Hello,
frankenstein warning: stable.mtier.org, all patches applied
the mail server in question doesn't deliver to a certain destination
("Network error on destination MXs"). Other destinations work. When I
connect manually I can send messages via the destination server. But no
TLS involved this
Am 30.03.2015 um 17:49 schrieb Martin Pieuchot:
On 30/03/15(Mon) 17:21, Holger Glaess wrote:
Am 29.03.2015 um 13:54 schrieb Martin Pieuchot:
On 29/03/15(Sun) 12:56, Holger Glaess wrote:
Am 24.03.2015 um 05:41 schrieb Holger Glaess:
hi
i play a little bit with rdomain
if add my pppoe device
Hi,
I have following ntpd.conf file on an OpenBSD machine:
OpenBSD 5.7-current (GENERIC) #839: Mon Mar 30 14:21:47 MDT 2015
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC
# /etc/ntpd.conf
server 0.pool.ntp.org
server 1.pool.ntp.org
server 2.pool.ntp.org
server 3.pool.ntp.o
On 03/30/15 14:05, RD Thrush wrote:
On 03/30/15 10:12, Peter Kay wrote:
On 30 March 2015 13:03:36 BST, RD Thrush wrote:
The OP's OpenBSD partition is located above 128G, ie. sector
start=842752000, which may have led to the complicated work-around.
I'm pretty certain the artificial 128GB li
worik writes:
> I got a lot of shit on this list for suggesting that the OpenBSD project
> sell documentation collections (that are freely available elsewhere) as
> a method of raising funds for the project as CD rom sales dry up.
I like printed documentation myself--I find it easier to read. Y
On 30/03/15(Mon) 11:58, David Newman wrote:
> On 3/29/15 12:38 PM, mxb wrote:
> > Probably your PF rules.
> > put in ‘pass quick proto icmp’.
>
> No joy. This did not improve on the existing ICMP rule in pf.conf.
>
> I think the root problem is that on both firewalls the physical and CARP
> inter
If anyone has some good pictures or stories they would like to share, we
will be putting together a short tribute to Paul at the end of this
weeks BSD Now episode.
Please mail them to feedb...@bsdnow.tv
Paul was a good friend and he will be dearly missed.
--
Allan Jude
[demime 1.01d removed an
On 30.03.2015 21:35, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Atanas Vladimirov
wrote:
On 30.03.2015 21:08, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Atanas Vladimirov bsdbg.net> writes:
https://www.marc.info/?t=14148214521&r=1&w=2
Earlier statement still applies: unified diff against -
On 3/29/15 12:38 PM, mxb wrote:
> Probably your PF rules.
> put in ‘pass quick proto icmp’.
No joy. This did not improve on the existing ICMP rule in pf.conf.
I think the root problem is that on both firewalls the physical and CARP
interface addresses are bound to lo0 instead of vic1. Here both .
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:55:49AM +0400, Denis Lapshin wrote:
> Since 4.9 till current 8510p/w read acpi temp with error (enormous
> high temp about 2000-5000 C) because SMBus data is not ready for
> reading. It seems data reading should be delayed.
>
I thought we(I) fixed this last year. If you
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Atanas Vladimirov wrote:
> On 30.03.2015 21:08, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
>>
>> Atanas Vladimirov bsdbg.net> writes:
>>
>>> https://www.marc.info/?t=14148214521&r=1&w=2
>>
>>
>> Earlier statement still applies: unified diff against -current
>> to tech@ with cc to
On 30.03.2015 21:08, Alexey Suslikov wrote:
Atanas Vladimirov bsdbg.net> writes:
https://www.marc.info/?t=14148214521&r=1&w=2
Earlier statement still applies: unified diff against -current
to tech@ with cc to usual networking suspects.
Hi,
I didn't ignore your previous statement but my
Atanas Vladimirov bsdbg.net> writes:
> https://www.marc.info/?t=14148214521&r=1&w=2
Earlier statement still applies: unified diff against -current
to tech@ with cc to usual networking suspects.
On 03/30/15 10:12, Peter Kay wrote:
> On 30 March 2015 13:03:36 BST, RD Thrush wrote:
>> The OP's OpenBSD partition is located above 128G, ie. sector
>> start=842752000, which may have led to the complicated work-around.
>
> I'm pretty certain the artificial 128GB limit was removed a few release
Am 30.03.2015 um 17:49 schrieb Martin Pieuchot:
On 30/03/15(Mon) 17:21, Holger Glaess wrote:
Am 29.03.2015 um 13:54 schrieb Martin Pieuchot:
On 29/03/15(Sun) 12:56, Holger Glaess wrote:
Am 24.03.2015 um 05:41 schrieb Holger Glaess:
hi
i play a little bit with rdomain
if add my pppoe device
On 30 March 2015 13:03:36 BST, RD Thrush wrote:
>The OP's OpenBSD partition is located above 128G, ie. sector
>start=842752000, which may have led to the complicated work-around.
I'm pretty certain the artificial 128GB limit was removed a few releases back
- I've installed above that with no is
On 30/03/15(Mon) 17:21, Holger Glaess wrote:
> Am 29.03.2015 um 13:54 schrieb Martin Pieuchot:
> >On 29/03/15(Sun) 12:56, Holger Glaess wrote:
> >>Am 24.03.2015 um 05:41 schrieb Holger Glaess:
> >>>hi
> >>>
> >>>i play a little bit with rdomain
> >>>
> >>>if add my pppoe device to rdomain 1
> >>>
>
Am 29.03.2015 um 13:54 schrieb Martin Pieuchot:
On 29/03/15(Sun) 12:56, Holger Glaess wrote:
Am 24.03.2015 um 05:41 schrieb Holger Glaess:
hi
i play a little bit with rdomain
if add my pppoe device to rdomain 1
# cat /etc/hostname.pppoe0
rdomain 1
rtlabel netcologne
inet6 autoconf
inet 0.0.0
It is very sad to have to communicate that our friend, Paul
Schenkeveld, has passed away.
Just recently Paul held a tutorial at AsiaBSDcon 2015; as we know
he enjoyed - or rather lived for - BSD conferences. He was
particularily proud of the 2011 EuroBSDcon in Maarssen, for which he
was the prime
On 03/29/15 22:19, Nick Holland wrote:
> On 03/29/15 14:25, Tuyosi Takesima wrote:
>> Hi all.
>>
>> this is my little expirience , it may be useful using openbsd & linux in
>> tha same hard disk .
> ...
>> i want to install openbsd OS into sdb4 .
>> But to install OpenBSD directly is risky .
>> if
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 07:27:44AM -0700, Kent Fritz wrote:
> Running March 26 snapshot, amd64, and built-from-source for getting
> backtrace. Simple httpd.conf. Note that tls config is before non-tls --
> it works fine the other way:
> http_ip="192.168.1.131"
>
> server "default" {
> li
21 matches
Mail list logo
