&r=1&w=2
2. MARC.info - OpenBSD-misc - Nick Holland - 'Re: BS
On 2008/07/28 11:37, Charlie Clark wrote:
>
>>
>> don't you have some way to handle the other situations where pfctl -sr
>> doesn't output exactly what pfctl -f was fed as input? how do you handle
>> macros or the ruleset optimiser?
>>
> There are no macro's as I'm using fwbuilder to build the
>
don't you have some way to handle the other situations where pfctl -sr
doesn't output exactly what pfctl -f was fed as input? how do you handle
macros or the ruleset optimiser?
There are no macro's as I'm using fwbuilder to build the ruleset and isn't the
ruleset optimiser is set using a set
On 2008-07-28, Charlie Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have, this is the script I am talking about, I want to know how to
> make the script know about option changes, eg. block policy, state
> policy
block policy and state policy don't get sent to /dev/pf, they only affect
how pfctl(8) pars
Then, if this is still
such a big issue, you can write some scripts that will give you
something along the lines of Junipers 'commit confirmed' .. you first
enable a ruleset which will be automatically reverted in 5 or 10 (or
however many you like) minutes. Then, if you don't lock yourself out,
an
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:30:41AM +0100, Charlie Clark wrote:
> Almir Karic wrote:
>
>> diff of a loaded ruleset is not that useful (for humans) IMHO, a better
>> way would be to diff the ruleset (possibly excluding the comments and
>> spaces etc). even better way to do that would be to JustDoIt
Almir Karic wrote:
diff of a loaded ruleset is not that useful (for humans) IMHO, a
better way would be to diff the ruleset (possibly excluding the
comments and spaces etc). even better way to do that would be to
JustDoIt (no diff checking whatsoever, and let the admins reload the
rule when t
Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 09:28:10AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
I threw my git saving throw so I was able to avoid looking at it.
There is a version in the OpenWRT tree:
https://dev.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/browser/trunk/package/ath9k/src/drivers/net/wireless
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 09:18:39AM +0100, Charlie Clark wrote:
> openbsd misc wrote:
>> interessting point. How about dumping it to a file or something so you are
>> able to check what was loaded last time (e.g. a file with 400 under
>> /var/whatever)?
>>
>>
> What I want is, I have a script tha
openbsd misc wrote:
interessting point. How about dumping it to a file or something so you are
able to check what was loaded last time (e.g. a file with 400 under
/var/whatever)?
What I want is, I have a script that when I commit a ruleset with pfctl
it uses pfctl to query the loaded rules a
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 09:28:10AM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> I threw my git saving throw so I was able to avoid looking at it.
>
There is a version in the OpenWRT tree:
https://dev.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/browser/trunk/package/ath9k/src/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k
The following thread
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 07:44:38PM -0700, my mail wrote:
> i have search for keywords "OpenBSD FAQ License" but can found it.
> It's same license with OpenBSD in http://openbsd.org/policy.html ?
>
> if different where i can found BSD license for document not for binary
> or source code or can i us
58 matches
Mail list logo
