Re: Understanding download speed reduction by introducing an inline Ubiquity ERL device

2020-10-04 Thread Josuah Demangeon
Hello, Scott Seekamp : > I had a similar speed drop on an Edge Router 4. I don?t know if it?s the same > situation on the Lite, but I believe it?s expected due to hardware > acceleration support (or lack of) and single core performance on the pf side. The last time I logged on an ubiquiti switc

Re: man tar

2020-10-04 Thread Jason McIntyre
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 03:05:48PM +, Roderick wrote: > > We read there: > > " > -f archive > > Filename where the archive is stored. Defaults to /dev/rst0. If set to > hyphen (?-?) standard output is used. See also the TAPE environment > variable. > > "" > > Well, hyphen (?-?) m

Re: Understanding download speed reduction by introducing an inline Ubiquity ERL device

2020-10-04 Thread Scott Seekamp
I had a similar speed drop on an Edge Router 4. I don’t know if it’s the same situation on the Lite, but I believe it’s expected due to hardware acceleration support (or lack of) and single core performance on the pf side. Scott > On Oct 4, 2020, at 17:24, Amarendra Godbole > wrote: > > So

Re: Understanding download speed reduction by introducing an inline Ubiquity ERL device

2020-10-04 Thread Amarendra Godbole
Sorry I forgot including "ifconfig" output: lo0: flags=8049 mtu 32768 index 5 priority 0 llprio 3 groups: lo inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00 cnmac0: flags=808843 mtu 1500 lladdr a8:28:dc:cc:2e:6f index 1 priority 0 llprio 3 grou

Understanding download speed reduction by introducing an inline Ubiquity ERL device

2020-10-04 Thread Amarendra Godbole
Hi misc@ I recently introduced an OpenBSD firewall inline and noticed a reduction in overall download speeds. I am trying to understand why this may be so. The firewall is Ubiquiti ERL running 6.7 release. Internet connection is Comcast xfinity via cable modem, plan 200 Mbits/s down and 10 Mbits/s

Re: man tar

2020-10-04 Thread Ottavio Caruso
On 04/10/2020 16:05, Roderick wrote: We read there: " -f archive Filename where the archive is stored. Defaults to /dev/rst0. If set to hyphen (‘-’) standard output is used. See also the TAPE environment variable. "" Well, hyphen (‘-’) may also mean stdin as expected, but it seems

Re: man tar

2020-10-04 Thread Roderick
On Sun, 4 Oct 2020, Ottavio Caruso wrote: Recent versions of tar(1) on {Free,Net}BSD stipulate: [...] As far as I know it was always so, as it is also in OpenBSD. But that is a very interesting issue on history of the tar command. I see only a documentation problem. Rod.

Re: Case of the missing softraid

2020-10-04 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2020-10-03, tera torn wrote: > I've been a happy user of OpenBSD softraid RAID 1 mirroring, and I'm > attemtping to migrate data off of a degraded RAID 1 mirror. > > I've booted before from the 6.7 install USB (amd64) and this degraded > chunk was detected and the volume was brought up and my d

Re: Case of the missing softraid

2020-10-04 Thread Nick Holland
On 2020-10-03 17:45, tera torn wrote: > Hello, > > I've been a happy user of OpenBSD softraid RAID 1 mirroring, and I'm > attemtping to migrate data off of a degraded RAID 1 mirror. > > I've booted before from the 6.7 install USB (amd64) and this degraded > chunk was detected and the volume was b

man tar

2020-10-04 Thread Roderick
We read there: " -f archive Filename where the archive is stored. Defaults to /dev/rst0. If set to hyphen (‘-’) standard output is used. See also the TAPE environment variable. "" Well, hyphen (‘-’) may also mean stdin as expected, but it seems not to be mentioned/insinuated on th