Re: VPN Between OpenBSD and iOS

Hi, On 12/29/13, Matt Carlson wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to get my iPhone with iOS 7.0.4 to connect to my OpenBSD > VPN server. If I understand the problem correctly, it's unable to > negotiate phase 2. I'd welcome any pointers. I'm somewhat curious, about this. Can you verify if this is onl

unreliable connections

I'm having a problem connecting with (and through) one OpenBSD box. Both ends are running OpenBSD -current (-current as of last weekend) and I've had the issue through a couple of months of various builds of -current. The problem occurs whether I'm connecting directly to the remote OpenBSD box (fi

VPN Between OpenBSD and iOS

Hello, I'm trying to get my iPhone with iOS 7.0.4 to connect to my OpenBSD VPN server. If I understand the problem correctly, it's unable to negotiate phase 2. I'd welcome any pointers. Below, I've provided the output of uname, rc.conf.local, ipsec.conf, messages, isakmpd.pcap. I changed a couple

Re: OpenBSD 5.4 under ProxmoxVE 3.1 / KVM 1.4: problems so far

On Sun 29 Dec 2013 02:59:38 PM CST, Rodrigo Mosconi wrote: I also have this problem on some vio network. The Nic stop receiving and transmiting, but if I access the console and start a tcpdump, the nics come back to work normally. Interesting... that was one of the troubleshooting steps I took

Re: OpenBSD 5.4 under ProxmoxVE 3.1 / KVM 1.4: problems so far

I also have this problem on some vio network. The Nic stop receiving and transmiting, but if I access the console and start a tcpdump, the nics come back to work normally. 2013/12/29 Comète > Yes, i confirm that i have this problem too with vio network drivers with > proxmox VE 2.x and OpenBSD

Re: OpenBSD 5.4 under ProxmoxVE 3.1 / KVM 1.4: problems so far

Yes, i confirm that i have this problem too with vio network drivers with proxmox VE 2.x and OpenBSD 5.3 and 5.4. Nics stop receiving and transmitting. I also switched back to em driver. Morgan Le 29/12/2013 20:55, Adam Thompson a écrit : Just an FYI at this time for anyone else searching on

Re: TRIM and vioblk(4)?

On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 13:27, Adam Thompson wrote: > I can't find any summary of whether TRIM is supported in 5.4 or not. I > see Ted's report on FFS work back in 2011, but that's about it. > Guessing that TRIM support is, in fact, present in some manner for at > least ATA devices, my question th

OpenBSD 5.4 under ProxmoxVE 3.1 / KVM 1.4: problems so far

Just an FYI at this time for anyone else searching on this problem. On the other hand, feel free to share ideas if you have 'em. OpenBSD 5.4 (RELEASE) does not appear to reliably receive ACPI signals delivered by KVM. Or, the version of kvm/qemu (1.4) that ships with ProxmoxVE 3.1 (pve 3.1) f

TRIM and vioblk(4)?

I can't find any summary of whether TRIM is supported in 5.4 or not. I see Ted's report on FFS work back in 2011, but that's about it. Guessing that TRIM support is, in fact, present in some manner for at least ATA devices, my question then becomes: is TRIM supported in vioblk(4) devices? If n

Re: Puccini 2x in calendar

On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:52:11AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: > i think he should be removed from birthday: > > calendar.birthday:12/22 Giacomo Puccini born, 1858 > calendar.music:12/22Giacomo Puccini is born in Lucca, Italy, 1858 > > calendar.music:11/29Giacomo Puccini dies due to thr

smp in dragonflybsd

Hi, The openbsd journal had a series of articles on rthreads back in 2012, which I came across last week. I've also been following DragonFlyBSD lately. Their approach to SMP is different but seems to pay off (according to their website), with contention in their kernel almost eliminated in their l

Re: baseXXX.tgz in package(5)

Marc Espie wrote: >On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 01:20:03PM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote: >> frantisek holop wrote: >> >as openbsd distribution tarballs have been so far, and will be for >> >some years to come in the form of baseXY.tgz, etc, i am proposing >> >this simple nitpicking patch: >> > >> >-

Re: baseXXX.tgz in package(5)

On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 01:20:03PM +0100, Alexander Hall wrote: > frantisek holop wrote: > >as openbsd distribution tarballs have been so far, and will be for > >some years to come in the form of baseXY.tgz, etc, i am proposing > >this simple nitpicking patch: > > > >- Note that the base distr

Re: baseXXX.tgz in package(5)

frantisek holop wrote: >as openbsd distribution tarballs have been so far, and will be for >some years to come in the form of baseXY.tgz, etc, i am proposing >this simple nitpicking patch: > >- Note that the base distribution tarballs of OpenBSD (e.g. >baseXXX.tgz, >- compXXX.tgz, ...) are

baseXXX.tgz in package(5)

as openbsd distribution tarballs have been so far, and will be for some years to come in the form of baseXY.tgz, etc, i am proposing this simple nitpicking patch: - Note that the base distribution tarballs of OpenBSD (e.g. baseXXX.tgz, - compXXX.tgz, ...) are not binary packages fit for pk

Puccini 2x in calendar

i think he should be removed from birthday: calendar.birthday:12/22 Giacomo Puccini born, 1858 calendar.music:12/22Giacomo Puccini is born in Lucca, Italy, 1858 calendar.music:11/29Giacomo Puccini dies due to throat cancer in Brussels, Belgium, 1924 -f -- imagination is more important

Re: dmassage - openbsd 5.4 build failure

Hi, Brett Mahar wrote: On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 23:42:24 +0100 Riccardo Mottola wrote: From http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Why : "You will not get any support from developers" That's absolutely useful information :) One always politely asks for help though, What I see here is either a d