, in the end, that increase your profit from day one!
Don't you like it?
Best,
Daniel
PS: I wish you the best in your future, what ever your choice might be.
Your call if that's going to be UP or DOWN.
Martin Toft wrote:
To Daniel Quellet: Sorry for disturbing the topic of your thread.
That's cool! No worry, I guess your subject is way more interesting to
many, or no one is using NAT traversal or have any needs for it.
That's fair game. (;
Daniel
this help you some anyway.
Best,
Daniel
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/06/13 14:58, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
That's cool! No worry, I guess your subject is way more interesting to many,
or no one is using NAT traversal or have any needs for it.
I don't know much about H.323, but for SIP draft-biggs-sip-nat has some
useful information
and obviously
they do not.
The same policy should apply here as it does for the OS at large.
Release when ready!
Adaptec was removed and we are better off and have more reliable
solutions now. So be it with Hifn crypto accelerators until they do.
Regards,
Daniel
Hello All,
I am happy to report an apparently successful install of OpenBSD 3.9 Release on
an HP Kayak XU 6/300 (Intel 440LX chipset, 2x Pentium II).
I am delighted to report that this is the first non-Windows OS I have used that
correctly reports and configures the on-board AD1816A audio
apart from the end-of-cable
lump and whatever is or isn't enabled on the drive itself.
It doesn't apparently affect performance, so I'll leave it be.
Thanks for your analysis.
Regards,
Dan.
--- Nick Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Hammett wrote:
...
ahc0: Illegal cable configuration
stable package, then add a class for
use by MySQL in login.config, then make sure you start MySQL using it
and then also increse your limits in sysctl.conf.
After that you will be fine.
Again, all explain in archive.
Daniel
Anders J wrote:
My self have experienced mixed issues with MysSQL on OpenBSD and also
read and heard about performance and stability problems with MySQL on
OpenBSD.
I use it for years (7+) without issues. The only one I recall was with
3.23.46, yeap, really old, where the database restart
hours if not use. Are you sure you do your dump with the
--opt flag? If I don't do this, it sure will take me about 8 1/2 hours
to do the same.
Just a side note that might help, or it may not, but just thought to
pass it along in case it help you.
Daniel
not
have tested their restore scenario and think what they may do is good
for them and when they will need it, that time, they will be stuck.
Best,
Daniel
!
Thanks
Daniel
Marian Hettwer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Julian,
Julian Bolivar wrote:
I use MySQL 5.0.18 and OpenBSD 3.9 for AMD64 and work fine, and I used
a lot of insert / hour in it, using Innodb tables.
What means a lot ? Can you provide a mysqladmin status, or a show
the original question.
Daniel
Looks like the packages for Weblizer on AMD64 is corrupted.
One three different systems, it all show thew same errors.
If I am not mistaken it is here:
freetype.13.1
Freetype is version 1.3.1, not 13.1 as below.
# pkg_add webalizer
Error from
Berk D. Demir wrote:
No. Packages are not damaged.
In fact it's looking for
/usr/X11R6/lib/libfontconfig.so.3.0
/usr/X11R6/lib/libfreetype.so.13.1
libraries which are provided with xbase39 installation set.
Extract the xbase39.tgz and voila you're done.
tar -pzxf xbase39.tgz -C /
the serer and doing it from scratch again, but I
still wasn't installing any X* stuff as I never use X and sure never
needed it until today looks like.
Daniel
.
By the way, the video is just an example, doesn't mean you should setup
yours like that, but that give you an idea how quick this is!
Really, a coffee break I tell you. That's all you need. The compare this
with Fedora setup time on your Linux for fun. (:
Daniel
it be that the same packages would be found in stable for
some platform and only in current on others?
What's actually dictate this?
Not a big deal, but for my own education, I would like to know and
understand this.
Best,
Daniel
there.
Kind Regards,
JCR
Thanks for your positive involvements!
Daniel.
Is there a special reason why we couldn't see the
set skip on interface
in the display of the rules in pf with the regular:
pfctl -sr
That's on 3.9.
it is not a rule.
OK, not a rule, but still shouldn't it be possible or useful to see that
in effect? If you make changes for testing or what not and you use this
temporary, etc on a box of 10+ interfaces, just my thinking, but I was
expecting to see this in display of how the pf was
a mistake I will not repeat
again! (;
Daniel
Indeed it does, but not by hacking up `-s rules`. pfctl(8) lists all
the various things you can display with -s. 'options' (as per
pf.conf(5)) do not seem to be among them, however, which I agree is
unfortunate. It also doesn't help that the manpage say, next to, -s
Rule:
Note that the ``skip
block return all
snip
Example 2:
In pf.conf
snip
set block-policy drop
block all
snip
pfctl -sr
snip
block drop all
snip
This set option does show up here.
OK, it can be argue that it might be a rule as well, but it is enter as
set option in the same section as set skip.
Daniel
Christopher Snell wrote:
Hi,
Is the Intel PRO/1000 PT still non-functional under our favorite OS?
I searced around and found a message from Darrian Hale in late April
that said he was having kernel panics with this NIC. Has anything
changed?
# dmesg
OpenBSD 3.9 (GENERIC.MP) #736: Thu Mar 2
The file sets that are used to install OpenBSD are not packages even
though they end in the tgz extension. Thus, pkg_add doesn't know what
to do with it. Try a command like this instead:
# cd /
# tar -xvpzf /home/music/xbase39.tgz
The -v is optional, but make sure you include -p to
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 11:13, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
It *is*. I've done so since a nearly uncountable number of years.
Something like this in /etc/fstab helps.
/dev/wd0b /tmpmfs rw,-m0,-s204800 0 0
In the past i've always symlinked /tmp to point to /var/tmp.
Paolo Supino wrote:
Hi
I'm in the process of building firewall (Obviously it will run OpenBSD)
and I need to put in a quad NIC card. There's Intel Quad card that I had
a success with in the past but is expensive as hell. I found a company
called Mikrotik that makes a Quad NIC card and I'm
If anyone has been lamenting the loss of the bash-static package, this
evening i took the time to figure out how to create something that
works just as well. I peeked in the Makefile for bash on an older
version of OpenBSD to see how the static version differs. The
difference is when compiling
Blah blah blah. Let's please drop this sociopolitical debate and get onto
some BSD?
Sure we can. What do you want to talk about?
VoIP would be nice and selfish as well, but oh well...
Hello. I have not used sensorsd on OpenBSD before, but am trying to
learn. I have read sensorsd(8) and sensorsd.conf(5) from OpenBSD 3.9
and the configuration looks very simple. However, i have a couple quick
questions:
The lines in sensorsd.conf start with hw.sensors.N (where N is a small
Thank you to those who responded! I can figure out sensorsd.conf now.
Also thank you to the developers who created such a simple way to
monitor the sensors. I've configured sensors on other operating systems
that have been a much greater hassle.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 08:21:01PM +0200, Peter Philipp wrote:
Hi I'm looking for clue. Does anyone have any?
Google provide some:
http://www.hasbro.com/clue/
Make sure you fit the minimum requirements however:
http://www.hasbro.com/clue/pl/page.browse/dn/default.cfm
May be CLUE JR.
Steve Glaus wrote:
Hello all,
I'm finally desperate enough to post this to a list...
I have been trying for two days to set up a basic VPN between my OpenBSD
box at home and my OpenBSD box at work.
The box at home is running 3.7 and the box here at work is running 3.9.
May be worth to have
How accurate are the sensors on most computers? I ask because after
learning (thanks to a few kind individuals on this list) how to monitor
sensors with OpenBSD 3.9, i have been checking the values on one of my
computers (a VIA Epia machine with 533 MHz C3 processor) to get an idea
of what
On Monday 31 July 2006 09:41, you wrote:
The SMART thing isn't that smart at all. Even after the server crashed
twice due faulty harddrive, SMART keeps teeling me everything is OK.
I think (someone with more knowledge may correct me if i'm wrontg) SMART
communicates with the drive and asks the
On Monday 07 August 2006 08:15, Gabriel George POPA wrote:
Most questions on this mail list require me to provide a valid output
of dmesg. But if old messages are erased, how am I
supposed to do this?
Take a look at /var/run/dmesg.boot.
Karsten McMinn wrote:
On 8/15/06, Marian Hettwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I played with a bit when I had access to lots of
RaQ3s and 4s but it wasnt worth the time with
their custom bios in the way.
I only maintain somewhat a distribution of it for the RaQ 2+ and Cube:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
I don't think it can be done. I had a RaQ3 once - way back when. The
But the RaQ3 was MIPS based, wasn't it ?
Nope, I386, the MIPS based stop at the RaQ2+ after witch they switch. To
bad if you asked me, but that's the new one. Yea, I bit more complicated
with the
stan wrote:
Does OpenBSD work well on a Sun Ultra 25?
I don't see it on the list here:
http://openbsd.org/sparc64.html#hardware
Also on the same page, if you scroll at the bottom you will get your
answer as well:
Unsupported machines
Ultra 25
stan wrote:
Does OpenBSD work well on a Sun Ultra 25?
I don't see it on the list here:
http://openbsd.org/sparc64.html#hardware
So, I would venture to say no. But the best way to know is to try.
tested it again by rebooting a spare server with it.
Error in rc.conf.local, but no error when place in the rc.local one.
Hope this help some.
Daniel
PS: I had the same issue with QMail as well, if not in the right config
file as well.
=
Error with configuration
administration. This is where
new daemons or host specific information should be stored.
Notice this part:
*** This is where new daemons or host specific information should be
stored ***
I guess that tells you where it should be.
Daniel
On Saturday 19 August 2006 03:13, you wrote:
1) Any chassis or supplier recommendations? Comments on
Rackmountpro, since I have found this 2U chassis from rackmountpro
(
http://www.rackmountpro.com/productpage.php?prodid=2421 ).
I have purchased rackmount chassis from them before and been quite
Marcos Marconcini wrote:
I did an upgrade from 3.8 stable to 3.9 current ( I don't know if this is
the problem )
Start with a snapshot and read the FAQ first. That's why they exists.
think.
Regards,
Daniel
the load well so far. Got to love OpenBSD I tell you!
Still, I am looking at various ideas if anyone have suggestions that
would be appreciated.
In the end if I understand you well, doing any SYNC Proxy setup wouldn't
do anything what so ever here. It was a nice thought anyway.
Best,
Daniel
Nick Guenther wrote:
Additionally I just ran nmap on the address listed in your log and
although it didn't identify it positively it says it's a windows box.
So there you go. It has an open port at 1026/tcp and I'll bet that's
the control channel.
Got to love Micro$oft I tell you. If true,
Ryan Corder wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 20:36 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
200.82.74.176 - - [23/Aug/2006:12:42:37 -0400] GET
/events/index.php?EventID=58 HTTP/1.1 200 5 - Mozilla/4.0
(compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
the following URL may be of interest to you
If I may ask. One part of my original question was if the CARP interface
is view as a bridge setup as far as Sync Proxy is concern. Is it the
case here? What I understand of the FaQ is clear for not working on
bridge setup, however, it's not clear to me if CARP setup is view as
bridge as well.
Joachim Schipper wrote:
Did you already check that the page is, indeed, the page you expect it
to be? And not, say, some botnet-controller?
Yes I did and even moved it and replace it with special hacking of my
own there. (;
Not that dumm. But thanks for your concern. (;
Plus it is really
well
become a night mare sooner then I would like if you follow my drift.
Thanks for your suggestions never the less.
Ryan Corder wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 12:30 -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I am now up to 11,149 simultaneous sources for the last 22 hours.
Someone is having fun at my
to specific
URL makin them useless.
What do you think?
Very stupid, impossible, useless, bad idea, or is that possible and may
have the effect intended here?
Best.
Daniel
Ryan McBride wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 09:15:44PM +0200, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 11:58:39AM -0600, Tim Pushor wrote:
Only question is to whether or not to use the/a carp address for the DNS.
It will work, but as noted, there's no particular reason to do this;
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/08/28 15:26, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
I have a list of 46K computers that from the logs are all the same OS,
patch, etc and I want to get the OSFP of it to see what it might be and
if that's the only connection with that specific signature.
If you log the traffic
I looked at the site:
http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/p0f-help/
There isn't any updated signature file available at this time right?
I know there is a new beta version of the p0f there.
Just wondering?
I also see in the docs that:
# KEEP IN MIND: Some packet firewalls configured to normalize
Joachim Schipper wrote:
However, *if* he did, you might have some interesting tricks to play on
him. Many scanners [1], for instance, will not send a SYN twice - and
(almost?) all TCP/IP stacks will. Dropping the first SYN from a new IP
can be done easily with pf, and while the impact on
Mike Frantzen wrote:
Last, as for the signature that may be different on the same computer if
control by a webbot, is that possible? I guess not as the TCP stack
isn't changed, but anyone know for sure? I am curious on that part.
It will only change if the application does a setsockopt() and
Make sure that you have your 'open-files-limit' parameter set to a sane
value in your my.cnf. If you don't have anything set for that limit
the default is extremely low (so low that using views tended to not
work on my dev box). I have been using open-files-limit = 8192,
however YMMV.
A very
that hump and get it to a stable stage.
Hope this help you some.
Daniel
, then DON'T!
But saying it shouldn't, or couldn't because it's not stable, or
efficient, is simply a lack of understanding and homework and simply
spread FUD!
Best,
Daniel
list to needs
RaidFrame for it! (;
Just a thought, may be review your setup might be much better then
trying to get new hardware, but that's just me.
Best,
Daniel
to be from very new OS and browsers as well.
So, any suggestions of what should be done next is very welcome as well
if anything.
I am obviously in very green territory here.
Best,
Daniel
in live systems with success. I am curious as to
if other ideas might add to this and help as well before I give a crack
to my gethttpd daemon.
Thanks for your time if you read that far and any feedback good or bad
would very much be welcome.
Regards,
Daniel
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
3.1 Good users supply data check.
So far most/all of the variations of attacks on web sites are with
scripts trying to inject itself to your servers. Well, you need to do
sanity checks on your code. Nothing can really protect you for that if
you don't check what you
Here to reduce the questions on the installation and configuration of
MySQL on OpenBSD. I put a document up with more details on it.
http://openbsdsupport.org/mysql.htm
Yeap, the English may not be perfect, but the steps are there.
Hope this help anyway.
Best,
Daniel
PS: I don't think I
that.
Also, neither text-based browsers nor most legitimate bots will request
images.
And that was the point. Allow legitimate bots, if you choose so
obviously, and ban the bad one!
Best,
Daniel
Toni Mueller wrote:
mind you that my problems radically increased with 5.x - nobody is
talking about 4.x anymore.
You checked these right?
Many details that might help you.
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/mysql.htm
Just a thought.
Daniel
really not aware of any.
I am still learning more on it from NetBSD as at a minimum, it does work.
So, that most likely doesn't help you more then this. But that's where
it's stand as far as I know anyway.
Daniel
. You don't have to agree with me if you don't see it the same
way, but why not? I never compare prices and frankly I wouldn't eiter,
at a minimum you know what you would pay for and you would know it just
work!
Just a thought!
Daniel
'/usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe ' /dev/null
Hope this help you some.
Daniel
edgarz wrote:
I do it too :)
Same answer:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=115846012811205w=2
Daniel
Marian Hettwer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Marian Hettwer wrote:
As soon as replication starts, mysql gets very unresponsive:
- -bash-3.1$ time mysqladmin -uroot -p proc stat
Enter password
,
Daniel
just never byte the argument that one is
not pay for doing things, etc.
Knowledge have no price really!
And I always find the payback to be much bigger! (:
Best,
Daniel
on login.
Let see when no errors are present in the near future.
ack.
Hopefully it will help. if not, then will see why that might be, but
anyway, I hope this did help you some regardless.
Best,
Daniel
,
Daniel
On Friday 22 September 2006 00:39, you wrote:
I have a machine running OpenBSD 3.6 on a remote location that I would
like to upgrade. I only have ssh access unless I buy myself an
expensive plane ticket. I wondered if there's a safe way to upgrade
remotely or should I just wait until I get an
to anyone to do it in
one step for all upgrade PLEASE!
You are not doing anyone a favor by doing so.
Be match if you like, let the others do it in the recommended way!
There is a well documented upgrade process, so anyone that wants to do
the upgrade, read it and follow it!
Daniel
Just in case you haven't seen it yet.
http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=articlesid=20060927091645
Daniel Hartmei posted a great article at undeadly.org and announce more
to come!
I very much enjoy the reading a LOTS!
Try all the example he showed as well just to see how good or bad my
Toni Mueller wrote:
Hello,
I've recently read that these machines are now fully supported on
OpenBSD. What experience do you have with them, please? Any advices on
what to watch out for?
Are you sure for your model.
They have the x336 or the eSeries 326m, but not the x326m. So, I assume
you
!
Current reference:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=115961387624300w=2
Daniel
!
Daniel
Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 03:54:47PM -0600, Jack J. Woehr wrote:
| Free and open software is a means to an end, rather than the
| sole end unto itself for OLPC.
|
| I was totally stunned by this admission. morally bankrupt, as Bob
| says, is exactly what is going
why users still don't get it!!!
Best luck in your choice
Daniel
PS: AMD is better anyway, so you can't go wrong, but vote for your OS of
choice and put your money where you mouth should be! Support the REAL
open hardware makes and ditch the rest until they get it!
Get it???
the pathway of years,
And get pats on the back as you pass;
But your final reward will be heartaches and tears
If you've cheated the man in the glass.
Hope you can see the light and look at yourself in the mirror
Regards,
Daniel
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
What strike me, among many things wrong and unreal here is the specific
part as well:
Marvell is not in a position to open their wireless firmware as it is
currently dependent on the third party operating system kernel that they
do not own. A GPL
Gustavo Rios wrote:
I meant more CPU processing cycles per a given constant amount of money!
That's it.
Then go for AMD, they have more instructions then Intel that now try to
catch up to them!
So, call it more instructions machine per dollar if you like that!
Jeroen Massar wrote:
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
[.. a part that you didn't want to make a 'point' about anyway..]
Men,
I must be pretty darn stupid I have to say.
My point wasn't about the dam licenses or comparing GPL to BSD for
crying at loud!
Then don't mention it. Also learn how to reply
The machine!
hw.machine=i386
hw.model=Cyrix 486DLC (486-class)
hw.ncpu=1
hw.byteorder=1234
hw.physmem=49917952
hw.usermem=49684480
hw.pagesize=4096
hw.disknames=wd0
hw.diskcount=1
# uname -a
OpenBSD anand..com.ar 3.9 GENERIC#617 i386
Daniel
On 10/12/06, Falk Husemann [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thursday 12 October 2006 13:54, Falk Husemann wrote:
Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
My home mail server was originally a 33 Mhz 486, but once 66 MHz CPUs
became free i acquired one and
gear for OpenBSD
router instead. Not to many network cards provide good sustain traffic
for small packets and when you add pf in the picture, it's getting
pretty hard.
Best,
Daniel
Stefan Klein wrote:
Just a shy question - if version 4 CDs have been shipped already, there
*should* be a downloadable version laying around somewhere, shouldn't it ?
Nope.
You want it early, you by the CD or you wait on the release date that
will be November 1. (:
What's the fun of
What's up with undeadly.org.
It's dying at:
cat6509-vlan300.edm.tera-byte.com (66.244.192.42)
* * *
around and log with PF.
If they use MGCP however, I wouldn't be able to help you.
Hope this help anyway.
If you need more, just ask!
Best,
Daniel
only come
from fix source ONLY and ALWAYS!
Best,
Daniel
put MCGP. Hmmm... Must need to go to sleep soon.
Sorry to provide the wrong protocol here, but you got the picture
anyway. MGCP is also use in VoIP, but wasn't the one I was referring at.
Glad it was corrected.
Thanks
Daniel
Hi,
I loaded 4.0 into a nice new Sun x2100 M2 and looks like it's working
pretty well so far anyway.
But I see a few weird things in the dmesg, like the dual core cpu
display one core at 1.8GHz and the other at 2.4 sometime?
Some device show not configure, but looks like they work.
.
Is that the only way?
Thanks
Daniel
601 - 700 of 2706 matches
Mail list logo
