Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having an issue with a single 10 Gigabit interface on one of Intel
> Xeon D-1541 network servers. Namely after the reboot the interface
> appears to be down even with a static route
>
> phobos# ifconfig ix0
> ix0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> lladdr ac:1
Hi,
I am having an issue with a single 10 Gigabit interface on one of Intel
Xeon D-1541 network servers. Namely after the reboot the interface
appears to be down even with a static route
phobos# ifconfig ix0
ix0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr ac:1f:6b:19:f7:72
index 1 priority 0 llpr
Thank you Alexandre!
I did
# sndiod -ddd -r 44100 -f rsnd/1 -m play
snd0 pst=cfg.default: play=0:1 vol=23170 dup
and went to the other window, did
petal# SNDIO_DEBUG=4 aucat -i sound.wav
_aucat_open: host= unit=0 devnum=0 opt=default
/tmp/sndio-0/sock0: No such file or directory
/tmp/sndio/sock0
FWIW, I also encountered some slightly different error messages, I'll see if I
can reproduce those.
-Adam
On May 14, 2019 4:48:29 p.m. CDT, Reyk Floeter wrote:
>
>> Am 14.05.2019 um 23:06 schrieb Adam Thompson :
>>
>>> On 2019-05-14 15:42, Adam Thompson wrote:
>>> OK, I'm pretty sure this is a
Hello,
These messages are filling up the Xorg.0.log and xenodm.log to
gigabytes and does not allow additional xterm windows to open.
I see these messages in /var/log/Xorg.0.log
joe:10424$ tail Xorg.0.log
[2616181.044] _XSERVTransSocketUNIXAccept: accept() failed
[2616181.044] _XSERVTransSocketUN
> Am 14.05.2019 um 23:06 schrieb Adam Thompson :
>
>> On 2019-05-14 15:42, Adam Thompson wrote:
>> OK, I'm pretty sure this is a dumb question, but...
>> Does relayd work properly, or at all with pf disabled? (in 6.5-RELEASE)
>
>
> I have partially answered my own question. That last message
The GUI verses command line arguments are as old as time itself, or close
to it. What constitutes a great desktop experience is a matter of taste,
whatever works for you may not work for someone else. Not one desktop or
GUI will fit everyone; use whats best for you and live your own computer
life.
Hello misc,
Anybody else encountered this issue:
I am using OpenBSD v6.3/6.4 with its Unbound as DNS server
in local subnet. It does not do any recursive DNS queries.
Reverse lookup works for VMware Esxi and Linux machines but not
for Windows 2016 or Dell EMC Compellent SCOS 7.3.x arrays.
The Win
On 2019-05-14 15:42, Adam Thompson wrote:
OK, I'm pretty sure this is a dumb question, but...
Does relayd work properly, or at all with pf disabled? (in
6.5-RELEASE)
I have partially answered my own question. That last message was posted
prematurely, in more than one way, sorry!
1. the
OK, I'm pretty sure this is a dumb question, but...
Does relayd work properly, or at all with pf disabled? (in 6.5-RELEASE)
It looks like it should as long as I use "relay" instead of "redirect",
but I'm having trouble, and don't want to keep banging my head against a
wall if it's something t
Hi Ruda,
rsyk...@disroot.org wrote on Tue, May 14, 2019 at 07:19:42PM +:
> after reading the sh man page I have been wondering:
> When is the line editing mode described just after the
> 'COMMAND HISTORY AND COMMAND LINE EDITING' heading relevant?
Near the beginning, the sh(1) manual page co
[responding to this little gem I just found in the archives...]
Ingo wrote on 2019-05-14 13:54:38:
> That's entirely a matter of taste.
>[snip rant]
Ingo, we don't often seem to agree, but mecouldn't have said what you
just did any better.
In particular, me'd like to reinforce this point:
> Au
Dear list,
after reading the sh man page I have been wondering:
When is the line editing mode described just after the
'COMMAND HISTORY AND COMMAND LINE EDITING' heading relevant?
[I know there exist vi and emacs modes, but I cannot make my
ksh shell behave along the lines described in the menti
So we did manage to make it work by adding a pair in each rdomain and a default
route from rdomain 0 using the pair on rdomain 2 as a gateway but it doesn't
the seem correct.
Is there any better proper way to make the traffic flowing back from one
rdomain to another when using an rdr-to rule in
aa...@bolddaemon.com (Aaron Bieber), 2019.05.10 (Fri) 16:05 (CEST):
> I am looking to understand / enhance the OpenBSD experience for blind
> users.
:flan_thumbsup:
> Do we have any blind users reading misc that can offer any insight
> into their usecases / pain points / work flows / wants?
I v
Can't we just use pf to move the traffic, rather than using pair?
From: Josh Grosse
Sent: 14 May 2019 17:42
To: Benjamin Girard
Subject: Re: Pf rdr-to and rdomain issue
I think pair(4) may come to your rescue.
Hi,
We would like to get a http request coming in on one rdomain moved to a host on
another rdomain.
How would we go about doing that? Can't seem to get it to work, the return
traffic gets lost on rdomain 0 and is not moved back to rdomain 2.
pass in on rdomain 2 proto tcp from any to 123.123.
On 2019-05-14, Marc Espie wrote:
> We also have (had?) a speech synthesis system in
> audio/festival
We deleted that. Somebody would need to create a new port for a
more recent release.
> I don't think we have any other speech synthesis open source
> software in the ports tree.
There's audio/
Hi Ulf,
ULF wrote on Tue, May 14, 2019 at 10:07:46AM +0200:
> On a mac, on a recent gnome, on a kde, etc. it's easier for a user to keep
> track of multiple jobs without thinking about the OS, but rather thinking
> about contents.
[...]
> In 2019, doing all of the above with fvwm, twm, (whatever-
On 5/13/19 12:51 PM, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
> On May 13, 2019 2:58 AM, shadrock uhuru wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/13/19 1:35 AM, shadrock uhuru wrote:
>>> hi everyone
>>> since upgrading to 6.5 my i3bar no longer works.
>>> i have not changed the configuration in any way
>>> when i run the i3status co
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 12:20:52PM +0100, Patrick Harper wrote:
> On Tue, 14 May 2019, at 09:09, ULF wrote:
> > If from one side is true that many modern interfaces (mostly M$, though)
> > are made for people who know nothing about computing, from one another is
> > clear that some good ones (in te
On Tue, 14 May 2019, at 09:09, ULF wrote:
> If from one side is true that many modern interfaces (mostly M$, though)
> are made for people who know nothing about computing, from one another is
> clear that some good ones (in terms of usability) help the user to keep
> concentrated on his work.
>
>
On 5/14/19 5:02 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
As far as I know, the only software we have for blind people
(and not just people with very poor eye sight)
is misc/brltty.
misc/screen also has support in the form of the shm flavor,
which hooks to misc/brltty
The main issue for this kind of thing is of
As far as I know, the only software we have for blind people
(and not just people with very poor eye sight)
is misc/brltty.
misc/screen also has support in the form of the shm flavor,
which hooks to misc/brltty
The main issue for this kind of thing is of course testing.
This was done over 10 ye
If from one side is true that many modern interfaces (mostly M$, though)
are made for people who know nothing about computing, from one another is
clear that some good ones (in terms of usability) help the user to keep
concentrated on his work.
On a mac, on a recent gnome, on a kde, etc. it's easi
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 04:06:41PM +0200, John Wilkes wrote:
>
> OpenBSD 6.3 (GENERIC.MP) #107: Sat Mar 24 14:21:59 MDT 2018
> dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
There were a lot of changes in usb audio support, please try -current
or at least OpenBSD 6.5
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 11:29:45AM +0900, Tuyosi T wrote:
> i use 6.6 snapshots and USB sound card .
> the card play youtube well including sound .
>
> --
> $ dmesg | grep audio
> uaudio0 at uhub2 port 4 configuration 1 interface 1 "C-Media
> Electronics Inc. USB Audio
27 matches
Mail list logo
