On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 06:43:57PM +, Chris Jones wrote:
> I see that the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter 6P is supported under octeon port.
> Just wondering if anyone on the list is running OpenBSD 6.3 or current
> on the EdgeRouter 6P? I'm mainly interested in the performance of this
> unit as a home fir
Hi Walter,
Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote on Tue, May 29, 2018 at 05:47:36PM +0200:
> My advice to others is not to pay attention to anything
> but the man page,
While that's often nor bad advice in other areas of OpenBSD,
this particular manual page is not perfect yet, as should be
obvious to
Diff, discussed in the thread, seems to follow all the way to 6.3.
Sure I probably can try out 6.3, but I have a feeling that this will not help.
dmesg can be arranged.
Br
> 29 maj 2018 kl. 20:56 skrev Chris Cappuccio :
>
> No magic expected here, but why not try 6.3? 6.1 is not supported anym
No magic expected here, but why not try 6.3? 6.1 is not supported anymore, and
in any event, you need to include full dmesg so that others without DL360 Gen9
have a chance at helping you.
Maxim Bourmistrov [m...@alumni.chalmers.se] wrote:
> Hey,
> While moving one of machines from 6.0 to 6.1, I
There's https://man.openbsd.org/nice.1
You might be describing https://man.openbsd.org/setrlimit.2 or the
ulimit shell builtin (ulimit -t). But you might not want what you are
describing, if that is the case.
--
Raul
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:35 PM, BergenBergen BergenBergen
wrote:
> Browser
Rupert Gallagher [r...@protonmail.com] wrote:
> Everybody loves the idea of an open-source CPU that can be uploaded to an
> FPGA processor. Anybody from China who starts selling a mini-itx board and an
> FPGA fast enough to run risc-v will turn the market on its head in 6--10
> years, killing bo
Browser or not, how *does* one cap CPU resources though? I think it's a
very interesting question, and I'm sorta baffled by the fact that the
demand for this kinda thing hasn't been any higher.
All the best,
Murk
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Dumitru Mișu Moldovan
wrote:
> On 05/27/18 13:07,
Hey,
While moving one of machines from 6.0 to 6.1, I found 6.1 not able to attach
ix-device.
Machine is HP DL360 Gen9.
ix0 at pci5 dev 0 function 0 "Intel 82599" rev 0x01: mmba is not mem space
ix1 at pci5 dev 0 function 1 "Intel 82599" rev 0x01: mmba is not mem space
Found this thread
http://op
On 05/27/18 13:07, Maximilian Pichler wrote:
Is it possible to limit the CPU usage of a given process to, say, 20%?
I'd like to slow down the web browser since it is draining my laptop's
battery. With enough tabs open it's often consuming ~50% of CPU but
not doing anything productive. Apparently
Just in case it could be useful to others.
After upgrading the snaptshot requiring the new version of smtpd.conf
it happend that the new rules I'd written (included the last one Gilles
passed me) were all wrong.
I could get it working thanks to the man page. The result:
# OLD
accept from local
Hi,
I will try your puffy to puffy. Looks so simple, that there are obviously no
Errors 😊.
Puffy to Android Comes next..
Puffy to puffy
# cat /etc/iked.conf
ikev2 “virtualmachine” passive esp from 172.0.16.0/24 to 192.168.10.0/24 \
local egress peer any psk “secret”
# cat /etc/iked.conf
Hi Stuart,
i trying to achieve Internet over vpn, Access to the Gateway via vpn and Access
to the home lan via vpn.
I somehow thought that this conifg-parameters also should work as Client.
Without them Things are nearly working right now.
Jan
On 2018-05-29, Jan Lambertz wrote:
> Hello e
On 2018-05-28, Marco van Hulten wrote:
>> Sounds like ether you're running out of system memory, or running into
>> ulimit limits.
>
> `ulimit` == unlimited
ulimit [-acdfHlmnpSst [value]] ...
Disp
Puffy to puffy
# cat /etc/iked.conf
ikev2 “virtualmachine” passive esp from 172.0.16.0/24 to 192.168.10.0/24 \
local egress peer any psk “secret”
# cat /etc/iked.conf
ikev2 “openbsdgw” active esp from 192.168.10.0/24 to 172.0.16.0/24 \
local egress peer 10.20.30.10 psk “secret”
---
On 2018-05-29, Jan Lambertz wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> i'm trying for two days now to setup an IKedV2 Roadwarrior VPN.
> the logfiles show, that something is not working correctly during
> connection establishment.
> I changed configs in every way i can think of without success. Why is
> it not
Hi Christophe,
i think i’ve got it now. I removed the „config“ Options from the Server config
and things started working.
(for what interface should they be applied at all ?)
Since then my home lan (192.168.1.0/24) stoped working for other devices at
home. When this is working again i will post
Hi Christophe,
I Made the changes you proposed. Sadly it still does not work. It seems to
me that the message "ikev2_resp_recv: failed to send auth response" is a
hint to the problem. But why did it fail ?
Jan
On 28/05/18(Mon) 22:24, Marc Peters wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> i am having issues with OpenBSD 6.3, latest patches as of today applied. We
> are using gif-tunnels between our datacenters, transport encryption and
> OpenBGPD to announce the prefixes between the datacenters. The boxes also
> have isak
18 matches
Mail list logo