On 11/24/2022 1:22 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
Yes. Sometimes they even have stock.
PCEngines have stock again. Just ordered an apu2e4, and it shipped
within hours after placing my order and making payment.
On 5/11/2021 3:41 AM, Edgar Pettijohn wrote:
On May 11, 2021 3:42 AM, Robert Klein wrote:
On Sun, 9 May 2021 07:47:32 -0700
Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
> On 5/9/2021 4:04 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2021-05-08, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
> >> Apologies if
On 5/11/2021 1:42 AM, Robert Klein wrote:
On Sun, 9 May 2021 07:47:32 -0700
Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
On 5/9/2021 4:04 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2021-05-08, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
Apologies if this is a question to which there is an obvious
answer, but I could not find one
On 5/9/2021 4:04 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2021-05-08, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
Apologies if this is a question to which there is an obvious answer, but
I could not find one in the sysupgrade man page, in the FAQ, or by Googling.
Is it not possible to do a sysupgrade from 6.9-current
On 5/8/2021 6:04 PM, trondd wrote:
On Sat, May 8, 2021 7:58 pm, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
Apologies if this is a question to which there is an obvious answer, but
I could not find one in the sysupgrade man page,
What is sysupgrade trying to do? What do you want it to do?
No? Read it again
Apologies if this is a question to which there is an obvious answer, but
I could not find one in the sysupgrade man page, in the FAQ, or by Googling.
Is it not possible to do a sysupgrade from 6.9-current to latest using
snapshots at the moment? When I try, I get the following response from
On 7/16/2018 9:15 AM, Todd C. Miller wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:11:50 -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
BTW, newaliases seg faults for me with latest couple of snapshots
(amd64). No message other than "segmentation fault". Just submitted a PR
with sendbug.
Already fixed i
On 7/16/2018 8:32 AM, Todd C. Miller wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 17:59:58 -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
In /etc/mail/aliases, there is the following note:
# >>>>>>>>>>The program "newaliases" must be run after
# >>
On 7/16/2018 3:01 AM, Benjamin Baier wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2018 19:54:12 -0700
Joshua Taylor Eppinette wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 05:59:58PM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
In /etc/mail/aliases, there is the following note:
# >>>>>>>>>>The pr
In /etc/mail/aliases, there is the following note:
# >>The program "newaliases" must be run after
# >> NOTE >> this file is updated for any changes to
# >>show through to smtpd.
Yet the man page for newaliases(8) says:
Note: this utility
On 7/2/2018 8:05 AM, John Long wrote:
What userid does httpd run under?
I have some kind of permission problem, httpd can't serve some of the
content.
ps aux|grep httpd
On 7/2/2018 8:03 AM, John Long wrote:
On Mon, 2018-07-02 at 17:18 +0300, IL Ka wrote:
What's the appropriate way to let the browser
know it should open it in Acrobat
See "Content-Disposition" header.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Content-Dis
position
It tells
On 6/24/2018 10:25 PM, Ve Telko wrote:
If you or your framework uses REQUEST_URI you don't need
request rewrite feature. Using REQUEST_URI and request
rewrite feature are two oposite solutions for the same problem.
To mimic nginx's try_files do something like this:
location match "/hello/.*" {
On 6/25/2018 9:37 AM, Elias M. Mariani wrote:
Does anybody knows what is needed to allow php to retrieve files while
under httpd chrooted ?
I recall the need of /etc/resolv.conf on the jail but that didn't work.
Also: http://php.net/manual/en/install.unix.openbsd.php
On 6/25/2018 9:37 AM, Elias M. Mariani wrote:
Does anybody knows what is needed to allow php to retrieve files while
under httpd chrooted ?
I recall the need of /etc/resolv.conf on the jail but that didn't work.
See /usr/local/share/doc/pkg-readmes/php-*
I was very eager to implement the new rewrite functionality in httpd.
However, I've run into an issue, and I am uncertain whether the new
behavior is CGI-compliant or not.
The app I am attempting to convert to httpd is currently built on nginx,
and the rewrite functionality it offers
Not quite the same as earlier reports. Also not sure if this qualifies
as something reportable to bugs@ or not. The system appears to be
working normally otherwise.
scott #sysctl kern.version
kern.version=OpenBSD 6.3-current (GENERIC.MP) #90: Thu Jun 7 09:08:25
MDT 2018
On 5/26/2018 4:54 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
aeneas.datagenic.com doesn't respond on port 80. (And if I can't
fetch it, letsencrypt's checkers are also unlikely to be able to).
Firewall issue?
Oh, FFS.
Yes. A silly pf rule blocking incoming traffic from outside my LAN that
I overlooked
. At least that’s my understanding.
Or maybe I misunderstood the error message.
V/r,
Bryan
Thanks for chipping in.
Regrettably, I get the same error with -D flag only (i.e., no -A).
On May 25, 2018, at 4:10 PM, Scott Vanderbilt <li...@datagenic.com> wrote:
I'm having difficulty creating a n
On 5/25/2018 2:20 PM, Fred wrote:
On 05/25/18 21:10, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
I'm having difficulty creating a new SSL cert for a virtual host I'm
just standing up for the first time. I get the following error on
successive attempts:
urn:acme:error:unauthorized
Error creating new cert
I'm having difficulty creating a new SSL cert for a virtual host I'm
just standing up for the first time. I get the following error on
successive attempts:
urn:acme:error:unauthorized
Error creating new cert :: authorizations for these names not found or
expired: aeneas.datagenic.com
I've
I am investigating the feasibility of migrating aRESTful webapp
currently hosted on nginx and6.1-currentto use httpd. Naturally, such an
application requires a URL-rewriting facility.
Perusing the httpd.conf(5) and httpd(8) man pages, this list's archive,
and Google, I see nothing that
On 6/14/2017 3:37 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Please forgive me if this has been noted on misc@, as I've overlooked
it, but, just out of curiosity, can anyone account for the recent
doubling in size of base61.tgz in recent amd64 snapshots of -current?
As recently as 7 June, it was ~58 MB in size,
Please forgive me if this has been noted on misc@, as I've overlooked
it, but, just out of curiosity, can anyone account for the recent
doubling in size of base61.tgz in recent amd64 snapshots of -current?
As recently as 7 June, it was ~58 MB in size, but over the last couple
of days at
Updated a machine to latest (5 Feb.) snapshot of amd64. I'm now seeing
the following message after booting that I've not recalled seeing before:
splassert: yield: want 0 have 1
Looking in the list archives, I see a thread from Sept. 2016 where the
following response from Theo Buehler is
Super. Thanks!
On 1/27/2017 11:10 AM, Pablo Méndez Hernández wrote:
Hi Scott,
Yes, it was a bug that was fixed some hours ago by sthen@:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-cvs=148551522630798=2
Next snap should have the fix.
Regards.
Pablo
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Scott Vanderbilt <
On 1/27/2017 9:58 AM, Philip Guenther wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Scott Vanderbilt <li...@datagenic.com> wrote:
I recently upgraded the -current snapshot on an amd64 host running Apache
Solr, and am now getting segmentation faults on Solr start-up that weren't
occ
I recently upgraded the -current snapshot on an amd64 host running
Apache Solr, and am now getting segmentation faults on Solr start-up
that weren't occurring with the previous snapshot ((GENERIC) #145: Mon
Jan 16 11:42:53 MST 2017).
Currently running:
# uname -a
OpenBSD vergil.rockology.com
I'm trying to use sed to munge some text in HTML files, converting
Unicode characters to their HTML entity equivalents, however I can't
seem to get it to work.
For instance, this command has no apparent effect:
sed -i -e 's/\xe2\x80\x94//g' foo.html
Other sed operations using ASCII
Not sure whom to report this to, but www.openbsd.org is off-line as I
write this (15:57 GMT).
Hello.
Commencing with the 2 June snapshot just upgraded (from 31 May), I can
no longer access the host via ssh. Attempts from multiple clients
(OpenSSH 6.2p2 and Putty 0.67) fail consistently.
On the host side, authlog contains entries like this:
Jun 4 13:29:46 foo sshd[12307]:
On 5/27/2016 11:25 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
I just upgraded an amd64 host from one snapshot (~20 April) to the
latest (26 May).
Upon rebooting, a rapid succession of the following error messages start
to appear:
/bsd: java(81240): mprotect W^X violation
This is even after updating to the
Hello.
I just upgraded an amd64 host from one snapshot (~20 April) to the
latest (26 May).
Upon rebooting, a rapid succession of the following error messages start
to appear:
/bsd: java(81240): mprotect W^X violation
This is even after updating to the latest snapshot build of the JDK
Another pledge(2) related issue, this time in syslogd.
Unfortunately, this occurs on an ancient Soekris box where rebuilding
the syslogd executable will be a non-trivial task. Hopefully I am
providing enough details to here to allow someone more knowledgeable
with the information necessary to
On 10/7/2015 12:38 PM, Daniel Jakots wrote:
On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 12:18:32 -0700, Scott Vanderbilt
<li...@datagenic.com> wrote:
Might anyone have an idea where I can start to look for the problem?
semarie@ explained how to debug/report tame(2) problem :
https://marc.info/?l=openbs
Running latest snapshot (amd64), I get a 'sycall 72' message when
attempting to start httpd, e.g.:
httpd(10043): syscall 72
I'm pretty sure this started with snapshots after Sept. 27.
Might anyone have an idea where I can start to look for the problem?
Thanks.
# /etc/rc.d/httpd start
On 10/2/2015 8:32 AM, Gregor Best wrote:
Looks similar for my machine, em0 works for a short time and then
timeouts. `ifconfig em0 up` seems to hang though.
This is my em0:
em0 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel ICH9 IGP M AMT" rev 0x03: msi, address
00:21:86:a1:1f:2b
Getting similar log
On 3/19/2015 9:36 AM, Bryan Steele wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:53:57AM -0700, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
Given that the patches in tedu's announcement to the tech@ list are all
time-stamped circa 18 Mar 2015 06:01:34 -, may I safely assume they are
included in the amd64 snapshot dated 18
Given that the patches in tedu's announcement to the tech@ list are all
time-stamped circa 18 Mar 2015 06:01:34 -, may I safely assume they
are included in the amd64 snapshot dated 18-Mar-2015, the earliest file
of which has a timestamp of 18:55?
I need to bring my snapshots up-to-date
On 2/27/2015 12:41 PM, Henrique Lengler wrote:
I wanna set a -current openbsd installation.
The FAQ [1] for 5.6 say I need etc56.tgz, so my question is do I need a
etc57.tgz to install a snapshot?
Because I can't find this file in the
servers.
[1]
I just upgraded to the latest amd64 snapshot (Dec 16) on a Soekris 6501
and noticed the following line on the console during startup:
kvm_mkdb: can't open /dev/ksyms
The kvm_mkdb(8) man page doesn't mention anything about /dev that I can
see. Permissions issue of some kind, perhaps?
$
On 11/8/2014 10:43 PM, Eric Lalonde wrote:
I recently upgraded from 5.5 to 5.6. I was surprised to see that the
various apparently sendmail-specific files in /etc/mail are not in the
‘Files to delete and move’ list in upgrade56.html, now that sendmail
is no longer in base. I suspect that either
Starting with the 18 Aug. amd64 snapshot (and continuing with the 8
Sept. as well), my nsd server immediately pegs 3 of my CPU's 4 cores
within seconds after starting. It won't even respond to nsd-control
commands. Running on the 3 Aug. snapshot and for many versions prior to
that, CPU usage
On 8/28/2014 8:13 AM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
How will update look like regarding sysmerge?
Lattest man for sysmerge(8) lost s flag. Since
I use X, it will still need -x xetc56.tgz?
I upgraded to the 26 August snapshot (amd64) yesterday. I used:
sysmerge -x xetc56.tgz
and all went
On 8/28/2014 8:54 PM, Zoran Kolic wrote:
I upgraded to the 26 August snapshot (amd64) yesterday. I used:
sysmerge -x xetc56.tgz
and all went successfully.
Thanks.
But apparently the xetc set is going away very soon, too, so if you
wait a day or two you might avoid this complication
as obsd. So if
bsd doesn't work, I just boot from that. Do you have an older snapshot
kernel you can tell tech support to boot into?
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Scott Vanderbilt li...@datagenic.com wrote:
Having done a little man page reading on boot-time configuration, I learned
about
On 6/27/2014 12:10 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2014-06-26, Scott Vanderbilt li...@datagenic.com wrote:
Having done a little man page reading on boot-time configuration, I
learned about the existence of ukc. I'm wondering whether something like
ukc disable acpi0
might circumvent
I have this exact same kernel panic. Unfortunately, it's occurring on a
host at a remote co-lo. Does anyone know a way that I can get the
on-site tech to suppress the assertion by way of some boot-time
configuration? Then at least I can get this machine up and running so I
can immediately
-essential.
Just grasping at straws in an effort to get this machine up and running
again.
Thanks.
On 6/26/2014 4:21 PM, Scott Vanderbilt wrote:
I have this exact same kernel panic. Unfortunately, it's occurring on a
host at a remote co-lo. Does anyone know a way that I can get the
on-site
On 3/3/2014 2:31 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
drm: initializing kernel modesetting (RS690 0x1002:0x791E 0x1458:0xD000).
radeondrm0: VRAM: 128M 0x7800 - 0x7FFF (128M used)
radeondrm0: GTT: 512M 0x8000 - 0x9FFF
drm: PCIE GART of 512M enabled (table at
On 3/1/2014 12:06 AM, Remco wrote:
I just upgraded a machine from source today.
Using snapshots might be a safer bet, unless you have good reason to use
sources instead.
Thank you for your reply.
I had to do a source update as this host is at remote co-location facility.
Not 100% sure,
On 3/1/2014 1:56 PM, Brad Smith wrote:
I just upgraded a machine from source today.
Using snapshots might be a safer bet, unless you have good reason to use
sources instead.
Thank you for your reply.
I had to do a source update as this host is at remote co-location
facility.
I don't know
I just upgraded a machine from source today. I then found a lot of
interesting errors at the end of my dmesg, the likes of which I've never
seen before.
Clearly I'm doing something wrong, not because I know how to interpret
the error messages, but because virtually every other error I've ever
I'm having difficulties configuring smtpd as a backup mail server. smtpd
is running on my main mail server and works a treat. (Good riddance,
sendmail.)
I've read the man pages and understood them the best I can, and tried
various configuration options, all to no avail. Mails to known valid
On 6/24/2013 12:18 PM, Eric Faurot wrote:
I've also tried various options using 'relay backup' without
success. The man page does not give an example for backup servers.
So, I'm not sure how to proceed.
relay backup is used to setup secondary mail servers for a domain,
that is a server that
On 6/24/2013 1:23 PM, Gilles Chehade wrote:
relay backup is used to setup secondary mail servers for a domain,
that is a server that accept mails for a domain and relay to MXs with
higher priority (i.e. lower preference in DNS).
So when you specify 'mx' as a parameter for the 'backup'
On 3/31/2013 4:59 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2013-03-30, Scott Vanderbilt li...@datagenic.com wrote:
So I copy all of these libraries into the paths specified by ldd, taking
the chroot into account. Here is where the libraries ended up:
Did you copy in ld.so?
I had not, but at your kind
I think I've done my homework, but apparently the answer eludes me
despite my best intentions to find an answer on my own. So, I throw
myself on the mercy of misc and pray I am not mauled too badly. :-)
I am running 5.3-current (3/22/2013 snapshot), Nginx as http server, and
PHP and PHP-FPM
In case no one else has noticed yet, requests to the Manuals link on the
home page:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi
return a 404.
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
it would appear that expat has been removed from ports.
so what is the correct move? Should I have installed xenocara anyway
even if this computer only needs a console?
This bit me too. Just install xbase and you'll be fine.
Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
so what is the correct move? Should I have installed xenocara anyway
even if this computer only needs a console?
This bit me too. Just install xbase and you'll be fine.
how do I install xbase without reformatting and reinstalling the whole OS?
This is answered in
61 matches
Mail list logo
