mazoc...@disroot.org wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We all know that bugs don't get fixed without backtraces.
>
> After few years of using OpenBSD I am annoyed to get mocked for not
> sending backtraces, but why I don't send them? The answer is: OpenBSD
> doesn't provide software packages with debugging symbo
On 7/8/19 10:57 PM, mazoc...@disroot.org wrote:
Hi!
We all know that bugs don't get fixed without backtraces.
After few years of using OpenBSD I am annoyed to get mocked for not
sending backtraces, but why I don't send them? The answer is: OpenBSD
doesn't provide software packages with debug
Hi!
We all know that bugs don't get fixed without backtraces.
After few years of using OpenBSD I am annoyed to get mocked for not
sending backtraces, but why I don't send them? The answer is: OpenBSD
doesn't provide software packages with debugging symbols.
Do I look like a Gentoo user? It's not
Just for the record, I think *my* (not the OP's) problem when trying
to grep fstat results was that unlike lsof, fstat didn't show the
former file names (hence unlinked); it only showed inodes, so I never
got the "find this former file" part to work on OpenBSD.
I have since found this blog post, wh
On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 06:01:52PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
[...]
> I use Openbox with program instantiation via dmenu. Now here's the
> thing: dmenu is written in pure X: No qt, no gtk, no xforms. Dmenu
> does its job perfectly, so quickly that instantiation from hotkey is
> imperceptable, as is m
On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 23:26:18 +0200
Tomasz Rola wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 07:18:18PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > Frankly, there is not much point in non-developers discussing
> > whether additions to base are acceptable. Feel free to suggest
>
> Well, whatever developers
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 07:18:18PM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
[...]
>
> Frankly, there is not much point in non-developers discussing
> whether additions to base are acceptable. Feel free to suggest
Well, whatever developers come up to, I hope I will be able to
continue using FVWM, on top or in
On Mon, 08 Jul 2019 15:59:54 -0400, Allan Streib wrote:
> It does behave like the file is opened and then unlinked. Sorry for my
> term "ghost" file I couldn't quite find the right words for what I was
> seeing.
You can use the fstat command to find these files (even if unlinked)
as well as the I
ropers writes:
> 1. I think the same behaviour may be what's going on with your
> so-called "ghost" files.
> I.e.: Files and file descriptors get created, the files get unlinked,
> but Firefox still has them open and *is still growing* them, which
> continues until it actually fclose(3)s them.
Y
Hello
I'm hoping someone has a similar setup and can tell me where I've made a
mistake. I currently have several OpenBSD routers (R1 & R2) setup to
provide
vxlan(4) overlay transport configured in a dynamic mode. When I run an
iperf
between 2 systems (C1 & C2) connected to the routers I am no
On 08/07/2019, Allan Streib wrote:
> I have recently encountered another issue with firefox, that is it will
> fill up my /tmp partition with "ghost" files. Meaning, df(1) (and other
> applications) will tell me that my 4GB /tmp is full, but I don't see any
> files there and du(1) will say that /t
On Sun, Jul 7, 2019, at 23:06, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> Xorg is no longer setuid you should use xenodm.
>
> See https://www.openbsd.org/faq/upgrade65.html
Indeed I can start X with xenodm. Thanks!
Hello
Attached is the EHC Form as discussed
(https://gallery.mailchimp.com/f1cbd6d256b0ffa7bd925ef64/files/579310f6-595b-464e-af0b-aa078fb96023/38298999_9399.zip?misc@openbsd.org)
Thanks
Mo
Copyright © 2019 The Napa Institute, All
Richard Ulmer writes:
> I heard multiple times now, that Firefox leaks memory. Maybe I'll give
> a new browser a shot. Iridium looked interesting, but upon research I
> found a lot of people concerned about whether this project has the
> resources to keep up with Chromiums security standards. The
Sorry for being so stupid but I just cannot get this working.
ifconfig vio0 rdomain 1
ifconfig vio0 192.168.10.1/24
route -T1 add default 192.168.10.250
route -T1 add 127/8 127.0.0.1
ifconfig lo1 inet 127.0.0.1/8 rdomain 1
ifconfig vio1 rdomain 2
ifconfig vio1 192.168.10.2/24
route -T2 add defaul
15 matches
Mail list logo
