This unit has been gathering dust for too long now and I figure
someone else may as well have a play with it. Its pretty heavy, maybe
25kg, so I'd prefer local pickup. I'd rather give it to a developer,
but if there is no interest I may change my mind.
No monitor or keyboard etc. It has two 50 pin
I'm currently trying to get my hands on a Nexcom Nise 2000. Should come
in under your power specs. Our goals are slightly different - I want a
smaller, quieter home server, don't care to do anything desktop related
with it. I'm sure it would work fine for either.
Timothy Hume wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:48:58AM -0400, Dan Harnett spoke thusly:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:02:35AM -0500, Denny White wrote:
> > Okay, dumb-ass me. Sitting here looking at the screen it finally
> > dawned on me I'm not looking at 2 physical cpu's, per se, but
> > instead 2 built onto one chip
2009/4/16 Bob Beck :
>> I have a t5xxx also and want to do the same, but if I use usb flash (tried
>> and worked fine), how to limit at max disk writes ? so the flash can live
>> longer ...
>
> Please let me know if you find an answer to this question. I have all these
> openbsd machines booking of
I'm in Montreal as well and just order them from the Computer Shop:
http://www.openbsd.org/orders.html#ca/cshop
-Martin
In the first few error cases where pfkey_reply returns early,
shouldn't the pending message still at least be read off the socket?
E.g., right now (as far as I can tell), if a pfkey response packet
ever has sadb_msg_errno set, that response will stay on the socket
forever and be used for every futu
cool, i'll look forward for getting a boxed copy... :)
any ideas where to find one of those in montreal ?
Regards and congrats for the release!
- erob
On April 17, 2009 12:37:22 pm Jean-Francois wrote:
> Absolutely *Splendid*
>
> As of today for order to France what is the channel ?
>
> Regard
http://openbsd.org/orders.html there are find a respective seller from you
country.
Regards.
---
---
ficovh - http://bsdguy.net
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Gen. 1:1
--- On Fri, 4/17/09, Jean-Francois wrote:
> From: Jean-Francois
4.5 (and t-shird) arrived in Poissy, France.
Thanks for this great work !
Absolutely *Splendid*
As of today for order to France what is the channel ?
Regards,
Jean-Frangois
Le vendredi 17 avril 2009 18:29:43, vous avez icrit :
> This year I was watching more closely for pre-order page to be updated
> and paid a few extra bucks for express shipping.
>
> Same picture -
This year I was watching more closely for pre-order page to be updated
and paid a few extra bucks for express shipping.
Same picture - two sizes:
0.5M: http://gallery.bax.on.ca/OpenBSD45s.jpg
5.0M: http://gallery.bax.on.ca/OpenBSD45.jpg
Frank
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:02:35AM -0500, Denny White wrote:
> Okay, dumb-ass me. Sitting here looking at the screen it finally
> dawned on me I'm not looking at 2 physical cpu's, per se, but
> instead 2 built onto one chip. Gee, I wish I would've come up
> with that beforehand instead of opening m
Agung T. Apriyanto-2 wrote:
>
> i found mismatch output from snmpwalk in -current net-snmp, sample bellow
>
> r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost
> .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2
> IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.0.1 = INTEGER: 1
> IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.66.1 = INTEGER: 5
> IP-M
Dave Wilson wrote:
> ... isn't working, at least not for me.
>
> Google has found me this sample dmesg from 4.0:
>
http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html?action=detail&id=dsc1425
>
> And this from Marco Peereboom announcing ipmi support:
> http://marc.info/?
It is disabled by default because some boxes have issues with it. Read
config(8) and enable it in your kernel.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 01:20:21PM +0100, Dave Wilson wrote:
> ... isn't working, at least not for me.
>
> Google has found me this sample dmesg from 4.0:
> http://www.armorlogic.com/op
* Markus Hennecke [2009-04-17 14:42]:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
>> * Markus Hennecke [2009-04-17 08:06]:
>>> Marco Peereboom schrieb:
I work with people that run io tools against flash parts. I still have
to see it fail too. Your puny little firewall will never write more to
it tha
2009/4/17 Michiel van Baak :
> On 11:37, Fri 17 Apr 09, Jasper Valentijn wrote:
>> 2009/4/17 Michiel van Baak :
>> > On 10:40, Fri 17 Apr 09, zpo wrote:
>> >> 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany
>> >
>> > And also in Denhaag/Netherlands
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Where did you order?
>
> Pre-ordered from kd85 ba
These people run io tools like iogen to it for a month at a time and
reuse the flash next time a device needs testing (the flash is just a
vessel). If you want to see what iogen does run it on your laptop with
iogen -n5 and wait 1 minute. Now try to cold launch firefox.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 0
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 06:45:48AM -0500, Neal Hogan spoke thusly:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Denny White wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Okay, dumb-ass me. Sitting here looking at the screen it finally
> > dawned on me I'm not looking at 2 physical cpu's, per se, but
> > instead 2 built onto
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Markus Hennecke [2009-04-17 08:06]:
Marco Peereboom schrieb:
I work with people that run io tools against flash parts. I still have
to see it fail too. Your puny little firewall will never write more to
it than a month long stress test. This write fatigue argument is
... isn't working, at least not for me.
Google has found me this sample dmesg from 4.0:
http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html?action=detail&id=dsc1425
And this from Marco Peereboom announcing ipmi support:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=112993650617151&w
2009/4/17 Marco Peereboom
> I work with people that run io tools against flash parts. I still have
> to see it fail too. Your puny little firewall will never write more to
> it than a month long stress test. This write fatigue argument is very
> silly.
Hey! My firewall may be puny in statur
* RJ45 [2009-04-17 12:10]:
> ok thank you for the configuration, but I have one more problem.
>
> aside vlan100 and vlan 101 I need to have i on physical vr1 vr2 vr3
> but also the default native vlan (VLAN 1 UNTAGGED) needs to be forwarded
> to vr1 vr2 vr3
>
> no I Can only do it adding physica
* RJ45 [2009-04-17 14:08]:
> ifconfig bridge100 add vlan1100 add vlan2100 add vlan3100 add vr1 add
> vr2 add vr3 up
congrats, now tehg speration between vlan100 and the 'native' vlan is gone.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP
* Markus Hennecke [2009-04-17 08:06]:
> Marco Peereboom schrieb:
>> I work with people that run io tools against flash parts. I still have
>> to see it fail too. Your puny little firewall will never write more to
>> it than a month long stress test. This write fatigue argument is very
>> silly.
* Markus Hennecke [2009-04-17 09:54]:
> So you are saying that there is no relation in writing many times to one
> inode and the block containing the inode no longer writeable? This seems
> obvious to me because flash memory is involved. Perhaps you can give a
> better explaination?
you're
* RJ45 [2009-04-17 11:27]:
> it would be a good idea but the problem is that you cannot assign an IP
> address to a bridge interface
so just assign it to one of the bridge member interfaces. c'mon...
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-S
Thanks for all the hints.
I solved te problem in this way and everything works:
# configure vlan1 (Default) ip interface
ifconfig vr1 172.16.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig vr2 up
ifconfig vr3 up
# configure VLAN 100 (TAG 100) on physical interfaces use pseudo names
ifconfig vlan1100 vlan
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Denny White wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 08:41:27PM -0500, Denny White spoke thusly:
>> Laptop is a Toshiba L305-S5921. I'm running -current on it with a snapshot
from 04/14/09. No, I couldn't wait for my new cd's
>> presently in route. ;) Mostly done just for
Hi. Right now i have written "db ALL=NOPASSWD:/sbin/mount /mnt/cd0,
/sbin/umount /mnt/cd0", but it seems that isn't correct. What could i write?
I was typing the root password, so i have tried the user password and it
works fine.
THank you very much.
Ok, thank you very much.
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:40:55 +0200
zpo wrote:
> 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany
arrived in Hannover/Germany
Thanks Wim, great job
regards
Rafael
RJ45 wrote:
ok thank you for the configuration, but I have one more problem.
aside vlan100 and vlan 101 I need to have i on physical vr1 vr2 vr3
but also the default native vlan (VLAN 1 UNTAGGED) needs to be forwarded
to vr1 vr2 vr3
no I Can only do it adding physical vr1 vr2 vr3 to the bridg
RJ45 wrote:
ok thank you for the configuration, but I have one more problem.
Your welcome.
aside vlan100 and vlan 101 I need to have i on physical vr1 vr2 vr3
but also the default native vlan (VLAN 1 UNTAGGED) needs to be forwarded
to vr1 vr2 vr3
I assume you wrote, that you want IP's on e
ok thank you for the configuration, but I have one more problem.
aside vlan100 and vlan 101 I need to have i on physical vr1 vr2 vr3
but also the default native vlan (VLAN 1 UNTAGGED) needs to be forwarded
to vr1 vr2 vr3
no I Can only do it adding physical vr1 vr2 vr3 to the bridge, and
after
On 11:37, Fri 17 Apr 09, Jasper Valentijn wrote:
> 2009/4/17 Michiel van Baak :
> > On 10:40, Fri 17 Apr 09, zpo wrote:
> >> 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany
> >
> > And also in Denhaag/Netherlands
> >
> >
>
> Where did you order?
Pre-ordered from kd85 back in the days the order site was still lin
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
RJ45 wrote:
it would be a good idea but the problem is that you cannot assign an IP
address to a bridge interface
I think this problem has no solution...
See below, you still can have IP address to interface, use bridge and
vlan as well. I do.
If that could possib
2009/4/17 Michiel van Baak :
> On 10:40, Fri 17 Apr 09, zpo wrote:
>> 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany
>
> And also in Denhaag/Netherlands
>
>
Where did you order?
--
We spend the first twelve months of our children's lives teaching
them to walk and talk and the next twelve telling them to sit
RJ45 wrote:
it would be a good idea but the problem is that you cannot assign an IP
address to a bridge interface
I think this problem has no solution...
See below, you still can have IP address to interface, use bridge and
vlan as well. I do.
thanks
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Matthew Demp
it would be a good idea but the problem is that you cannot assign an IP
address to a bridge interface
I think this problem has no solution...
thanks
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:10 PM, RJ45 wrote:
>> I cannot use the same vlan name and I need an
On 10:40, Fri 17 Apr 09, zpo wrote:
> 4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany
And also in Denhaag/Netherlands
--
Michiel van Baak
mich...@vanbaak.eu
http://michiel.vanbaak.eu
GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x71C946BD
"Why is it drug addicts and computer aficionados are b
4.5 arrived in Bielefeld/Germany
---
a.angerer log, stardate: 04/16/2009 11:05 PM
following transmission from >> Bob Beck <<
>
> That's funny. it works for me.. I wonder what your issue is?
>
> -Bob
*lol*
Thank you Bob.
Best answer for this question.
Regards Andreas
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 09:44:18AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
>>> The inode holding the log files metadata was no longer writeable.
>>> What else would cause that?
>> I don't know what the cause is, and there is no point speculating.
>
> So you are saying that there is no relation in writing ma
Aaron Stellman wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:19:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
> > Aaron Stellman schrieb:
> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:54:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
> >>> Generalization is always false.
> >>> I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging of
> >>
Aaron Stellman schrieb:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:19:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
Aaron Stellman schrieb:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:54:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
Generalization is always false.
I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging of
OpenVPN
And what
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 08:19:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
> Aaron Stellman schrieb:
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 07:54:11AM +0200, Markus Hennecke wrote:
>>> Generalization is always false.
>>> I killed a 1GB SanDisk CF Card because of excessive logging of
>>> OpenVPN
>> And what makes you
47 matches
Mail list logo
