On Aug 4, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Christophe t...@stuxnet.org wrote:
Hi misc@,
I was wondering about the behavior of OpenBSD in this case (not a
production case at this time).
2 WAN interfaces (Ethernet / IPv4 DHCP) , linked to an OpenBSD box and 1
LAN interface (Ethernet / IPv4 static
This is starting to remind me of Ubuntu's pollen/pollinate services.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
I wonder if there would be some benefit to faking these files from inside
the tftp daemon itself..
On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:37 AM, Chester T. Field chester.fi...@hushmail.com
wrote:
Hi friends,
I'm experiencing really poor network performance via the Realtek 8101E (re)
Ethernet card on my HP Mini 110. Using the default setting of tcpbench
I'm getting an average Mbps of 0.172 versus a
On Nov 6, 2014, at 9:18 AM, Jakub Skrzypnik jot.skr...@gmail.com wrote:
It may be probably look like a x-post from bugs@, but I just want to share
my experience with users, not only with developers, maybe I just do
something wrong or someone here have same problem.
So, problem is simple,
I've used MOC quite a bit on OpenBSD, though just a local compile -
nothing fancy like a port. It's probably the only non-base program I
ever use on the Sparc 5.
What specifically is missing?
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 8:00 PM, Richard Toohey
richardtoo...@paradise.net.nz wrote:
Hi, guys.
This
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:22 PM, Henrique Lengler
henriquel...@openmailbox.org wrote:
On 2014-12-23 02:55, Eric Furman wrote:
No. This is done by the BIOS.
After the computer boots the BIOS then hands over control to the OS.
So this it the time the OS is able to do whatfuck it wants with
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:46 AM, John Long codeb...@inbox.lv wrote:
Does portable NTPD use a drift file? I didn't see one in the previous
version and a new install of 5.7p1 doesn't seem to have one either. I didn't
see any discussion of a drift file in the manpage for ntpd nor for ntpd.conf
in
On Jan 20, 2015, at 9:59 AM, John Long codeb...@inbox.lv wrote:
though I should fix the the portable version to adjust the manpage to
point where it actually gets configured for installation. Some packagers
have already been patching this for their distributions. By default, it
should get
, I found a number of other half-width 1u
servers designed for this application that may also be appropriate.
They seem to basically repackage mini ITX boards.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Brent Cook bust...@gmail.com wrote:
I think Dell used to have servers in its 'Cloud' line that fit 2
I think Dell used to have servers in its 'Cloud' line that fit 2
machines in 1U, though IIRC they were a little pricey. I couldn't find
them again when searching.
The HP SL2x170z server pulls off a similar feat - you can find several
on ebay, though it may be discontinued as well.
On Wed, Jan
On Apr 7, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Hrishikesh Murukkathampoondi hris...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
I got LibreSSL portable from https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable
https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable
I get the following error when trying to compile on Mac OS X Yosemite (ie I
On May 29, 2015, at 11:51 AM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
Running openntpd portable version 5.7 without HTTPS contraint, like I
have been doing for many months now, but upon rebooting, a machine
can't sync:
The ntpdate command is not a part of openntpd.
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Tim Kuijsten i...@netsend.nl wrote:
Since I'm running postfix with LibreSSL, some clients encrypt the connection
using ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305. Now I'm used to seeing headers like
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Seth l...@sysfu.com wrote:
Build environment:
OpenBSD 5.7-release (x64) with all latest patches applied via Mtier openup
utility.
LibreSSL 2.2.0
OpenSMTPD 5.7.1-rc1
I'm having difficulty getting OpenSMTPD 5.7.1-rc1 to build and link the
/usr/sbin/smtpd
On Jul 18, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Mikolaj Kucharski miko...@kucharski.name wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:44:17AM -0600, Brent Cook wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Mikolaj Kucharski
miko...@kucharski.name wrote:
minimalisic patch as below fixed the issue for me:
Index: constraint.c
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Mikolaj Kucharski
miko...@kucharski.name wrote:
Hi,
I've initially reported this problem a while ago and I thought problem
was related to IPv6. Now I belive it is not. I did some research and
this is what I've found. I contacted Reyk couple of days ago, but
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:36 PM, wrote:
> (i) a. With both Linux or Windows all downloads tend to hover around 100 KB/s
> on a 50 Mb/s cable Internet connection
> b. if I run a processor intensive program while downloading (typically at the
> moment a video of a burning
> On Mar 16, 2016, at 6:23 AM, Gabor Juhasz wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> In our IoT project we have to select an NTPd for our embedded device
> in order it can have accurate time.
> It uses 3G/4G mobile net. Of course the net is expensive so we have to
> reduce the
> network
Thanks for the report Jorge.
Yes, that looks like a bug. The outer read loop is missing
in asn1_d2i_read_bio, truncating the reads to ASN1_CHUNK_INITIAL_SIZE
(16k). Will get a patch going to resolve it.
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Jorge Luiz Silva Peixoto <
jorge.peix...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 7:56 PM, David Schmidt
wrote:
> Nick Holland wrote:
> >Nowhere on the OpenBSD website mentions github as anything official.
>
> It does on this page: https://www.openbsd.org/libressl/. Its even
> above the cvs link. Of course this is just for
You forgot to put 'rw', 'ro', or 'rq' as the first element of the options
column (where you had the undefined word 'defaults').
If you don't include one of these options as indicated in the man page and
all of its examples, the fstab line will be ignored entirely in OpenBSD.
This is slightly
> On Jul 30, 2019, at 5:15 AM, Remco wrote:
>
> On 30-07-19 09:51, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I had considered doing some programming in visual studio on windows and I
>> really miss the easy arc4random*() routines there.
>
> You may be able to get the arc4ramdon interface on systems
22 matches
Mail list logo