On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 07:58:00AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> As far as I know, none of the developers are specifically working on
> World Peace, either.
>
That was a work in progress, but it was aborted due to lack of general
interest :-/
--
Gil
n, that time once past never returns;
and that the moment which is lost is lost for ever."
-- Samuel Johnson
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 03:55:20PM +0200, David Coppa wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Can you guys update to yesterday's snapshot and confirm that you still
> > experience this issue ?
> >
> > Two people have told me they no l
B revision 1.0
> uhub4 at usb4 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
> isa0 at pcib0
> isadma0 at isa0
> pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
> spkr0 at pcppi0
> uhub5 at uhub0 port 2 "Apple, Inc. Keyboard Hub" rev 2.00/96.15 addr 2
> uhidev0 at uhub5 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 "Apple, Inc Apple
> Keyboard" rev 2.00/0.69 addr 3
> uhidev0: iclass 3/1
> ukbd0 at uhidev0: 8 variable keys, 5 key codes, country code 33
> wskbd0 at ukbd0: console keyboard, using wsdisplay0
> uhidev1 at uhub5 port 2 configuration 1 interface 1 "Apple, Inc Apple
> Keyboard" rev 2.00/0.69 addr 3
> uhidev1: iclass 3/0
> uhid0 at uhidev1: input=1, output=0, feature=0
> uhidev2 at uhub5 port 3 configuration 1 interface 0 "Primax Electronics Apple
> Optical USB Mouse" rev 1.10/1.10 addr 4
> uhidev2: iclass 3/1
> ums0 at uhidev2: 4 buttons, Z and W dir
> wsmouse0 at ums0 mux 0
> rum0 at uhub0 port 5 "Cisco-Linksys Compact Wireless-G USB Adapter" rev
> 2.00/0.01 addr 5
> rum0: MAC/BBP RT2573 (rev 0x2573a), RF RT2528, address 00:18:39:1c:22:7a
> vscsi0 at root
> scsibus2 at vscsi0: 256 targets
> softraid0 at root
> scsibus3 at softraid0: 256 targets
> root on wd0a (1b370bc9a7444b9f.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
>
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 08:03:59AM -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> On 18 May 2014 07:52, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 07:37:26AM -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> >> On 18 May 2014 05:37, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >> > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 07:37:26AM -0400, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> On 18 May 2014 05:37, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:40:13PM -0400, Allan Streib wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 17, 2014, at 05:30 PM, Allan Streib wrote:
> >>
> >> >
ot;Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
> usb3 at uhci2: USB revision 1.0
> uhub3 at usb3 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
> usb4 at uhci3: USB revision 1.0
> uhub4 at usb4 "Intel UHCI root hub" rev
ent" I meant "snapshot" sorry if that caused any confusion.
>
I'll have a look at this, thanks
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 12:13:06PM +0300, Gregory Edigarov wrote:
> Helio,
>
> configs are just reduced to the famous
>
> [...]
>
> system is current as of Sat Apr 5 19:05:54 EEST 2014
>
Hi,
Did you follow the steps at:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.ht
On 03/27/14 14:37, Erling Westenvik wrote:
That means that encrypted data, which would typically reside in
/var/mysql, /var/www, and /var/transmission, must reside on volumes that
can be unlocked and mounted separately. However, I cannot in advance
predict which "service" will outgrow others firs
Hello,
without commenting on the need for the utility itself, the code you have
provided does not respect the coding style of OpenBSD, and your main
function shouldn't be returning errno
Gilles
On 03/26/14 12:19, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Hello!
For some reason POSIX X/Open Systems Interface
brought to you by Gilles Chehade, Eric Faurot and Charles Longeau.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
he API is supposed to be usable by a larger audience very soon (we're
talking in matter of weeks), the python/perl bindings are just regular
filters, they are not part of smtpd itself, they rely on the C API so
they are as usable as the API itself ;-)
If you are interested in filters developme
or some code which allowed verify to work when sending peers
a certificate but not yet in the general case ...
It's coming next, no worries, I just want to avoid touching SSL related
code so close to a lock ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
or: ssl_load_key: error:0906D06C:PEM
routines:PEM_read_bio:no start line
fatal: load_pki_tree: failed to load key file
$ sudo smtpd -nf /etc/mail/smtpd.conf
fatal: load_pki_tree: failed to load key file
$
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:42:58PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 02:09:53AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > Correct me if I'm wrong, but there's no way to find out what parts of
> > smtpd (mda, mta) are paused? I can always run smtpctl pause mta
elaying messages.
using the "verify" keyword on a listen line will require that a client
provide a certificate that we can verify before a session can be started
whereas using a verify on a relay line will require that smtpd(8)'s own
client can verify a peer certificate before relaying a message.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:37:08AM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 09:26:35PM +0100, Frank Brodbeck wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 07:24:32PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > I would try using a full path.
> > >
wrong here?
>
> Trying to test my thesis I created two empty files: foo.pem and foo.key
> and used them in my pki statement with some astonishing result:
>
> # smtpd -nf /etc/mail/smtpd.conf
> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>
> While the test is more or less stu
ething like a one shot monitor would be nice.
>
Indeed, we'll add something :-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
to
do is call free() in your error path to give him another chance at
exploiting the situation.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
ostname` daily insecurity output" root
> >
> >While it perfectly does what I want, I consider it bad habit to change
> >/etc/daily itself and would like to know if there is any preferred
> >solution to this issue?
>
> add it to ~r
es which should be committed to
OpenBSD very soon too
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
t; stat backend
> > > info: startup [debug mode]
> > > debug: parent_send_config_ruleset: reloading
> > > debug: parent_send_config_mfa: reloading
> > > debug: parent_send_config: configuring smtp
> > > mfa: building si
resend the failed ones,
> only to be told again that there are
> "too many recipients".
>
So not a single recipient is ever accepted ?
If that's the case, I'll tell you in private how to fix this and we will
have to find a way that works f
smtpd will always try to group and reuse connections,
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
tually, the longer it runs, the bigger my shitlist to test some
filters grows :-P
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
.
>
I feel offended by those who feel offended about some man page.
Maybe we should remove them as they are causing controversy ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
b:/etc/mail/aliases.db
> accept from any for domain { kma.mydomain.net,
> prv.mydomain.net,mydomain.net } virtual { "@" => didier } deliver to mbox
> accept for local alias deliver to mbox
> accept for any relay
>
Adding "auth" on the "listen on egress" line should get you the desired
result
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
ts/core.Techn0.eu.key"
> pki core.Techn0.eu dhparams "/etc/mail/certs/core.Techn0.eu.dh"
>
> [...]
>
can you try with an all-lowercase hostname ?
I think we're missing a call to lowercase() in our configuration parsing
and I'll have a fix for that in a few minu
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:03:45PM +0100, Craig R. Skinner wrote:
> On 2013-09-25 Wed 11:39 AM |, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> > It's officially still true, unofficially you can do it on recent
> > versions by declaring a table (i'll use a static table for the exa
not available
> yet? Not a huge deal, I just would like to know so that I stop beating
> myself trying to get it to work.
>
summary:
For OpenSMTPD versions earlier than 5.3.3, it's correct to assume that.
For OpenSMTPD 5.3.3, it's a hidden feature
g/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/smtpd/delivery_mbox.c.diff?r1=1.8;r2=1.9;f=h
I don't see how your issue could possibly happen with this code :-/
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
by the troll, but it turned
> out that the whole sentence is missing from original interview.
>
> [0]
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2013/05/29/sharyl-attkisson-and-her-compromised-computers/
>
seriously, who fucking cares.
let this thread die
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
(8) knows when it is invoked as "sendmail" and will work just the
way you'd expect. All you have to do is setup the mailwrapper(8) and you
can then let your ruby app config reference sendmail
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
t won't
take long before rbl and similar filters get implemented.
> Just switched over from Postfix. Couldn't be happier.
>
Glad to hear ;)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 01:41:49PM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
> On 6/24/2013 1:23 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> >>>"relay backup" is used to setup secondary mail servers for a domain,
> >>>that is a server that accept mails for a domain and relay to M
ain
than the one specified in mx. [...]
therefore:
accept for domain foobar.org relay backup mx2.example.org
will turn your machine as a backup mx for domain foobar.org with the
same priority as mx2.example.org, only relaying to other MXs that have
a higher priority
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
> resolve the aliases, since it already passed through amavis.
>
There's a way but it's going to require you to edit the individual
envelopes either manually or through a script
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
ch a 5.3.3 stable tarball from opensmtpd.org and it will
run on top of OpenBSD 5.3
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
ept for any alias relay via $av_origin
>
> # coming in from authed clients
> accept tagged $originating for any alias relay via $av_origin
>
Ok, there's a parse.y bug here that I'll be looking into.
You shouldn't be able to use "alias" in a relay rule, it is discarded.
What you want is to use local lmtp delivery, not lmtp relaying.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
ribes the
envelope before the rule you're showing, then we will not be able to
understand the issue.
Also, "No MX could be reached" means that no MX willing to accept the
envelope could be reached. That can mean you have invalid credentials
and that none
cronjobs, but not
> the daily/weekly/monthly/security scripts or anything else send to
> "root". Same goes for the MAILTO, which is ignored in those scripts as well.
>
> Is there any ETA when smtpd will properly handle rewriting the address?
>
It's high on the todo and very likely to be done by 5.4
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
dited from
> the root's cronjob, right?
>
Oops, forgot to reply to this one.
If you're replacing sendmail with smtpd you can get rid of that entry in
root's crontab. If present, smtpd will ignore it, so you're not required
to remove it.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
of smtpd on
> server 2 as well, that is the case.
>
> Ideas? Suggestions?
>
smtpd doesn't support address rewriting at the moment.
It will either use the local `hostname` or the one supplied by your MUA.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
r"
>
>
>
>
>
> Experimental:
>
>
>
> * SQLite lookup backend
>
> * LDAP lookup backend
>
>
>
>
>
> Portable:
>
>
>
> * Support for PAM authentication
>
> * Known to build and work on FreeBSD, Net
: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: www
CVSROOT:/cvs
Module name:www
Changes by: e...@cvs.openbsd.org2013/03/29 07:19:56
Modified files:
. : want.html
Log message:
I could need a new laptop
- End forwarded message -
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.pool
Bugs:
===
Please read http://www.opensmtpd.org/report.html
Security bugs should be reported directly to secur...@opensmtpd.org
Other bugs may be reported to b...@opensmtpd.org
OpenSMTPD is brought to you by Gilles Chehade, Eric Faurot and Charles Longeau.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:57:29AM -0500, Scott McEachern wrote:
> On 02/26/13 11:52, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >Here's a schema I did of the layout a while ago:
>
> Your diagram, with "Charles", reminds me of a question I've always wondered:
>
> What'
//goo.gl/73UaI
And here's wikipedia page on "privilege separation"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privilege_separation
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
eeds
> root privilages. Am I on the correct path for
> this?
>
Yes, wrong path, this is not how you do it.
You need to setup the mailwrapper: see mailwrapper(8) and mailer.conf(5)
Then smtpctl can be invoked as sendmail and will not require root privs.
-
url: smtp.sbb.rs
>
> If needed, I will provide further info.
>
actually I didn't spot that you were -current:
accept for any relay via smtp://smtp.sbb.rs
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
;
> accept for any relay via my.isp.smtpserver
>
> What exact syntax should I use? Current, amd64.
> Best regards
>
You should really show the entire conf and the exact message
otherwise it's hard to know.
The line by itself seems correct
--
Gi
without, but without output I can't
> > help you troubleshoot
> >
>
> Since the problem resolved itself, I reckoned the output wouldn't be
> relevant (since everything does seem to work now). But my output was:
ok, issues that resolve themselves ar
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 03:34:24PM +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 13:48 +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 01:41:45PM +0100, Martijn van Duren wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > world. To do so I set up a
n on egress tls certificate domainname enable auth
> map aliases source db "/etc/mail/aliases.db"
>
> accept from all for local alias aliases deliver to mbox
> accept from all for domain domainname.nl alias aliases deliver to mbox
> accept for
gt; might be confusing for new users.
>
smtpd.conf(5) has been reworked in -current, it now provides an example to
setup your SSL enabled instance at the bottom of the page.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
Kind regards,
> Frank.
>
The syntax has changed slightly to allow for multiple credentials to be
used on the same MX, amongst other things.
I just committed a fix to the example in the man page, your line should
read as:
smtps+auth://la...@mail.split-brain.de
where "label"
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:08:52PM +, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > Don't be a tease!! What's in -current?
>
> Ponies. Lots of'em.
>
folding ponies into envelopes turned out to be gross, we gave up.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:02:45PM -0500, bofh wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > Oh, and if you liked what's in 5.2, you will love what's in -current !
>
> Don't be a tease!! What's in -current? And I see 5.3-beta is tagged
what's in 5.2, you will love what's in -current !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
Great thanks
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:42:35PM +0100, Joel Carnat wrote:
> Built on source tree from 5.2: it works!
>
> Gotta switch back to SSL :))
> Thank you.
>
> Jo
>
> Le 28 janv. 2013 ? 12:31, Gilles Chehade a ?crit :
>
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013
key_exchange(SSL_CTX *ctx)
+ssl_set_ephemeral_key_exchange(SSL_CTX *ctx, DH *dh)
{
- DH *dh;
-
- dh = get_dh512();
- if (dh != NULL)
- SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh(ctx, dh);
+ if (dh == NULL || !SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh(ctx, dh))
guys,
no feedback on the diff I sent :/
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:31:41PM +0100, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> Hi Vadim,
>
> I only use ldapd in a local context but I'll have a look tomorrow and
> come up with a diff for that.
>
> Thanks,
> Gilles
>
>
> On Sa
t: 3
> >ldap_prepare_socket: 3
> >ldap_connect_to_host: Trying 10.0.0.50:636
> >ldap_pvt_connect: fd: 3 tm: -1 async: 0
> >TLS: can't connect: The Diffie Hellman prime sent by the server is
> >not acceptable \
> >(not long enough)..
> >ldap_err2string
> >ldap_sasl_bind(SIMPLE): Can't contact LDAP server (-1)
> >
> >Not sure if that matters, but the OpenBSD's openssl.cnf (which was
> >used to generate
> >and sign the CA and certificate files) contains:
> >default_bits = 4096
> >
> >Is there a way to tell ldapd(8) to use a bigger DH value ?
> >
> >TIA,
> > Jo
>
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
machines.
> p.s.: are you Gilles ( http://unix.stackexchange.com/users/885/gilles )?
>
No
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
; principle is not followed...
>
Interesting question ...
> Please read the thread in the:
>
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/60175/why-does-time-ident-daytime-comsat-run-after-an-openbsd-5-2-install
>
> if further comments needed.
>
... by obv
gt; always fails for me without the -f option.
>
No idea, maybe procmail is still running and waiting for something
to quit ? Can you check for the procmail process with top ?
If so, then it's expected and the process will be killed after a few
minutes.
I don't understand why delivery to user_b doesn't take place though,
can you provide logs ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
t doesn't
allow email from external sources:
accept for local alias aliases deliver to mbox
accept for all relay
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
It's slow as hell, I know (I own a 150). But it's cool (a sparc64 laptop!) :)
> :)
>
Yep, sparc64 laptop would be <3
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
bility, 1400x1050
> > wsdisplay0 at machfb0 mux 1: console (std, sun emulation), using wskbd0
> > usb1 at ohci0: USB revision 1.0
> > uhub1 at usb1 "NEC OHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
> > usb2 at ohci1: USB revision 1.0
> > uhub2 at usb2 "NEC OHCI root hub" rev 1.00/1.00 addr 1
> > cardslot0 at cbb0 slot 0 flags 0
> > cardbus0 at cardslot0: bus 1 device 0 cacheline 0x10, lattimer 0x20
> > pcmcia0 at cardslot0
> > vscsi0 at root
> > scsibus1 at vscsi0: 256 targets
> > softraid0 at root
> > scsibus2 at softraid0: 256 targets
> > bootpath: /pci@1f,0/ide@d,0/disk@0,0
> > root on wd0a (66dd7746863e7550.a) swap on wd0b dump on wd0b
> >
> > Max
>
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
site to what
> smtpd.conf(5) claims?
> Can anyone clarify?
>
A bit old, but as I'm cleaning my mbox ...
A fix was committed yesterday which updates code and clarifies the
situation in the man page. You should update to -current and update
your smtpd.conf
Gilles
--
Gilles Cheh
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 12:02:13PM +0930, David Walker wrote:
> Gilles Chehade
> > We are getting closer to a stable version of OpenSMTPD
>
> Which to my mind raises the question of how OpenSMTPD is to be
> implemented alongside Sendmail in the base system.
> Presumably, as
t was mentioned, I was just wondering if disposable addresses
> was on it or would that be in a galaxy far away?
>
What do you mean by disposable ?
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
I use it on 5.1 but it requires a -current checkout of both src/usr.sbin/smtpd
and src/lib/libc/asr
bofh a écrit :
>On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>> Dear misc@ and tech@,
>>
>> We are getting closer to a stable version of OpenSMTPD and now would b
hl@, gilles@). Do no spam the lists ;-)
Thanks
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
not root on Google (yet ? ;p) and Internet is not a source of
clean information, which is why some things need to be clarified to
also surface in searches ;-)
> Just my 2 cents off list.
>
cheers,
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
t then I used Calomel for example
> configs of more obscure things :).
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 06:55:54AM +0200, Shaka NKofo wrote:
> > >
> > > [blabla]
> > >
> >
> >
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 06:55:54AM +0200, Shaka NKofo wrote:
>
> [blabla]
>
*facepalm*
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
You're welcome, we like bugs that no longer exist :-)Â
Envoyé depuis un mobile SamsungPatrick Lamaiziere a
écrit :Le Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:50:30 +0200,
Gilles Chehade a écrit :
Hello,
> > That worked fine on 4.8, but with 4.9 the box does not send any
> > mail :
> &g
ck right now, but I seem to recall eric@ fixing this
a while ago
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 03:31:50PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>
> [...]
>
and many thanks to Rune and Jean-Loup for their help !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
and report bugs, please contact us off-list !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
/minimalist/minimalist.pl"
> > > listname: "|/var/spool/minimalist/minimalist.pl listname"
> > > listname-owner: s...@guy.org
> > >
> >
> > yes. That's true. I did a lot of work on minimalist. Improving security
> > and making it work with the aliales file I sent you. See
> > https://github.com/madroach/minimalist
>
> I just started making a port of
> http://www.mml.org.ua/LIST/minimalist-2.5.4-1.tgz
>
> Would you advise to use your github minimalist instead?
> Does it work better within smtpd than the original minimalist?
> Do you already have an OpenBSD port of it?
>
> Jan
>
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
no i can understand, i usually have lots of verbose logs because I run
in debug mode I wasn't aware that it was THAT verbose otherwise ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
t(int fd, short event, v
> return;
>
> scheduler_sleep:
> - log_info("scheduler: sleeping");
> + log_trace(TRACE_SCHEDULER, "scheduler: sleeping");
> return;
> }
>
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
amp;sektion=8";>ssl(8)
> man page.
> +
> +
> +
> +2012/07/09 - smtpd queue layout changed
> +A change to the queue layout was introduced, you will want to empty
> +your queue before updating.
>
>
>
>
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
site to what
> smtpd.conf(5) claims?
> Can anyone clarify?
> Many thanks
> Percy
I think we will clarify the man page because this one seems to confuse
everyone and ultimately it confuses me too :-)
Gilles
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
nections
> from the sending machine. Sorry for the noise.
>
Even though, you didn't hit a bug, I created a ticket on our bug tracker
to mention that IO error should be made more precise.
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
o smtpd[12676]: 7dfec386df56349a: to=,
> delay=0, relay=gw.stare.cz [192.168.222.1], stat=LocalError (IO error)
>
> What local IO Error could that be?
>
Just for the record, Eric is dealing with this offlist ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
nd them, which
> you have already proven here:
>
> > net.bpf.bufsize=1048576 # Internal kernel buffer for storing packet
>
> q. e. d.
>
Q E D ? :-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
Hi,
Thanks to the many people who offered soekris and similar boards after
my request on want.html.
I can't update the page right now, but I have received offers from 4
people, one being a backup if the others change their plans. I should
be fine now.
Thanks again !
--
Gilles Chehade
how
> to write Unix code, PERIOD.
>
That and "Linux for dummies" too !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
>
> So what is wrong with perl??
> It is nearly a standard in the UNIX Admin world.
Friday trolling and messing with Marc ;-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 02:33:13PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 01:57:10PM +0200, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 01:20:09PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Actually, before a webserver, I'd recommend
ting a kernel is simpler than a shell,
and why writing a shell is more complex than network programming :-)
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg
see
otherwise ... then network programming :-p
--
Gilles Chehade
calomel.org, do us all a favor => https://poolp.org/calomel
ble book is Kernighan & Ritchie "The C Programming
> > > Language".
> > >
> > > -Otto
> >
> > +1
>
> Pff... that's so 80's...
> Cool kids these days want ``C in 21 days'' or some crap like that.
>
pfff...
C for dummies in two volumes is much much better !
--
Gilles Chehade
https://www.poolp.org | http://pool.ps @poolpOrg
ot;@.@": tai
>
> :)
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 5:10 PM, bofh wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
> >
> >> I don't know if it's that, but it is then we are facing a bug, it should
> >> work with as many
pient rejected: r...@urd.spidernet.to)
> send-mail: command failed: 530 5.0.0 Recipient rejected: r...@urd.spidernet.to
>
> smtp: 0x86ff6000: deleting session: disconnected
>
> # grep "^root" /etc/mail/aliases
> # grep "^tai" /etc/mail/aliases
> # newaliases
101 - 200 of 507 matches
Mail list logo
