.
--
Jason Stubbs
you want.
--
Jason Stubbs
would be configured on Linux
with:
# ifconfig eth0 192.168.1.121 netmask 255.255.255.0 metric 10
# ifconfig eth1 192.168.1.122 netmask 255.255.255.0 metric 5
# route add -host 192.168.1.120 dev eth0
# route add default gw 192.168.1.120
--
Jason Stubbs
On 16/06/06, Michael Coulter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 12:01:35PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Unless the quality of the CD has deterioated, where does the
random element come from?
http://www.stereophile.com/features/827/
If you start reading about the low-level details
a data track and an
audio track is that a data track divides a sector into a data portion
and a checksum portion whereas an audio track uses the entire sector for
data. Unless the quality of the CD has deterioated, where does the
random element come from?
--
Jason Stubbs
) {
sleep(1);
} else {
close(c);
}
}
return 0;
}
--
Jason Stubbs
any.
Perhaps you wanted -s? That would theoretically get rid of your need to
set static routes.
--
Jason Stubbs
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Complete lack of response is very disheartening...
Well, them's the breaks...
The data center was kind enough to provide for our situation with
something like this:
DC1DC2
| |
SW1SW2
| |
FW1-pfsync-FW2
FW1/FW2 are OpenBSD running
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Ryan McBride wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 12:32:31PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Same main question as in the last thread I posted to, but without any
of the distractions. Can a pair of redundant firewalls be used with
arpbalance without being affected by the state race
Ryan McBride wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 12:32:31PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Same main question as in the last thread I posted to, but without any of
the distractions. Can a pair of redundant firewalls be used with
arpbalance without being affected by the state race?
It should work fine
) states if it is preferable that one firewall
handle the traffic... which implies that more than one firewall can
handle the traffic.
So what's the deal?
--
Jason Stubbs
Ryan McBride wrote:
On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 12:32:31PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Same main question as in the last thread I posted to, but without any of
the distractions. Can a pair of redundant firewalls be used with
arpbalance without being affected by the state race?
It should work fine
Jason Stubbs wrote:
From what I understand of the theory, it should work but I was hoping
to get a yes, I'm doing it from somebody. Unless there's a reason it
won't work, I'll be having a go and getting it set up in the first week
of March and will write back with the results.
Ok, I had
Joseph C. Bender wrote:
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to set up redundant firewalls in pretty much the same way
as is detailed in the PF FAQ. For discussion purposes, I've reproduced
the basic network layout below.
From your description and questions below, it looks like you're
of the soekris.
No idea what's happening here. Best guess would be protection against
overheating. If there's nothing in your OS logs, check your BIOS for any
management logs.
--
Jason Stubbs
by using priority queues and always bumping pfsync
traffic to the top of the list. Are there any other possible gotchas or
reasons why this might not work?
Thanks in advance.
--
Jason Stubbs
16 matches
Mail list logo
