-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Theo de Raadt
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 1:30 PM
To: Jack J. Woehr
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Org
Subject: Re: hardware needed for network stack performance work
On Jun 13, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Theo de Raadt
John Brahy wrote:
Hello,
I am having a problem routing IP traffic on my network. my firewall
has three interfaces.
|
+-+--+
| P2P - t1 |
| router |
| 10.1.2.1 |
+-+--+
|
+-+--+
| 10.1.2.2 |
| router |
| 10.1.3.1 |
+-+--+
|
Running 4.0 RELEASE in i386.
I installed yesterday, and today, received my nice daily insecurity
output. I love this report because it is a great way to document my
initial configuration changes.
I noticed that it didn't pick up my changes to /etc/rc.local that I made
to start mysql.
Looking in
I have a Dell 2950, and I'm trying to install the amd64 port of 4.0
release.
Install goes fine until the card tries to get an IP address from dhcp.
Then I get:
Fatal protection fault in supervisor mode. Trap type 4 code 0
rip802c279c cs 8 rflags 10286 cr 2 4a8f40 cpl 7 rsp
Robert Urban wrote:
to me, this just looks like a horrible mess. I have never understood
why people should be so keen on creating thousands of microscopic filesystems.
For me, the advantage of being able to have several classes of filesystem
content all take advantage of the available free
Bob Beck wrote:
* Jason McIntyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-07 11:25]:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 06:52:19PM +0100, Igor Sobrado wrote:
Can I suggest adding atalk(4), inet6(4), ipsec(4), pf(4), pflog(4),
eon(5), hostapd(8), and tcpdump(8) to the SEE ALSO section of
ifconfig(8)? I think
I'm trying to get an external usb audio device working on 4.0 release:
uaudio0 at uhub1 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0: FORTEMEDIA FM1083,
rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2
uaudio0: ignored audio interface with 2 endpoints
uaudio0: audio rev 1.00, 5 mixer controls
audio1 at uaudio0
I'm a little
Anyone tried these fuzzing tools on OpenBSD?
http://projects.info-pull.com/mokb/
What's the purpose of the MoKB ?
Publish one bug on daily basis for the month of November, 2006. Show
tools and procedures useful for testing the strength and quality of
kernel code (ex. networking,
Is it possible to specify multiple thresholds for the same sensor in
/etc/sensorsd.conf?
For example:
hw.sensors.2:low=50F:high=70F:command=/bin/echo Ambient Temp %2 |
/usr/bin/mail -s Hardware Sensors Warning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hw.sensors.2:low=55F:high=68F:command=/bin/echo Ambient Temp %2 |
Jon Simola wrote:
On 10/25/06, Douglas Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Other than bsdtalk, NYCBUG and some rare one off taster programmes
are there
any recordings of talks about OpenBSD (OGG or MP3) available on the
web ?
I'm really hoping someone recorded Theo's talk at the CUUG last
Some interesting spamd statistics gathered from /var/log/daemon:
From 8am Oct 22 to noon Oct 23:
19112 connected messages from spamd, which means connections from IPs
that are not in the whitelist.
2247 inbound messages from spamlogd, which mean connection from IPs
that are already on the
Steve Williams wrote:
Hi,
I have been running spamdb greylisting only for several years as my
only line of defense at home. At work I have managed to sneak in a
Sparc64 Sunfire 120 (OpenBSD 3.9) as a caching web proxy default
gateway.
Today, we had a fairly agressive attack on our email
While wandering around the source code to spamd looking to see if
trapping was case insensitive, I noticed a slight difference in how
spamd and spamdb convert addresses to all lower case:
Spamd does the following in the greyupdate function:
for (i = 0; trap[i] != '\0'; i++)
In the man page for spamdb, it states:
If adding or deleting a SPAMTRAP address (-T), key should be specified
as
an email address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
But this only works with quotes around the address for me, ie:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Should the man page be updated, or am I doing
Falk Husemann wrote:
Hello List!
We're trying to put an old server to good use again and would like to
know what's exactly the oldest machine running OpenBSD?
As machine we defined something with processor, ram, network, hard
disk and a connection to the internet. So no Newton or toaster
In the FAQ for building a kernel:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Building
After the make, it says to do a make install.
In the section about following stable:
http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html#building
It instead says to backup the old kernel move the new kernel into the
right place.
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-09-26 22:36]:
Having just done it with make install for the first time, I'd always
copied and moved it manually, it looks like it saves the previous
kernel as /obsd.
it actually replaces the kernel atomically by doing
mv
Have you experienced any interoperability problems when establishing
tunnels with peers that run other implementations (cisco, checkpoint,
etc)? And if so, how do you work around those?
None--after finding the correct initial configuration everything just
worked and continued to.
One
Any OpenBSD developers interested in an Aladdin eToken (WSO)?
--
Will Backman
Network Administrator
Coastal Enterprises, Inc.
Am I correct in assuming that spamd and TLS on port 25 don't get along?
-- Will
Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 09:39:56AM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that spamd and TLS on port 25 don't get along?
-- Will
Remember that you get *either* spamd *or* your MTA. So there's no
getting along to deal with.
However
Does anyone know why spamd and spamlogd log to syslog at different log
levels.
It isn't too hard to change syslog.conf to include daemon.debug in order
to capture output from spamlogd, but why the difference?
I have spamd get up in a simple greylist mode, but I left the default
/etc/spamd.conf file intact.
I'm not running spamd-setup.
By default, spamd is stuttering for 10 seconds, but watching
/var/log/daemon, I also noticed that connections from spews and other
lists are lasting for over 400
Will H. Backman wrote:
Will H. Backman wrote:
Is this a sane minimum configuration for spamd -g on a transparent
bridge? Is it unwise to only greylist?
1. Create bridge with no IP's.
2. pf=YES and spamd_flags=-g in /etc/rc.conf.local
3. Simple three line /etc/pf.conf:
ext_if=xl0
rdr
Is this a sane minimum configuration for spamd -g on a transparent
bridge? Is it unwise to only greylist?
1. Create bridge with no IP's.
2. pf=YES and spamd_flags=-g in /etc/rc.conf.local
3. Simple three line /etc/pf.conf:
ext_if=xl0
rdr pass inet proto tcp from !spamd-white to any \
Will H. Backman wrote:
Is this a sane minimum configuration for spamd -g on a transparent
bridge? Is it unwise to only greylist?
1. Create bridge with no IP's.
2. pf=YES and spamd_flags=-g in /etc/rc.conf.local
3. Simple three line /etc/pf.conf:
ext_if=xl0
rdr pass inet proto tcp
Alex Berdan wrote:
Hi All,
I set up a GRE tunnel between two sites to have the
broadcast/multicast passing between the two but nothing is passing!
I'm not using for the moment any firewall and the configuration
straight forward as per man gre.
192.168.1.2/24
|
|
|
|--
I can't seem to find the man page that mentions the tunnel option for
gif interfaces.
There is a lot of information out there on the net, but I don't see it
in the man page for gif or hostname.if.
Also, is it true that giftunnel is the old syntax?
-- Will
The man page for mygate says that one can add an IPv6 gateway address to
/etc/mygate, but it doesn't seem to add an entry to the routing table
upon reboot. I'm not using rtsol anywhere.
Most of my searching on the internet shows people adding a line to the
/etc/hostname.gif0 file, i.e:
Darrin Chandler wrote:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 04:37:23PM -0400, Will H. Backman wrote:
The man page for mygate says that one can add an IPv6 gateway address to
/etc/mygate, but it doesn't seem to add an entry to the routing table
upon reboot. I'm not using rtsol anywhere.
Most of my
Is my memory fuzzy?
The console on OpenBSD 3.9 release doesn't seem to log unknown username
or failed login attempts anywhere.
It does keep a count of failed logins for an existing account, which is
displayed upon successful login.
Somehow I remember the console being more verbose in previous
Dimitry Andric wrote:
Will H. Backman wrote:
The console on OpenBSD 3.9 release doesn't seem to log unknown username
or failed login attempts anywhere.
See this commit:
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/etc/syslog.conf#rev1.14
Make the default syslog.conf not make the console
Joe wrote:
I manage a few openbsd 3.9-release firewalls and I need to update the
OS, but I don't want to cvsup and recompile on each system.
Is there a documented/recommended way to do update a system by
creating a tarball or package of what was upgraded?
I'm looking to apply security fixes
Mackan wrote:
On 10 jul 2006, at 20.43, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any UTF-8-aware text editor (for terminal use) available
for OpenBSD? Vi(m) and similar is out of question for me, I never
learned those.
As ubiquitous as vi is on Unix, it seems a shallow
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Stephen Bosch wrote:
Does tcpdump work on enc0?
Are you really too lazy to read a manual page?
And for the record -- since some people found that question
Have you looked at gpsd, which is BSD licensed? According to the author, they
have very good device detection, so maybe you could use their device info
database.
http://gpsd.berlios.de/
-- Willg
While wandering through the usr.bin source tree (not to imply that I am
qualified to take the journey), I noticed that getopt.c doesn't have a
license clause in it.
Anyone know who david might be?
$OpenBSD: getopt.c,v 1.6 2003/07/10 00:06:51 david Exp $
-- Will
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 5/31/06, Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While wandering through the usr.bin source tree (not to imply that I am
qualified to take the journey), I noticed that getopt.c doesn't have a
license clause in it.
Anyone know who david might be?
$OpenBSD: getopt.c,v
Looking at /bin/head source code.
The usage function uses:
fputs(usage: head [-n line_count] [file ...]\n, stderr);
While many other programs use:
fprintf(stderr, usage: arch [-ks]\n);
Is there a difference? Is one preferred?
Yes, I know. I should take a C programming course.
Tobias Weisserth wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am still trying to sort out some of the information on the OpenBSD website
about how to follow a specific branch and what are the benefits of each
method.
I understood what STABLE, CURRENT and RELEASE are and how to follow them.
I still have some
Didier Wiroth wrote:
Hello,
The answer is the same as previous posts ;-)
1) man 8 release
2) tcl and tk installed ( or perhaps old versions - pkg_add -u)
3) clean sources? if not, delete your sources and refetch them
4) do not build in your src directory!!! - see man 8 release
(use for example:
dave feustel wrote:
I have just installed OpenBSD 3.9 and I
am running into some strangeness.
What are the devices /dev/rst[01]used for?
Thanks,
Dave
rewinding tape device, usually for backups.
002 patch for 3.9 says crash it and to execute malicious code within
the X server.
What side of the privilege separated X does this apply to?
-- Will Happy I don't install X on my servers Backman
I'm looking for some hints on evaluating load average. I have a new
system that is showing load averages over .50 most of the time, but I
don't see that it is doing much according to systat vmstat. I figured
that this machine would be way overpowered for the job it is doing.
Is load average
001_sendmail.patch for 3.9 says:
make obj
make depend
make
make install
Is there anything wrong with
make obj make depend make make install
?
-- Will
From http://www.incidents.org/
Yes, if you use Ethereal, it is time to upgrade. According an advisory
posted by Frsirt, 28 vulnerabilities has been identified in Ethereal
which could be exploited by remote attackers to compromise a vulnerable
system or cause a denial of service.
Thanks for
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Will H. Backman wrote:
Would there be a benefit to use the pkg_ tools to install and manage the
install sets?
I fail to see the point of it really. The install set is done at
install time, or to add it if you miss it at the install.
Plus packages tools
Hans-Joerg Hoexer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 02:11:36PM +0100, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
Hi,
I have an OpenBSD (file-)server at a remote location on the internet
that is around 137ms away from an OS X 10.4 laptop.
Is there a way to securely mount OpenBSD's filesystems from OS X in
As no answer came up after a little searching on google and the openbsd
FAQ...
Would there be a benefit to use the pkg_ tools to install and manage the
install sets? The pkg_ tools seem to be a fairly elegent system.
So if money and time and developers grew on trees, would it be a
reasonable
I don't know if this has been posted before, but I found a nice openbsd server
compatibility list:
To ensure availability of appropriate server hardware platforms for Profense,
Armorlogic is testing new server models from major manufacturers on an ongoing
basis. It is our goal to provide our
Michael Flanagan wrote:
I found myself needing up apply the recent patch for sendmail against
an aging 3.6 stable box.
I took the sendmail patch for the 3.7 stable branch and applied it
against 3.6 stable. It applied cleanly with the exception of a half
dozen hunks in a couple of files. I
On Cisco I configured
neighbor 10.0.0.2 next-hop-self, but how to do this with openbgp?
that, again, is sth nobody ever asked for or missed :)
however, the (completely untested except for compilation) diff below
should add set nexthop self.
Index: bgpd.h
How come Cisco doesn't send me the
I assume this is an obvious question, but I just wanted to be sure. Was
the release that was sent to the CD manufacturer created before the 3.9
001 errata?
-- Will
No, this isn't another Sendmail needs to be replaced because there was
a security hole email. I was following the thread on BugTraq regarding
the Sendmail vulnerability, and saw this from Theo (Mar 24 2006):
Luckily within a few months you will be able to tell Sendmail how
to disclose their bugs
Will H. Backman wrote:
Looking for feedback on a basic blueprint for a small office using BSD.
Situation: Small office with maybe five workstations.
Question: What would an all BSD setup look like?
Solution that comes to mind:
* Single server for DNS, DHCP, LPD, SMTP, IMAP, and home directories
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:29:50AM -0500, Roy Morris wrote:
Try this
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq13.html#javaflash
Nowadays, the recommendation to fetch a flashplugin and install it by
hand is outdated. There's /usr/ports/www/opera/opera-flashplugin.
Kind
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
Hello!
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:42:31AM -0500, Will H. Backman wrote:
Hannah Schroeter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 10:29:50AM -0500, Roy Morris wrote:
Try this
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq13.html#javaflash
Nowadays, the recommendation to fetch
Looking for feedback on a basic blueprint for a small office using BSD.
Situation: Small office with maybe five workstations.
Question: What would an all BSD setup look like?
Solution that comes to mind:
* Single server for DNS, DHCP, LPD, SMTP, IMAP, and home directories.
* Full install with
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 09:53:30AM -0500, Will H. Backman wrote:
Looking for feedback on a basic blueprint for a small office using BSD.
Situation: Small office with maybe five workstations.
Question: What would an all BSD setup look like?
Solution that comes to mind
John R. Shannon wrote:
Will H. Backman wrote:
Looking for feedback on a basic blueprint for a small office using BSD.
Situation: Small office with maybe five workstations.
Question: What would an all BSD setup look like?
Solution that comes to mind:
* Single server for DNS, DHCP, LPD, SMTP
Peter wrote:
--- Joachim Schipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Do you usually assign static IPs?
Yes, on a small LAN such as this - why not? It cuts out one bad idea
(DHCP), and does not have any disadvantages I can see. Except maybe
that
you need to update the DNS server(s) on all the
Will H. Backman wrote:
Looking for feedback on a basic blueprint for a small office using BSD.
Situation: Small office with maybe five workstations.
Question: What would an all BSD setup look like?
Solution that comes to mind:
* Single server for DNS, DHCP, LPD, SMTP, IMAP, and home directories
Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Sorry for my ignorance on the subject and this issue and the use of X
all together.
Not critical what so ever by any long shoot, but I was curious as to if
there is some window manage that actually DO NOT need any of the X stuff
all together?
Meaning something that
Brandon Mercer wrote:
Anon wrote:
Hello :)
My questions can be summarised as :
1) What is the easiest way to install php in CGI mode on OBSD?
2) Why doesn't OBSD have a package for php that includes the CGI version?
3) Why doesn't OBSD have a suphp package? Is there any special reason?
I ask
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Marcel Prisi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-03-08 16:42]:
OpenBGPD's config seems OK, but I need some help about OpenBSD's tunable
parameters using sysctl.
the only thing you might want to change is
net.inet.ip.ifq.maxlen
the default is a little low for routing at higher
Reza Muhammad wrote:
Hi guys,
I was just updating my source tree through cvsup, and I've been
following -current for a while. There hadn't been any problems
before. But today, make build returned errors. The last time I
cvsup'd was today around 10pm (GMT +7), and here's some of the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Gustavo Rios
Sent: Fri 2/24/2006 9:39 PM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: integrating windows client and server with openbsd servers
Hey folks,
i am in need to make windows and openbsd machines to live together and happy.
I have
Trying to get OS X to mount an openbsd nfs share. I can force OS X to
use reserved ports by using mount_nfs -P from the command line, but
users mounting from the finder don't have that option.
OpenBSD man page for mountd says that there is an -n option to allow
mounting from unreserved ports,
Will H. Backman wrote:
Trying to get OS X to mount an openbsd nfs share. I can force OS X to
use reserved ports by using mount_nfs -P from the command line, but
users mounting from the finder don't have that option.
OpenBSD man page for mountd says that there is an -n option to allow
Just a note to the OpenBSD community:
I have been helping a friend clean up after a security incident with a
PHP web app that hadn't been patched on a Linux server. I run the same
app on OpenBSD, and I worry a lot less. I still patch my PHP apps
because it would be stupid to assume that OpenBSD
Possible correction?
http://openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html#Intro
Invoking pkg_add(1) with the -u flag and no package name will just
examine all installed packages for updated versions. When a package has
dependencies, they are also examined for updates.
pkg_add -u now also does the upgrade, doesn't
Edd Barrett wrote:
On 2/10/06, Budhi Setiawan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear All,
Can you give me a link HOWTO/FAQ/tutorial to create a NIS
server/client on OpenBSD.
Found this on google, but dont know how accurate it is.
http://www.openbsdsupport.org/sharedhomes.html
I could have swore
How functional and safe is pkg_add -u at this point?
Also, I just wanted to say thanks for the hard work on the pkg_* tools.
They just keep getting better.
--
Will Backman - Network Administrator
Coastal Enterprises, Inc.
http://www.ceimaine.org
Kenny Mann wrote:
I'm looking for something that which I can slap OpenBSD 3.8 on and use
it as a router.
This will be used for a house (~ 4 people) and I'm looking for something
small in form factor and that which doesn't run hot because it will run
in a closet.
I'm seeking to replace our
Shane J Pearson wrote:
What an incredible load of tripe!...
From:http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/26/131246
Second, it is not completely accurate to say that OpenBSD is more
secure. If you compare vulnerability counts just from the last 3 months,
OpenBSD had 79 for
For those of you who are sending dmesg output to the developers, you may
also want to post your dmesg to the New York City BSD Users Group dmesg
tracker.
From their site:
Upload your dmesg so others can see your kernel boot messages and
related troubleshooting details. Each dmesg is
Rob W wrote:
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/16375 is minor but important enough to
report?
A way to remotly crash a OpenBSD box is minor?
From http://openbsd.org/security.html:
Security information moves very fast in cracker circles. On the other
hand, our experience is that coding and
Are the OpenBSD Release songs also BSD licenced? The lyrics page
doesn't specify.
I wanted to know if they are podcast safe.
Would any OpenBSD developer be interested in the book NFS Illustrated?
http://www.awprofessional.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=0201325705redi
r=1
I'll ship it to you. It got it for free, but it is over my head.
--
Will Backman - Network Administrator
Coastal Enterprises, Inc.
I've just crossed the 10,000 downloads of the OpenBSD VMWare image since
I posted it a few weeks ago.
Unfortunately, it is a little too popular for the people providing my
bandwidth. Is anyone else willing to host the file? I'll just point my
page to you. You would be looking at about a
Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 13:41:50 -0500
Will H. Backman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just crossed the 10,000 downloads of the OpenBSD VMWare image since
I posted it a few weeks ago.
Unfortunately, it is a little too popular for the people providing my
bandwidth
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Jan 4, 2006, at 9:32 AM, Hekan Olsson wrote:
On 4 jan 2006, at 05.57, Jason Dixon wrote:
After some gentle persuading by Adrian Close, I dropped ipsecadm and
went back to automatic key exchange with isakmpd. A quick
configuration based on the east/west and all is
Ted Unangst wrote:
On 12/31/05, Travers Buda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Nazis thought their Enigma machine was perfect.
Do you know why Enigma was broken? Primarily because the operators
didn't follow procedure and made a series of other mistakes (This
doesn't seem too important). As is
According to the vpn(8) man page:
Paragraph just before section header for Creating IPsec Flows [manual
keying]
Note that when no authentication and encryption algorithms are defined,
ipsecctl(8) will automatically use HMAC-SHA2-256 for authentication and
AES-128 in countermode for
Just an update on the popularity of the OpenBSD 3.8 VM image:
Since it was posted on Dec 19 (4 days ago), apache logs have shown 2826
hits on the file with just over 277 gigs of traffic created by those
downloads.
Not bad for only a few days.
--
Will Backman - Network Administrator
Coastal
martin wrote:
--- Jason Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IP - 209.216.76.1
Netmask - 255.255.255.252
GW - 209.216.77.6
Either a typo in your netmask, or a typo in your gateway, since your
gateway IP does not belong to the current netmask you assigned to
your
external IP. I have a feeling
OpenBSD 3.8 release.
I'm getting the same errors as this thread:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2005-11/1980.html
I'm trying to use as many defaults as possible in this test setup, and
sha1 is not being chosen by the defaults. Any ideas?
Here is my ipsec.conf (yes, key values
My OpenBSD 3.8 virtual machine image has made it on to the VMWare
community virtual machine page. Perhaps this means that more people
will be trying out OpenBSD. My page does warn people not to expect the
OpenBSD project to support this.
I hope this will be a benefit to the OpenBSD community by
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Bob Smith
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 11:37 AM
To: J. C. Roberts
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: browser security
thanks for the explanation.
so it would be less work to try to chroot a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Simon Morgan
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 2:32 PM
To: J.C. Roberts
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: browser security
On 14/12/05, J.C. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you think about
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Ricardo Lucas
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 10:17 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: WebTools
Hello everybody,
that's my doubt, what program can I use to monitoring the traffic of
my
LAN,
and
If you want to do it properly, use fdisk -e wd1, disklabel -E wd1, and
newfs /dev/rwd1a, in that order.
Joachim
Which is the short version of the New Disk FAQ:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq14.html#NewDisk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Greg Oster
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 12:26 PM
To: Robbert Haarman
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Updated CCD Mirroring HOWTO
Robbert Haarman writes:
Greg,
Again, you raise some
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Spruell, Darren-Perot
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:57 PM
To: 'misc@openbsd.org'
Subject: Re: #define failure opportunity
From: pete wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not that I don't think
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Siju George
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 10:46 PM
To: misc
Subject: Re: Where to get md5 of X* install sets and packages
On 11/18/05, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Tobias Ulmer
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 3:50 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: skype security?
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:14:22AM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
Skype was brought to you by the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
David fire
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 10:29 AM
To: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: pre defined macro
hi
i almost finish my network the only think i need to finish is a way to
tell
to PF what it
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Marco Peereboom
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 11:41 AM
To: knitti
Cc: Julian Smith; misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: Filesystem redundancy
This is actually pretty common believe it or not. This
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Dries Schellekens
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 9:26 AM
To: Chad Loder
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: isakmp implementation vulnerabilities
Chad Loder wrote:
I just tested our isakmpd(8)
http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=338type=vulnerabilit
iesflashstatus=true
Other vendors are suspected as also being vulnerable. The following
vendors include Lynx packages that are not susceptible to exploitation
as the lynxcgi feature is not compiled into Lynx by default:
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
