On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 08:37:54PM +0200, Peter Janos wrote:
> use S for extras security at the expense of performance. Use other options
> only if you know what you are doing and have specific needs.
> BTW, ssh and sshd enable S by themselves.
>
> -Otto
Some background on the current state of
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 07:10:54PM -0500, Patrick Dohman wrote:
>
> > nonsense. daily security is mailed *if it is non-empty*. Same goes for
> > weekly and mothly.
> >
> > -Otto
>
> i guess that’s explains why the output of who was omitted from the insecurity
> out
either be specific, pro
There needs to be a new law like Godwin's Law that states that any
technical discussion will eventually and inevitably lead to
Hitchhiker's Guide references.
But to follow on from what Raul said, it may be impossible to make
your system 100% secure without violating part 15 of the FCC rules,
proba
> nonsense. daily security is mailed *if it is non-empty*. Same goes for
> weekly and mothly.
>
> -Otto
i guess that’s explains why the output of who was omitted from the
insecurity out
use S for extras security at the expense of performance. Use other options
only if you know what you are doing and have specific needs.
BTW, ssh and sshd enable S by themselves.
-Otto
-> so "S" is the best way, Thanks! :)
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 at 12:20 PM
From: "Otto Moerbeek"
To:
if anyone interested, correction for the pax topic Sent: Tuesday, October
11, 2016 at 3:57 PM
From: "W. Dean Freeman"
To: "'Peter Janos'"
Subject: RE: RE: OpenBSD PaX Test questionIncreasing the stack gap size
isn't necessarily bad or good. Basically,
you're adjusting the run-time value of a gap
On 2016-10-16 01:47, trondd wrote:
This has an error:
listen 127.0.0.1 port 7000
This does not:
listen on 127.0.0.1 port 7003
This has an error:
forward with tls to 6697
The rest of your forward to lines do not.
Tim.
Sorry for late response, this mail server went down for a while, anyway,
t
...
Still nothing about NSA or other conspiracies in security field?
8 matches
Mail list logo
